QGP France 20-23 sept 2010Sanjoy Pal Performances of the tracking Chambers of the ALICE MUON Spectrometer 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cosmic Ray Test of GEM- MPI/TPC in Magnetic Field Hiroshima University Kuroiwa CDC Group Mar
Advertisements

CSC Test Beam Data Analysis Alexander Khodinov and Valeri Tcherniatine.
Study of Large-area GEM Detectors for a Forward Tracker at a Future Electron-Ion Collider Experiment Aiwu Zhang, Vallary Bhopatkar, Marcus Hohlmann Florida.
Kondo GNANVO Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne FL.
Behaviour of MicroMega chambers in magnetic field: analysis of H2 June data Outline: (0) Introduction (1) Data set used and noise filtering (2)Cluster.
5 th Workshop on ALICE Installation and Commissioning April 1 rst & 3 rd, CERN Muon Tracking (MCH) Conclusion of the February/March 08 ALICE COSMIC run.
A New Approach to Cluster Finding and Hit Reconstruction in Cathode Pad Chambers and its Development for the Forward Muon Spectrometer of ALICE A.Zinchenko,
Roberta Arnaldi AFTER meeting, Grenoble 10 May 2012
Update on SBS Back Tracker UVa K. Gnanvo, N. Liyanage, V Nelyubin, K. Saenboonruang, Seth Saher Cross Talk issues with APV25 Electronics Uniformity.
- RHIC, PHENIX PHENIX Pad Chambers - Net-Charge Fluctuations Predictions PHENIX Analysis Comparison to simulations O UTLINE.
Henrik Tydesjö May O UTLINE - The Quark Gluon Plasma - The Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) The PHENIX Experiment - QGP Signals Event-by-Event.
Christine KOURKOUMELIS University of Athens ATLAS Muon Chamber construction in Greece and alignment studies for H  ZZ  4μ decay Como, 8/10/03.
Muon Tracker Overview The PHENIX Muon Arms detect vector mesons decaying into muon pairs, allow the study of the Drell-Yan process, and provide muon detection.
9/11/2007JC Wang1 Track Resolution Scale, assume equal  meas for different planes. HP3 HP4 All 6 measurements. Without leftmost one. Without rightmost.
South Arm FEE Performance Prior to Au run, all FEMs installed and working. Currently, 157 of 168 FEMs read out useful data. = 93.5% operational FEM losses:
1 The CMS Heavy Ion Program Michael Murray Kansas.
LHeC : Muon Systems L. Pontecorvo.
STS Simulations Anna Kotynia 15 th CBM Collaboration Meeting April , 2010, GSI 1.
Performance of the PHENIX Muon Tracking System in Run-2 Ming X. Liu Los Alamos National Lab (for the PHENIX Collaboration) –Detector Commissioning –Detector.
Υ Measurements at PHENIX Shawn Whitaker RHIC/AGS Users’ Meeting June 20, /20/20111Shawn Whitaker - RHIC/AGS Users Meeting.
MuTr HV Optimization RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa 1.
1 Performance of the LHCb VELO Outline LHCb Detector and its performance in Run I LHCb Detector and its performance in Run I LHCb VELO LHCb VELO VELO performance.
Straw spatial resolution (beam test 2007 and 2008) A.Zinchenko, S.Shkarovskiy.
Ivan Vitev & E906 Muon Identifier Status Patrick McGaughey and the muon radiography team E866 Meeting at FNAL June 20-21, 2007 Large Muon Tracker at LANSCE.
Updates on GEMs characterization with APV electronics K. Gnanvo, N. Liyanage, K. Saenboonruang.
The ALICE Muon Spectrometer Andreas Morsch ALICE Collaboration IV International Symposium on LHC Physics and Detectors Fermilab, May
Javier CastilloLHC Alignment Workshop - CERN - 05/09/ Alignment of the ALICE MUON Spectrometer Javier Castillo CEA/Saclay.
RPC detection rate capability ≈ 1/ρ Float-Glass ( Ω-cm) RPC rate capability < Bakelite( Ω-cm) one. New kind of doped glass was developed.
Performance of a Large-Area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System Vallary Bhopatkar M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger,
1 A.Andronic 1, H.Appelshäuser 1, V.Babkin 2, P.Braun-Munzinger 1, S.Chernenko 2, D.Emschernmann 3, C.Garabatos 1, V.Golovatyuk 2, J.Hehner 1, M.Hoppe.
4 th Workshop on ALICE Installation and Commissioning January 16 th & 17 th, CERN Muon Tracking (MUON_TRK, MCH, MTRK) Conclusion of the first ALICE COSMIC.
Anatoli Romaniouk TRT Introduction TRT in ATLAS p. 2-4TRT in ATLAS p. 2-4 TRT design p. 5-7TRT design p. 5-7 TRT operation principles p. 8-9TRT operation.
The 21st International Conference on Ultrarelativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions, March 30 – April 4, Knoxville, TN Results from cosmics and First LHC.
The STAR FGT upgrade program Xuan Li for the STAR Collaboration Temple University STAR 1p+A physics at RHIC workshopXuan Li (Temple University)
Measurement of J/  -> e + e - and  C -> J/  +   in dAu collisions at PHENIX/RHIC A. Lebedev, ISU 1 Fall 2003 DNP Meeting Alexandre Lebedev, Iowa State.
1 Pad Chamber Simulation Results for Muon Trigger Upgrade 10/13/2003 Muon Trigger Upgrade meeting.
Performance of the PHENIX Muon Identifier Introduction Calibration with cosmic rays Performance in Au+Au collisions Summary Hiroki Sato, Kyoto University.
The RICH Detectors of the LHCb Experiment Carmelo D’Ambrosio (CERN) on behalf of the LHCb RICH Collaboration LHCb RICH1 and RICH2 The photon detector:
Test of the GEM Front Tracker for the SBS Spectrometer at Jefferson Lab F. Mammoliti, V. Bellini, M. Capogni, E. Cisbani, E. Jensen, P. Musico, F. Noto,
Muon Tracker Responsibilities This Year South arm commissioning through this year’s run Analysis Software oversight and development North Arm station 2.
Mauro Iodice INFN Roma (Italy) Hall A Collaboration Meeting - JLAB May 18, 2004.
PERFORMANCE OF THE PHENIX SOUTH MUON ARM Kenneth F. Read Oak Ridge National Lab & University of Tennessee for the PHENIX Collaboration Quark Matter 2002.
Readout Architecture for MuCh Introduction of MuCh Layout of Much ( proposed several schemes) Read ASIC’s Key features Basic Readout chain ROC Block Diagram.
2002 LHC days in Split Sandra Horvat 08 – 12 October, Ruđer Bošković Institute, Zagreb Max-Planck-Institute for Physics, Munich Potential is here...
Beam Test of a Large-Area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System Vallary Bhopatkar M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger, A.
1 HBD Commissioning Itzhak Tserruya DC meeting, BNL December 13, 2006 Progress from October 3 to November 28, 2006.
Performance and Early Results from the Muon Tracking System of Rusty Towell of Abilene Christian University for the PHENIX collaboration First Joint Meeting.
Overview of PHENIX Muon Tracker Data Analysis PHENIX Muon Tracker Muon Tracker Software Muon Tracker Database Muon Event Display Performance Muon Reconstruction.
July 27, 2002CMS Heavy Ions Bolek Wyslouch1 Heavy Ion Physics with the CMS Experiment at the Large Hadron Collider Bolek Wyslouch MIT for the CMS Collaboration.
Javier Castillo3rd LHC Alignment Workshop - CERN - 15/06/ Status of the ALICE MUON Spectrometer Alignment Strategies & Results from Cosmic run Javier.
Station-4 MuID System: Status Ming X. Liu Los Alamos National Lab 1/7/091E906 Collaboration Meeting.
Siena, May A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /1 Performance of BIL tracking chambers for the ATLAS muon spectrometer A.Baroncelli,
Plots of RPC performance G. Cattani, University of Rome “Tor Vergata” & INFN Roma 2 on behalf of ATLAS Muon Collaboration.
Anna Kotynia.  8 stations  fully based on micro-strip detectors Tracking detector: -low-mass detector -full azimuthal angle coverage -polar angle coverage:from.
Precision Drift Tube Detectors for High Counting Rates O. Kortner, H. Kroha, F. Legger, R. Richter Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, Munich, Germany A. Engl,
Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes, France Dimuon Production from Au-Au Collisions at Ming Xiong Liu Los Alamos National Laboratory (for the PHENIX.
Operation, performance and upgrade of the CMS Resistive Plate Chamber system at LHC Marcello Abbrescia Physics Department - University of Bari & INFN,
Design and performance of the ALICE Muon Spectrometer
Analysis of LumiCal data from the 2010 testbeam
Dimuon Spectrometer : Status of the tracking chambers
FEE for TPC MPD__NICA JINR
MDT second coordinate readout: status and perspectives
Entrance Muon Counter (EMC)
The Silicon Drift Detector of the ALICE Experiment
Gaseous Beam Position Detectors, with Low Cost and Low Material Budget
Quarkonium production in p-p and A-A collisions: ALICE status report
Bi-Weekly Meeting 2004/09/08 Susumu Oda
11th Pisa meeting on advanced detectors
Quarkonium production in p-p and A-A collisions: ALICE status report
Engineering Design Review
Presentation transcript:

QGP France sept 2010Sanjoy Pal Performances of the tracking Chambers of the ALICE MUON Spectrometer 1

QGP France sept 2010Sanjoy Pal ALICE muon Spectrometer x y z muon Spectrometer 2 Physics Goals : Studying heavy quark production via their muonic and semi-muonic decay in Forward rapidity (-4 < y < -2.5) Large quarkonia acceptance down to p T  0 Measurement of Quarkonia production - as a function of centrality (ZDC) - as a function of p T, rapidity St3, St4 and St5 Slats type St1 and St2 St1 and St2 Quadrants type Muon Tracking System: Five stations Two detection planes for each station. Detection plane consists of Multi wire proportional chambers with bi-cathode pad readout: bending and non-bending. Expected Spatial resolution below 100  m in the bending plane, around 700 µm in the non-bending

QGP France sept 2010Sanjoy Pal 3 Muon Tracking System Muon Tracking System: The total area of covers about 100 m 2 Total number of readout pads about 1 million Gas Mixure : Ar + CO2 (20%) High Voltage : 1650 Volt Wire diameter : 20 µm Wire pitch : 2 mm for St1 : 2.5 mm for St 2,3,4 & 5 Anode cathode gap : 2 mm for St1 : 2.5 mm for St 2,3,4 & 5 Pad width y direction for Bending Cathode 4 mm for St1 5 mm for St 2,3,4 & 5 Pad width x direction for Non-bending Cathode 6 mm for St1 7.5 mm for St 2,3,4 & 5 The chamber thickness : 0.03 X0 Muon Dipole Magnet (Bx) : B=0.7 T, ∫Bdl ~ 3 Tm

QGP France sept Sanjoy Pal Readout buspatches configuration for the NonBending plane in red buspatchs which are present in configuration In white buspatchs which are removed from configuration

QGP France sept Sanjoy Pal Readout buspatches configuration for the Bending plane 5% of the Read out Channel are removed form configuration

QGP France sept Sanjoy Pal Pedestal Bending (max 500 ADC Channel) in black MANU`s which are also dead

QGP France sept Sanjoy Pal Pedestal NonBending (max 500 ADC Channel)

QGP France sept Sanjoy Pal Noise Bending (max 5 ADC Channel) 1 ADC Ch ~ 1000 e Noise below 3 ADC Ch for most of the read out Channel and average around 1.5 Ch which is very good

QGP France sept Sanjoy Pal Noise Non Bending (max 5 ADC Channel) Noise is higher compare to bending plane but it is less critical

Zero-Suppression 10 QGP France sept 2010 Sanjoy Pal The pedestal and noise per readout channel  give threshold for 0-suppression : critical parameter ! Mean and sigma values of pedestals for each readout channel are calculated by DA over 400 event //=========================================================================== // NEW File calculated by makeped //=========================================================================== // * Statistics : 400 // * # of MANUS : // * # of channels : // // //format : // // BUS_PATCH MANU_ADDR CHANNEL MEAN SIGMA // … Flat ASCII file Zero-Suppression is performed by FEE (MARC). Pedestal and noise distribution for one plane of a quadrant

QGP France sept Sanjoy Pal High Voltage configuration 1400 V Nominal HV = 1650 volt 1500 V

Total Cluster charge distributions in pp run 2010 Station 1 have relatively High gain Station 2 have relatively low gain compare to Station 3, 4 & 5 QGP France sept Sanjoy Pal Absolute values of gain are not important for position resolution calculation

No of pad hits in the B plane involved in a cluster for each chamber QGP France sept Sanjoy Pal 3 Pad hit in bending direction is needed for nominal position resolution

QGP France sept Sanjoy Pal No of pad hits in the NB plane involved in a cluster for each chamber

Charge correlation between two cathodes QGP France sept Sanjoy Pal Station 1 Station 2 Station 3Station 4Station 5

QGP France sept 2010Sanjoy Pal 16 Occupancy Bending (max 0.01) Mean Occupancy ~ 0.002

QGP France sept Sanjoy Pal Occupancy NonBending (max 0.01)

Condition to reconstruct a track : one hit among chambers 1 & 2. one hit among chambers 3 & 4. one hit among chambers 5 & 6. three hits among chambers 7, 8, 9 & 10. Total tracking efficiency for LHC10e :  Total = 93.7 ± 0.9 % 18 QGP France sept 2010Sanjoy Pal Chamber Efficiency

QGP France sept 2010Sanjoy Pal Summary We have a quite stable read-out configuration with a busy time most often less than 500 μs ; baseline is 330 μs. We have a quite stable HV configuration. Excellent behavior of all the Muon Chambers was achieved during pp run Tracking efficiency ~95% Ready for HI data taking. 19