Lecture 4 Four transport modelling stages with emphasis on public transport (hands on training) Dr. Muhammad Adnan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THURSTON REGION MULTIMODAL TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL IMPLEMENTATION IN EMME/2 - Presentation at the 15th International EMME/2 Users Group Conference.
Advertisements

Using the Parkride2.mac Macro to Model Park and Ride Demand in the Puget Sound Region 22 nd International Emme Users Conference September 15-16, 2011,
Modal split to be estimated on an interzonal basis.
A Synthetic Environment to Evaluate Alternative Trip Distribution Models Xin Ye Wen Cheng Xudong Jia Civil Engineering Department California State Polytechnic.
Mode Choice Lecture 10 Norman W. Garrick. Mode Choice The introduction of congestion charging in London in 2003 is one example of a situation where mode.
Transportation leadership you can trust. FDOT Systems Planning White Paper A Recommended Approach to Delineating Traffic Analysis Zones in Florida.
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2014 Lecture 07
CE 254 Transportation Engineering
What is the Model??? A Primer on Transportation Demand Forecasting Models Shawn Turner Theo Petritsch Keith Lovan Lisa Aultman-Hall.
Norman W. Garrick Mode Choice The introduction of congestion charging in London in 2003 is one example of a situation where mode choice modeling is needed.
GEOG 111 & 211A Transportation Planning Traffic Assignment.
REVISION. Sample Question The sample questions for this year. Describe briefly the classic transport model, explaining the four stages of the model. [10]
Chapter 4 1 Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply 1.List the four steps of transportation demand analysis 2.List the four steps of travel.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
Sequential Demand Forecasting Models CTC-340. Travel Behavior 1. Decision to travel for a given purpose –People don’t travel without reason 2. The choice.
CE 2710 Transportation Engineering
Trip Generation Input: Socioeconomic Data Land Use Data Output:
GEOG 111/211A Transportation Planning UTPS (Review from last time) Urban Transportation Planning System –Also known as the Four - Step Process –A methodology.
Lec 20, Ch.11: Transportation Planning Process (objectives)
Discrete Choice Models for Modal Split Overview. Outline n General procedure for model application n Basic assumptions in Random Utility Model n Uncertainty.
Norman W. Garrick CTUP. Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers.
Lec 15 LU, Part 1: Basics and simple LU models (ch6.1 & 2 (A), ch (C1) Get a general idea of urban planning theories (from rading p (A)
1 The Four-step Travel Model GEOG 111 & 211A – Fall 2004 October 14.
CEE 320 Fall 2008 Transportation Planning and Travel Demand Forecasting CEE 320 Anne Goodchild.
Norman W. Garrick Trip Assignment Trip assignment is the forth step of the FOUR STEP process It is used to determining how much traffic will use each link.
Planning Process ► Early Transport Planning  Engineering-oriented  1944, First “ O-D ” study  Computational advances helped launch new era in planning.
TRIP ASSIGNMENT.
Interfacing Regional Model with Statewide Model to Improve Regional Commercial Vehicle Travel Forecasting Bing Mei, P.E. Joe Huegy, AICP Institute for.
GEOG 111/211A Transportation Planning Trip Distribution Additional suggested reading: Chapter 5 of Ortuzar & Willumsen, third edition November 2004.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW Denver Regional Council of Governments June 24, 2011.
Transportation Planning and Traffic Estimation CE 453 Lecture 5.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
Transport Modelling– An overview of the four modeling stages
Transit Estimation and Mode Split CE 451/551 Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 7.
Trip Generation Input: Output: Socioeconomic Data Land Use Data Trip Ends by trip purpose.
Some network flow problems in urban road networks Michael Zhang Civil and Environmental Engineering University of California Davis.
Characteristics of Weekend Travel in the City of Calgary: Towards a Model of Weekend Travel Demand JD Hunt, University of Calgary DM Atkins, City of Calgary.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 18: Demand Forecasting.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Trip Distribution CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Regional Traffic Simulation/Assignment Model for Evaluation of Transit Performance and Asset Utilization April 22, 2003 Athanasios Ziliaskopoulos Elaine.
Transportation Planning, Transportation Demand Analysis Land Use-Transportation Interaction Transportation Planning Framework Transportation Demand Analysis.
Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers or vehicles that will use.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Transportation leadership you can trust. TRB Planning Applications Conference May 18, 2009 Houston, TX A Recommended Approach to Delineating Traffic Analysis.
Ying Chen, AICP, PTP, Parsons Brinckerhoff Ronald Eash, PE, Parsons Brinckerhoff Mary Lupa, AICP, Parsons Brinckerhoff 13 th TRB Transportation Planning.
FDOT Transit Office Modeling Initiatives The Transit Office has undertaken a number of initiatives in collaboration with the Systems Planning Office and.
Transportation Engineering (CIVTREN) notes of AM Fillone, DLSU-Manila
Planning Applications Conference, Reno, NV, May Impact of Crowding on Rail Ridership: Sydney Metro Experience and Forecasting Approach William Davidson,
How Does Your Model Measure Up Presented at TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference by Phil Shapiro Frank Spielberg VHB May, 2007.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to 12th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference presented by Arun Kuppam, Cambridge.
an Iowa State University center SIMPCO Traffic Modeling Workshop Presented by: Iowa Department of Transportation and Center for Transportation Research.
May 2009TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference 1 PATHBUILDER TESTS USING 2007 DALLAS ON-BOARD SURVEY Hua Yang, Arash Mirzaei, Kathleen.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Florida Transit Modeling Workshop presented by Thomas Rossi Cambridge Systematics, Inc. April 8,
A Tour-Based Urban Freight Transportation Model Based on Entropy Maximization Qian Wang, Assistant Professor Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental.
Enlarging the Options in the Strategy-based Transit Assignment TRB Applications Conference Reno 2011 Isabelle Constantin and Michael Florian INRO.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting, Ch. 6 (152054A) Trip Distribution.
An AQ Assessment Tool for Local Land Use Decisio ns 13 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 9, 2011 Reno, Nevada Mark Filipi, AICP.
CE Urban Transportation Planning and Management Iowa State University Calibration and Adjustment Techniques, Part 1 Source: Calibration and Adjustment.
Generated Trips and their Implications for Transport Modelling using EMME/2 Marwan AL-Azzawi Senior Transport Planner PDC Consultants, UK Also at Napier.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Traffic Assignment CE331 Transportation Engineering.
CEE 320 Winter 2006 Transportation Planning and Travel Demand Forecasting CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Transportation Planning Asian Institute of Technology
Transportation Planning Asian Institute of Technology
Karen Tsang Bureau of Transport Statistics Department of Transport
Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply
Travel Demand Forecasting: Mode Choice
Trip Distribution Meeghat Habibian Transportation Demand Analysis
Multi-modal Bi-criterion Highway Assignment for Toll Roads Jian Zhang Andres Rabinowicz Jonathan Brandon Caliper Corporation /9/2018.
Trip Distribution Lecture 8 Norman W. Garrick and Hamed Ahangari
Presentation transcript:

Lecture 4 Four transport modelling stages with emphasis on public transport (hands on training) Dr. Muhammad Adnan

Lecture Outline Trip Generation Trip Distribution Modal Choice Trip Assignment- Car Traffic Trip Assignment – Public transport

Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) Geographic areas dividing the planning region into relatively similar areas of land use and land activity. Zones represent the origins and destinations of travel activity within the region… every household, place of employment, shopping center, and other activity… are first aggregated into zones and then further simplified into a single node called a centroid. (TRB Report-365) TAZs serve as the primary unit of analysis in a travel demand forecasting model. They contain socioeconomic data related to land use. TAZs are where trips begin and end

Guidelines for Delineating TAZs The following can serve as a checklist summarizing recommendations on the best practices in delineating TAZs – The number of people per TAZ should be greater than 1,200, but less than 3,000 for the base and future years; – Each TAZ yields less than 15,000 person trips in the base and future year; – The size of each TAZ is between 0.25 to one square mile in area; – There is a logical number of intrazonal trips in each zone, based on the mix and density of the land use; – Each centroid connector loads less than 10,000 to 15,000 vehicles per day in the base and future year; – The study area is large enough so that nearly all (over 90 percent) of the trips begin and end within the study area; – The TAZ structure is compatible with the base and future year highway and transit network; – The centroid connectors represent realistic access points onto the highway network; – Transit access is represented realistically; – The TAZ structure is compatible with Census, physical, political, and planning district/sector boundaries; – The TAZs are based on homogeneous land uses, when feasible, in both the base and future year – Special generators and freight generators/attractors are isolated within their own TAZ.

Trip Generation Modelling Methods Linear regression method Cross-classification (category analysis) method/trip rate method _______________________________________________________ Trip generation Productions & Attractions Home-based & non-home based trips J I Zones

Example City X has recently conducted a travel survey of its 10 TAZs. The collected data is summarized in the table. Based on the given information Predict the total number of trips that will be produced by each zone in 10 yrs. (Assume zonal population in 10 yrs is known)? Relate Y (total trips produced by a zone) to X 1 (zonal population)? Expected total number of trips for a zone with a population of 5,000? How confident you are about your estimates?

Excel Method

Another Data

Trip Distribution Models (1) People decide on Possible destinations is function of – Type and extent of transportation activities – Pattern (location and intensity) of land use – Socio-Economic characteristics of population Modelling Assumptions – Number of trips decrease with COST between zones – Number of trips increase with zone “attractiveness”

Trip Distribution Models (2) I.Growth Factor Models (Uniform, Average Factor, Fratar and Detroit) II.Theoretical Models (Gravity Model, Intervening opportunity Model, Entropy Models)

Growth Factor Models (General) Future trips can be found by proportioning the relative growth in those zones Iterative in Nature – Start with existing – New proportions established – Iteration continues till we reach stable numbers

Uniform Growth Factor Model F= P*/P 0 P* = Design Year Trips P 0 = Base year Trips (Total) T ij = F t ij for each pair i and j T ij = Future Trip Matrix t ij = Base-year Trip Matrix F= General Growth Rate

Uniform Growth Factor Model The Uniform Growth Factor is typically used for over a 1 or 2 year horizon. However, assuming that trips grow at a standard uniform rate is a fundamentally flawed concept. This method suffers from the disadvantages that it will tend to overestimate the trips between densely developed zones, which probably have little development potential, and underestimate the future trips between underdeveloped zones, which are likely to be extremely developed in the future.

Gravity Model (Mathematical Form)

K-Factors K-factors account for socioeconomic linkages K-factors are i-j TAZ specific If i-j pair has too many trips, use K-factor less than 1.0 Once calibrated, keep constant? for forecast K-Factors are used to force estimates to agree with observed trip interchanges

Example

Input Data

Travel times into friction factors

Modal Choice

Logit Models (Discrete Choice Models) Binomial Logit Models Multinomial Logit Models Nested Logit Models These models worked on the principle of Random Utility Maximization

Concept of Utility Utility Function measures the degree of satisfaction that people derive from their choices. A disutility function represents the generalized cost associated with each choice

Example Auto Utility Equation: UA= (IVT) (OVT) (COST) Transit Utility Equation: UB= (IVT) (OVT) – 0.10(WAIT) – 0.20(XFER) (COST) Where: IVT= in-vehicle time in minutes OVT = out of vehicle time in minutes COST = out of pocket cost in cents WAIT = wait time (time spent at bus stop waiting for bus) XFER = number of transfers Question: what is the implied cost of IVT? OVT? WAIT? XFER? Binary logit Example

Example ModeOVTIVT Cost (cents) 1 person person carpool person carpool person carpool Transit

Part 1: CALCULATE MODE PROBABILITIES BY MARKET SEGMENT Overview: Calculate the mode probabilities for the trip interchanges. Use the tables on the next pages. Part A: Calculate the utilities for transit as follows: – Insert in the table the appropriate values for OVT, IVT, and COST. – Calculate the utility relative to each variable by multiplying the variable by the coefficient which is shown in parenthesis at the top of the column; and – Sum the utilities (including the mode-specific constant) and put the total in the last column. Part B: Calculate the mode probabilities as follows: – Insert the utility for transit in the first column; – Calculate e U for transit – Sum of e U for transit and put in the “Total” column; and – Calculate the probability for transit using the formula: – Sum the probabilities (they should equal 1.0)

Say, from trip distribution, the number of trips was 14,891. Calculate the number of trips by mode using the probabilities calculated. Mode Trips (Zone 5 to Zone 1) Solo Driver 2-Person Carpool 3-Person Carpool 4-Person Carpool Transit Total14, 891

Trip Assignment- Car Traffic

Equilibrium Assignment (capacity Restraint Assignment)

Two link problem with an O-D pair

Example-2 All or Nothing Assignment

Problem formulation User Equilibrium

Solution

For Large Networks- Frank-wolfe Algorithm Initial UE guess: AON based on free-flow times Find link travel times at current UE guess Find Latest AON based on link travel times above New UE guess: Find best λ to combine old UE guess and latest AON solution through Z function Repeat second step

t 2 (V 2 )=2+V 2 t 1 (V 1 )=1+3V 1 Example -3 O D t 3 (V 3 )=3+2V 3 O-D Demand constraint V 1 +V 2 +V 3 =10

Solution- FW algorithm See excel Worksheet A: Initial estimates of travel time B: First AON Solution C: As we don’t yet have any other information, the AON solution in B becomes our first equilibrium flow estimate D: The corresponding equilibrium travel time estimates are obtained by substituting the flows C in the travel time functions E: the input travel times to the next step F: The AON solution G: This is the first time we have to do some work to calculate these values –the first combination step of the FW algorithm, combination of a mix of C and F – New (V1, V2, V3)= (1-λ)(10,0,0) + λ(0,10,0) = (10-10λ, 10λ, 0), – Put these volumes in Z function, calculate λ, =0.725 GOTO step D and repeat this until travel times equate each other

Trip Assignment- Public Transport

Transit Assignment Links include different services running between stops or stations. Involves movement of passengers, not vehicles Complex interchange patterns associated with passengers Impedance functions includes fare structure Some paths offer more than one parallel service with complex associated choices (e.g., express bus versus local bus service)

In-vehicle time Initial wait time Transfer wait time Access time Egress time Dwell time Number of transfers Costs To ensure consistency with mode choice, variables used and their weights should be consistent with mode choice utilities

Assignment attributes and weighting factors: In-vehicle time factor = 1.0 Auxiliary (walk) travel time factor = 2.0 Wait time factor = 2.0 Wait time = Headway/ 2 Boarding time = 5 min Boarding time factor =1.0