1 Critical Thinking, Reading and Writing PRESENTED BY Cynthia Santosuosso.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Common Core Standards (What this means in computer class)
Advertisements

By Anthony Campanaro & Dennis Hernandez
Understanding American Citizenship
Balanced Literacy How our instructional practices will support the implementation of Common Core.
Assessing Student Presentations Scott Johnstone Jill Doise.
Evaluating Thinking Through Intellectual Standards
Fostering Intellectual Engagement Through Critical Reading.
Critical Thinking Course Introduction and Lesson 1
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Nevada Joint Union High School District Nevada Union High School September 23, 2013 Louise Johnson, Ed.D. Superintendent.
Common Core State Standards Professional Learning Module Series
Visual Thinking Strategies and the Common Core State Standards Cara Goger M A R I P O S A C O U N T Y A R T S C O U N C I L
You will need… Materials: Large sticky note pads Small sticky note pads Pens Markers Highlighters Class set of Pinch cards.
English Language Arts in Illinois
Foreign language and English as a Second Language: Getting to the Common Core of Communication. Are we there yet? Marisol Marcin
Critical Thinking: Close Reading of Texts Presented by Dr. Cheryl Torok Fleming November, 2013 Based on Paul, R. & Elder, L. (2006). Critical Thinking:
Making the Connection: Level 1 to Advanced Placement Blanca M. Guerra World Languages Curriculum Supervisor College and Career Readiness Broward County.
Empowering Student Participation Lisa Sabella Karen Kondrick Allyson Bird Ripley Central School District.
Educator’s Guide Using Instructables With Your Students.
Keeping KUD’s Concise What do your students need to KNOW, UNDERSTAND and DO to master unit content?
Welcome to Implementing the Common Core State Standards
Launching the Common Core State Standards We need to prepare our students for 21 st Century Learning in an information age with technology innovations.
AND THE NEXT GENERATION SCIENCE STANDARDS Common Core as it Relates to Middle School Science.
General Considerations for Implementation
Children Have the Right to Say! Kopish and Wenhart (2013) Children Have the Right to Say! Dr. Michael.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Parent Information Session Colchester Public Schools 1.
1 Summer 2012 Educator Effectiveness Academies English Language Arts Transitioning to the CCSS by Making Strategic and Informed Choices in the Classroom.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Language Arts and Social Studies A cross-curricular approach to instruction Session 1.
ELA Common Core Shifts. Shift 1 Balancing Informational & Literary Text.
ESSENTIAL QUESTION What does it look like and sound like when students use evidence to support their thinking?
ACADEMIC CONVERSATIONS
NC E ARLY L EARNING N ETWORK IS A JOINT PROJECT OF THE NC D EPARTMENT O F P UBLIC I NSTRUCTION, O FFICE O F E ARLY L EARNING AND UNC F RANK P ORTER G RAHAM.
ELA: Focus on Collaborative Conversations & Writing FCUSD Instructional Focus Meeting Sara Parenzin September 20, 2012 Welcome! Please sign in and start.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards Professional Learning Module Series.
Common Core National State Standards Math Language Arts Science, Social Studies, and other subject areas. Two foci: Reading and Writing.
Grade 8 – Writing Standards Text Types and Purposes (1b) Write arguments to support claims with clear reasons and relevant evidence. Support claim(s) with.
Investigating Identity Unit. Unit Summary During this unit students will participate in different activities that are all a part of Project-Based Learning.
ERIKA LUSKY JULIE RAINS Collaborative Dialogue in the Classroom
Introduction to the ERWC (Expository Reading and Writing Course)
Close Reading of Complex Texts in the 3-8 Modules
COUNCIL OF CHIEF STATE SCHOOL OFFICERS (CCSSO) & NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES (NGA CENTER) JUNE 2010.
Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools (Foundation for Critical Thinking, 2001)
Anchor Standards ELA Standards marked with this symbol represent Kansas’s 15%
Common Core State Standards Introduction and Exploration.
Common Core State Standards & Next Generation Science Standards Common Core State Standards & Next Generation Science Standards Grades Close Reading.
ELACC7W1 Write arguments to support claims with clear reasons and relevant evidence.
Common Core State Standards in English/Language Arts What science teachers need to know.
PENNSYLVANIA COMMON CORE STANDARDS 1.5 Speaking and Listening Students present appropriately in formal speaking situations, listen critically, and respond.
TCH 264: Museum Literacies April 21, Today’s Class Share Writing Crawl Pieces Examine Museum Literacies Describe classroom applications Writer’s.
Fostering Vocabulary Development and Deeper Conceptual Understanding in the Mathematics Classroom Melissa Christie September 16, 2013.
Amy Jo Southworth Bay Shore High School Library Common Core wiki: bshscommoncore.wikispaces.com.
Common Core State Standards Mapping to the Core May 21, 2013.
Writing – CCSS Style AACRC – October 29, Prior Knowledge 1.I don’t know anything about the ELA CCSS 2.I have some familiarity with the ELA CCSS.
Exploring the Literacy Standards: CCSS & Main Idea.
Critical Thinking or how to learn and know that you know what you know, if you know it Terry C. Norris.
 The abbreviation for Common Core State Standards “Educational standards are the learning goals for what students should know and be able to do at each.
Common Core.  Find your group assignment.  As a group, read over the descriptors for mastery of this standard. (The writing standards apply to more.
The New Illinois Learning Standards
Middle School English Language Arts Learning Targets: I can…
Instructional Critical Thinking Assessment Item Development
The Role of Teachers and Technology in Assessing the CCSS Speaking and
The New Illinois Learning Standards
Visual Thinking Strategies and the Common Core State Standards
Debate Unit 1 Standards Comprehension and Collaboration
Literacy Content Specialist, CDE
Using the 7 Step Lesson Plan to Enhance Student Learning
Presentation transcript:

1 Critical Thinking, Reading and Writing PRESENTED BY Cynthia Santosuosso

LEARNING OBJECTIVES 1.Understand the disciplinary overlaps in CCSS and how elements of critical thinking are integrated throughout. 2.Analyze how assumptions and inferences impact critical thinking. 3.Differentiate between the five levels of close reading, and examine the role of critical thinking in each level. 4.Plan to apply critical thinking models into reading and writing within your common core classroom. 2

DEFINING CRITICAL THINKING: A SHORT DEFINITION Critical thinking is that mode of thinking - about any subject, content, or problem - in which the thinker improves the quality of his or her thinking by skillfully taking charge of the structures inherent in thinking and imposing intellectual standards upon them. (Taken from Richard Paul and Linda Elder, The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools, Foundation for Critical Thinking Press, 2008) 3

WHY CRITICAL THINKING? Meet our Friends 4

WHY CRITICAL THINKING? Naïve Nancy 5

WHY CRITICAL THINKING? Selfish Sam 6

WHY CRITICAL THINKING? Fairminded Fran 7

WHY CRITICAL THINKING? How does critical thinking help us? Solve problems Think creatively Gain precision in our thinking Become a “fairminded” thinker 8

GROUND RULES Critical thinking is not a formula. 9

GROUND RULES Critical thinking is messy. 10

GROUND RULES Critical thinking may feel uncomfortable. 11

GROUND RULES You gotta be in it to win it. 12

GROUND RULES Thinking critically is part of life. 13

WHERE IN THE CCSS? ELA-Integration of Knowledge and Ideas #7 Integrate and evaluate content presented in diverse media and formats, including visually and quantitatively, as well as in words. #8 Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, including the validity of the reasoning as well as the relevance and sufficiency of the evidence. #9 Analyze how two or more texts address similar themes or topics in order to build knowledge or to compare the approaches the authors take. 14 p. 1

WHERE IN THE CCSS? Speaking and Listening: Comprehension and Collaboration 1. Prepare for and participate effectively in a range of conversations and collaborations with diverse partners, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly and persuasively. 2. Integrate and evaluate information presented in diverse media and formats, including visually, quantitatively, and orally. 3. Evaluate a speaker’s point of view, reasoning, and use of evidence and rhetoric. 15 HO p. 2

WHERE IN THE CCSS? Speaking and Listening: Presentation of Knowledge and Ideas 4. Present information, findings, and supporting evidence such that listeners can follow the line of reasoning and the organization, development, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience. 5. Make strategic use of digital media and visual displays of data to express information and enhance understanding of presentations. 6. Adapt speech to a variety of contexts and communicative tasks, demonstrating command of formal English when indicated or appropriate. 16 HO p. 2

INTERDISCIPLINARY OVERLAPS 17 HO p. 3

INFERENCES AND ASSUMPTIONS Information: Input Situation Picture Video Text 18

INFERENCES AND ASSUMPTIONS Inferences: Conclusions you make using what you know 19

INFERENCES AND ASSUMPTIONS Assumptions: Beliefs you take for granted Hidden/unconscious thoughts 20

INFERENCES AND ASSUMPTIONS 21 Information Possible Inference Assumptio n

INFERENCES AND ASSUMPTIONS 22 Information Possible Inference Assumption I will not be hit by a car or bike if the sign says cross.

INFERENCES AND ASSUMPTIONS 23 Information Possible Inference Assumption I could be hit by a car or bike even if the sign says cross.

INFERENCES AND ASSUMPTIONS SIMULATION 24

INFERENCES AND ASSUMPTIONS AT 1:00 HO Page 4 25 Information: What is the situation? Inference: What conclusion can you make? Assumptions: What are my beliefs?

INFERENCES AND ASSUMPTIONS AT 1:30 26 Information: What is the situation? Inference: What conclusion can you make? Assumptions: What are my beliefs?

INFERENCES AND ASSUMPTIONS: TURN AND TALK the information your inference What did you notice about your assumptions? What do you notice in general about your thinking? 27 What changed in terms of:

APPLYING CRITICAL THINKING TO CLOSE READING Five Levels of Close Reading: 1.Paraphrase 2.Explicate 3.Analysis 4.Evaluating 5.Role Playing 28

LEVEL 1: PARAPHRASE Paraphrase the text sentence by sentence. State in your own words the meaning of each sentence as you read. 29

PARAPHRASE-GET THE GIST: Turkey If my parents want me to grow up to graduate from school, they might bury my tooth in the garden to the university. If they hope I will become a doctor, they bury it in the garden of a hospital, or they could bury it in a soccer field so I will be a good soccer player. From Throw Your Tooth on the Roof: Tooth Traditions from Around the World 30

APPLYING CRITICAL THINKING TO CLOSE READING Five Levels of Close Reading: 1.Paraphrase 2.Explicate 3.Analysis 4.Evaluating 5.Role Playing 31

LEVEL 2: EXPLICATE (SEEI) 1. State the main point. 2. Elaborate on what you mean. In other words… 3. Give examples that connect your thoughts to life experiences. For example… 4. Give an illustration of your main point. To give you an analogy… 32

PLANNING FOR SEEI Try a primary source! 33

PLANNING FOR SEEI “I pledge” 1. This text is about someone making a pledge. 2. In other words… 3. For example… 4. To give you an analogy… 34 HO p. 8

I pledge Allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for all.

APPLYING CRITICAL THINKING TO CLOSE READING Five Levels of Close Reading: 1.Paraphrase 2.Explicate 3.Analysis 4.Evaluating 5.Role Playing 36

LEVEL 3: ANALYSIS Analyze the logic of what we are reading or the parts of our thinking. 37

LEVEL 3: ANALYSIS The One Million T-Shirt Social Media Campaign 38 HO p. 9

LEVEL 3: ANALYSIS Debriefing your thinking: 1.Review one of the two additional sources on this topic on pp Can you refine your thinking further? 3.Turn and talk. 39

PLANNING FOR ANALYSIS How will these questions help students to analyze their thinking about what they are reading? What other texts can we use? 40

ANALYZING PRIMARY SOURCES Try a primary source! 41

APPLYING CRITICAL THINKING TO CLOSE READING Five Levels of Close Reading: 1.Paraphrase 2.Explicate 3.Analysis 4.Evaluating 5.Role Playing 42

LEVEL 4: EVALUATION Be Clear: Can You state what you mean? Can you give examples? Be Accurate: Am I sure it’s true? Be Relevant: Is it related to what we are thinking about? Be Logical: Does it all fit together? Be Fair: Am I considering how my behavior might make others feel? Be Reasonable: Have we thought through this problem with an open mind? 43

LEVEL 4: EVALUATION Intellectual Standards assess the logic of what we are reading or parts of our thinking. 44

PLANNING FOR EVALUATION See pp in your handouts. How can these cards be useful in your instruction? Where and how would you use them? 45

APPLYING CRITICAL THINKING TO CLOSE READING Five Levels of Close Reading: 1.Paraphrase 2.Explicate 3.Analysis 4.Evaluating 5.Role Playing 46

LEVEL 5: ROLE PLAYING Speak in the voice of the author. You will need a partner who has read the text and is willing to answer important questions about it. 47

LEVEL 5: ROLE PLAYING Step 1: Read the text you are given. 48

LEVEL 5: ROLE PLAYING 49 Partner 1: Plays the part of the narrator of the text (Mistresses of the Dame School, The Basket Trader, The Milliner or The Blacksmith’s Slave) Partner 2: Uses the questions in the Intellectual Standards to “interview” the character. HO Page 22

LEVEL 5: ROLE PLAYING SWITCH 50 Partner 2: Plays the part of the narrator of the text (Mistresses of the Dame School, The Basket Trader, The Milliner or The Blacksmith’s Slave) Partner 1: Uses the questions in the Intellectual Standards to “interview” the character.

LEVEL 5: ROLE PLAYING Debrief: 1.How did this activity help you? 2.How could you see this activity aiding a student’s critical thinking? 3.How could you use this activity in your classroom? 51

SUMMARY Information, Inferences and Assumptions Five Levels of Close Reading: Paraphrase Explicate Analysis Evaluating Role Playing 52

RESOURCES Toolbox of Resources: -The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking for Children by Fairminded Fran (and Linda Elder) -The Aspiring Thinker’s Guide to Critical Thinking by Linda Elder and Dr. Richard Paul -For further resources aligned with this presentation, go to *Thank you to HILL for Literacy for the use of this presentation. 53

THANK YOU!