Two Union Square - 601 Union Street, Suite 601 Seattle, WA 98101-2341 (206) 292-2078 www.floydsnider.com Field testing and modeling of in situ groundwater.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Demonstration of Subaqueous Disposal of Mill Waste Dave Hinrichs, NewFields Mark Doolan, U.S. EPA Chris Wienecke, ATT Sunoco and Jasper County Group R.
Advertisements

American Water Raw Water Quality Not Textbook? Just Pilot! Iron Removal with High pH Raw Water March 27, 2008 Sandy Kutzing, P.E., CDM Eric Hahn, P.E.,
Herwig Goldemund, Ph.D. Geosyntec Consultants Atlanta Regional Office
NITROGEN & PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL FROM SHALLOW GROUNDWATER.
Water Contaminants Soluble Contaminants - dissolve in water Particulates/Colloids - carried by the water column Insoluble Contaminants - very low solubility.
Air Sparging at Fort Greely, Alaska Presented by Aung Syn & James Powell.
Treatment of Arsenic in Groundwater EAST HELENA D.W.A.S.W.Daladawatta Dawoud.
Dale T Littlejohn Senior Geologist. What is fate and transport in the vadose zone? Vadose Zone Hydrocarbon release from buried pipeline Aquifer Surface.
Air Force Plant 4 Superfund Site Evaluation of SVE Combined with ERH for the Remediation of TCE Source Material Jeffrey Ragucci SWS 6262 – Soil Contamination.
The Practical Application of Constructed Wetlands in the Philippines R.E. James, N. Callora, R. Inion, G. Tolentino.
Gorgas Wetlands Revitalization Alabama Power Company Environmental Affairs Field Services Gerson Pickett.
1 Thermal Remediation Services, Inc. Electrical Resistance Heating for In-Situ Remediation of Soil & Groundwater December 10, 2002 Greg Beyke (770)
Environmental Geotechnology Presentation Naval Air Station, Pensacola, Florida.
Pump and Treat Permeable Reactive Barrier Former Intersil, Inc. Site Sunnyvale, California Presented by Daniel Cheung.
Background Site of a former Industrial Waste Treatment Plant Contaminants accumulated in sludge drying beds and surge pond, they subsequently leaked into.
Phytotechnologies for Environmental Restoration and Management Micah Beard, M.S. Shaw Environmental, Inc.
Wetlands for Acid Mine and Livestock Drainage Treatment By: Gabe Jenkins April 18 th 2005.
Permeable Reactive Barriers for Inorganic Contaminants and Treatment of Acid Rock Drainage USEPA Scientist - to - Scientist Meeting Las Vegas, Nevada June.
Clean-up at BP Paulsboro New Jersey (USA) Roxane Fisher and Mark Ferguson.
1 Kent S. Sorenson, Jr. Ryan A. Wymore Enhanced Bioremediation for Treatment of Chlorinated Solvent Residual Source Areas – Case Study and Implications.
Figure 4-1. Diagram of a Zn-Cu electrochemical cell. Zn and Cu metal electrodes are immersed in a CuSO 4 solution. Electrons flow from left to right and.
Fate and Transport of Chemicals A Presentation by Terrie Boguski Technical Outreach Services for Communities (TOSC) Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Hazardous.
Water quality issues – ‘natural’ controls Acidity – low pH due to infiltration of acidified precipitation; acids from mine drainage; pyrite oxidation.
Solution Provider bij bodemsanering Leading in soil and groundwater remediation Solution Provider for soil & groundwater remediation Leading in soil and.
Acid Lakes from Lignite Mines Dan Henderson. Lignite  Brown/soft coal.  Used for steam electric power generation.  Mined in open pits.  Production.
Remedy Analysis for Sierra Army Depot, Building 210 Area
Groundwater Pollution GW 14 Reactive Barriers and Funnel and Gate 1.
1 In-Situ Treatment of Groundwater with Non-aqueous Phase Liquids December 10-12, 2002, Chicago, IL Scott G. Huling, Ph.D., P.E. USEPA Robert S. Kerr Environmental.
Equus Beds ASR Program – Wichita’s Future Water Supply September 6, 2012.
Ground Water. Kristina Loen Wei Zheng  Groundwater important of drinking  Pollution industry/agriculture: near surface abandoned, obtained from deeper.
Use of ochre products for remediation of metal-contaminated soils and waters Kate Heal School of GeoSciences University of Edinburgh
Formation and Treatment
Seasonal Changes in Biogeochemistry of a Natural Wetland Receiving Drainage from an Abandoned Mine Diane McKnight and Eric August – University of Colorado.
1 GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION OF A HIGHLY CONTAMINATED BEDROCK SITE - The Oxygen Infusion Phase - J. Morrow D. Side By :
Groundwater Chapter 10.
1June 19, 2002 Bioventing (7) Incineration (18) Soil Vapor Extraction (33) Bioremediation (16) Land Treatment (9) Composting (4) Slurry-Phase Bioremediation.
1 Section II: ISCO Technology  Importance of ISCO chemistry  Terminology  Reaction sequences/products/byproducts  Oxidant selection/contaminants 
Environmental Technology ChimH409 (2-0-1) Michel Verbanck 2012 Universite Libre de Bruxelles Bruface Dept Water Pollution.
Almost Everywhere: Naturally Occurring Arsenic in Wisconsin’s Aquifers Madeline Gotkowitz Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey.
The world’s leading sustainability consultancy In Situ Chemical Oxidation of Pesticides Using Shallow Soil Mixing The world’s leading sustainability consultancy.
History and Cleanup at Chemical Commodities, Inc. Jeff Field US EPA Region 7 1.
Former DuPont Barksdale Works Project Update December 14, 2004 DuPont Corporate Remediation Group Great Lakes Visitors Center.
ABSTACT La Réduction Chimique In Situ Offre la Réclamation sans Séquestrer les Contaminants ou Accumuler les Catabolites In Situ Chemical Reduction (ISCR)
Ground Water. Makes up 0.397% of Earth’s Water. - song.
What’s the origin of high As concentrations in groundwater? Tony Appelo Hydrochemical Consultant Amsterdam.
Decommissioned BCR Organic Media Characterization Standard Mine Superfund Site, Crested Butte, CO Neal Gallagher, Eric Blumenstein, Tom Rutkowski, John.
1, 12/2/ Key factors for a successful ISCO application with Permanganate Prepared by: Richard W Lewis CPG Program Manager ERM.
August 27, 2008 Treatment of Heavy Metals and Elimination of Sulfur with a Novel Sulfate Reducing Permeable Reactive Barrier Containing ZVI Dr. Jim Field.
MTCA Science Advisory Board Presentation Establishing Moderate Soil Levels for Arsenic October 23, 2006.
Sustainable development and the environment Remediation.
By: Pimluck Kijjanapanich. I Introduction O Objectives S Scope of Study L Literature Review マスタ タイトルの書式設定 M Methodology マスタ タイトルの書式設定 R1R1 Results and.
Bioremediation of Arsenic Contaminated Water
Biological Treatment of Residual DNAPL
“ Safer, More Effective ISCO Remedial Actions Using Non-Extreme Persulfate Activation to Yield Sustained Secondary Treatment ” Michael Scalzi, President.
In Situ Perchlorate Bioremediation for Soil and Groundwater Dan Cowan 5th Annual Joint Services Pollution Prevention and Hazardous Waste Management Conference.
Environmental Bio-Systems, Inc.
“ Safer, More Effective ISCO Remedial Actions Using Non-Extreme Persulfate Activation to Yield Sustained Secondary Treatment ” Wade Meese, Vice President.
1 Groundwater Pollution GW 10 Monitored Natural Attenuation.
Groundwater Pollution
Remediating Contaminated Groundwater with Slow-Release Oxidants Remediating Contaminated Groundwater with Slow-Release Oxidants Steve Comfort – University.
Benefits of Laboratory Treatability Studies in Support of Full-Scale Design for In Situ Remedies Michaye McMaster Geosyntec Consultants Sandra Dworatzek.
FIELD INVESTIGATION OF IN SITU LIME NEUTRALIZATION OF ACIDIC SEDIMENT
Background Professional Geologist - 36 years
Jesse Taylor: Remington Technologies
ENHANCED BIOREMEDIATION PILOT USING iSOC® TECHNOLOGY AT A FORMER MANUFACTURED GAS PLANT CASE STUDY PREPARED BY: MR. DAVID WORK, PE RETEC GROUP.
System Monitoring/Regulatory Evaluation
Anthropogenic Induced Redox Disequilibrium in Uranium Ore Zones
Water’s Effect on Earth
Soil processes and trace metals
Web-based Class Project on Geoenvironmental Remediation
Presentation transcript:

Two Union Square Union Street, Suite 601 Seattle, WA (206) Field testing and modeling of in situ groundwater arsenic remediation through iron sulfide precipitation near Tacoma, Washington Brett Beaulieu and Samantha Ewing

Overview Arsenic cleanup at B&L Woodwaste Site Pilot injection, two application rates of EHC-M Modeling pyrite precipitation and oxidative dissolution

2009 GSA Annual Meeting, Portland OR B&L Woodwaste Site

Cleanup Goals Physically contain source Treat leading plume edge in situ Remediate plume remainder Study area 100 ft Groundwater Flow direction Wetlands Landfill

2009 GSA Annual Meeting, Portland OR Shallow Alluvial Sand Aquifer Groundwater Flow direction Study area Wetlands Landfill Groundwater arsenic plume

2009 GSA Annual Meeting, Portland OR Goals of current study Add to limited reductive precipitation field data Arsenic remediation pilot: Effectiveness and time required Dosage Permeable reactive barrier (PRB) Pyrite as arsenic sink Pyrite stability, pH in oxic groundwater

2009 GSA Annual Meeting, Portland OR Methods Pilot injection of EHC-M Commercial product (Adventus) Slurry: carbon, zerovalent iron, sulfate Groundwater monitoring Kinetic reaction path modeling (Geochemist’s Workbench) pyrite precipitation oxidative dissolution

Methods: Pilot Study 2009 GSA Annual Meeting, Portland OR Groundwater monitoring 5 events/6 months Total and dissolved As, Fe Sulfate/sulfide Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) Redox-sensitive metals pH, ORP, DO, T Treated depth: 12 – 22 feet below ground Two injection zones: 0.6% soil weight 0.2% soil weight 0.2%0.6% PD-105PD-106 PD-122

2009 GSA Annual Meeting, Portland OR Methods: Pilot Injection

2009 GSA Annual Meeting, Portland OR

Methods: Pilot Injection 2009 GSA Annual Meeting, Portland OR

Methods: Pilot Injection 2009 GSA Annual Meeting, Portland OR

Baseline : Total As, Feb. As concentrations over time

2009 GSA Annual Meeting, Portland OR Results: Total As, March As concentrations over time

2009 GSA Annual Meeting, Portland OR Results: Total As, April As concentrations over time

2009 GSA Annual Meeting, Portland OR Results: Total As, May As concentrations over time

2009 GSA Annual Meeting, Portland OR Results: Total As, August As concentrations over time

2009 GSA Annual Meeting, Portland OR Results: Arsenic removal Arsenic removal plot Injection PD-105 (0.2%) PD-122 (between treatment zones) PD-106 (0.6%)

Results: Dissolved Iron 2009 GSA Annual Meeting, Portland OR PD-105 (0.2%) PD-106 (0.6%) Injection

Results: Sulfate 2009 GSA Annual Meeting, Portland OR Injection PD-105 (0.2%) PD-106 (0.6%)

Results: Pyrite oxidative dissolution 2009 GSA Annual Meeting, Portland OR Dissolution rates ~ mol/sec 20% dissolved in 30-day experiment 83% dissolved in 1-year experiment/100% in 5-year

Results: pH and pyrite dissolution 2009 GSA Annual Meeting, Portland OR pH decreases to below 5 in 1-year, 5- year experiment

Conclusions EHC-M treatment at 0.2% soil weight removed 67% As in 5-m pilot Treatment at 0.6% (10% pore space) may hinder flux and treatment Pyrite a realistic sink for injection PRB application of EHC-M Pyrite and pH stable during short- to medium-term oxic events 2009 GSA Annual Meeting, Portland OR

Full-scale treatment: Dec GSA Annual Meeting, Portland OR