Accessible and reusable learning designs: Oliver & Littlejohn Discovering and describing accessible and reusable learning designs (practice models) for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 A proposed approach to developing indicators Use the Strategic Targets document as the basis –Recent; explicitly addresses outcomes; relatively concise.
Advertisements

Effective Practice in e-learning
DeSILA Designing and Sharing Inquiry-based Learning Activities JISC Design for Learning Programme Dr Philippa Levy & Dr Sabine Little (CILASS) John Stratford,
Supporting further and higher education e-Learning and Pedagogy overview Helen Beetham Programme Consultant.
Supporting further and higher education Future Activities Sarah Knight Helen Beetham.
Supporting further and higher education A template for describing instances of (e)learning.
Designing learning activities This morning you will design and storyboard two activities in each of the first 4 modules – an early induction activity and.
Learning by Doing: Unit Planning That Gets Learners Doing! Presenters: Lia Conklin: ELL Instructor/Team Leader, EL Civics Grant Coordinator & Designer,
What type of support is available to meet our school-community integration goals and improve student outcomes?
Susan G. Komen for the Cure Los Angeles County Affiliate Grant Writing Workshop August 1, 2012.
Role of Vendor Technologies in the Development of Network Professionals Mak Sharma and Sharon Cox School of Computing, Telecommunications and Networks.
Stage 2: Determine Acceptable Evidence Making the Goal – Assessment – Lesson/Activity Connection Susan. M. Connolly Central Washington University.
Janet SLA Review. A Service Level Agreement that – Measures the service as a whole for the funders – Measures the service for individual customers But.
Unlocking Potential Usability Implications JISC TechDis Service Emma Arnold Project Officer, TechDis
On your mini whiteboards draw this scale Never Sometimes Often.
Consistency of Assessment
CLAReT PERSONAS AND SCENARIOS. When? Personas were used in the CLAReT workshops as a role play activity. Participants were required to assume a persona.
Identifying Needs and Establishing Requirements John Thiesfeld Jeff Morton Josh Edwards.
Phoebe A wiki-based pedagogic planner to promote innovative practice in Design for Learning Liz Masterman Oxford University Computing Services with Marion.
Design of metadata surrogates in search result interfaces of learning object repositories: Linear versus clustered metadata design Panos Balatsoukas Anne.
Modeling Units of Assessment for Sharing Assessment Process Information: towards an Assessment Process Specification Yongwu Miao, Peter Sloep, and Rob.
Logic Modeling for Success Dr Kathryn Wehrmann Illinois State University.
The Graduate Attributes Project: a perspective on early stakeholder engagement Dr Caroline Walker Queen Mary, University of London.
Richard Nurse 11 May 2009 TELSTAR
Topical Interest Groups as Communities of Practice: Strategies for Building a Community of Practice Facilitated by: PK12 Educational Evaluation TIG Evaluation.
1 SESSION 1 using The New Performance Standards and New VDOE Requirements
PTLLS – Assessment Week 6. In today’s session we will: Discuss the purpose of assessment Explore types of assessment Examine the application of ‘paper-light’
Domain Modelling the upper levels of the eframework Yvonne Howard Hilary Dexter David Millard Learning Societies LabDistributed Learning, University of.
2016 Transitional GEO Work Programme Discussion & CONSOLIDATION Session 10, 2015 GEO Work Plan Symposium Geneva, 7 May 2015 Alan Edwards (IPWG) Giovanni.
Macquarie University Library1 LAMS, e-learning & Information Literacy: possibilities & practicalities Margaret Wright, Macquarie University Heather Cooper,
INTEGRATED LEARNING: STAGE 4 (SECONDARY COGS) Principles and process.
Design of Blended Learning Activities Design of blended learning activities: Issues and perspectives An ASCILITE workshop By Allison Littlejohn Chair of.
Instructional Design Eyad Hakami. Instructional Design Instructional design is a systematic process by which educational materials are created, developed,
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Stage 2: Determine Acceptable Evidence Making the Goal – Assessment – Lesson/Activity Connection Susan. M. Connolly Central Washington University.
Developing Specially Designed Instruction
ELearning Design After your analysis, prepare for delivery.
DEVELOPING AND SHARING RESOURCES Embedding Learning Development to enhance student experience.
Learning design as a foundation for the future success of e-learning Diana Laurillard 2007 European LAMS Conference University of Greenwich 5 July 2007.
Leveling Out the Lesson Objectives Demonstration of Learning
Designing for learning: The state of the art in learning design Gráinne Conole University of Leicester,
Background to the Generic Statistical Information Model (GSIM) Briefing Pack December
School of Computing FACULTY OF ENGINEERING Developing a methodology for building small scale domain ontologies: HISO case study Ilaria Corda PhD student.
What Does Great Teaching Look Like? Professional Learning Communities USD #443 Secondary Schools.
The Agricultural Ontology Service (AOS) A Tool for Facilitating Access to Knowledge AGRIS/CARIS and Documentation Group Library and Documentation Systems.
2007 © Giunti Labs – No reproduction without written permission Visualizing IMS Learning Design for easier editing Marco Luccini, Giunti Labs R&D Project.
Session Objectives At the end of the session you should be able to:- Explain how learning theories such as Kolb and Blooms impact teaching practice Identify.
Sharing Design Knowledge through the IMS Learning Design Specification Dawn Howard-Rose Kevin Harrigan David Bean University of Waterloo McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
Mod4L: representing practice models Mod4L: Representing Practice Models By Dr Isobel falconer, Prof Allison Littlejohn, University.
Creating a European entity Management Architecture for eGovernment CUB - corvinus.hu Id Réka Vas
Wandsworth Lifelong Learning Teaching, Learning & Assessment Refresher Training April 1 st, 2014.
ICT TOOLS AND SOCIETY INVOLVEMENT AMONG THE EUPAN NETWORK HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE SURVEY RESULTS TANYA CHETCUTI AND MARCO FICHERA - WORKSHOP EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
Isobel Falconer & Allison Littlejohn Caledonian Academy, Glasgow Caledonian University JISC Design4Learning Programme MOD.
Learning Activity Reference Model Charles Duncan, Ed Barker
Metadata for OBJECTS or metadata for LEARNING? Tom Boyle Learning Technology Research Institute (LTRI) London Metropolitan University Metadata Workshop.
LTSC Report to SAB1 Learning Technology Standing Committee Sponsor Report October, 2006.
31 March Learning design: models for computers, for engineers or for teachers? Jean-Philippe PERNIN (*,**) Anne LEJEUNE (**) (*) Institut national.
By the end of this module, you will be able to... Explain the importance of collecting data over time Define key measures Describe strategies to collect.
2 EC SIG 7/12/06 JISC Design for Learning Programme What is it?  2 year project - till May 2008  Part of the pedagogy strand of the JISC eLearning Programme.
Achieving quality in technology-supported learning: the challenges for elearning and distance education. Ron Oliver Edith Cowan University Perth, Western.
This resource has been released by the University of Bath as an Open Educational Resource. The materials are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike.
Modelling a team-based astronomy task using LAMS James Dalziel Professor of Learning Technology, and Director, Macquarie E-Learning Centre Of Excellence.
Reflection on the 2015 Forum Sense of belonging – Participation Outcome.
Principles of planning
Welcome to M301 P2 Software Systems & their Development
LO3 - Create the Game 2016 Specification - L/615/1355
LO2 - Be Able to Design IT Systems to Meet Business Needs
Building Capacity for Quality Improvement A National Approach
Social Practice of the language: Describe and share information
Presentation transcript:

Accessible and reusable learning designs: Oliver & Littlejohn Discovering and describing accessible and reusable learning designs (practice models) for higher education By Ron Oliver, Edith Cowan University Allison Littlejohn, University of Dundee

Accessible and reusable learning designs: Oliver & Littlejohn Scenario 3 Scenario 4 identifying the problem

Accessible and reusable learning designs: Oliver & Littlejohn Scenario 3 Scenario 4 learning designs  lesson plans  intended forms of learner engagement  comprising tasks, resources, supports  reusable & sharable

Accessible and reusable learning designs: Oliver & Littlejohn Scenario 3 Scenario 4 current issues with learning designs  difficult to describe  difficult to decontextualise  often described at a macro level  no shared understanding among practitioners  integral to the successful use of LOs

Accessible and reusable learning designs: Oliver & Littlejohn Scenario 3 Scenario 4 Discussion: some LD examples? Do you have any examples of strong learning designs that you use in your teaching and learning? Could others could use these learning designs? Post a description of your LD to share with the participants in this discussion. What is needed to enable others to use your learning design to achieve the same outcomes?

Accessible and reusable learning designs: Oliver & Littlejohn Scenario 3 Scenario 4 current development and work  IMS LD specification  LAMS  JISC LADIE  DIALOG Plus  AUTC Project  etc

Accessible and reusable learning designs: Oliver & Littlejohn Scenario 3 Scenario 4 Example of a taxonomy: DialogPlus

Accessible and reusable learning designs: Oliver & Littlejohn Extending reputation 2. What sorts of resources will you share? Example of a learning design: LAMS

Accessible and reusable learning designs: Oliver & Littlejohn Extending reputation 2. What sorts of resources will you share? Example of a learning design: LAMS community

Accessible and reusable learning designs: Oliver & Littlejohn Extending reputation 2. What sorts of resources will you share? Example of a learning design: AUTC

Accessible and reusable learning designs: Oliver & Littlejohn Extending reputation 2. What sorts of resources will you share? Examples of a lesson plan : LDLite

Accessible and reusable learning designs: Oliver & Littlejohn Scenario 3 Scenario 4 progress to date  models and language to describe LDs  broad LD descriptions  sample LDs  few reusable and sharable LDs  LOs galore, no glue to bind them

Accessible and reusable learning designs: Oliver & Littlejohn Scenario 3 Scenario 4 strategies to progress aims Building on the LADIE methodology  Top down – capture user needs by documenting learning activities  Bottom up – surveying services, specifications and standards, and potential for integration

Accessible and reusable learning designs: Oliver & Littlejohn Scenario 3 Scenario 4 people and practice models Stakeholder groupRepresentation Practitionerslesson plans (eg AUTC) Educational developerslearning designs (eg LAMS IMS) Technical developersuse cases (eg LADIE) Information specialiststaxonomies (eg DialogPlus).

Accessible and reusable learning designs: Oliver & Littlejohn Scenario 3 Scenario 4 people and practice models

Accessible and reusable learning designs: Oliver & Littlejohn Scenario 3 Scenario 4 Discussion: what works for you? Choose which stakeholder group(s) you represent? Practitioners, Educational developers, Technical developers, Information specialists Identify representations that are meaningful to you. Why are they useful? Will current models provide a successful means to map the Practice Models we find? Is anything missing?