CRWR-PrePro Calculation of Hydrologic Parameters Francisco Olivera, Ph.D. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Texas Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hydrology Rainfall - Runoff Modeling (I)
Advertisements

Hydrologic Modeling with HEC-HMS
Module 5: Storage Concepts Theodore G. Cleveland, Ph.D., P.E, M. ASCE, F. EWRI October 2013.
Development of DRAIN-WARMF Model to Simulate Water Flow & Nitrogen Transport From an Agricultural Watershed: “ Subsurface Flow Component” Shadi Dayyani.
Unit Hydrograph Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections , 7.5, 7.7,
CHARACTERISTICS OF RUNOFF
Estimating Catchment Runoff Storm Surface depression storage Infiltration Initial abstraction Direct runoff or Effective rainfall Losses.
R AINFALL -R UNOFF M ODELING O F W ADI Z IMAR. Prepared by Ahmad Tallal Abu-Hamed Mohamed Nemir Mohsen Osama Omar Nazzal Under the direction of Dr. Sameer.
Watershed Management Runoff models
City of Austin Water Quality Master Planning - GIS Model David Maidment Francisco Olivera Mike Barrett Christine Dartiguenave Ann Quenzer CRWR - University.
Applications of GIS to Water Resources Engineering Francisco Olivera, Ph.D., P.E. Department of Civil Engineering Texas A&M University Rice University.
Global Hydrology Francisco Olivera Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin 19 th ESRI International User Conference GIS Hydro.
PrePro2004: Comparison with Standard Hydrologic Modeling Procedures Rebecca Riggs April 29, 2005.
Applications of GIS to Water Resources Engineering Francisco Olivera Department of Civil Engineering Texas A&M University Department of Civil Engineering.
Development of a Hydrologic Model and Estimation of its Parameters Francisco Olivera, Ph.D., P.E. Department of Civil Engineering Texas A&M University.
By Jennifer VerWest. Differences between Flat and Average/Steep Terrain Flat Terrain Steep/Average Terrain.
PREPRO2004 BY ASHISH AGRAWAL. PREPRO2004 Why we need this tool? Why we need this tool? Inputs, Outputs and How it works? Inputs, Outputs and How it works?
CRWR-PrePro Francisco “Paco” Olivera, Ph.D. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Francisco Olivera 1998 ESRI User Conference.
CRWR-PrePro: A System of GIS Tools for HEC-HMS Modeling Support
Calculation of Hydrologic Parameters Using CRWR-PrePro Francisco Olivera, PhD Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin.
Urban Storm-Water Management Plan Utilizing Arc View and HEC-HMS College Station, Texas Kara Corcoran CVEN 689.
CE 3372 – Lecture 10. Outline  Hydrology Review  Rational Method  Regression Equations  Hydrographs.
Hydrologic Routing Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections 8.1, 8.2, 8.4.
Estimating Qmax Using the Rational Method
Watershed Management Water Budget, Hydrograph Analysis
Evaluation for the Effects of Flood Control
Introduction to HEC-HMS
A Cell to Cell Routing Model A Cell to Cell Routing Model By : Rajeev Raina CVEN 689 Civil Engineering Applications of GIS Instructor : Dr. Francisco Olivera.
DES 606 : Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS Module 5 Theodore G. Cleveland, Ph.D., P.E 29 July 2011.
Module 6: Routing Concepts Theodore G. Cleveland, Ph.D., P.E, M. ASCE, F. EWRI October 2013 Module 6 1.
HEC-HMS Runoff Computation.
DES 606 : Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS Module 4 Theodore G. Cleveland, Ph.D., P.E 29 June 2011.
Channel Flow Routing Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections 8.4, , 9.7.
Time of Concentration and Lag Time in WMS Ryan Murdock CE 394K.2.
Finding the S vs. Q relationship By: Cody Hudson.
Stream and Watershed Delineation from DEM’s David Maidment, Ph.D. and Francisco Olivera, Ph.D. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas.
Long Valley Creek: A Rainfall-Runoff Modeling Story Rob Thompson Hydrologist U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District
Hydrologic Objects for Modeling: One Viewpoint Thomas A. Evans US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center.
Flood Routing Applied Hydrology
Effects of Rain Water Harvesting on the Hydrograph Tyler Jantzen May 3, 2007 CE 394K.2.
FLOOD ROUTING Flood Routing Techniques Siti Kamariah Md Sa’at PPK Bioprocess
CE 374 K – Hydrology Second Quiz Review Daene C. McKinney.
LibHydro.
CRWR-PrePro Stream and Watershed Delineation Francisco Olivera, Ph.D. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Texas Department.
The Effects of Impervious Cover on a Hydrologic System BRUSHY CREEK WATERSHED By Ruth Haberman.
DIRECT RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH FOR UNGAUGED BASINS USING A CELL BASED MODEL P. B. Hunukumbura & S. B. Weerakoon Department of Civil Engineering, University of.
HEC-PrePro Workshop GIS Research Group Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Francisco Olivera HEC-PrePro v. 2.0 Workshop.
Rainfall and Runoff Reading: Haested Section 2.4 Computing Hydrographs.
ERT 246 Hydrology & Water Resources Eng.
DES 606: Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS Watershed Subdivision Theodore G. Cleveland, Ph.D., P.E. 6 OCT 11.
Sanitary Engineering Lecture 4
BUILDING AND RUNNING THE HYDROLOGICAL MODEL
HYDROLOGY Lecture 10 Unit Hydrograph
Routing surface runoff to a basin outlet
S Curves From Mays, 2011, Ground and Surface Water Hydrology.
Computer Modeling/GIS Linkages
Prepared by: Sulyman Khraishe Madhat Z
Approaches to Continental Scale River Flow Routing
Hydrologic Simulation Models
Hydrologic Analysis PART 1
Hydrologic River Routing
GIS FOR HYDROLOGIC DATA DEVELOPMENT FOR DESIGN OF HIGHWAY DRAINAGE FACILITIES by Francisco Olivera and David Maidment Center for Research in Water Resources.
CRWR-PrePro HMS Schematic and Basin File
Hydrograph Computation
From GIS to HMS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center University of Texas at Austin Center for Research in Water Resources Francisco.
Floods and Flood Routing
Flood Routing.
CRWR-PrePro Calculation of Hydrologic Parameters
HEC-HMS Runoff Computation Modeling Direct Runoff with HEC-HMS Empirical models Empirical models - traditional UH models - traditional UH models - a.
Example Determine the 1- hr unit hydrograph for a watershed using the precipitation pattern and runoff hydrograph below. The abstractions have a constant.
Presentation transcript:

CRWR-PrePro Calculation of Hydrologic Parameters Francisco Olivera, Ph.D. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) Water Resources Modeling Using GIS Austin, Texas

Hydrologic Parameters zWatershed yAbstractions and routing method yParameters zStream yRouting method yParameters

Watershed Abstractions and Routing Method zAbstractions: rainfall/runoff transformation ySCS curve number method yInitial loss + constant rate loss zRouting: runoff/flow transformation ySoil Conservation Service (SCS) synthetic unit hydrograph

Watershed Abstractions Soil properties Precipitation (mm/hr) Runoff (mm/hr) Runoff = f(precipitation, soil properties, moisture conditions)

Watershed Routing Runoff (mm/hr) Flow (m 3 /s) Watershed

Watershed Routing Runoff (mm/hr) Flow (m 3 /s) Time Runoff and Flow Flow = f(Runoff, Watershed hydrologic properties) Time

Hydrologic Parameters zWatershed yAbstractions and routing method yParameters zStream yRouting method yParameters

Watershed zArea zAverage curve number zInitial + constant rate loss zLength of longest flow-path zSlope of longest flow path zLag time

Watershed Abstractions Average Curve Number SCS Method Initial + Constant Method Initial Loss (mm) Constant Loss (mm/hr)

Elevation Grid

Flow Length Downstream

Flow Length Upstream

Longest Flow-Path

Flow Length Downstream to the Watershed Outlet

Hydrologic Parameters zFlow length downstream to the sub-basin outlet.

Flow Length Upstream to the Watershed Divide

Hydrologic Parameters zFlow length upstream to the sub-basin divide.  A NODATA cell is defined at the sub-basin outlets before running the flow length function.

Watershed Longest Flow-Path

Hydrologic Parameters zSub-basin longest flow- path. zThe longest flow-path is the geometric locus of the points for which the sum of both flow lengths is a maximum.

Slope of Watershed Longest Flow Path

Hydrologic Parameters t p :sub-basin lag-time (min) L W :length of sub-basin longest flow-path (ft) CN :average Curve Number in sub-basin S :slope of the sub-basin longest flow-path (%)  t: analysis time step (min) zSub-basin lag-time according to the SCS formula:

Watershed Lag-Time (SCS) Flow length upstream and downstream Average Curve Number Length and slope of the longest flow-path Identification of the longest flow-path Lag-time

Hydrologic Parameters t p :sub-basin lag-time (min) L w :length of sub-basin longest flow-path (ft) V w :average velocity sub-basin longest flow-path (m/s)  t: analysis time step (min) zSub-basin lag-time according to 0.6 L/v formula:

Watershed Lag-Time (L/V) Flow length upstream and downstream Longest flow-path average velocity Length of the longest flow-path Lag-time

Hydrologic Parameters zSub-basin parameters: Grid code, area (Km 2 ), unit hydrograph model (SCS), length of longest flow path (m), slope of longest flow path (fraction), average curve number, lag-time (min), baseflow (none).

Hydrologic Parameters zWatershed yAbstractions and routing method yParameters zStream yRouting method yParameters

Routing Method

Pure-Lag Method zFlow is delayed a fixed amount of time t lag. t lag : flow time in the reach I: inflow to the reach Q: outflow from the reach

Muskingum Method zFlow is delayed a fixed amount of time K, and redistributed around its centroid. S: storage in the reach K: flow time in the reach (  t < K <  t/2X ) X: storage parameter I: inflow to the reach Q: outflow from the reach  t: analysis time step

Routing Method Flow time (L s /V s ) L s /V s <  t Muskingum Routing L s /V s >  t Pure Lag Routing L s :length of the stream V s :flow velocity in the stream  t: analysis time step

Hydrologic Parameters zWatershed yAbstractions and routing method yParameters zStream yRouting method yParameters

Hydrologic Parameters t lag :reach lag-time (min) L s :length of reach (m) V s :reach average velocity (m/s) zReach lag-time for Pure Lag routing:

Hydrologic Parameters K :Muskingum parameter K (hr) X :Muskingum parameter X L s :reach length (m) V s :reach average velocity (m/s) n :number of sub-reaches zReach lag-time and number of sub-reaches for Muskingum routing:

Hydrologic Parameters  Pure lag routing for L s /60v s <  t, otherwise Muskingum routing. zReach parameters: Grid code, sub-basin code, length(m), velocity (m/s), routing method (Lag or Muskingum), lag time (min), Muskingum X, Muskingum K (hr), number of sub-reaches.