1 Using Scenarios in the California Water Plan. 2 Scenario Overview ● Background ● Update 2005 narratives ● Feedback we received ● Creating themes.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Drought Preparedness Planning & Drought Response in California Jeanine Jones, CDWR.
Advertisements

David Purkey, SEI Rob Lempert, RAND
Robert Goldstein Senior Technical Executive, Water & Ecosystems WSWC–WGA Energy–Water Nexus Workshop Denver, April 2, 2013 Water Prism: Decision Support.
1 California Water Plan Update 2009 We Are Here => Work Plan Recap 1 st Plenary Meeting Sacramento October 22-23, 2007.
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services A Clean Water Agency Presented to the Environment Committee November 9, 2010 Information Item Master Water.
Overview of the Colorado River Basin Water Supply and Demand Study National Climate Assessment Workshop Boulder, CO June 6-8, 2011.
California Water Plan Presented by: Emily, Juhn-Yuan, Zhi, Cheng-Wei, Mitchel Source: sierrafoothillgarden.com.
The Coca-Cola Company's Observations, Responses and Outlook in a Changing Climate Greg Koch Director, Global Water Stewardship Office of Sustainability,
California Water Demand Scenarios David Groves Pardee RAND Graduate School Scott Matyac and Tom Hawkins Department of Water Resources * * * California.
2014: A Year of Crisis and Opportunity Power Association of Northern California Nov. 18, 2014 Timothy Quinn, ACWA Executive Director.
1 Preparing Washington for a Changing Climate An Integrated Climate Change Response Strategy Department of Ecology Hedia Adelsman, Executive Policy Advisor.
Regional Climate Change Water Supply Planning Tools for Central Puget Sound Austin Polebitski and Richard Palmer Department of Civil and Environmental.
A Preliminary Analysis of the Impacts of Climate Change on the Reliability on West Side Water Supplies Richard Palmer and Margaret Hahn Department of Civil.
1 Measuring Performance of Resource Management Responses Rich Juricich (DWR) David Groves (RAND)
What’s next in California's flood future? Finding answers: California Water Management Investment Strategy FEMA Region IX - CHARG Stakeholder Meeting July.
2 1)Familiarize State agency staff with Water Plan Update 2013 information, tools and resources 2)Identify opportunities for State agencies to derive.
The Colorado River: Operation, Current and Projected Future Conditions Southern California Water Dialogue Los Angeles, CA April 27, 2011.
The TNA Process in Costa Rica Experiences and lessons learned Francisco Sancho Advisor TNA
REGIONAL FORUM FOR BEVERLY, DANVERS AND SALEM DECEMBER 8, 2010 North Shore Regional Strategic Planning Project.
1 Analytical Tools, Data & Scenarios Workshop July 29, 2004 California Water Plan Update 2004.
WATER ISSUES IN THE EASTERN EUROPE:
1 Public Workshop Coachella June 23, 2005 Public Review Draft California Water Plan Update 2005.
Regional Water Supply Planning. Background  Legislative history  Benefits of regional planning  Regulatory requirements  Existing water source information.
What is Legacy? Current Comprehensive Plan for Forsyth County and Winston-Salem. Adopted in 2001 by Forsyth County and its 8 municipalities. Focuses on.
America’s Water Upmanu Lall water.columbia.edu.
1 Public Workshop Fresno June 30, 2005 Public Review Draft California Water Plan Update 2005.
Overview of the Colorado River Basin Water Supply and Demand Study Urban Water Institute 19 th Annual Water Policy Conference August 22-24, 2012 San Diego.
California Water 2030: An Efficient Future Peter H. Gleick, Heather Cooley, David Groves To be released September
1 Improving Analytical Capabilities of the California Water Plan Rich Juricich, California Dept. of Water Resources.
Methods for Developing Robust Climate Adaptation Plans in the Energy Sector David Groves Water and Climate Resilience Center.
Presentation to Contra Costa County Climate Leaders October 3, 2013.
1 California Water Plan Update 2009 Where We’ve Been Where We Are Going South Lahontan Regional Workshop Palmdale July 10, 2007.
Agricultural and Urban Water Use Scenario Evaluation Tool
1 California Water Plan Update 2009 Resource Management Strategies Overview 1 st Plenary Meeting Sacramento October 23, 2007.
1 The Rise of Regionalism in Water Resources John K. Woodling California Department of Water Resources North Bay Watershed Association Conference April.
IRP Approach to Water Supply Alternatives for Duck River Watershed: Presentation to XII TN Water Resources Symposium William W. Wade Energy and Water.
Using the DSF to assess scenarios Some things it will do for you - and some things it won’t.
Adapting Water Policy to Meet Future Need North Bay Watershed Association April 4, 2008 Lester Snow Director.
1 California Water Plan Update 2009 Advisory Committee June 4, 2007.
1 Using Scenarios in the California Water Plan. 2 Overview ● Background ● Update 2005 scenario narratives ● Analysis performed for Update 2005 ● Scenarios.
Chapter 6: Integrating Knowledge and Action Scott Kaminski ME / 9 / 2005.
1 Scenarios and More California Water Plan Advisory Committee Meeting April 14 th, 2005.
California Water Plan Update 2005 Draft Slides for Public Hearings in June April 14, 2005.
1 Status of AC Input from Last Meeting. 2 Overview  Input received on Strategic Planning Elements (Mission, Vision, Guiding Principles) & the 7 Key Content.
1 Public Workshop Eureka June 14, 2005 Public Review Draft California Water Plan Update 2005.
Comprehensive Plan Update. General, far-reaching vision to benefit the whole community Takes a long term view of issues Focuses on physical development.
1 California Water Plan Update Integrated Flood Management Central Valley Flood Protection Board April 17, 2009.
1 Public Workshop Redding June 13, 2005 Public Review Draft California Water Plan Update 2005.
Rebuilding the System Reducing the Risk California Water Plan Plenary Session October 22-23, 2007.
Regionalism in Water Resources Management
California Water Plan Update Advisory Committee Meeting January 20, 2005.
1 Scenario formulation Scenario-based planning is a structured way of thinking about what might happen in the future Scenarios are descriptions of possible.
California Water Plan Old and New Steve Macaulay, Executive Director.
1 Public Workshop Los Angeles June 22, 2005 Public Review Draft California Water Plan Update 2005.
1 Public Workshop Bakersfield June 28, 2005 Public Review Draft California Water Plan Update 2005.
Santa Rosa Plain Groundwater Management Planning Update Fall 2013.
Draft example: Indicators for water supply reliability and storage projects Presented by Steve Roberts (Department of Water Resources, Storage Investigations)
1 Public Workshop Chino July 13, 2005 Public Review Draft California Water Plan Update 2005.
1 Recommended Next Steps For Improving Quantitative Information California Water Plan Advisory Committee Meeting August 17, 2005.
Ocean/ENVIR 260 Autumn 2010Lecture 16© 2010 University of Washington 1 Ocean/Envir 260 Lecture #16: Population Growth in the Puget Sound Ecosystem.
Harmonization and Use of Standard Analytical Tools for Water Resources Management as an approach towards Regional Cooperation Abdulkarim H Seid Head, Water.
Modeling with WEAP University of Utah Hydroinformatics - Fall 2015.
1 California Water Plan Update 2009 Assumptions and Estimates Report.
Climate Change Threat Reduced Snowpack 1. Potential Impacts Related to Reduced Snowpack How might our community be impacted by reduced snowpack? 2.
CHINA – 4 – Challenges facing urban communities
Liana Prudencio and Sarah E. Null
Concepts in Water Resources Management
LA06 Assessment of Impacts and Adaptation Measures for the Water Resources Sector Due to Extreme Events Under Climate Change Conditions. REGIONAL PROJECT.
Water Scarcity and Drought EEA Assessment
Investing in Source Water Protection
Presentation transcript:

1 Using Scenarios in the California Water Plan

2 Scenario Overview ● Background ● Update 2005 narratives ● Feedback we received ● Creating themes

3 Multiple Quantitative Views ● Water Portfolios  Describe where water originates, where it flows, and what it is used for based on recent data ● Future Baseline Scenarios  Describe expected changes by 2030 if water managers do not take additional action ● Alternative Response Packages  Describe packages of promising actions, predict expected outcomes, and compare performance under each scenario

4Background “In a scenario process, managers invent and then consider, in depth, several varied stories of equally plausible futures. The stories are carefully researched, full of relevant detail, oriented towards real-life decisions, and designed (one hopes) to bring forward surprises and unexpected leaps of understanding” Peter Schwartz, “The Art of the Long View, Planning for the Future in an Uncertain World”

5 Schwartz’ View of Scenarios ● Serve as a tool for ordering one’s perceptions ● Evaluate different actions or responses based on different plausible futures ● Do not want to pick one preferred future or the most likely future ● Make strategic decisions that will be sound for all plausible futures

6 Water Plan Scenarios Represent Baseline Conditions ● Water Plan Scenarios only consider conditions that:  are plausible during planning horizon under consideration  affect future water demands or supplies  the water community has little control over

7 Scenario Narratives Used in Update 2005 ● Scenario 1 – Current Trends ● Scenario 2 – Less Resources Intensive ● Scenario 3 – More Resources Intensive

8 Scenario 1 Current Trends ● Recent trends continue for the following:  Population growth and development patterns  Agricultural and industrial production  Environmental water dedication  Naturally occurring conservation (like plumbing code changes, natural replacement, actions water users implement on their own)

9 Scenario 2 Less Resource Intensive ● Includes the following:  Recent trends for population growth  Higher housing density  Higher agricultural and industrial production  More environmental water dedication  Higher naturally occurring conservation than Current Trends (but less than full implementation of all cost-effective conservation measures available)

10 Scenario 3 More Resource Intensive ● Includes the following:  Higher population growth rate  Lower housing density  Higher agricultural and industrial production  No additional environmental water dedication (year 2000 level)  Lower naturally occurring conservation than Current Trends

11 Update 2005 Table of Scenario Factors

12 Feedback from Advisory Committee and Regional Meetings

13 Feedback Sought ● Planning horizon / Time step ● Geographic scale ● Climate change ● Drought conditions ● Flood management ● Other considerations?

14 Temporal Scale Planning Horizon / Time Step ● No clear preference for planning horizon  2030, 2040,  Shorter horizon to be consistent with city / county general plans  Longer horizon to evaluate climate change ● Preference to report at 5 or 10 year intervals ● Track changes over time rather than fixed level of development

15 Geographic Scale ● Preference to look at smaller than Hydrologic Region scale  Watersheds  IRWMP regions

16 Climate Change ● Key factors  Temperature  Precipitation  Snowpack  Land use patterns / vegetation  Drought and flood occurrence and intensity  Applied water use  Facility reoperation

17 Drought ● Key factors  Multi year and multi decade droughts  Different areas of occurrence  Water conservation efforts / new technologies  Land use changes / demand hardening

18 Flood Management ● Key factors  Land use planning / future growth  Facility reoperation and regulatory controls  Additional bypasses / conveyance capacity  Local, on-property water storage (for example stock ponds)

19 Other Considerations ● Land use changes ● Water use changes ● Economic changes ● Facility & system operations

20 Land Use Changes ● Housing densities ● Population growth ● Trends in agriculture ● Rural growth ● Environmental protection

21 Water Use Changes ● Conservation efforts ● Population growth ● Environmental protection ● Water quality regulations

22 Economic changes ● Military base closures ● New regulations (for example to limit green house gases) ● Energy costs ● Economic recession / depression

23 Facility & System Operation ● Delta “Fix” ● Flood management alternatives ● Adapting to climate change ● Response to catastrophic events

24 Before we move on... Questions about what has been presented so far?

25 Creating Themes for Scenario Narratives

26 Number of Scenarios ● Update 2005  Current Trends  Less Resource Intensive  More Resource Intensive ● Other suggestions  Current Trends  Less Resource Conflicts  More Resource Conflicts  Aggressive Water Conservation ● Hundreds of scenarios using Robust Decision Making techniques (RAND)

27 Plausible futures ● Population growth  Current trend, lower than expected, higher than expected ● Urban land use  Current trend, higher inland growth, more infill, denser growth ● Agricultural land use  Current trend, less land conversion, more land conversion, more double cropping

28 Plausible futures ● Urban water use  Current trend, medium conservation, full implementation of CUWCC BMPs ● Agricultural water use  Current practices, additional conservation, technically feasible conservation ● Water in the Environment  Current requirements, full unmet flow and water quality objectives

29 Plausible futures ● Water quality  Current regulations, stricter treatment requirements, emerging contaminants ● Economy  Current energy costs, higher energy costs  Robust economy, economic depression

30 Discussion ● Are there 3 or 4 key themes or stories about the future you want the scenarios to tell? ● We have heard a lot from you on the important factors, but still need advice on plausible trends.

31 Next Steps on Scenarios ● Develop narrative scenarios  Advisory Committee, Regional Forums, and Plenary ● Identify options for quantifying scenarios  Statewide Water Analysis Network ● Include scenario narratives and factors in Assumptions and Estimates Report

32 Reference Information ●  Chapter 4, Volume 1, Update 2005  Volume 4 Article, “Quantified Scenarios of 2030 Water Demand” ● Rich Juricich   (916)

33