Guangzhao Mao Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science College of Engineering Institute for Manufacturing Research.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Summer Internship Program Outline
Advertisements

NSF CAREER Young Faculty Perspective Steve McIntosh Department of Chemical Engineering.
INSTITUTE OF BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES WRITING GRANT PROPOSALS Thursday, April 10, 2014 Randy Draper, Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research Room 125, IBS.
Merit Review and Proposal Preparation Mark Courtney Division of Environmental Biology
NSF Merit Review Criteria Revision Background. Established Spring 2010 Rationale: – More than 13 years since the last in-depth review and revision of.
HARRINGTON d e p a r t m e n t of b I o e n g i n e e r i n g Eric J. Guilbeau, Ph.D. Olin Professor and Chair Bioengineering Seed Grant Program.
The IGERT Program Preliminary Proposals June 2008 Carol Van Hartesveldt IGERT Program Director IGERT Program Director.
FastLane Project Reports System 101 For Faculty and Staff Submitting Annual, Final or Interim Reports on National Science Foundation Projects May 1999.
NSF CAREER workshop March 12-13, 2009 I. Kretzschmar, CCNY slide 1 How to write a successful CAREER proposal? Ilona Kretzschmar Associate Professor Chemical.
Workshop NSF Major Research Instrumentation grants program NSF approach to research in undergraduate institutions Supporting students on grants Introduction.
Current vs. proposed procedures CURRENT PROCEDURE Each proposal author or authors chooses the college or discipline-based panel that they want their proposal.
I got this great idea! What’s next? Time to start preparing a proposal.
(from 2003 workshop presentation on NSF funding mechanisms & proposal strategies)
The RUI proposal: Research in Undergraduate Institutes Mark Lubkowitz Saint Michael’s College.
1 Writing a Successful CAREER Proposal - my personal experience Hong Liang Jordan Career Development Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering Texas A&M.
1 Welcome to an NSF Unsolicited Panel Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport (CBET) Division.
Overview of the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Major Research Instrumentation (MRI) Program Office of Integrative Activities National Science.
CAREER WORKSHOP APRIL 9, 2014 Required Elements of the Proposal Beth Hodges Director, Office of Proposal Development FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY.
Proposal Strengths and Weakness as Identified by Reviewers Russ Pimmel & Sheryl Sorby FIE Conference Oct 13, 2007.
Seminar Series Foundation and Other Non-Profit Agreements: Grants with Special Conditions Caroline Jones, Senior Contract and Grant Officer Catalina Verdu-Cano,
The National Science Foundation’s proposal review process Helpful tips for getting your proposals funded.
Proposals Steven A. Jones Biomedical Engineering Louisiana Tech University Created for Louisiana Tech’s NSF-Funded Research Experiences in Micro/Nano Engineering.
9/7/2015Division of Undergraduate Education Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (S-STEM) Program Bert Holmes
NSF Proposal Writing Guidelines Overview Components Other Important Factors Tips for Success
Course Timeline October 7 th : Project description October 14 th : Paperwork and Budget October 21 st : Successful Grant Writers (Project description due)
Submitting a Proposal: Best Practices By: Anu Singh Science Assistant
NSF Committee of Visitors (COV) Report Review of Bioengineering and Environmental Sciences (BES) Division of the Engineering Directorate 2005.
Research Project Grant (RPG) Retreat K-Series March 2012 Bioengineering Classroom.
Electronic Engineering Department Final Year Projects September 2008.
CS Careers© Dr. Ayman Abdel-Hamid, CS5014, Fall CS5014 Research Methods in CS Dr. Ayman Abdel-Hamid Computer Science Department Virginia Tech CS.
NSF IGERT proposals Yang Zhao Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Wayne State University.
1 Learning Agents Laboratory Computer Science Department George Mason University Prof. Gheorghe Tecuci 2. Projects and assignments.
This Thursday (November 30, 2006) You will individually select an agency where you actually would like to send your proposal. Read their instructions and.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Broadening Participation.
Secure and Trustworthy Cyberspace (SaTC) “Top 10” Tips for SaTC Proposals One program director’s observations Sol Greenspan.
Grant writing 101 The Art of Flawless Packaging Scott K. Powers Department of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology Scott K. Powers Department of Applied.
Parts of an NSF full grant proposal
Final Year Project 2 Systems and Networking Department.
DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY JOINT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OFFICE CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE create collaborate communicate Click to add title of.
National Institutes of Health AREA PROGRAM (R15) Thomas J. Wenzel Bates College, Lewiston, Maine.
Midwest Big Data Hub Letters of Intent for NSF Edward Seidel Director, NCSA Founder Prof. of Physics, Prof of Astronomy On behalf of the Midwest.
1Mobile Computing Systems © 2001 Carnegie Mellon University Writing a Successful NSF Proposal November 4, 2003 Website: nsf.gov.
Atlantic Innovation Fund Round VIII February 5, 2008.
International Arctic Research Center. Vision: IARC will serve our nation and the arctic research community by building an integrated understanding of.
Background (and significance) Section Things to remember: As your progress through the literature review be sure to highlight in summary sentences where.
Limited Submissions NCURA Region III Spring Meeting.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
21 October Administrative Review Michelle Kelleher Science Assistant Division of Environmental Biology 21 October 2005.
Sofia, 5th December, 2013 Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA) Promoting Excellence in Research László P. Kollár President.
VLBA Key Science: Making It Happen Bob Dickman AD for New Mexico Operations.
Major Research Instrumentation- COV Discussion of the Issues and Recommendations with SMART October 18, 2005.
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process RC Chair identifies 3 RC members to review Pre-Proposal & information is sent for review (within 2 weeks.
Navigating NSF Programs Esin Gulari Dean, College of Engineering & Science Clemson University.
National Science Foundation
NATA Foundation Student Grants Process
ARC – The Rejoinder Process
ECE361 Engineering Practice
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals
Research Project Grant (RPG) Retreat R-series
FISH 521 Further proceedings Peer review
Preparing Research Proposals for NSF and NIH April 20, 2018
Bibliometric Analysis of Process Safety and Environmental Protection
How to Succeed with NIH: September 28, 2018
Capstone Team Project title
RESEARCH REPORT Presented By: Dr. Ajit Singh yadav
Study Section Overview – The Process and What You Should Know
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process
NSF Funding Melissa A. Moss Professor, Dept. Chemical Engineering
Presentation transcript:

Guangzhao Mao Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science College of Engineering Institute for Manufacturing Research

 Typical panel process in CBET  How NOT to write a GOOD proposal?  How to convert a VERY GOOD proposal into an Excellent proposal?  Recommended format by Dr. Stephen Russell

 Panel makeup and proposal assignment  Fastlane review submission  Panel meeting ◦ Proposals ranked according to submitted reviews ◦ Discussion of top proposals ◦ Final recommendations and panel summaries Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems (CBET)

 Lack of scientific underpinning/hypotheses  Incremental/work already done  Lack of supporting data  “Bait and switch”

 Example of an excellent proposal ◦ Strong science, strong publication record, new collaboration, preliminary data, believable broader impacts  What can you do? ◦ Milestones ◦ Proposal framed as a series of questions and solutions ◦ Emphasis on originality/uniqueness ◦ Alternative hypotheses and experimental approaches

 Overview and objectives  Expected significance  Relation to PI’s longer-term goal  Background (Prior NSF support, literature review, preliminary data)  Relation to other work in progress  Experimental plan (develop each specific objective, timetable, future directions)  Broader impacts