PUSD Evaluations for 2015 - 2016 Governing Board Presentation May 14, 2015 Dr. Heather Cruz, Deputy Superintendent.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PERSONAL LITERACY PLANS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL December 12, 2003.
Advertisements

Assessing Students in the 21st Century
World’s Best Workforce  Board Level Curriculum and Instruction  December 18, 2013.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Update on Teacher and Principal Evaluation Implementation of ARS
PUSD Teacher Evaluation SY12/13 Governing Board Presentation May 10, 2012.
PUSD Teacher Evaluation SY 13/14 Governing Board Presentation May 9, 2013 Dr. Heather Cruz, Deputy Superintendent.
Dr. Heather Cruz, Deputy Superintendent
“Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.” Accountability 2.0 and the World’s Best Workforce—What Does it Mean? World’s.
Peoria Unified Common Core Curriculum Dr. Heather Cruz, Deputy Superintendent August 27, 2013.
Education Committee Meeting Professional Development Plan November 3, 2014.
Site Administrator Evaluation Update Governing Board Presentation May 10, 2012 Dr. Heather L. Cruz, Deputy Superintendent.
Special Education and Teacher Evaluations Janelle Smith Dr. Peter Verona O Director of Special Services O Byron CUSD #226 O O Byron.
PUSD Site Administrator Evaluation SY 13/14 Governing Board Presentation May 23, 2013 Dr. Heather Cruz, Deputy Superintendent.
Teacher & Principal Evaluation: As Easy as Doing the Hula.
Alaska Educator Evaluation Overview Yukon Koyukuk School District.
Pay for Performance Programs in Arizona CPRE Conference February 21, 2007 Arizona Performance Based Compensation SystemArizona Performance Based Compensation.
The Leadership and Learning Center ® Teacher Evaluation System for Florida’s Charter Schools An Overview: Florida Consortium of Public Charter Schools.
Ramapo Teachers’ Association APPR Contractual Changes.
Delivery Model for Psychological and Behavioral Services.
Guidance Evaluation SY12/13 Governing Board Presentation September 13, 2012.
Module 1: PERA Illinois Administrative Code Part 50
EDUCATOR CERTIFICATION UPDATE Michigan Association of School Personnel Administrators Conference December 3, 2010 Flora L. Jenkins, Director Office of.
Accountability Assessment Parents & Community Preparing College, Career, & Culturally Ready Graduates Standards Support 1.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
PUSD Compensation Project Overview Governing Board Meeting March 14, 2013.
NEW TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS CONNECTING TEACHER PERFORMANCE to ACADEMIC PROGRESS.
Statewide Awareness Presentation Dr. Karen Butterfield, Associate Superintendent Jan Amator, Deputy Associate Superintendent Highly Effective Teachers.
 Student Learning Objectives February 26, 2015 Work and Creation Session.
Update on Teacher Principal Evaluation System (TPEP) Implementation July, 2014.
Oregon Department of Education Agency Overview Susan Castillo, Superintendent of Public Instruction Patrick Burk, Deputy Superintendent Mike Greenfield,
BEST Standards in Teaching Rubric.  Overview  State Legislation  District Policy  Key Components and Rating Percentiles  Outline the Evaluation Process,
April –February 2014 – Advisory Council (SCAC) convenes –April 2014 – NYSED School Counselor Summit –June 2014 – Summit recommendations to BOR.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
The world is changing. Meet the future. Every student prepared for a world yet to be imagined Provide excellent, distinctive educational experiences that.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
NEW TEACHER PRINCIPAL EVALUATION. RACE TO THE TOP AND ESSB 5895  The principles guiding the change  Quality teaching and leading is critically important.
The Leadership and Learning Center ® Teacher Evaluation System for Florida’s Charter Schools An Overview: The Danielson Framework Name of School.
M-DCPS Framework of Effective Instruction Part I: Dr. David K. Moore.
Educator Growth & Evaluation Marshall Public Schools.
MPS Memorandum of Agreement Renewal with Metropolitan Urban Indian Directors MUID Presentation December 13, 2011.
PUSD Teacher Evaluation SY 14/15 Governing Board Presentation May 13, 2014 Dr. Heather Cruz, Deputy Superintendent.
2012 – 2013 School Year. OTES West Branch Local Schools.
Instructional Coaching Study Group Process and Timeline Dr. Heather Cruz, Deputy Superintendent September 10, 2015.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
TEACHER EVALUATION After S.B. 290 The Hungerford Law Firm June, 2012.
Writing Policy for SBDM Councils. Goals of this Session provide an overview of Senate Bill 1 requirements related to writing provide guidance in reviewing.
District Action Plan Strategic Planning for Student Success Board Meeting March 24, 2015 Dr. Rodney Thompson, Superintendent.
Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.
The Law  Section , paragraph 3… A requirement that a pupil not be promoted from the third grade if the pupil obtains a score on the reading portion.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
14/15 301Plan for Governing Board December 2, 2014 Dr. Heather Cruz.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Accountability Committee Dr. Chris Woolard March 7, 2016.
Ohio Principal Evaluation System Pike County Joint Vocational School March 7,
Arizona Framework for Teacher Effectiveness Governing Board Meeting May 1, 2012.
PUSD Reading Intervention Plan Read 180 and System 44 Implementation Plan August 5,2014.
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
Nevada Nevada Educator Performance Framework – Other Licensed Personnel Recommendations Dr. Pamela Salazar, Chair, Nevada Teachers and Leaders Council.
MSBSD Educator Evaluation
World’s Best Workforce (WBWF)
Alternative Education Programs
What’s the connection to Ohio’s other initiatives?
Dr. Julie Beddow-Schubert EC4 Principal Curriculum Director
State Board of Education Progress Update
Model Schools Contract Revision
Presentation transcript:

PUSD Evaluations for Governing Board Presentation May 14, 2015 Dr. Heather Cruz, Deputy Superintendent

Presentation Overview  Evaluations Presented  Legislative History  Overview of the Peoria Model  Changes  Continuous Improvement  Next Steps

Evaluations Presented  Evaluations for 2015 – 2016  Teacher  Guidance  Curriculum/Instructional Coach  Teacher on Special Assignment  Behavior Specialist  Psychologist  Speech and Language Pathologist  Occupational and Physical Therapist  Site Administrator

Arizona Revised Statutes § (A)(38)  The State Board of Education shall…”on or before December 15, 2011 adopt and maintain a model framework for a teacher and principal evaluation instrument that includes quantitative data on student academic progress that accounts for between thirty-three percent and fifty percent of the evaluation outcomes and best practices for professional development and evaluator training. School districts and charter schools shall use an instrument that meets the data requirements established by the State Board of Education to annually evaluate individual teachers and principals beginning in school year 2012 – 2013.”

Other Bills Affecting Evaluation  SB 1040  HB 2823  HB 2500

ADE Adopted Model Framework  ADE Adopted Model Framework for Educator Effectiveness  Classroom observation tool must be:  Rubric-based  Tied to Specific Standards  33% to 50% of the evaluation must be based on student achievement data  PUSD began to make the shift in evaluation practices in SY 11/12

Overview of the Peoria Model-13/14  Professional Practices – Implemented 11/12  Self-Evaluation  Goals – Student Achievement, Instructional, & Exit Outcomes  Reflection  Rubric Components Aligned to Specific Standards  Professional Expectations  Student Achievement Data – Implemented 12/13  Moved to Student Learning Objective in 14/15

Data Model Guiding Principles  Collaborative thinking  Guiding principles  Equity  Comprehensive  Manageable  Choice – Menu Driven  Balance  Transparency  Spirit of the Law

Alignment  ACT and Freshman College Success  PUSD Data Model and AZ Learns

Peoria Data Model for 15/16

Changes  No changes to the follow evaluations for 15/16  Teacher  Guidance  Curriculum/Instructional Coach  Teacher on Special Assignment  Site Administrator

Changes  The data component was added to the following evaluations:  Behavior Interventionist  Psychologist  Speech and Language Pathologist  Occupational and Physical Therapist  No other changes were made to these instruments  Goal to bring them into alignment with the other district evaluations

Continuous Improvement of Process  Committees reconvene to make adjustments to evaluations yearly, unless none are required or needed

14 Questions