Probabilistic Hurricane Storm Surge (P-Surge) Arthur Taylor Meteorological Development Laboratory, National Weather Service January 20, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Probabilistic Guidance for Hurricane Storm Surge (P-surge) Arthur Taylor and Bob Glahn Meteorological Development Laboratory, National Weather Service.
Advertisements

Andrea Schumacher, CIRA/CSU Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS/StAR Dan Brown and Ed Rappaport, NHC.
PRESENTS: FORECASTING FOR OPERATIONS AND DESIGN February 16 th 2011 – Aberdeen.
National Weather Service SLOSH S ea, L ake, and L ake, and O verland O verland S urges from S urges from H urricanes H urricanes Part 1: W. Shaffer / MDL.
WRC HURRICANE DAMAGE POTENTIAL SCALE GULF OF MEXICO HURRICANES PAST – PRESENT – FUTURE MMS ITM January 6, 2009 Jill F. Hasling, President Certified Consulting.
NOAA Hurricane Storm Surge NOAA Hurricane Storm Surge Judith Gray National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Oceanic and Atmospheric Research Atlantic.
The Storm Surge Toolkit Jamie Rhome Storm Surge Specialist/Team Lead National Hurricane Center Jamie Rhome Storm Surge Specialist/Team Lead National Hurricane.
Motivation The Carolinas has had a tremendous residential and commercial investment in coastal areas during the past 10 years. However rapid development.
Jeopardy Composition of Hurricanes Locating Storms Type of Storms Hurricane Categories Organizations Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Q $100 Q $200.
CHAPTER 5: PREDICTING STORM SURGE LESSONS FROM HURRICANE IKE.
Applications of Ensemble Tropical Cyclone Products to National Hurricane Center Forecasts and Warnings Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR, Ft. Collins, CO.
NOAA’s National Weather Service: Probabilistic Storm Surge (P-Surge) Arthur Taylor, Nicole P. Kurkowski MDL / OST July 26, 2006.
Session 10: Hurricane Storm Surge Modeling and Analysis 1 Hurricane Storm Surge Modeling.
Storm Surge Products John Cole Warning Coordination Meteorologist NWS Morehead City/Newport NC Acknowledgements: Jamie Rhome and Rick Knabb (NHC), Mark.
HFIP Ensemble Products Subgroup Sept 2, 2011 Conference Call 1.
Chapter 9: Weather Forecasting Acquisition of weather information Acquisition of weather information Weather forecasting tools Weather forecasting tools.
14-April Univ of Delaware Philadelphia Engineer District 1 Delmarva Hurricane Evacuation Study (HES) Jason F. Miller, P.E. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
CS 8751 ML & KDDEvaluating Hypotheses1 Sample error, true error Confidence intervals for observed hypothesis error Estimators Binomial distribution, Normal.
EG1204: Earth Systems: an introduction Meteorology and Climate Lecture 7 Climate: prediction & change.
WHY IKE A CATEGORY 2 HURRICANE WAS SO DEVASTATING THE FREEMAN HURRICANE DAMAGE POTENTIAL SCALE 2011 Hurricane Outlook Jill F. Hasling, President Certified.
MOS Performance MOS significantly improves on the skill of model output. National Weather Service verification statistics have shown a narrowing gap between.
Ensemble Post-Processing and it’s Potential Benefits for the Operational Forecaster Michael Erickson and Brian A. Colle School of Marine and Atmospheric.
A Regression Model for Ensemble Forecasts David Unger Climate Prediction Center.
National Weather Service – Newport/Morehead City NC NHC/WFO Tropical Products…and What’s New for 2012 WFO Newport Hurricane Awareness Seminar July 17,
Hydrologic Statistics
NOAA’s CENTER for OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PRODUCTS and SERVICES Center for Operational Products and Services (CO-OPS) Storm QuickLook Product Paul Fanelli.
There are no two things in the world that are exactly the same… And if there was, we would say they’re different. - unknown.
December 5, 2012Introduction to Artificial Intelligence Lecture 20: Neural Network Application Design III 1 Example I: Predicting the Weather Since the.
Improvements in Deterministic and Probabilistic Tropical Cyclone Wind Predictions: A Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Update Mark DeMaria and Ray Zehr NOAA/NESDIS/ORA,
Storm Surge Panel Discussion Orlando, Florida February 10, 2010 Ron Nash – Director, ISCM.
Update on Storm Surge at NCEP Dr. Rick Knabb, Director, National Hurricane Center and representing numerous partners 21 January 2014.
Improvements in Deterministic and Probabilistic Tropical Cyclone Surface Wind Predictions Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Status Report Mark DeMaria NOAA/NESDIS/ORA,
Office of Coast Survey NOAA’s Storm Surge Modeling Capabilities Jesse C. Feyen Storm Surge Roadmap Portfolio Manager.
Guidance on Intensity Guidance Kieran Bhatia, David Nolan, Mark DeMaria, Andrea Schumacher IHC Presentation This project is supported by the.
Continued Development of Tropical Cyclone Wind Probability Products John A. Knaff – Presenting CIRA/Colorado State University and Mark DeMaria NOAA/NESDIS.
Pablo Santos WFO Miami, FL Mark DeMaria NOAA/NESDIS David Sharp WFO Melbourne, FL rd IHC St Petersburg, FL PS/DS “HURRICANE CONDITIONS EXPECTED.”
In this study, HWRF model simulations for two events were evaluated by analyzing the mean sea level pressure, precipitation, wind fields and hydrometeors.
NOAA’s National Weather Service: Probabilistic Storm Surge (P-Surge) Arthur Taylor, Bob Glahn, Wilson Shaffer MDL / OST November 30, 2005.
An Improved Wind Probability Program: A Year 2 Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Update Mark DeMaria and John Knaff, NOAA/NESDIS, Fort Collins, CO Stan Kidder,
Probabilistic Hurricane Storm Surge (P-Surge) Arthur Taylor MDL / OST December 4, 2006.
Storm Surge Modeling and Forecasting LTJG Jeffrey Pereira, NOAA Storm Surge Unit National Hurricane Center NOAA Storm Surge Workshop May 2011 LTJG Jeffrey.
Importance to the Off-Shore Energy Industry James Done Chad Teer, Wikipedia NCAR Earth System Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research NCAR.
Managerial Economics Demand Estimation & Forecasting.
Caribbean Disaster Mitigation Project Caribbean Institute for Meteorology and Hydrology Tropical Cyclones Characteristics and Forecasting Horace H. P.
Office of Coast Survey Improving NOAA’s Capacity to Address Coastal Inundation Events Jesse C. Feyen, Ph.D. Storm Surge Roadmap Portfolio Manager Acting.
61 st IHC, New Orleans, LA Verification of the Monte Carlo Tropical Cyclone Wind Speed Probabilities: A Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Update John A.
Kelly Godsey and Jeffry Evans National Weather Service Tallahassee, Florida.
Model Post Processing. Model Output Can Usually Be Improved with Post Processing Can remove systematic bias Can produce probabilistic information from.
Forecasting Hurricane Storm Surge on the Mississippi River David Reed Bob Stucky National Weather Service Lower Mississippi River Forecast Center.
Development of Probabilistic Forecast Guidance at CIRA Andrea Schumacher (CIRA) Mark DeMaria and John Knaff (NOAA/NESDIS/ORA) Workshop on AWIPS Tools for.
Tropical Storm Isaac Briefing August 26, :00 CDT Weather Forecast Office Slidell, LA.
1 Vision for Marine and Coastal Services Digital Products Jamie Vavra Marine and Coastal Weather Services Branch Office of Climate, Water and Weather Services.
Sampling Theory and Some Important Sampling Distributions.
Improved Statistical Intensity Forecast Models: A Joint Hurricane Testbed Year 2 Project Update Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS, Fort Collins, CO John A. Knaff,
The Lake Pontchartrain Forecast System Rick Luettich Jason G. Fleming Institute of Marine Sciences University of North Carolina.
NOAA Data & Catastrophe Modeling Prepared by Steve Bowen of Impact Forecasting September 16, 2015.
2015 Production Suite Review: Report from NHC 2015 Production Suite Review: Report from NHC Eric S. Blake, Richard J. Pasch, Andrew Penny NCEP Production.
Enrica Bellone, Jessica Turner, Alessandro Bonazzi 2 nd IBTrACS Workshop.
Andrea Schumacher, CIRA/CSU Mark DeMaria and John Knaff, NOAA/NESDIS/StAR.
Don Resio, Senior Scientist, US Army ERDC-CHL Data Needs for Coastal Storm Surge Estimation IbTrACS Meeting Honolulu, HI April 12, 2011.
DOWNSCALING GLOBAL MEDIUM RANGE METEOROLOGICAL PREDICTIONS FOR FLOOD PREDICTION Nathalie Voisin, Andy W. Wood, Dennis P. Lettenmaier University of Washington,
VERIFICATION OF A DOWNSCALING SEQUENCE APPLIED TO MEDIUM RANGE METEOROLOGICAL PREDICTIONS FOR GLOBAL FLOOD PREDICTION Nathalie Voisin, Andy W. Wood and.
Morris Bender, Timothy Marchok (GFDL) Isaac Ginis, Biju Thomas, Il-Ju Moon (URI) Aleksandr Falkovich (EMC/NCEP) 2006 GFDL HURRICANE MODEL UPGRADES.
Maritza De La Luz. Category One: Winds from 119 to 153 km (74 to 95 mi.) per hour. No damage to building structures. Some damage to construction signs.
Extra-Tropical Storm Surge (ETSS 2.0) Pre-Implementation Briefing College Park, MD May 14, 2015 Arthur Taylor, Huiqing Liu and Ryan Schuster MDL/NWS/NOAA.
Quantifying uncertainty in volcanic ash forecasts
Storm Surge Forecasting Practices, Tools for Emergency Managers, A Probabilistic Storm Surge Model Based on Ensembles and Past Error Distributions.
Storm Surge Modeling and Forecasting
Storm Surge Definitions:
Verification of Tropical Cyclone Forecasts
Presentation transcript:

Probabilistic Hurricane Storm Surge (P-Surge) Arthur Taylor Meteorological Development Laboratory, National Weather Service January 20, 2008

Probabilistic Storm Surge 2008 Introduction The Sea, Lake, and Overland Surges from Hurricanes (SLOSH) model is the NWS’s operational hurricane storm surge model. The NWS uses composites of its results to predict potential storm surge flooding for evacuation planningThe NWS uses composites of its results to predict potential storm surge flooding for evacuation planning National Hurricane Center (NHC) begins operational SLOSH runs 24 hours before forecast hurricane landfallNational Hurricane Center (NHC) begins operational SLOSH runs 24 hours before forecast hurricane landfall

Probabilistic Storm Surge 2008 Introduction NHC’s operational SLOSH runs are based on a single NHC forecast track and its associated parameters. When provided accurate input, SLOSH results are within 20% of high water marks.When provided accurate input, SLOSH results are within 20% of high water marks. Track and intensity prediction errors cause large errors in SLOSH forecasts and can overwhelm the SLOSH results.Track and intensity prediction errors cause large errors in SLOSH forecasts and can overwhelm the SLOSH results.

Probabilistic Storm Surge 2008 Hurricane Ivan: A case study

Probabilistic Storm Surge 2008 Probabilistic Storm Surge Methodology Use an ensemble of SLOSH runs to create probabilistic storm surge (p-surge) Intended to be used operationally so it is based on NHC’s official advisory.Intended to be used operationally so it is based on NHC’s official advisory. P-surge’s ensemble perturbations are determined by statistics of past performance of the advisories.P-surge’s ensemble perturbations are determined by statistics of past performance of the advisories. P-surge uses a representative storm for each portion of the error distribution space rather than a random samplingP-surge uses a representative storm for each portion of the error distribution space rather than a random sampling

Probabilistic Storm Surge 2008 Input Parameters for SLOSH A single run of SLOSH requires the following parameters: Track (Location and Forward Speed)Track (Location and Forward Speed) PressurePressure Radius of Maximum Winds (Rmax)Radius of Maximum Winds (Rmax)

Probabilistic Storm Surge 2008 Errors used by P-surge The ensemble is based on distributions of the following: Cross track error (impacts Location)Cross track error (impacts Location) Along track error (impacts Forward Speed)Along track error (impacts Forward Speed) Intensity error (impacts Pressure)Intensity error (impacts Pressure) Rmax errorRmax error

Probabilistic Storm Surge 2008 P-surge Error Distributions The error distributions for cross track, along track, and intensity are determined by: Calculating the regression of the yearly mean errorCalculating the regression of the yearly mean error Assuming a normal error distributionAssuming a normal error distribution Determining the standard deviation (sigma) based on:Determining the standard deviation (sigma) based on:

Probabilistic Storm Surge 2008 Regression of Yearly Mean Error To calculate the yearly mean error: The forecasts from the advisories were compared with observations, represented by the 0 hour information from the corresponding later advisories.The forecasts from the advisories were compared with observations, represented by the 0 hour information from the corresponding later advisories. The errors were averaged by yearThe errors were averaged by year Regression curves were calculated and plotted for each forecast hour (12, 24, 36, …)Regression curves were calculated and plotted for each forecast hour (12, 24, 36, …) A mean error value was determined from where the regression curve crossed a chosen year.A mean error value was determined from where the regression curve crossed a chosen year.

Probabilistic Storm Surge 2008 Example of 24-hour Cross Track Error Regression Plot The 2004 error regression value 34.8 was chosen as the 24-hour mean cross track error

Probabilistic Storm Surge 2008 Rmax Error Distributions For Rmax, we can’t assume a normal distribution since the error is bounded. To calculate the Rmax error distributions: Group the values in bins according to:Group the values in bins according to: The forecasts from the advisories were matched to the 0 hour estimate, which was treated as an observationThe forecasts from the advisories were matched to the 0 hour estimate, which was treated as an observation The probability density function (PDF) and cumulative density function (CDF) were plotted for each bin and forecast hour (12, 24, 36, …)The probability density function (PDF) and cumulative density function (CDF) were plotted for each bin and forecast hour (12, 24, 36, …) Since we chose to use 3 storm sizes (small 30%, medium 40%, large 30%) we determined the 0.15, 0.5, and 0.85 values of the CDF for each bin and forecast hour.Since we chose to use 3 storm sizes (small 30%, medium 40%, large 30%) we determined the 0.15, 0.5, and 0.85 values of the CDF for each bin and forecast hour.

PDF for Rmax Errors Bin 0-3

.85 = small size.50 = medium size.15 = large size CDF for Rmax Errors Bin 0-3

Probabilistic Storm Surge 2008 Example: Katrina Advisory 23

Probabilistic Storm Surge 2008 Cross Track Variations To vary the cross track storms, we consider the coverage and the spacing. Chose to cover 90% of the area under the normal distribution. This was standard deviations to the left and right of the central trackThis was standard deviations to the left and right of the central track Chose to space the storms Rmax apart at the 48 hour forecast. Storm surge is typically highest one Rmax to the right of the landfall point. So for proper coverage, we wanted the storms within Rmax of each other.Storm surge is typically highest one Rmax to the right of the landfall point. So for proper coverage, we wanted the storms within Rmax of each other.

Probabilistic Storm Surge 2008 Example: Cross Track Error

Probabilistic Storm Surge 2008 Varying the Other Parameters: Size: Small (30%), Medium (40%), Large (30%) Forward Speed: Fast (30%), Medium (40%), Slow (30%) Intensity: Strong (30%), Medium (40%), Weak (30%)

Probabilistic Storm Surge 2008 Assigning Weights This is repeated for other two dimensions (Rmax weights, Intensity weights) A representative storm is run for each cell in the 4 dimensional (Cross, Along, Rmax, Intensity) error space. Actual number of Cross Track weights depends on Rmax. Cross Track Weight 12.43%23.25%28.65%23.25%12.43% Along Track Slow 30% 3.729%6.975%8.595%6.975%3.729% Along Track Medium 40% 4.972%9.300%11.460%9.30%4.972% Along Track Fast 30% 3.729%6.975%8.595%6.975%3.729%

Probabilistic Storm Surge 2008 Putting it all together 1)Calculate initial SLOSH input from NHC advisory 2)Determine which size distribution to use, based on the size-bin of the storm. Iterate over the size 3)Calculate the cross track spacing, a function of the size. Iterate over the cross tracks, stepping by the spacing and covering standard deviations to left and right 4)Iterate over the along tracks, creating slow, medium and fast storms 5)Iterate over the intensity, creating weak, medium, and strong storms. 6)Assign a weight to the storm (cross track weight * along track weight * intensity weight * size weight) 7)Perform all SLOSH runs

Probabilistic Storm Surge 2008 Product 1: Probability of exceeding X feet To calculate the probability of exceeding X feet, we look at the maximum each cell in each SLOSH run attained. If that value exceeds X, we add the weight associated with that SLOSH run to the total.If that value exceeds X, we add the weight associated with that SLOSH run to the total. Otherwise we don’t increase the total.Otherwise we don’t increase the total. The total weight is considered the probability of exceeding X feet.The total weight is considered the probability of exceeding X feet. Example: 5 storms have weights of 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.2, 0.1, and the first 2 exceeded X feet in a given cell. The probability of exceeding X feet in that cell is: = 30% = 30%

Probabilistic Storm Surge 2008 Katrina Adv 23: Probability >= 5 feet of storm surge

Probabilistic Storm Surge 2008 Product 2: Height exceeded by X percent of the ensemble storms. Determine what height to choose in a cell so that there is a specified probability of exceeding it. For each cell, sort the heights of each SLOSH run.For each cell, sort the heights of each SLOSH run. From the tallest height downward, add up the weights associated with each SLOSH run until the given probability is exceeded.From the tallest height downward, add up the weights associated with each SLOSH run until the given probability is exceeded. The answer is the height associated with the last weight added.The answer is the height associated with the last weight added. Example: 5 storms have surge values of 3, 6, 5, 2, 4 feet and respective weights of.1,.2,.4,.2,.1. Make ordered pairs of the numbers: (3,.1), (6,.2), (5,.4), (2,.2), (4,.1)Make ordered pairs of the numbers: (3,.1), (6,.2), (5,.4), (2,.2), (4,.1) Sort by surge height: (6,.2), (5,.4), (4,.1), (3,.1), (2,.2)Sort by surge height: (6,.2), (5,.4), (4,.1), (3,.1), (2,.2) Height exceeded by 60% of storms = 4(.6 < )Height exceeded by 60% of storms = 4(.6 < )

Probabilistic Storm Surge 2008 Katrina Adv 23: 10% of ensemble storms exceed this height

Probabilistic Storm Surge 2008 Is it Statistically Reliable? If we forecast 20% chance of storm surge exceeding 5 feet, does surge exceed 5 feet 20% of the time? Create forecasts for various projections and thresholdsCreate forecasts for various projections and thresholds Get a matching storm surge observationGet a matching storm surge observation Problem: Insufficient observations Observations are made where there has been surge, so there is a bias toward higher values.Observations are made where there has been surge, so there is a bias toward higher values. Storm surge observations contaminated by waves and astronomical tide issues.Storm surge observations contaminated by waves and astronomical tide issues. Number of hurricanes making landfall is relatively small.Number of hurricanes making landfall is relatively small. Result: 340 observations for 11 Storms from

Probabilistic Storm Surge 2008 Point Observations 11 Storms (340 Observations): Dennis 05, Katrina 05, Wilma 05, Charley 04, Frances 04, Ivan 04, Jeanne 04, Isabel 03, Lili 02, Floyd 99, Georges 98Dennis 05, Katrina 05, Wilma 05, Charley 04, Frances 04, Ivan 04, Jeanne 04, Isabel 03, Lili 02, Floyd 99, Georges 98 OF THE 340 OBSERVATIONS, 2.35% (8/340) ARE < 2 FEET 16.18% (55/340) ARE < 5 FEET 35.00% (119/340)ARE < 7 FEET 61.18% (208/340)ARE < 10 FEET STORM OBS % OF TOTAL OBS Katrina % Ivan % Isabel % Lili % Floyd % Georges % Dennis % Wilma % Charley % Jeanne % Frances %

>5 ft Forecasts (Point) 12hr 48hr36hr 24hr

>7 ft Forecasts (Point) 12hr 48hr36hr 24hr

> 10 ft Forecasts (Point) 12hr 48hr36hr 24hr

Probabilistic Storm Surge 2008 Gridded Analysis In order to deal with the paucity of observations, we wanted to use an analysis field as observations. Used SLOSH hindcast runs. NHC used best historical information for inputNHC used best historical information for input Given accurate input, model results are within 20% of high water marks.Given accurate input, model results are within 20% of high water marks.Advantage: Observation at every grid point (on the order of 10 6 )Observation at every grid point (on the order of 10 6 ) Observations are made where there is little surge.Observations are made where there is little surge.Disadvantage: Used same model in analysis as we did in p-surge method.Used same model in analysis as we did in p-surge method.

>5 ft Forecasts (Gridded) 12hr 48hr36hr 24hr

>7 ft Forecasts (Gridded) 12hr 48hr36hr 24hr

>10 ft Forecasts (Gridded) 12hr 48hr36hr 24hr

Probabilistic Storm Surge 2008 Where can you access our product? When is it available? Beginning when the NHC issues a hurricane watch or warning for the continental USBeginning when the NHC issues a hurricane watch or warning for the continental US Available approx. 1-2 hours after the advisory release time.Available approx. 1-2 hours after the advisory release time.

Probabilistic Storm Surge 2008 Current Development We were “experimental” in 2007, and plan on becoming “operational” in 2008.We were “experimental” in 2007, and plan on becoming “operational” in We have added the data to the NDGD (National Digital Guidance Database), and are now working on delivering the data to AWIPS.We have added the data to the NDGD (National Digital Guidance Database), and are now working on delivering the data to AWIPS. We are developing more training material.We are developing more training material. We are updating the error statistics used in our calculations based on the 2007 storm season, and will continue to investigate the reliability diagrams.We are updating the error statistics used in our calculations based on the 2007 storm season, and will continue to investigate the reliability diagrams.

Probabilistic Storm Surge 2008 Future Development We would like to: Include probability over a time range, both incremental and cumulative.Include probability over a time range, both incremental and cumulative. Allow interaction with the data in a manner similar to the SLOSH Display program.Allow interaction with the data in a manner similar to the SLOSH Display program. Investigate its applicability to Tropical storms.Investigate its applicability to Tropical storms. Add gridded astronomical tides to forecast probabilistic total water levels.Add gridded astronomical tides to forecast probabilistic total water levels.