Benthic Macroinvertebrate Assemblages in Flint River, Indian Creek and Flint Creek Watersheds in North Alabama- Preliminary Study R. Ward, L. White, A.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
20 th Annual Student GREEN Congress “Counting Critters” Workshop.
Advertisements

Watershed Watch Protocols Level I. Goals for this module Understand how biomonitoring is used to evaluate the health of a stream Understand how biomonitoring.
Riparian Zone Habitat Assessment Vegetation and More.
Measuring Stream Quality We use the bugs living in the creek to measure stream quality for two reasons. When the stream is rich in habitat variety it will.
Clearwater River Habitat/Bioassessment
A Comparative Study of Water Quality and Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Diversity in the Rio Grande and its Ditches By Lian Liu Mentor: Ayesha Burdett.
Melissa Churchel 1, Jim Hanula 2, Wayne Berisford 1 and Jim Vose 2 1 Department of Entomology University of Georgia 2 USDA Forest Service Southern Research.
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
An analysis of the aquatic insect communities of McMichael Creek, PA under open and closed canopies Christopher Hartzler, James Hartzler, Bradley Rehnberg.
Macroinvertebrates and Bioassessment: Using Biological Indicators to Measure Stream Health Caitlin Chaffee URI Cooperative Extension.
Watershed System Physical Properties Stream flow (cfs) Stream Channel Pattern Substrate Chemical Properties pH Dissolved Oxygen Temperature Nutrients Turbidity.
Adem.alabama.gov Incorporating NPS Intensive Surveys into ADEM’s Monitoring Strategy Southeastern Water Pollution Biologists’ Association Meeting Lake.
Do installed steam logjams increase macroinvertebrate richness and abundance? Seyeon Kim and Ong Xiong with faculty mentor Dr. Todd Wellnitz Biology Department.
Conclusion -Velocity affects the temperature, pH and DO of a stream; the greater the velocity, the greater the water quality -The positive correlation.
The Use of Benthic Macroinvertebrates to Assess Water Quality in an Urban WV Stream Laura Canton and Thomas Ford, PhD Concord University Brush Creek ~Originates.
Habitat Assessment Developed by Ken Cooke Kentucky Division of Water Watershed Watch Program Coordinator Modified by Mike Kemp Professor of Environmental.
Final stuff: n Lab practical –Coleoptera, Hemiptera n Final exam: Fri May 2:15 –Assessment with Invertebrates n Lecture material (IDEM protocol) n.
Common Monitoring Parameters. Step 1 Consider purpose/objectives of monitoring Assess use attainment Characterize watershed Identify pollutants and sources.
A landscape perspective of stream food webs: Exploring cumulative effects and defining biotic thresholds.
Bioassessment 1.0. Stream Visual Assessment Protocol 1. Turbidity 2. Plant growth 3. Channel Condition 4. Channel Flow Alteration 5. Percent Embeddedness.
Aquatic invertebrates and water quality monitoring in the Little Luckiamute River Aquatic invertebrates and water quality monitoring in the Little Luckiamute.
Streams and Rivers.
Metric (Family Level) Standard Best Value (95 th or 5 th percentile) Worst Possible Value Expected Response to Degradation Total Taxa180 EPT Taxa120 %EPT91.90.
An Assessment of the Benthic Community Structure: Implications on the Water Quality of Lake Palacpaquen, San Pablo City, Philippines Perez, Terresita.,
Introduction Larger streams and rivers in the Piedmont, Southwestern Appalachians, Ridge and Valley, and parts of the coastal plain ecoregions of Alabama.
©MathScience Innovation Center Our Backyard Waterways : Water Quality and Bioindicators Presented by: Rachel Martin Day 2.
To what extent is there excess sediment in the Middle Truckee River that impairs aquatic life use? Application of benthic macroinvertebrate bioassessment.
How do humans affect watersheds, the hydrologic cycle and stream ecology ? AKA management implications.
STREAM ECOSYSTEMS.
NC Division of Water Quality Water Quality Assessments and Local Watershed Plans.
A Comparative Stream Study of Two First Order Streams in Nixon Park, York PA Susan Price Department of Biological Sciences, York College Introduction Macroinvertebrates.
Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment.
Final stuff: n Lab practical: Apr 29 n Final exam: due Fri May 2:15.
Kentucky’s comprehensive Water Monitoring and Assessment Program addresses water quality management objectives outlined in the Clean Water Act, as well.
LOTIC ECOSYSTEMS Flowing water Moving continuously in one direction. Headwaters- Where the river or streams begin. Rivers are created in two ways: 1.
 Sustainability Master Plan  Effect of Runoff on Stream  Negative Effect on Lake Carnegie  Final Pre-Restoration Assessment  Why this first order.
Aquatic Macroinvertebrates
Fish Assemblages of the Wabash River Mark Pyron. Wabash River Fishes 1.Large river 2.High diversity 3.History of human impact 4.Fish assemblages respond.
Benthic Macroinvertebrate Sampling. Sampling -WHAT All available invertebrate taxa in the entire 200 foot stream reach -WHERE All available habitats in.
Stream macroinvertebrate responses to landscape variables; an evaluation of rapid bioassessment techniques using a statistical modeling approach. Declan.
Stream Ecosystem Assessment Group 1 Camp Caesar August 2003.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
Sampling Biodiversity Using macroinvertebrates
Comparison of Benthic Invertebrate Communities Upstream and Downstream of Proposed Culvert Installations in Alabama Amy C. Gill USGS, Alabama Water Science.
National Monitoring Conference May 7-11, 2006
Water Assessment Data Lab Assignment # 5 Land Use The first thing you notice when field sampling is the area around your site. What type of land use.
Comparison of Aquatic Invertebrates in Pool and Riffle Habitats of Blackburn Fork Comparison of Aquatic Invertebrates in Pool and Riffle Habitats of Blackburn.
Stream Health: biotic integrity variation in Owasco Lake watershed Susan F. Cushman Hobart and William Smith Colleges 2007 Finger Lakes Research Conference.
Detecting Ecological Effects of Development in the Wappingers and Fishkill Watersheds Karin Limburg, Karen Stainbrook, Bongghi Hong SUNY College of Environmental.
Lab: Benthic Bugs and Bioassessment
Middle Fork Project AQ 3 – Macroinvertebrate and Aquatic Mollusk Technical Study Report Overview May 5, 2008.
Macroinvertebrates Little Creatures that tell us If our natural waterways are healthy.
13. Sediment and aquatic habitat in rivers (a)Benthic organisms and bed sediments (b)Fish and bed sediments (c)Reach classification based on bed material.
The Arizona Rivers Project Southwestern Academy June 2009 Fun with Macroinvertebrates.
Record notes in your notebook  Record at least 5 facts/ideas in your notebook.  Write down and answer the following questions:  What are“benthic macroinvertebrates”?
USE OF BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES TO ASSESS WATER QUALITY IN BOLIN CREEK David Lenat Lenat Consulting Services.
Effects of Stream Restoration: A Comparative Study of Pine Run in Felton, Pennsylvania Luke Mummert, Department of Biological Sciences, York College of.
Initial Assessment of Habitat Use by Stocked Lake Sturgeon in the Genesee River D. E. DITTMAN 1 and E. C. ZOLLWEG 2 1 Tunison Laboratory of Aquatic Science,
Watershed Health Indicators
Stream Ecology.
Biology October 6, 2016 Class: Post River Study Homework: Test on Water properties, Water cycle, Macroinvertebrates, Watershed Next week.
5.2 Detection and Monitoring of Pollution
Fun with Macroinvertebrates
J. M. C. K Jayawardhana1, W. D. T. M Gunawardhana 1, E. P
Biological Assessment of Pond Health
Using Benthic Macroinvertebrate Populations to Assess Campus
Water Testing Project for the North Fork River
By: Sarah, Kevin, Joe, John and KC
The Index of Biotic Integrity (the BI or IBI)
EVPP 110 Lab Freshwater Streams 1-2 Diversity of Life 12
Presentation transcript:

Benthic Macroinvertebrate Assemblages in Flint River, Indian Creek and Flint Creek Watersheds in North Alabama- Preliminary Study R. Ward, L. White, A. Bohlman and T. Tsegaye Department of Plant and Soil Science, Alabama A&M University P.O. Box 1208, Normal, AL METHODS (Cont’d.) Dip Net – Both sides of the stream bank were sampled for aquatic insects using 10 jabs of dip net along the stream within the sampling site. Samples were combined for collections on each side of the stream. Leaf Pack – Leaf packs were collected from each half of the stream into a composite sample ( g wet weight). Leaf packs provide suitable habitat and nutrition for a variety of macroinvertebrates. Each collected leaf pack was hand-picked for clinging invertebrates. Kick Net - Three riffles were sampled with a 1-m kick net. The substrate was disturbed approximately 3 meters upstream of the net. The invertebrates were handpicked after each kick. Sampling Sites The general geophysical characteristics of the collection sites canopy cover (%), riparian vegetation, stream disturbances, etc. were noted. Field parameters recorded include stream depth (cm), water temperature (°C), pH, turbidity (FAU), total dissolved solids (ppm) and dissolved oxygen (mg/L). All macroinvertebrates were initially preserved in 75% ethyl alcohol, brought back to the laboratory, sorted, identified to family, and placed in 90% ethanol in glass vials. Parameters For this report, bioassessment was based on percent (%) EPT for each sampling site and for all watersheds combined. Percent chironomids and simuliids were measured similarly. Other parameters (e.g., total taxa, diversity indices, etc.) will be used in subsequent data analyses. LITERATURE CITED U.S. EPA Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates, and fish. Abstract Benthic macroinvertebrates are excellent indicators of water pollution such as turbidity and nutrient loads. The assessment of aquatic biodiversity is widely used to strengthen continuing measures of water quality in north Alabama. This preliminary study was conducted to determine taxa richness (total number of taxa) and composition of aquatic insects occurring in Flint River, Indian Creek and Flint Creek. For this report, bioassessment was based mainly on the relative abundance of EPT and chironomid [percent Ephemeroptera-Plecoptera-Trichoptera (%EPT) and percent chironomids]. EPT are known to be highly sensitive to increasing perturbations; increase in their abundance suggest improved water health. The occurrence and dominance of chironomids, on the other hand, may indicate organic impairments of streams. Twenty seven families have been identified in our sample collections suggesting the rich diversity of biotic components in the watersheds under study. In this study, spring-summer aquatic insect samplings were done at monthly intervals in three locations along each tributary using surber, dip net, kick net and leaf pack methods. In addition, gastropod presence in the watersheds was also recorded. The sampling sites also represent the diverse riparian zones and land use of the surrounding areas. Our preliminary results showed high dominance of Ephemeroptera over stonefly and caddisfly populations in all watersheds. Chironomids and simuliids comprised the majority of the Dipterans collected. Likewise, Elmidae (riffle beetles) has a strong presence in all watersheds. Riparian and stream characteristics were described for each sampling location. INTRODUCTION Flint River, Indian Creek and Flint Creek are major tributaries to the Tennessee River which supplies drinking water and provides recreation areas to residents of Madison and other counties in north Alabama. The quality of water draining from these watersheds is of prime importance to the public. Benthic macroinvertebrates vary in their sensitivity and tolerance of pollutants occurring in bodies of water. These organisms respond to long term impairments of stream water. Unlike chemical water parameters which are reflective of water condition at time of sampling, population levels of aquatic fauna respond to long term effects due to their stabilized water environment. Thus, as bioindicators, aquatic insects are excellent and reliable determinants of the general health of streams and rivers. Members of the orders Ephemeroptera (mayflies), Plecoptera (stoneflies) and Trichoptera (caddisflies) are intolerant of pollutants; their relative abundance indicates good water quality. Midges and blackflies [both are in the order Diptera (flies)] are tolerant of pollution; their occurrence in high numbers is indicative of water impairment. Table 1. Description of sampling sites. Sample SitesWatershedSite Location Description 1. B.W. Road Forks 3. FR on Hwy Providence Main 5. Farrow Road 6. Old Madison Pike 7. Lacon, AL 8. Bankhead N.F. 9. Neel, AL Flint River Indian Creek Flint Creek Mostly agricultural, variable riparian widths, moderate canopy cover, high siltation. High residential, wide riparian widths, too wide for complete canopy reach, remnants of old bridges Mostly agricultural, expanding residential developments, public access accumulates trash, complete canopy, mixed substrate On new greenway space off of poorly contained community development, stable riparian area, large snags throughout reach On new greenway space through high residential area. Thin riparian area, highly shaded, mostly cobble bottoms South of IC Greenway and current construction, large riparian buffers, balanced ratio of riffles, pools, some bedrock In bottom hardwood forested/wetland, sandy bottoms, many snags and embankments, very low flow during dry season Within established preserve wilderness area, ephemeral flow, well shaded by canopy, mix sandy and cobble substrate Near some residential and wetlands, small intermittent stream, sandy mud bottom, previously channelized, high (>2.5 m) banks Identified Families Number of Individuals Percent % Ephemeroptera: Heptageniidae, Ameletidae, Baetidae, Caenidae, Ephermerillidae, Empididae % Diptera: Chironomidae,Tipulidae,Tabanidae, Simuliidae, Dixidae, Athericidae % Trichoptera: Hydropsychidae, Philopotamidae, Polycentropodidae, Psychomyiidae, Leptophlebiidae % Coleoptera: Psephenidae, Elmidae % Odonata: Coenagrionidae, Gomphidae, Aeshnidae, Calopterygidae, Libellulidae % Gastropoda: N/A % Plecoptera: Perlidae % Total % METHODS Study Watersheds – Flint River, Indian Creek and Flint Creek Three sampling sites, each 100 m long reach, were selected for each watershed. For Flint River, the sites were on Hwy 72, Buddy Williams Road, and 3 Forks. For Indian Creek, Old Madison Pike, Farrow Road, and Providence Main were chosen. Lacon, AL, Neel, AL, and the Bankhead National Forest were selected for Flint Creek. Sampling Methods Each site per watershed was sampled monthly. Sampling was based on EPA Rapid Bioassessment Protocol’s (RBP’s) multi-habitat methods (USEPA 2006). Macroinvertebrates were collected from a variety of microhabitats using different techniques. All sampling methods were begun downstream, moving up the reach to minimize disturbance. Surber – Each site per watershed was divided into 3 sections with riffles along the length of the stream from which three samples were collected. Each sample was a composite of three sub-samples obtained by rubbing substrate (gravel and cobbles) for 1 minute to dislodge aquatic insects. Insects were individually picked using forceps or camel’s hairbrush from the mesh. Allison at work North Alabama watersheds Fig. 1. Dominant families in watersheds combined. Table 2. Major groups collected in study areas. Fig. 5. Simuliid mass from Flint River SUMMARY  A total of 27 families were collected in all watersheds combined; top 9 included Heptageniidae, Elmidae, Hydropsychidae, Chironomidae, Ameletidae, Baetidae, Simuliidae, Coenagrionidae and Caenidae.  Indian Creek (Madison Pike) had the highest % EPT compared to other watersheds; however, this watershed (Providence Main) also harbored the highest number of chironomids.  Based on relative EPT abundance (% EPT) and low numbers of chironomids as bioindicators of pollutants, Flint River (Hwy 72) has the highest water quality of all watersheds under study.  Top 6 families account for %; top 11 families account for 84.24%. RESULTS Each of the sampling sites is described in Table 1. On the Flint River, collection sites were near agricultural lands and expanding residential rural developments; most effluents were from adjacent agricultural farms. Indian Creek is situated in heavily populated urbanized sections of the City of Huntsville; two sites on this watershed bordered green space areas. Urban sprawl and sedimentation contribute significantly to the deterioration of water quality in this tributary. Flint Creek is a designated EPA cleanup site; it is heavily channelized through agricultural pasture lands but two of the collection sites are located in hardwood forested/wetlands. All of these reaches are intermittent; their flow slowed, developing into shallow pools during the dry season. Twenty seven families in 7 orders were represented in our composite collections (combined watersheds) (Table 2). Among EPT, Ephemeroptera dominated other groups at 29% of total individuals collected (Figs. 1-3); families Heptageniidae and Hydropsychidae (Trichoptera) led the group in abundance across watersheds. Stoneflies were practically absent in the study sites; Plecoptera was represented by only one family (Perlidae) at 3.17%. Caddisflies (Trichoptera) had a healthy presence in the watersheds at 15.70%. Although combined EPT dominated all other insect groups, Diptera (17.82 %) closed in second to mayflies in abundance. Chironomids ranked fourth among top families in all watersheds suggesting organic stream impairment. Indian Creek (Providence) topped all other sites for number of chironomids. The site is in the center of a massive urban sprawl; adjacent areas are currently undergoing expansive business and residential development. The xylophagous riffle beetles (Elmidae) occurred in all watersheds. With Heptageniidae, Elmidae ranked first (at 14%) among top 11 families in the all watersheds (Fig. 1). Simuliids were predominant in Flint Creek (Fig. 4), occurring in moderate numbers elsewhere. Fig. 4. Total number and percent chironomids (bars) and simuliids (line) in each sampling site. Fig. 3. Percent (%) EPT in all sampling sites. Fig. 2. Total number of EPT collected from each sampling site. Flint River Indian Creek Greenway Flint Creek