Morongo Basin Transit Authority Deviated Fixed Route Services.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tysons Tysons Corner Circulator Study Board Transportation Committee June 12, 2012.
Advertisements

Research Needs in the Intercity Bus and Rail Transportation Industry Chapter 28 Research Methodologies.
West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.
National Transit Database Reporting Requirements May 15, 2007 Brett Harris, Ohio Dept of Transportation
ANYBODY CAN RIDE! Examples of successful rural transit programs and practices elsewhere in the United States.
Laredo Transit Management, Inc. Feliciano Garcia Jr. Feliciano Garcia Jr. General Manager General Manager El Metro Operations Proposed FY Budget.
Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs APTA Annual Meeting September 30, 2013.
Washington County Transportation Authority. Mission Statement  The mission of the Washington County Transportation Authority (Washington Rides) is to.
Nevada County Transit Services Paratransit Fare Review Paratransit Fare Revenue Review.
Transportation Development How do we get rubber on the road? …..and other burning questions.
Cheryl Thole, Jennifer Flynn CUTR/NBRTI, Senior Research Associates Transit in GIS Conference September 14, 2011 St. Petersburg, Florida.
GETTING THERE The Vehicle To Participation!!!!
Short Range Transit Improvement Plan CITY OF HIGHPOINT Sounding Board Meeting Service Recommendations September 9, 2014.
Miao(Mia) Gao, Travel Demand Modeler, HDR Engineering Santanu Roy, Transportation Planning Manager, HDR Engineering Ridership Forecasting for Central Corridor.
Public Transit in Sacramento
Transportation Planning and Design in Practice
Human Services Coordinated Transportation Plan Thursday July 20, 2006 GF City Hall Rm A102.
Trains are better for our environment than other modes of travel.
Mountain Mobility Buncombe County’s Community Transportation System.
Performance Metrics for August 2009 E/WN/SWAMUSNSNGTotal Costs $485,710.26$181,954.95$240,099.89$159,936.37$23,203.52$1,090, Revenue $153,155.62$30,445.33$45,671.35$19,993.87$3,788.78$253,
Utah Transit Authority Proposed Changes to ADA Paratransit Services October 5, 2015 John M. Inglish, CEO/General Manager.
September 19 & 20, 2007 Items 4.11a,b, & c Tabs 15, 16, & 17 Proposition 1B Intercity Rail Bond Program.
May 9, 2011 RLS & Associates, Inc. Kent County Transit Needs Assessment Draft Findings and Recommendations.
Early findings in the Helena’s Planning Process Lisa Ballard, P.E. November 28, 2012.
1 Comprehensive Strategic Operating and Capital Plan FY15 Update April 2, 2014 RELATED TO AGENDA ITEM 7.
EFFECTS OF RISING GAS PRICES ON BUS RIDERSHIP FOR SMALL URBAN AND RURAL TRANSIT SYSTEMS Jeremy Mattson 18 th National Conference on Rural Public and Intercity.
Valley Transit Fixed Route and ADA Paratransit Transportation.
Innovations in Transit Planning and Financing Presentation to the 2003 MPO Conference, Muncie IN October 16, 2003.
Cost-Effective Accessible Transportation Alternatives in Rural Areas: Examples from the US Transed 2012 Delhi, India September 17-21, 2012.
Mary Ross, P.E./Myung Sung. 2 3 Lower Atlantic Regular Gas Price HIGH: $4.03- July 2008 LOW: $1.60- Dec 2008.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 23: Transit System Performance Evaluation.
Transit Funding 101. Exciting  Management issue? Service levels Wages/benefits Safety Layoffs Why Care About Transit Funding?
Transportation and Transit Committee 4 December 2002 Albion Road Corridor Study.
Gauteng Strategic Plan Update Public Transport GDS 2055 Summit Hishaam Emeran, General Manager: Strategic Network Planning 7 September 2012.
00 Metropolitan Transit System Transit Serving Point Loma September 23, 2008.
JOSHUA CRAIN CE 458: PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS JUNE 4, 2009 Costs in Small Public Transit Systems in Oregon.
Siskiyou County Short Range Transit Plan Draft Final Report Presentation to the Steering Committee LSC Transportation Consultants.
Comprehensive Operations Analysis LYNX 2013 Comprehensive Operational Analysis John Lewis, CEO.
IPART’s review of CityRail’s regulatory framework – stakeholder roundtable 31 July 2008.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Fairfax County Comprehensive Transit Plan and Transit Development Plan Board Transportation Committee December 1, 2015 Randy.
Regional Transportation Council Mobility Plan Workshop North Central Texas Council of Governments November 12, 2015.
Valley Metro Regional Paratransit Plan Public Meeting January 27, 2016.
Gastonia Transit Expansion Study City Council/Planning Commission Joint Transportation Workshop September 13, 2007.
Placer County Rural Transit Study Expanding Public Transit Service for Rural Placer County.
Valley Metro Update Open House and Public Hearing March 9, 2007.
FARE STUDY UPDATE Operations & Customer Service Committee October 21,
E XPANDING M OBILITY O PTIONS IN M ARIN Marin Transit’s Paratransit and Mobility Management Programs 1.
Partnering with Clients & Paratransit Providers for Brokerage Success.
WIS DOT MCLARY MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT.
Los Angeles – San Diego – San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor Update
CET Service Proposal.
and Transportation Impacts
Service Routes and Community Transit Hubs: Right Sizing Transit
RELATED TO AGENDA ITEM W1
Public Works Department
Comprehensive Operational Analysis (COA)
Microtransit Pilot In Sacramento
Lorain County Transit Needs Assessment
USDOT ADA Service Requirements
LRT, GRT, PRT Comparison Peter Muller, PE Ingmar Andreasson, Ph. D.
Annual Operating & Capital Budget
Technology In Action Session: An On-Demand Sunday Transit Application
Introduction to Micro-Transit / Demand Responsive Transit
Transit Integration and Efficiency Study Transit Advisory Committee
Implementing Mobile Ticketing
Annual Operating & Capital Budget
Reimagine RTS Public Hearing
National Transit Database Reporting Requirements
FREEdom and Volunteer Incentive Program (VIP)
HRT Workshop: Transit Strategic Plan and Aug-Dec working items
Presentation transcript:

Morongo Basin Transit Authority Deviated Fixed Route Services

 Deviations are available to all passengers  No additional fare is charged on Routes 3A, 3B,7A and 7B.  Route 21 charges a premium of $1.50 for regular fare and.75 cents for Seniors and Disabled  ¾ mile deviation corridor on Routes 3A,3B, 7A& 7B  1.5 mile deviation corridor on Route 21  24 hour advance notice required for deviation requests

 MBTA provides deviated or flexed service on 5 of it’s 14 routes. These are: Routes 3A (29 Palms Base), 3B (29 Palms City), 7A (North Yucca Valley), 7B (South Yucca Valley), 21 (Landers)  These are in smaller communities where traditional fixed route service plus complementary DAR is unfeasible.  Flex Routes have been in place since 2001 replacing General Public Demand response service in these areas that had very low ridership and productivity

 163,292 passengers were carried via flex route service  13,762 revenue hours  Operating Cost: $873,727  Operating Revenue: $141,965  Farebox Recovery Ratio: 16.2%

Operating Traditional fixed route with complementary demand response service in these areas would result a cost to MBTA of approximately $630,000 more. (11,000 service hours X $63/hr). Losing the ability to operate the flex service would lower farebox productivity below 10% and trigger unpalatable policy decisions on fares and service cuts.

 If needed, augment flex routes with supplementary demand response at peak times.  Consider a reasonable fare structure to limit deviations  In the rural areas, “approve” deviations that are off paved roads.  Consider whether a route can be classified or modified to become a commuter or intercity route.  Monitor service closely to determine whether a shift to different mode of service is appropriate.  A robust travel training, transit ambassador program and travel escort service is recommended.  We recommend partnership with social service agencies to also reduce demand.

 Consider carefully the type of vehicle for the routes so that it has sufficient capacity but is maneuverable enough to perform origin to destination type service on demand. We have found the Class E vehicles to be best suited for flex service.