Dynamic Tolling Assignment Model for Managed Lanes presented to Advanced Traffic Assignment Sub-Committee presented by Jim Hicks, Parsons Brinckerhoff.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
General Update March Background As the region grows, increased travel demand on our aging Metro Highway System will continue to create additional.
Advertisements

SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting FDOT Systems Planning Office
Managed Lanes Development Strategy Phase I District Four October 17, 2012.
TRB Planning Applications Conference Columbus, OH May 7, 2013 TRAFFIC AND REVENUE FORECASTING FOR THE OHIO TURNPIKE ASSET EVALUATION Presented by: Gregory.
Getting Started with Congestion Pricing A Workshop for Local Partners Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations.
DynusT (Dynamic Urban Systems in Transportation)
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
A Toll Choice Probability Model Application to Examine Travel Demand at Express and Electronic Toll Lanes in Maryland.
Time of day choice models The “weakest link” in our current methods(?) Change the use of network models… Run static assignments for more periods of the.
Analyzing the Effects of Tolls and Operating Costs on Statewide Travel Patterns Vishal Gossain Thomas A. Williams Joseph P. Savage Jr. Christopher E. Mwalwanda.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
Urban Transport Modeling (based on these two sources) A Transportation Modeling Primer May, 1995 Edward A. Beimborn Center for Urban Transportation Studies.
TRB Lianyu Chu *, K S Nesamani +, Hamed Benouar* Priority Based High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes Operation * California Center for Innovative Transportation.
Multi-Modal Concurrency PSRC TRAC-UW Depart of Urban Design and Planning Evans School.
Lec 24: Ch1.(T&LD): Urban transportation planning vs. Site planning Review the transportation-land use cycle (Read examples in Ch.1 & compare the development.
Evaluation and Application of Active Traffic and Demand Management (ATDM) Strategies, including Managed Lanes for Urban Corridors in Ohio Naveen Juvva.
GreenSTEP Statewide Transportation Greenhouse Gas Model Cutting Carbs Conference December 3, 2008 Brian Gregor ODOT Transportation Planning Analysis Unit.
May 2009 Evaluation of Time-of- Day Fare Changes for Washington State Ferries Prepared for: TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Versatile Applications of EMME/2 and ENIF: Seattle Experience Madhavi Sanakkayala Heather Purdy & Sujay Davuluri Parsons Brinckerhoff, Seattle.
Less Stop More Go EXPRESS LANES Travel Choices and Strategies to Relieve Congestion Presentation to FDOT’s Annual ITS Working Group Meeting March 2008.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
11 May, 2011 Discrete Choice Models and Behavioral Response to Congestion Pricing Strategies Prepared for: The TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco DTA Project: Model Integration Options Greg Erhardt DTA Peer Review Panel Meeting July 25 th,
Tolling and Congestion Pricing Patrick DeCorla-Souza Office of Innovative Program Delivery Federal Highway Administration Presentation to Transportation.
Transit Estimation and Mode Split CE 451/551 Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 7.
SHRP2 C10: Jacksonville Partnership to Develop an Integrated Advanced Travel Demand Model and a Fine-grained Time- sensitive Network Key Agency Partners:
Lynn Peterson Secretary of Transportation Combining Macro Scopic and Meso Scopic Models in Toll and Traffic Revenue Forecasting SR 167 Corridor Completion.
Kermit Wies, Craig Heither, CMAP Peter Vovsha, Jim Hicks, PB Hani Mahmassani, Ali Zockaie, NU TPAC, May 17-20, An Integrated ABM-DTA Model for the.
What are Managed Lanes What are Express Lanes What are HOT Lanes Regional Express Lanes Network I-95 Express I-595 Express I-75 Express.
Integration of Transportation System Analyses in Cube Wade L. White, AICP Citilabs Inc.
Regional Traffic Simulation/Assignment Model for Evaluation of Transit Performance and Asset Utilization April 22, 2003 Athanasios Ziliaskopoulos Elaine.
Transportation Planning, Transportation Demand Analysis Land Use-Transportation Interaction Transportation Planning Framework Transportation Demand Analysis.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide Data Requirements to Support Road Pricing Analyses Johanna Zmud, Ph.D. NuStats Partners, LP Expert Forum on Road.
2007 TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference – Daytona Beach, Florida Pseudo Dynamic Traffic Assignment A Duration Based Static Assignment.
February 8, 2008 SERPM65 vs. SERPM6-Corradino 1 SERPM-6.5 & SERPM-6: Differences & Future Directions Southeast Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting Ft. Lauderdale,
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB 11 th Conference on Transportation Planning Applications presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.
Integrated Travel Demand Model Challenges and Successes Tim Padgett, P.E., Kimley-Horn Scott Thomson, P.E., KYTC Saleem Salameh, Ph.D., P.E., KYOVA IPC.
Calibrating Model Speeds, Capacities, and Volume Delay Functions Using Local Data SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting February 6, 2009 Dean Lawrence.
EMME Users’ Group Meeting Recent toll patronage forecasting using EMME 27 May 2011.
Enhancement and Validation of a Managed-Lane Subarea Network Tolling Forecast Model May 19, 2005 Stephen Tuttle (RSG), Jeff Frkonja (Portland Metro), Jack.
SHRP2 C10A Final Conclusions & Insights TRB Planning Applications Conference May 5, 2013 Columbus, OH Stephen Lawe, Joe Castiglione & John Gliebe Resource.
Application of an Activity-based Model for a Toll Road Study in Chicago Matt Stratton Parsons Brinckerhoff May 19, 2015.
Presented to Time of Day Subcommittee May 9, 2011 Time of Day Modeling in FSUTMS.
1 Ramp-to-Ramp Toll Modeling Presented By Presented By Jim Fennessy Fennessy Associates Michael W Doherty URS Corporation For Model Task Force Meeting.
Comparative Analysis of Traffic and Revenue Risks Associated with Priced Facilities 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks.
Weighing the Scenarios: The Costs and Benefits of Future Transit Service Produced for MTDB by The Mission Group © 2000 by The Mission Group. 1 Dave Schumacher.
Modeling Various Tolling Schemes Using Emme: Seattle Experience Andrew Natzel, Parsons Brinckerhoff Bhanu Yerra, Parsons Brinckerhoff Craig Helmann, Puget.
Analysis of the IH 35 Corridor Through the Austin Metropolitan Area TRB Planning Applications Conference Jeff Shelton Karen Lorenzini Alex Valdez Tom Williams.
Presented to Time of Day Panel presented by Krishnan Viswanathan, Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Jason Lemp, Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Thomas Rossi, Cambridge.
The development of a HOV driver behavior model under Paramics Will Recker, UC Irvine Shin-Ting Jeng, UC Irvine Lianyu Chu, CCIT-UC Berkeley.
Jack is currently performing travel demand model forecasting for Florida’s Turnpike. Specifically he works on toll road project forecasting to produce.
Estimating Volumes for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia Prepared for: 2009 Planning Applications Conference Houston, TX May 18, 2009 Prepared by: Kenneth D.
Interstate 95 Managed Lanes PD&E Study (95 Express) Project Development and Environment Study SE FSUTMS Users Group The Corradino Group November 2, 2007.
Incorporating Time of Day Modeling into FSUTMS – Phase II Time of Day (Peak Spreading) Model Presentation to FDOT SPO 23 March 2011 Heinrich McBean.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide Attitudinal Evaluation Overview and Update Johanna Zmud / NuStats October 28, 2004 MnPass Copyright WSDOT © 2002.
A Sketch Planning Assessment of Managed-Lane Options for the I-5 Freeway Corridor Master Plan William R. Loudon, DKS Associates.
The Current State-of-the-Practice in Modeling Road Pricing Bruce D. Spear Federal Highway Administration.
IH-10 Managed Lanes Project: A “Public-Public” Partnership ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Presented at the Value Pricing Conference.
1 Forecasting Traffic for a Start-Up Toll Road 12 th TRB National Transportation Planning Application Conference May 18, 2009 David Schellinger, P.E. Vice.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Traffic Assignment CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Presented to Toll Modeling Panel presented by Krishnan Viswanathan, Cambridge Systematics, Inc.. September 16, 2010 Time of Day in FSUTMS.
Peter Vovsha, Robert Donnelly, Surabhi Gupta pb
Nick Wood, P.E. Texas A&M Transportation Institute
Jim Henricksen, MnDOT Steve Ruegg, WSP
Development of New Supply Models in Maryland Using Big Data
Multi-modal Bi-criterion Highway Assignment for Toll Roads Jian Zhang Andres Rabinowicz Jonathan Brandon Caliper Corporation /9/2018.
Trip Distribution Review and Recommendations
Advanced Toll Modeling
  Advanced Tools to Assess Managed Toll Lane Operations Model Task Force Toll Subcommittee Meeting September 16, 2010.
Presentation transcript:

Dynamic Tolling Assignment Model for Managed Lanes presented to Advanced Traffic Assignment Sub-Committee presented by Jim Hicks, Parsons Brinckerhoff September 14, 2012

Overview Prior discussions on Managed Lanes in Florida Features of Phase I Model Implementing and Testing Model Results of Model Discussion 1

Conceptual Requirements Flexible – able to accommodate most “flavors” of managed lanes within a unified approach Behaviorally Sensitive – Includes variables that are important to selection and use of a managed lane Policy Sensitive – Has the ability to test different Managed Lane Policies (e.g., tolls, congestion sensitive) Ease of use – Model implementation compatible with FSUTMS and a reasonable runtime Understandable – No “black boxes” 2

Managed Lane “Flavors” HOV - only Express Lanes Truck Only Reversible lanes HOT – SOV pay Dynamic Tolling Open Road Tolling Dedicated Facilities Pre-pay and/or Pay per use (toll booths) ITS Solutions (Traffic calming, speed advisories, incident management) 3

Behavioral Variables Time savings Cost Trip Purpose Income/Value of time Time of Day Household Structure (e.g. daycare?) Employment type (on-time requirements) 4

Managed Lane Policy Dimensions Willingness to pay – toll cost per minute saved Toll Cost – congestion related Separate managed lanes and general purpose lanes 5

Data Requirements Willingness to Pay Toll Cost as a function of congestion level Auto Demand Highway Network 6

Managed Lane Modeling Development Phase IPhase IIPhase III TypeAssignment- Based Mode Choice + Assignment Discrete Choice Model TypeTrip-Based, Static AB and/or DTA FeaturesDynamic toll Estimation, Willingness to pay Curve, Toll Policy Feedback of toll LOS skims to mode choice. Sensitive to multi- modal shifts Incorporates detailed HHLD characteristics for toll choice UsesLRTP & Corridor Planning Multi-modal corridor evaluation Policy Sensitivity Testing, and TP Planning Data Requirements SP/RP survey for WTP curve or logit estimation SP+RP survey to estimation and calibrate MC logit HIS supportive of AB models AvailabilitySummer,

Managed Lanes Toll Segments 8

Highway Network Coding Diagram 9

Toll Cost as a function of Congestion 10

Toll Market Calculation 11

Willing to Pay Proportions Toll Cents per Minute Saved by Demand Category

Application Flow WTP and Toll Policy Curves Define toll segments and initial toll values Phase ILOOP Skim Tolls and times Phase ILOOP In Jloop, compute toll & nontoll demand Phase ILOOP Assign toll & non- toll in multiclass assignment Phase ADJUST Compute Max VC on toll segments & new toll by segment One Assignment Iteration 13

Testing Model Implementation 14

Flow on Managed and General Purpose Lanes 15

Testing Dynamic Toll Calculations iterationstartendsegmentpaytollV/Cnode

Toll Segments Numbered 17

Sensitivity to Toll Values for Managed Lanes 18

Sensitivity to Willingness to Pay Tolls 19

Adaptations Fixed Toll – subset of toll policy Allows multiple toll policies Allows for multiple markets income stratified Purpose Stratified Can still do accell/decell at toll booths 20

Strengths Planning Level Application No a priori assumption of toll Assures no congestion on toll facility Useful tool for evaluating LOS / Revenue Goals Testing toll policies Customized for WTP 21

Weaknesses No mode shift assumed from transit Congestion represented in daily assignment Statewide model application No sensitivity to SE data of travelers 22

FSUTMS Apps? Urban HOT lanes Urban Tolled Freeways Rural Turnpike? – willingness to pay characteristics need evaluation Not sufficient for multi-modal corridors, but could play a role 23

Questions or Comments?