Mars Today 1 An immediate and inexpensive program for manned Mars visitation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Concept Overview for 2 mt Case “2 mt case”: integrated payloads of no more than 2 mt can be landed on the surface of Mars; extension of current Mars EDL.
Advertisements

Larry Phillips MAY 13th-17th, 2002 Micro Arcsecond Xray Imaging Mission: Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Launch Vehicle Information Final Version.
Presented by Marco Christov at the 11th Mars Society Annual Convention, 14 – 17 August 2008, Boulder Colorado. A Mars Heavy Transport.
A GenCorp Company High Thrust In-Space Propulsion Technology Development R. Joseph Cassady Aerojet 22 March 2011.
 Falcon 9 Heavy › To carry crew capsule and propellant required to rendezvous with transit vehicle Image Credit:
M. R. Tetlow and C.J. Doolan School on Mechanical Engineering
“Mars To Go” Based Missions Donovan Chipman David Allred, Ph.D.
Lessons from Apollo * Data from NASA Apollo 11 Press Kit Shows spacecraft weight delivered to LEO (Low Earth Orbit) Shows weights for each portion of Apollo.
Principles of Propulsion and its Application in Space Launchers Prof. Dr.-Ing. Uwe Apel Hochschule Bremen REVA Seminar1.
Minimalist Human Mars Mission Surface infrastructure discussion July 26 th, 2008.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Propellant Choice and Mass Estimates for the Translunar OTV Week 2 Presentation Thursday, Jan 22, 2009 Brad Appel Propulsion Group.
The Lander is at a 25 km Lunar altitude and an orbital period of approximately 110 minutes. After separation occurs the Lander is completely self sufficient.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Analysis of Trans-Lunar Spiral Trajectory [Levi Brown] [Mission Ops] February 12,
Project X pedition Spacecraft Senior Design – Spring 2009
Choices: Some Considerations in Configuring Launch Systems Dr. John M. Jurist Adjunct Professor of Space Studies, Odegard School of Aerospace Sciences,
Spacecraft Propulsion Dr Andrew Ketsdever Lesson 13 MAE 5595.
Design of a Piloted Spacecraft to Bridge the Gap between the Space Shuttle and Crew Exploration Vehicle Michael Seibert University of Colorado at Boulder.
AAE450 Senior Spacecraft Design Project Aquarius Kowalkowski - 1 Mike Kowalkowski Week 4: February 8 th 2007 Project Aquarius Power Engineering Habitat.
AAE450 Senior Spacecraft Design Project Aquarius Kowalkowski - 1 Mike Kowalkowski Week 11: April 5 th 2007 Project Aquarius Final Presentation Storyboard.
Earth-Moon Transport Doroteo Garcia Kazuya Suzuki Patrick Zeitouni.
Space Exploration: Should It Be Done? Nishith Patel.
Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Background The Apollo program sent 12 Americans to the lunar surface between 1969 and 1972, but humans have not set foot on the moon since then. In January.
The Return to Space Exploration Constellation. NASA Authorization Act of 2005 The Administrator shall establish a program to develop a sustained human.
© Lavochkin Association, 2013 Ganymede Lander mission overview.
Ryan Mayes Duarte Ho Jason Laing Bryan Giglio. Requirements  Overall: Launch 10,000 mt of cargo (including crew vehicle) per year Work with a $5M fixed.
Constellation Program Overview Mark Geyer Constellation Program Office October 2006.
1 SpaceX proprietary data constituting “Confidential Information” under applicable agreements. Tim Hughes Vice President & Chief Counsel.
Team PM8 Eventus Slide 1. Commercial spaceflight has seen increased activity as more privately owned companies invest in the venture. To avoid a catastrophic.
What to do with Space Station Poo 1. 2 David Heck Advanced Manufacturing Research & Development Boeing – Phantom Works, St. Louis, Mo SEND IT TO THE MOON.
Advanced Space Exploration LEO Propellant Depot: Space Transportation Impedance Matching Space Access 2010 April 8-10, 2010 Dallas Bienhoff Manager, In-Space.
AAE 450- Propulsion LV Stephen Hanna Critical Design Review 02/27/01.
Mars Orbit Rendezvous Robert Dyck. Only land what you need Mars Direct ERV contains stuff not needed on Mars Food & life support for transit to Earth.
Space Station Will it be accessible for You and Me?
STRATEGIES FOR MARS NETWORK MISSIONS VIA AN ALTERNATIVE ENTRY, DESCENT, AND LANDING ARCHITECTURE 10 TH INTERNATIONAL PLANETARY PROBE WORKSHOP June,
MIT : NED : Mission to Mars Presentation of proposed mission plan
RASC-AL 2010 Topics. TECHNOLOGY-ENABLED HUMAN MARS MISSION NASA is interested in eventual human mission to the Martian surface. Current Mars design reference.
Minimalist Mars Mission Establishing a Human Toehold on the Red Planet Executive Summary DevelopSpace MinMars Team.
Use of Lunar Volatiles in Chemical and Nuclear-Thermal Rockets John F Santarius April 30, 1999 Lecture 41, Part 2 Resources from Space NEEP 533/ Geology.
Introduction to the Altair Project
MAE 4262: ROCKETS AND MISSION ANALYSIS
ERV - 1 End of Semester Presentation Brad Buchanan – Group Leader Dominic Amaturo.
The Space Shuttle. The Shuttle’s mission  The purpose of the space shuttle is to bring supplies, equipment, and people to the International Space Station.
America will send a new generation of explorers to the moon aboard NASA’s Orion crew exploration vehicle. After that, on to MARS!!!
NOON UNO HIGH-MOBILITY MARS EXPLORATION SYSTEM DANIEL MCCAFFERY JEFF ROBINSON KYLE SMITH JASON TANG BRAD THOMPSON.
Unit 6 Lesson 1 Explanation. In 2004, President Bush set the following goal for the NASA constellation program, “this vision… is a sustainable and affordable.
FEDERAL SPACE AGENCY OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION LAVOCHKIN ASSOCIATION "PHOBOS-GRUNT" PROJECT MISSION CONCEPT & CURRENT STATUS OF DEVELOPMENT IKI, 13 October.
IRNCLAM – InteRNational CisLunar Ascension Module Brian Anderson ASTE /11/23.
Human Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5
The Space Shuttle. The Shuttle’s mission  The purpose of the space shuttle is to bring supplies, equipment, and people to the International Space Station.
CRICOS No J a university for the world real R ENB443: Launcher Systems Image Credit: ESA Caption: The generic Ariane-5 (Ariane Flight 162) lifting.
We Are Closer to Mars Today Than We Have Ever Been…
A&AE 450 – Senior Design Jeremy Davis Group A – Aerodynamics Preliminary Design Analysis January 23, 2001.
LEO Propellant Depot: A Commercial Opportunity? LEAG Private Sector Involvement October 1 - 5, 2007 Houston, Texas LEAG Private Sector Involvement October.
Rocket Performance Principles of Space Systems Design U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND Parametric Design The Design Process Regression Analysis Level I.
Review of Past and Proposed Mars EDL Systems. Past and Proposed Mars EDL Systems MinMars Mars entry body design is derived from JPL Austere Mars entry.
Recommendation to Cease NASA Crew Return Vehicle Development April 29, 2004 Amanda KellyBlake HajovskyAnthony Pittman Engineering Technical Communications.
October, 2005 NASA’s Exploration Architecture. 2 A Bold Vision for Space Exploration  Complete the International Space Station  Safely fly the Space.
Launch Structure Challenge - Background Humans landed on the moon in 1969 – Apollo 11 space flight. In 2003, NASA started a new program (Ares) to send.
An Earth – Moon Transportation System Patrick Zeitouni Space Technology.
Callisto Mission LaRC Option
1. Launch Mother Ship to LEO
  Robert Zubrin Pioneer Astronautics W. 8th Ave. unit A
Ares I System Requirements Review (SRR)
Lunar Descent Trajectory
Derivation of the FSOA in Ariane 6 Specifications
Kevin Dahya Critical Design Review 3/6/01
Introduction to the Altair Project
  Robert Zubrin Pioneer Astronautics W. 8th Ave. unit A
Team A Propulsion 1/16/01.
Presentation transcript:

Mars Today 1 An immediate and inexpensive program for manned Mars visitation

Basic Assumptions No nuclear components No heavy lift launch capability No oversized components Use existing components to minimize development Emergency supplies for crew Recycle ?

Major systems Space Propulsion Transit Habitation Surface Habitation Mars Lander Crew Ferry Vehicle(s)

Space Propulsion Centaur (Mentaur) Empty Mass 2200Kg Lox/H2 16,800Kg Lox/CH4 42,200kg A Mentaur is a Centaur upper Stage with modified RL-10 Engines and propellant tanks for CH4 instead of LH2. Same shape, different mass.

Transit Habitation ‘ The Mir core’ 20,000 Kg Orbital crew habitat Long range Earth communications Kg Provisions

Surface Habitation Equipment Multiple deliveries 3m diameter 5m long 10,000Kg

Mars Lander 20,000 kg GLOW Hypersonic aerodynamic L/D ,000 Kg Payload ( surface module etc) Mars launch capability (if resupplied with 10,000 kg propellant)

Crew Ferry Vehicle Deliver and retrieve crew Space Shuttle Soyuz/Apollo/etc

Mars Today Supply Profile LEO Assembly First LEO Impulse Trans Mars Impulse Trans Mars Cruise Direct Entry to Landing

Supply First LEO Impulse Orbit = 300x300 km Alt Mass 58 (116) Mg Burn Centaur (Mentaur) DeltaV=1.5 km/s New Orbit = 300x11000km Alt Stage Centaur

Supply Trans Mars Impulse Mass 39 (72) Mg Burn Most of Centaur DeltaV=2.4 km/s Escape Excess V = 4.3 km/s or less

Supply Cruise / Entry Time 9 months Available DeltaV = 0.25 km/s Aerobrake for Mars Orbit Capture Autoland / Remote

Mars Today Manned Profile LEO Assembly First LEO Impulse Trans Mars Impulse Trans Mars Cruise Mars Orbit Capture Mars Braking Descent Mars Surface Stay Mars Orbit Rndvs Mars Lander Return Trans Earth Impulse Earth Orbit Capture Crew Recovery

Manned First LEO Impulse Burn Four Centaurs DeltaV = 1.7 km/s New Orbit = 300x1300 km Alt Stage Centaurs

Manned Trans Mars Impulse Burn 3.25 of Centaurs DeltaV = 4.2 km C3 = 4.3 km or less depending on req.

Manned Cruise Time 10 months Supplies for 36 month with failed recycling at minimal levels

Manned Mars Orbit Capture 2/3 of Supplies Rem Initial C3 = 4 km/s Burn 1 Centaur DeltaV = 1.4 km/s Final orbit = –3700 x km –(300x alt)

Manned Mars Braking Decent Aerobrakes Land with beacon assistance DeltaV = m/s

Mars Surface Stay Two+ early supply missions Surface stay 1.5 Yrs Supplies for 36 month with failed recycling at minimal levels Resupply option Abort to orbit early

Mars Orbit Rendevous Lander fueled for ascent to orbit final orbit matched with transit hab Offload extra supplies Hab may have lowered orbit during stay

Manned Trans Earth Impulse Leave Lander Burn 1/2 of Centaur DeltaV = 1.47 Final final C3=4km/s

Manned Earth Orbit Capture Initial C3 = 4.2 km/s Burn of Centaur DeltaV = 0.8 km/s Final orbit = –300x km Alternate RV –3000kg vs 4200kg

Optional Crew Recovery Parking orbit Rendezvous with crew transfer vehicle Trasit hab may be braked to Leo

System Costs Centaur Space Propulsion =$20M Transit Habitat= $30M Surface Habitat= $30M Lander Development= $200M Lander=$30M Launch of 20000kg= $20-300M

Supply Mission Cost 2 Centaurs$40 M 1 Lander$30 M Payload$30 M Launch 3 units$300M –Total= $400M

Manned Mission Cost 9 Centaurs$180 M 1 Lander$30 M Tranist Hab $30 M Launch 11 units$ 1100M –Optimistic Total= $1340M

Total First Costs 3 Supply Missions $1200M 1 manned mission$1340M Lander development$300M –Total Cost for first mission = $2840M –+shuttle flights and assembly

Launch Costs 20 Launches –Assuming $100M/Proton –Launch costs = $2000M Total Price is $2840M Reducing Launch to $20M –$1000kg (1/2x Zenit x2) Total Price is $1240M