1 Miscellaneous Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure IETF 64 Vancouver, BC, Canada November 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Deployment Considerations for Dual-stack Lite IETF 80 Prague Yiu Lee, Roberta Magione, Carl Williams, Christian Jacquenet Mohamed Boucadair.
Advertisements

EAP Channel Bindings Charles Clancy Katrin Hoeper IETF 76 Hiroshima, Japan November 08-13, 2009.
OSPF Two-part Metrics Jeffrey Zhang Lili Wang Juniper Networks 88 th IETF, Vancouver.
Routing Security Capabilities draft-zhao-opsec-routing-capabilities-02.txt OPSEC WG, IETF #66.
Network Management Access Security Capabilities draft-bonica-opsec-nmasc-00 Ron Bonica Syed Ahmed.
Cisco Architecture for Lawful Intercept in IP Networks October 2004,rfc3924 Author(s): F. Baker,B. Foster,C. Sharp.
Draft-li-rtgwg-cc-igp-arch-00IETF 88 RTGWG1 An Architecture of Central Controlled Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) draft-li-rtgwg-cc-igp-arch-00 Zhenbin.
WSON General WG Drafts 1.Routing and Wavelength Assignment Information Model for WSON (v14) 2.General Network Element Constraint Encoding for GMPLS Controlled.
DMM Framework based on Functional Elements draft-liebsch-dmm-framework-analysis-02 M. Liebsch, P. Seite, G. Karagiannis IETF88, Vancouver DMM WG 08 th.
Copyright © 2004 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidentialwww.juniper.net 1 ANCP protocol draft updates draft-ietf-ancp-protocol-00.txt ANCP.
RTCWEB WG draft-aboba-rtcweb-ecrit-00 Bernard Aboba Martin Thomson July 30, 2012 IETF 84, Vancouver Please join the Jabber room:
Signaling & Routing Extension for Links with Variable Discrete Bandwidth draft-long-ccamp-rsvp-te-availability-03 draft-long-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-02.
December 13, Policy Terminology - 01 Report for 49th IETF Andrea Westerinen.
1 CALEA and VoIP: The Internet is not the PSTN Steven M. Bellovin
3/20/2002IESG PlenaryIETF 53, Minneapolis Survey of IPv4 Addresses in Currently Deployed IETF Standards draft-ietf-ngtrans-ipv4survey NGTRANS WG Meeting.
Operational Security Requirements (opsec) BOF or “Give Us The Knobs We Need” July 17, 2003 George M. Jones (mailing list)
Draft-li-mpls-global-label-framework-02IETF 90 MPLS WG1 A Framework of MPLS Global Label draft-li-mpls-global-label-framework-02 Zhenbin Li, Quintin Zhao,
Draft-chown-v6ops-renumber-thinkabout-05 Things to think about when Renumbering an IPv6 network Tim Chown IETF 67, November 6th, 2006.
Operational Security Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure
3Com Confidential Proprietary 3G CDMA AAA Function Yingchun Xu 3COM.
DIME WG IETF 79 DIME WG Status & Other Stuff Thursday, November 11, 2010 Jouni Korhonen, Lionel Morand.
RADIUS Crypto-Agility Requirements November 18, 2008 David B. Nelson IETF 73 Minneapolis.
IETF-63 OPSEC WG OPSEC WG _______ Operational Security Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure IETF #65 - Dallas.
XCON IETF 64 November 8 th – 9 th, 2005 Vancouver, BC, Canada.
NAT64 Operational Experiences draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-01 IETF 83- Paris, Mar 2012 Gang Chen, China Mobile Zhen Cao, China Mobile Cameron Byrne,
STIR Problem Statement IETF 88 (Vancouver) Tuesday Session Jon Peterson.
AAA and Mobile IPv6 Franck Le AAA WG - IETF55. Why Diameter support for Mobile IPv6? Mobile IPv6 is a routing protocol and does not deal with issues related.
Multi6 interim meeting agenda Chairs: Brian Carpenter, Kurt Lindqvist 1.IPR reminder, logistics, agenda bashing 2.Charter review 3.draft-lear-multi6-things-to-think-about-03.txt.
CDNI Requirements (draft-lefaucheur-cdni-requirements-02) CDNI Working Group IETF 81 Quebec City, Canada July 28, 2011 Kent Leung Yiu.
RADEXT WG IETF 91 Rechartering. Why? Current charter doesn’t allow us to take on new work that is waiting in the queue Has an anachronistic Diameter entanglement.
Status of L3 PPVPN Working Group Documents March 2005 – Minneapolis IETF Ross Callon Ron Bonica Rick Wilder.
Dissuasion, Working Group Scope and Deliverables Lou Berger Pat Thaler
IETF #84 - NETCONF WG session 1 NETCONF WG IETF 84, Vancouver, Canada MONDAY, July 30, Bert Wijnen Mehmet Ersue.
1 MPLS Architectural Considerations for a Transport Profile ITU-T - IETF Joint Working Team Dave Ward, Malcolm Betts, ed. April 16, 2008.
IDR WG draft-chakrabarti-idr-as4-route-cap-01.txt Samita Chakrabarti, IPInfusion IETF 72, Dublin July 29, 2008.
A Framework for Session Initiation Protocol User Agent Profile Delivery (draft-ietf-sipping-config-framework-11) SIPPING – IETF 68 Mar 19, 2007 Sumanth.
1 OSPF WG meeting, IETF61 OSPF Wireless Design Team update November 8, 2004 Tom Henderson
Early copy-edit experiment Experiences with the Diameter SIP application draft-ietf-sip-diameter-sip-app IETF 64 Vancouver, 6-11 November,
Routing Information Protocol
SNMP MIBs to manage Black Links networks draft-galimbe-kunze-black-link-mib-00.txt Gabriele Galimberti Cisco Ruediger KunzeDeutsche Telekom March 2011.
Requirements and Selection Process for RADIUS Crypto-Agility December 5, 2007 David B. Nelson IETF 70 Vancouver, BC.
RFC 4068bis draft-ietf-mipshop-fmipv6-rfc4068bis-01.txt Rajeev Koodli.
OSPF WG Security Extensions for OSPFv2 when using Manual Keying Manav Bhatia, Alcatel-Lucent Sam Hartman, Huawei Dacheng Zhang, Huawei IETF 80, Prague.
Interface to the Routing System (IRS) BOF IETF 85, Atlanta November 2012.
Netconf Schema Query Mark Scott IETF 70 Vancouver December 2007
IDR WG Document Status Update Sue Hares, Yakov Rekhter November 2005.
1 cellhost-ipv6-52.ppt/ December 13, 2001 / John A. Loughney Minimum IPv6 Functionality for a Cellular Host John Loughney, Pertti Suomela, Juha Wiljakka,
1 Content-Aware Device Benchmarking Methodology (draft-hamilton-bmwg-ca-bench-meth-05) BMWG Meeting IETF-79 Beijing November 2010 Mike Hamilton
Interdomain Multicast BCP Draft IETF 84 Vancouver, BC Robert Sayko
1 IETF 91, 10 Nov 2014draft-behringer-anima-reference-model-00.txt A Reference Model for Autonomic Networking draft-behringer-anima-reference-model-00.txt.
IETF85 A framework for Point-to-Multipoint MPLS-TP draft-hmk-mpls-tp-p2mp-oam-framework-01.txt Yoshinori Koike Masatoshi Namiki Takafumi Hamano.
PMIPv6 multicast handover optimization by the Subscription Information Acquisition through the LMA (SIAL) Luis M. Contreras Telefónica I+D Carlos J. Bernardos.
Doc.: IEEE /0122r0 Submission January 2012 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 1 IEEE IETF Liaison Report Date: Authors:
Using BGP to Bind MPLS Labels to Address Prefixes draft-rosen-idr-rfc3107bis-00 Eric Rosen (presented by Ross Callon) IETF 95 MPLS WGdraft-rosen-idr-rfc3107bis-001.
Advertising Generic Information in IS-IS
Open issues with PANA Protocol
draft-white-i2rs-use-case-02
IETF#67 – 5-10 November 2006 FECFRAME requirements (draft-ietf-fecframe-req-01) Mark Watson.
SNMP MIBs to manage G parameters
Gunter Van de Velde Kiran Kumar Chitimaneni Warren Kumari
L1VPN Working Group Scope
Benchmarking Framework draft-constantine-bmwg-traffic-management-02
IKEv2 Mobility and Multihoming Protocol (MOBIKE)
DHCPv6-Shield: Protecting Against Rogue DHCPv6 Servers
RADEXT WG RADIUS Attribute Guidelines draft-weber-radius-attr-guidelines-01.txt Greg Weber November 8th, 2005 v1 IETF-64, Vancouver.
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN:
Migration-Issues-xx Where it’s been and might be going
1 Guidelines for Autonomic Service Agents draft-carpenter-anima-asa-guidelines-00 Brian Carpenter Sheng Jiang IETF 97 November
Georgios Karagiannis, Tom Taylor, Kwok Chan, Michael Menth
Presentation transcript:

1 Miscellaneous Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure IETF 64 Vancouver, BC, Canada November 2005

2 Goal of This Document OPSEC WG Charter outlines various documents to be produced –Framework; Standards Survey; Current Practices; Packet Filtering; Event Logging; In-Band; Out-of-Band; Interface; AAA; Documentation & Assurance; Miscellaneous Miscellaneous Caps includes any text from RFC3871 that doesn’t fit other documents Draft is largely taken from RFC3871, with a bit of additional text

3 Issue: Must / Should / May We are defining Capabilities We are not writing Requirements What is required may vary between environments, and over time Do we want to specify MUST, SHOULD, MAY, and so on? Current compromise: MUST (etc..) is in the context of the capability

4 Context for MUST, SHOULD, … “The use of the terms MUST, SHOULD, and so on are in the context of each capability in the sense that if you conform to any particular capability then you MUST or SHOULD do what is specified for that capability, but there is no requirement that you actually do conform to any particular capability.”

5 Contents of Misc Cap Draft Introduction –Describes what this document includes –Otherwise references other WG documents Route Filtering Capabilities –Taken from RFC3871 IP Stack Capabilities –Taken from RFC3871

6 Contents of Draft, continued Performance and Prioritization –Somewhat extended from what is in 3871 –Nearly all as SHOULD (rather than MUST) Security Features must not cause operational problems –Again taken from RFC3871 –(I have to wonder whether this is almost too obvious)

7 Proposed Disposition of Draft We are not done Comments and updates will be needed I think that it is a reasonable start Propose that it become a working group draft