The Why (Waiver & Strategic Plan) Aligned to research: MET Study Components: Framework/Multiple Measures Pilot Requirements Timeline.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson
Advertisements

June 20, Your Presenters  Ken Mattingly – Rockcastle County  Jessica Addison – Todd County/KDE.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Math Content Network Update The Power of Mistakes Student Engagement Culture of Learning Growth Mindset Congruent Tasks.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal Requirements SB 290 ESEA Waiver Oregon Framework.
The “Highly Effective” Early Childhood Classroom Environment
Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System An Overview of the System and the Kentucky Framework for Teaching.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY RENEWAL PROCESS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS January29, 2015.
Why Student Perceptions Matter Rob Ramsdell, Co-founder April 2015.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
New York State Professional Development Standards S/CDN 2010.
Session Materials  Wiki
The Backwards Bike.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
ASSESSMENT and EVALUATION FOR IMPROVED STUDENT LEARNING:
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
A Strategy for Assessment PORTFOLIOS Jones, M., Shelton, M. (2011). Developing Your Portfolio--Enhancing Your Learning and Showing Your Stuff: A Guide.
THE TRIPOD PROJECT STUDENT SURVEYS. What is the Tripod Project? Student voice survey Measures student perceptions and perspectives Captures key dimensions.
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.
PILOT REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH DISTRICT: Select a minimum of 10% of schools to participate. A minimum of 1 school MUST meet the minimum participant requirements.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
What Students Can Tell Us about the Quality of Teaching: Evidence from MET and Implications for Teacher Preparation Ronald F. Ferguson, PhD Harvard University.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Committee on the Assessment of K-12 Science Proficiency Board on Testing and Assessment and Board on Science Education National Academy of Sciences.
Effective Coaching for Success Presenter: Dr. Wendy Perry 2015.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Final Reports from the Measures of Effective Teaching Project Tom Kane Harvard University Steve Cantrell, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
LOGO Principal Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Conferencing and Feedback.
Should Students Have A Voice?
Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System An Overview of the System and the Kentucky Framework for Teaching Jenny Ray PGES Consultant KDE/NKCES.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Program Introduction to Principal Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
ESEA, TAP, and Charter handouts-- 3 per page with notes and cover of one page.
Learning More About Oregon’s ESEA Waiver Plan January 23, 2013.
Teacher Evaluation ___________________________ Modified ADEPT Model Assisting Developing Evaluating Professional Teaching
The School Effectiveness Framework
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
A TAP Story: A. A. Nelson Elementary School Jacqueline Smith, Principal A.A. Nelson Elementary School TAP Leadership Team Teddy Broussard, State TAP Director.
Getting Ready for the Professional Growth & Effectiveness System AISD Getting Ready for the Professional Growth & Effectiveness System AISD.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
Professional Growth & Effectiveness System. DECISION REQUIRED BY MARCH 2013 Current Evaluation and PD Models The current evaluation plan was last revised.
Education.state.mn.us Principal Evaluation Components in Legislation Work Plan for Meeting Rose Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education.
Evaluation: An Opportunity to leverage learning at all levels School Board Presentation – May 22, 2013.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
PGES Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Update Kentucky Board of Education August 8,
Designing Quality Assessment and Rubrics
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
Montgomery Township Board of Education
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
An Introduction to NETS*T
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 1
Fall 2017 Data Summit Welcome!.
Implementing Race to the Top
REPORTING.
Presentation transcript:

The Why (Waiver & Strategic Plan) Aligned to research: MET Study Components: Framework/Multiple Measures Pilot Requirements Timeline

From Qualified to Effective ESEA Waiver used for continual improvement; differentiate performance use multiple, valid measures evaluate regularly provide useful feedback, used to inform personnel decisions

Xn8ZQ&feature=player_embedded Testimony of Dr. Steve Cantrell to the U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee on Early Childhood, Elementary, and Secondary Education. February 28, 2013

7  Monitor validity  Ensure reliability  Assure accuracy  Make meaningful distinctions  Prioritize support and feedback  Use data for decisions at all levels  Set expectations  Use multiple measures  Balance weights

Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Observation Peer Observation Professional Growth Self Reflection Student Voice Student Growth All measures are supported through evidence.

Explanation of Multiple Measures Student Growth Quantitative measure of the impact a teacher or principal has on a student (or set of students) as measured by student growth goal setting and student growth percentiles. Student Voice Student feedback around teacher performance based on survey data Professional Growth Increased effectiveness resulting from experiences that develop an educator’s skills, knowledge, expertise and other characteristics Self Reflection Critical self-examination of practice on a regular basis to deepen knowledge, expand repertoire of skills and incorporate findings to improve practice Peer Observation Process of a peer observing another’s professional practice and observable behaviors, providing supportive and constructive feedback for formative purposes Observation Evaluator’s observation, documentation and feedback on a teacher’s professional practices and observable behaviors Documents or demonstrations that indicates proof of a particular descriptor. Should be a natural by-product created through the process of teaching Evidence SUPPORTED BY

The Observation Process Principal/Supervisor provide documentation provide feedback measure the effectiveness of professional practice Peer (formative) collaborative process provide supportive and constructive feedback

A process by which teachers assess the effectiveness of: their instructional planning, lesson implementation, content knowledge beliefs and dispositions

Caring about students (Encouragement and Support) Captivating students (Learning Seems Interesting and Relevant) Conferring with students (Students Sense their Ideas are Respected) Controlling behavior (Culture of Cooperation and Peer Support) Clarifying lessons (Success Seems Feasible) Challenging students (Press for Effort, Perseverance and Rigor) Consolidating knowledge (Ideas get Connected and Integrated)

Student Growth Measures Goal Setting for Student Growth Applies to all teachers Student Growth Percentiles Applies to grades 4 – 8 reading & math

Questions?