Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Board Governance: A Key to Quality Organizations
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Educational Specialists Performance Evaluation System
SEED – CT’s System for Educator and Evaluation and Development April 2013 Wethersfield Public Schools CONNECTICUT ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION Overview of.
Connecting Teacher Evaluation to Student Academic Progress Implementing Standard 7 0 August 2012.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
PORTFOLIO.
THREE HANDBOOKS TEACHER PROFESSIONAL EVALUATION SYSTEM EDUCATIONAL SPECIALISTS PROFESSIONAL EVALUATION SYSTEM SCHOOL ADMINISTRATOR PROFESSIONAL EVALUATION.
Ib Ia Teachers lead in their classroom. Take responsibility for all students’ learning Communicate vision to students Use data to organize, plan, and set.
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System 0 August 2012.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
STANDARDS FOR SCHOOL LEADERS DR. Robert Buchanan Southeast Missouri State University.
Purpose of the Standards
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System
Stronge Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
OverviewOverview Virginia Principal Performance Evaluation System February 2013.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
What should be the basis of
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Technology Leadership
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ William E. Harner, Acting Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Principal Effectiveness: Domains Domain 1: Strategic/Cultural.
Principal Effectiveness: Domains Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education Domain 1: Strategic/Cultural.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
PAULDING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AdvancED EXTERNAL REVIEW REPORT.
New Virginia Superintendent Evaluation Why the Change?
Segment 5: Sample Activities Federal Accountability Requirements School Leadership Instructional Supervision 1.
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. April 4, 2006.
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Overview.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research Review Taking Stock Collect evidence Principal Practices & the Rubric End-of-the-Year Looking.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Primary Purposes of the Evaluation System
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers Virginia Department of Education Approved April 2011.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
NEASC SITE VISIT SEPTEMBER 30-OCTOBER 3, Standards of Accreditation 4 standards of Teaching and Learning 1- Mission and Expectations for Student.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Principal Evaluation Code of Virginia states that: Principal evaluations be consistent with the 7 Standards set forth by the state.
Student Achievement Teacher & Leader Effectiveness Overview of Stronge & MyLearningPlan/OASYS Interim Report #1 January 27,
An Overview of Revisions to the Rhode Island Model
Education.state.mn.us Principal Evaluation Components in Legislation Work Plan for Meeting Rose Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Personal Growth and Professional Development
State Board of Education Progress Update
February 21-22, 2018.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Presentation transcript:

Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.

The Old and the New Current Evaluation Model Model in New Guidelines

Purposes of Evaluation Improve educational performance Improve superintendent/board relations and communications Clarify roles of superintendent/inform superintendent of board’s expectations Improve planning Aid in the professional development of superintendent Serve as an accountability mechanism Serve as a basis for personnel decisions Fulfill legal requirements

Guidelines The Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Superintendents provide a model evaluation system that may be used “as is” or used to refine existing systems.

Requirements The Code of Virginia requires that school boards have procedures for evaluating superintendents that include a component to address student academic progress. How this requirement is met is the responsibility of the board. See: Code of Virginia Section and :5

The Evaluation Process The evaluation process is designed to be a collaborative, interactive process involving the superintendent and the board. The model includes the following components: Performance standards – expectations Performance indicators – observable, tangible behaviors Documentation – multiple sources of data Student academic achievement – goals for student growth Ratings rubric – acceptable performance levels

An Effective Superintendent Think of how you would complete the following statement – “An effective superintendent is one who ________________.” Write at least 3 precise statements that could be used to measure effectiveness.

The Superintendent’s Role In… Mission, Vision & Goals Planning & Assessment Instructional Leadership Org Leadership & Safety Communication and Community Relations Professionalism Student Academic Progress

Mission, Vision, and Goals The superintendent works with the local school board to formulate and implement the school division’s mission, vision, and goals to promote student academic progress.

Planning and Assessment The superintendent strategically gathers, analyzes, and uses a variety of data to guide planning and decision- making consistent with established guidelines, policies, and procedures that result in student academic progress.

Instructional Leadership The superintendent fosters the success of all teachers, staff, and students by ensuring the development, communication, implementation, and evaluation of effective teaching and learning that leads to student academic progress and school improvement.

Organizational Leadership & Safety The superintendent fosters the safety and success of all teachers, staff, and students by supporting, managing, and evaluating the division’s organization, operation, and use of resources.

Communication and Community Relations The superintendent fosters the success of all students through effective communication with stakeholders.

Professionalism The superintendent fosters the success of teachers, staff, and students by demonstrating professional standards and ethics, engaging in continuous professional development, and contributing to the profession.

Student Academic Progress The superintendent’s leadership results in acceptable, measurable division-wide student academic progress based on established standards.

Student Academic Achievement One approach to linking student academic progress to superintendent performance is goal setting. Use student achievement data to set target goals for division – wide student improvement.

Division-Wide Performance Think of short term goals that are needed to address long- term issues Set annual goals related to the division’s needs and concerns Identify valid measures of student academic progress See page 28 of Guidelines for examples of progress measures.

Documentation Multiple data sources are needed in order to develop a complete picture of the superintendent’s performance. Suggestions include: Self Evaluation Documents Client Survey Goal Setting

Rating Scales ExemplaryProficient Developing/ Needs Improvement Unacceptable Proficient is the expected level of performance.

Targeted Professional Growth Part 6 of Guidelines provides suggestions for targeted professional growth plans when additional support is needed for superintendent. See pages 59 – 61

The Old and the New Current Evaluation Model Model in New Guidelines Our Revised Model