Supporting Teaching and Learning Arkansas Department of Education Dr. Tom Kimbrell, Commissioner May 11, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
March 6-7, 2012 Waterfront Hotel - Morgantown, WV Federal Programs Spring Directors Conference Developing Federal Programs of Excellence.
Advertisements

In August, the historic CORE district waiver was approved allowing these districts to pursue a new robust and holistic accountability model for schools.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Most current teacher evaluations provide little information that can be used to give teachers the training and tools they need to be effective; better.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Van Buren School District Principal Evaluation Pilot District July 2012.
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVERS Gayle Pauley Assistant Superintendent Special Programs and Federal Accountability
Targeted Efforts to Improve Learning for ALL Students.
Shelda Hale, Title III, ELL and Immigrant Education Kentucky Department of Education.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Kansas accreditation is:  1.A school improvement plan  2.An external assistance team  3.Local assessments aligned with state standards  4.Teachers.
Making preparations in Ohio: Common Core and Ohio’s Revised Academic Content Standards New System of Assessments.
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) Common Core Summer Institutes 1.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: RENEWAL PROCESS November 20, 2014.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY RENEWAL PROCESS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS January29, 2015.
Accountability Assessment Parents & Community Preparing College, Career, & Culturally Ready Graduates Standards Support 1.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
April 11, 2012 Comprehensive Assessment System 1.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
June 19 th – PLC Day June 19 th – PLC Day Year In Review – Year In Preview District Road Map District Road Map TPEP Early Release Collaboration Early Release.
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
October 12, College- and Career-Ready Expectations for All Students 2. State-Developed Differentiated Recognition, Accountability, and Support.
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers.
Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
Education in Delaware: ESEA Flexibility Renewal Community Town Hall Ryan Reyna, Office of Accountability.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
Strategic Planning Update Kentucky Board of Education January 31, 2012.
Committee of Practitioners ESEA Flexibility Waiver Review June 25, 2014.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
STATE CONSORTIUM ON EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS September 10, 2013.
ESEA Renewal Title I Coordinators Meeting May 13, 2015 Mary Gable Assistant State Superintendent, Academic Policy and Innovation Chandra Haislet Director,
ESEA Flexibility U.S. Department of Education SECRETARY OF EDUCATION’S PRIORITIES.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
PARCC Assessments Overview ISBE/SSoS Data and Assessment Content Specialists.
CURRICULUM COMMITTEE MEETING AUGUST 15, 2011 PBL UNIT #10.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
July,  Congress hasn’t reauthorized Elementary & Secondary Education Act (ESEA), currently known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB)  U.S. Department.
Arkansas Association of Educational Administrators Henderson State University April 28, 2012 Dr. Richard Abernathy AAEA Executive Director.
ESEA Flexibility Waiver Florida’s Proposal November 14,
Governor Christie’s Educator Effectiveness Task Force Report March 1, 2011.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Introduction to the CORE District Waiver for Interested Local Education Agencies (LEAs) May 2013.
BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.
A Mission of Restoration
2012 KanSPRA Conference Brad Neuenswander Deputy Commissioner, KSDE.
March 30, 2012 Marriott Hotel- Charleston, WV Committee of Practitioners Developing Federal Programs of Excellence.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: EDUCATION STAKEHOLDERS FORUM September 29, 2011 Carmel Martin, Assistant Secretary for Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development.
CCSSO Task Force Recommendations on Educator Preparation Idaho State Department of Education December 14, 2013 Webinar.
ESEA Flexibility Waiver Renewal What to Expect for the Upcoming School Year June 17, 2015.
PADEPP PROGRAM FOR ASSISTING, DEVELOPING, AND EVALUATING PRINCIPAL PERFORMANCE CHANGES FOR 2015 – 2016 SCHOOL YEAR.
Diane Mugford – Federal Accountability, ADAM Russ Keglovits – Measurement and Accountability, ADAM Renewing Nevada’s ESEA Waiver Flexibility Request.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
State of Alaska House Finance Subcommittee Department of Education and Early Development July 25, 2013.
Stephanie Graff, Chief Accountability Officer
CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
Erie 2 Regional Curriculum Council March 14, 2012
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
KAESP 2012 Spring Retreat April 2, /15/2018.
CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Maryland State Board of Education October 25, 2011
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers
Presentation transcript:

Supporting Teaching and Learning Arkansas Department of Education Dr. Tom Kimbrell, Commissioner May 11, 2012

Today’s Topics for Teaching and Learning 1.Teacher Excellence and Support System 2.Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) – Technology Specs 3.ESEA Flexibility Request – Targeted Achievement Gap Groups (TAGG) – Accountability, Reporting & Responding

Teacher Excellence and Support System Act 1209 of 2011 – Teacher Excellence and Support System (TESS) Rules are out for public comment until May 18 Charlotte Danielson’s Framework for Teaching – Based on 4 Domains and 22 Components Appropriate external measures of assessment for teachers of non-tested areas Incorporate student learning into Danielson’s framework Training for 35,000 teachers and administrators

Teacher Excellence and Support System  Measure individual teacher performance.  Guide for teachers as they reflect upon and improve their effectiveness.  Serve as the basis for instructional improvement.  Focus the goals and objectives of schools and districts - support, monitor and evaluate their teachers.

Regional Meetings held throughout the state to gain input and inform stakeholders. ARKANSAS TEACHER EXCELLENCE SUPPORT SYSTEM (TESS) 11 Schools Pilot – TESS Using Teachscape Software and 360° cameras *Training of Evaluators - 1 day face-to-face training held at co-ops will kick off the 30 hours of on-line training and certification test Jan – May 2013 Pilot Year All districts will pilot TESS. Committee of stakeholders will obtain input and feedback from pilot First Year of Full Implementation All districts will implement TESS; Data from 14-15, 15-16, and will be published on school report cards in Training of Teachers – Half- day face-to-face training held at districts and co- ops will kick off 18 hours on-line training. June – Aug 2013 Train the Trainers 80 to 100 trainers located throughout the state will be trained Fall Schools Pilot New Evaluation System Act 1209 Passed in March 2011 Rules and Regs approved by State Board of Education Summer Teacher Eval. Task Force Comprised of 36 members representing all stakeholder groups *The face-to-face training will take place in January and February 2013 – Evaluators will need to complete the on-line training and certification test by August 2013

Spring Fall 2012Jan 2013 Summer Schools in Principal Evaluation Pilot Dr. Connie Kamm w/ Doug Reeves Leadership and Learning Center facilitates training ARKANSAS PRINCIPAL EVALUATION SYSTEM TIMELINE 10 Schools Pilot –Year 2 Training and Support will continue w/ pilot schools to obtain feedback, gather data, and determine professional development needs- Work will also begin on revising rubrics for asst prin., curr specialists, etc. Work w/ Stakeholders and Legislators for legislation of principal evaluation system to mirror TESS Pilot Year All districts will pilot principal evaluation system. Committee of stakeholders will obtain input and feedback from pilot First Year of Full Implementation All districts will fully implement principal evaluation system –Data will be collected on system Training for Principals and Superintendents All principals and superintendents will be trained on principal evaluation system - Conduct Meetings with appropriate stakeholders to receive input for principal evaluation system and possible legislation – Explore options for on-line platforms Act 222 Council develops principal evaluation system based on ISLLC standards Revisions made to evaluation rubric, forms, etc., based on feedback from piot ACT 222 of 2009 School Leadership Council Set up Council of Educational Assoc, and Leadership Groups to aid in development of evaluation tools

Partnership for the Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers The PARCC assessments have six priority purposes, which are driving the design of the system: Determine whether students are college- and career-ready or on track Assess the full range of the Common Core Standards, including standards that are difficult to measure Measure the full range of student performance, including the performance high and low performing students Provide data during the academic year to inform instruction, interventions and professional development Provide data for accountability, including measures of growth Incorporate innovative approaches throughout the system

Partnership for the Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) PARCC will develop an assessment system comprised of four components. Two summative, required assessment components designed to: Make “college- and career-readiness” and “on-track” determinations, Measure the full range of standards and full performance continuum, and Provide data for accountability uses, including measures of growth. Two non-summative, optional assessment components designed to: Generate timely information for informing instruction, interventions, and professional development during the school year. An additional third non-summative component will assess students’ speaking and listening skills

Partnership for the Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) Minimum Guidelines for New Hardware Purchases

ESEA Flexibility Request Why ? Core values Reduce complexity Fairness & sensitivity Measure what is important—proficiency, growth/progress, gap closure Honor history—use data & lessons learned to improve system Fairness is not always simple-parsimony vs. simplicity Infuse incentives & rewards Credit schools for progress & growth All efforts support & ensure path to CCR Anticipate & minimize unintended consequences Do what is best for Arkansas’s children.

Accountability System and Feedback Loop

TAGG: Targeted Achievement Gap Group Students from low income families; Students with disabilities; and English learners

TAGG: Targeted Achievement Gap Group Reduces unintended consequences – Students may belong to several groups, stakeholders have been concerned this exaggerates school failure. Focuses more schools on achievement gaps – 90% of schools have a TAGG – Differentiates accountability and response for students with lowest performance AMOs for ESEA subgroups Reporting ESEA subgroups with N ≥ 10

Accountability, Reporting & Responding Accountability: Classification of Schools – 95% tested – Proficiency Gap-Combined Population & TAGG – Growth Gap-Combined Population & TAGG – Graduation Rate Gap-Combined Population & TAGG College & Career Ready Indicators developed during transition to PARCC Reporting & Responding with Interventions (N ≥ 10) – 95% tested – Proficiency Gap-Combined Population, TAGG & ESEA Subgroups – Growth Gap-Combined Population, TAGG & ESEA Subgroups – Graduation Rate Gap-Combined Population, TAGG & ESEA Subgroups College & Career Ready Indicators reported

ESEA Flexibility Request Arkansas is one of 26 states, along with the District of Columbia, in the second round of ESEA Flexibility applications. Application was submitted February 28, Following peer review, the state has been involved in an iterative process with the USDE to provide clarification and coherence. Has submitted the third revision this week. Hope to receive approval within next two weeks.

Supporting Teaching and Learning Arkansas Department of Education For more information contact: TESS—Dr. Karen Cushman, Assistant Commissioner Human Resources/Licensure PARCC—Dr. Laura Bednar, Assistant Commissioner Learning Services ESEA Flexibility—John Hoy, Assistant Commissioner Academic Accountability

Questions and Answers?