What is Standards Based Grading? SBG is the grading of assignments based on evidence of specific academic criteria directly linked to the learning standards.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Square Peg and Round Hole… As parents and educators, the change in grading systems requires a fundamental switch in our thinking… 4=A 1=F 2=D 3=B.
Advertisements

Mesa County Valley School District #51 STANDARDS - BASED GRADING AND REPORTING
The Complexities of Grading: What’s fair? What’s worth grading? Kay M. Sagmiller Oregon State University Center for Teaching and Learning.
 Standards Based Grading Discussion- February 3, 2014.
GRADING and ASSESSMENT MODEL FALCON HIGH SCHOOL OUR MISSION STATEMENT The Falcon High School community is dedicated to educating our students in a safe.
Standards Based Grading: A New Outlook on Grading.
Understanding the New Eagle Point School District Grading and Reporting Policy.
ELL (English Language Learner) Program.  An ELL student is a student who:  Was not born in the United States  Or whose native language is not English.
We accept learning as the fundamental purpose of our school and therefore are willing to examine all practices in light of the impact on learning.. - DuFour,
Update from the UNC General Education Council [presented to the UNC Board of Governors’ Educational Planning, Programs, and Policies Committee on February.
Session 6 Common Problems Associated with Writing Learning Outcomes Comments from your reports.
Credit to Thomas R. Guskey. Systemic Change  Change is a highly complex process  Professional development is essential.
Let’s Get to the Core Presenter Info: Ron Jetty, Director, PK 16 Initiatives University of Wisconsin System.
DSD Curriculum & Instruction Department
Analysis of States’ Use of Student Enrollments and Performance Criteria in Higher Education Funding May 2012 R EPORT FOR THE N EVADA L EGISLATURE ’ S C.
Classroom Assessment and Grading
Wisconsin Extended Grade Band Standards
Michigan’s Accountability Scorecards A Brief Introduction.
Standards-based grading What does it look like?.
The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess.
October 3, 2013 Parent Meeting STEM MAGNET LAB School Standards Based Grading.
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
OASD Annual Report October 14, 2013 Maximizing Opportunities For Success.
Standards-based Grading. Why Standards-based grading ? Nation-wide % of college students need remediation. National research shows that 50% of those.
Standards-based assessment and reporting An Overview for Parents.
Diocesan 5-Year Plan Year 1 (14/15): Educating Educators Year 2 (15/16): Creating a Diocesan Grading & Assessment Philosophy Year 3 (16/17): Aligning Related.
Creating Rubrics. Information taken from Formative Assessment and Standards-Based Grading Robert Marzano 2010.
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION, AND ASSESSMENT UPDATE FEBRUARY 2014 VERONA PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
Preliminary Data: Not a Final Accountability Document1 SAISD TAKS Performance Board Work Session June 2004 Office of Research, Evaluation,
What you need to know about changes in state requirements for Teval plans.
Why Standards-Based Grading Buck Evans Assistant Superintendent for Operations.
Standards-Based Grading
P HILOSOPHY OF C URRICULUM EDUC 542 B Y : M ONICA M AC E ACHEN.
Teacher SLTs General Format for Teacher SLTs with a District-wide Common Assessment The percent of students scoring proficient 1 in my 8 th.
September 12, 2012 Standards Based Grading: Information Meeting for Parents.
Marzano’s Teacher Evaluation Model*
Educator Effectiveness Summit School District’s Recommendation for the School Year.
+ SOUTH DAKOTA PRINCIPAL EFFECTIVENESS MODEL PROCESS OVERVIEW PE WEBINAR I 10/29/2015.
Special Education Plan Feedback Sessions. Agenda Welcome and Introductions Department of Student Services Purpose Why are we updating the Special Education.
Life without Levels Assessing children without levels.
Understanding AzMERIT Results and Score Reporting An Overview.
Marzano’s Teacher Evaluation Model Marzano is an educational researcher who has developed a teacher evaluation model that has been adopted by most of the.
Standards Based Grading: A New Outlook on Grading Walnut Creek Elementary.
Standards Based Grading: A New Outlook on Grading.
Assessment without levels. Why remove levels?  levels were used as thresholds and teaching became focused on getting pupils across the next threshold.
1. Welcome 2. Working with the WIKI 3. Discussion of Assessment in curriculum development 4. Break 5. Divide into curricular areas – discuss: A.Standards.
Understanding How Evaluations are Calculated Professional Practices, Measures of Student Learning/ Outcomes- Calculating Scores & Translating SLOs/SOOs.
Globalization. Innovation. Graduation.  Transition to Five Achievement Levels  School Performance Grades (A–F)  EVAAS as a Tool NC READY ACCOUNTABILITY.
What Grade should this Student Earn?
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Conversation about State Report Card November 28, 2016
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Updated Progress Report: A New Outlook on Grading
Woodland Park School District Educator Effectiveness
Standards Based Grading
Parent Forum – Elementary Report Card
Fostering a Community of Learners and Leaders
Standards- based grading for parents- grades k-2
Making Sense of Assessment
English 2 Mrs. Olsen.
Assessing Learning Outcomes
IFs and Nested IFs =IF(R3<60,”F”,”P”)
Standards-Based Grading
Teacher SLTs
Teacher SLTs
Standards Based Grading
Standards Based Grading: A New Outlook on Grading
Mastery Based Learning and Grading 101
Presentation transcript:

What is Standards Based Grading? SBG is the grading of assignments based on evidence of specific academic criteria directly linked to the learning standards. Do you believe that clear learning targets improve learning? If yes, how?

UBD Unit Planning 1.Part 1: Identify the learning outcomes (standards) – what do we want students to know and be able to do? 2.Part 2: Design the formative and summative assessments that will provide us with the evidence that students know, understand and are able to do the learning outcomes (standards). 3.Part 3: Design and provide teaching and learning activities and experiences that will enable students to know understand and be able to do.

What’s Wrong with the Traditional Grading Systems? “More than one third of American High School graduates who enter college are required to take remedial courses at the cost of over $2 billion annually. Nearly four of every five of those students had a high school grade point average of 3.0 or higher ….” (Dufour and Marzano, 2011) In other words, our current grading systems are not a true representation of what students know, understand and are able to do

Traditional Grading Systems Based on the accumulation of points using the percentage system

Traditional Grading Systems Academic achievement tainted by non- academic factors and some punitive practices Can you identify times when teachers used punitive grading to manipulate behavior? Is there another alternative?

Traditional Grading Systems The mean is the main measure as points for grades are “accumulated” and “calculated”

Do the Math 80% Test 1 90% Test 2 30% Test 3 70% Test 4 What is the final grade? How well does this final grade address true learning?

Traditional Grading Systems Criteria is often unclear or assumed to be known

SBG Grading

Criteria is clear and based on the achievement of specific learning criteria directly related to a standard

SBG Grading Only academic achievement is reported through formative and summative assessments that directly address the learning standards When would you give a formative and what is its purpose?

Example of SBG Unit Grade Standard & Score Assess #1 Assess #2 Assess #3 Assess #4 Assess #5 Final Assess Std #1234 Std #2233 Std # Std # Std #523434

Example of SBG Unit Grade Standard & Score Assess #1 Assess #2 Assess #3 Assess #4 Assess #5 Final Assess Std #12344 Std #22333 Std # Std # Std # = A

SBG Grading 5-point system: for achievement levels and, in some cases, letter grades A, B, C, D for final grades that relate to the 5-point system rather than a percentage

The Achievement Scale Achievement Level Achievement Descriptors 4Exemplary: In addition to a 3.0 performance the student provides evidence of deep understanding and fluent application of the target standards as well as the ability to apply and transfer learning to new situations 3Proficient: No major errors or omissions regarding any of the target standards 2Basic: No major errors or omissions regarding the simpler outcomes or processes of the target standards but errors or omissions regarding the complex processes 1Below Basic: The student is only beginning to address the simpler outcomes of the target standards 0No Evidence: No evidence of addressing the standards

Transition Steps Adopt or review the UbD framework for unit planning

Transition Steps Base all assessments on criteria directly related to unit standards Do your current assessments connect to standards and benchmarks?

Transition Steps Remove non academic considerations from grades What non academic practices could possibly be removed in your school environment?

Transition Steps Remove “punitive” grading practices that do not support true academic achievement Identify 3 “punitive” practices

Transition Steps Adopt a system of achievement levels (relative to standards) rather than the accumulation of points (i.e. use ) Can you think of any ways you could introduce this concept?

Transition Steps Introduce policies that both expect and support academic success Review an array of in-school supports that allow students to find academic success

Transition Steps Review UbD framework and its connection to SBG Base all assessments on criteria directly related to unit standards Remove non academic considerations from grades Remove “traditional” grading practices that do not support true academic achievement Adopt a system of achievement levels (relative to standards) rather than the accumulation of points (i.e. use ) Introduce policies that expect and support academic success