Military Family Services Program Participant Survey Briefing Notes.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Board Governance: A Key to Quality Organizations
Advertisements

Program design overview Pre-contract to post-program year Office on Volunteerism and Community Service.
1 Mystery Shopping SHIP Directors’ Conference June 11, 2007 Julie Leonard & Erika Melman BearingPoint, Inc.
Ideas from the Outcomes Think Tank. Gather family’s concerns and general information about child following program procedures Use 3 global outcomes as.
Third sector strategy Dave Hill Director Children, Schools and Families Daniel Moore Project manager: third sector strategy.
Quality Improvement/ Quality Assurance Amelia Broussard, PhD, RN, MPH Christopher Gibbs, JD, MPH.
Healthy Child Development Suggestions for Submitting a Strong Proposal.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
1 Minority SA/HIV Initiative MAI Training SPF Step 3 – Planning Presented By: Tracy Johnson, CSAP’s Central CAPT Janer Hernandez, CSAP’s Northeast CAPT.
Presented By: Tracy Johnson, Central CAPT
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
1 Statewide Assessment Elements of a Successful Statewide Assessment.
Washington State Prevention Summit Analyzing and Preparing Data for Outcome-Based Evaluation Using the Assigned Measures and the PBPS Outcomes Report.
Molly Chamberlin, Ph.D. Indiana Youth Institute
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Choosing Questions and Planning the Evaluation.
Information and planning that make the difference.
Session Goals: To redefine assessment as it relates to our University mission. To visit assessment plan/report templates and ensure understanding for.
Culture Programme - Selection procedure Katharina Riediger Infoday Praha 10/06/2010.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
Chapter 3 Internal Controls.
Policy Council and Program Planning. The Head Start Program Planning Cycle National Center on Program Management and Fiscal Operations (PMFO)
Performance Measurement: A Brief Introduction For Kunuwanimano Child and Family Services.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Using the Evaluation System to Answer Key Questions About Your Initiative.
This project was supported by Award No VF-GX-0001, awarded by the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
CP methodology adapted to UNFCCC Swedish International Development Agency S ESSION 9.A United Nations Environment Program Division of Technology Industry.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Working Definition of Program Evaluation
Unit 10. Monitoring and evaluation
Military Family Services Program Participant Survey Training Presentation.
Joint Area Review Overview. What is a JAR? Q. What is a Joint Area Review (JAR)? A. A JAR provides a comprehensive report on the outcomes for children.
CHILDREN, YOUTH AND WOMEN’S HEALTH SERVICE New Executive Leadership Team 15 December 2004 Ms Heather Gray Chief Executive.
Director of Evaluation and Accountability Manager, UW’s Grand Rapids, Michigan Robert McKown, CIRS Director of Evaluation and Accountability Sherri.
1 Unit 1 Information for management. 2 Introduction Decision-making is the primary role of the management function. The manager’s decision will depend.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S.
Avoid Disputes, Not Complaints Presented by: Stuart Ayres and Derek Pullen Stuart Ayres, Scheme Manager Derek Pullen, Scheme Adjudicator.
Enterprise Risk Management Chapter One Prepared by: Raval, Fichadia Raval Fichadia John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Guidance for Completing Interim Report I Evaluation Webinar Series 3 Dec 2013.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
SMS Planning.  Safety management addresses all of the operational activities of the entire organization.  The four (4) components of an SMS are: 1)
Continuous Improvement and Focused Monitoring System US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Overview of the OSEP Continuous Improvement.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
M & E TOOLKIT Jennifer Bogle 11 November 2014 Household Water Treatment and Water Safety Plans International and Regional Landscape.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 6-1 Chapter 6 CHAPTER 6 INTERNAL CONTROL IN A FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Using the Evaluation System to Answer Key Questions About Your Initiative.
Planning for a Disaster: Service Provider and Advocacy Organizations Carl T. Cameron, PhD Pat Heineman.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
1 An introductory workshop for new governors 2005 Becoming a governor.
The European Expert Group on the Transition from Institutional to Community-based Care Claire Champeix, Coordinator European Expert Group on the Transition.
Partnership Health: Evaluation and possibilities for an adapted structure Agenda item 11 Madhavi Bajekal, ONS (UK) PH coordinator Directors of Social Statistics.
Choosing Questions and Planning the Evaluation. What do we mean by choosing questions? Evaluation questions are the questions your evaluation is meant.
An Overview of Revisions to the Rhode Island Model
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
HSM 220 MART Teaching Effectively/hsm220mart.com FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
PP 620: Public Policy and Health Administration Unit One Seminar Kris R. Foote, J.D., M.P.A., M.S.W. Kaplan University.
CHB Conference 2007 Planning for and Promoting Healthy Communities Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Boards Presented by Carla Anglehart Director,
Middle Managers Workshop 2: Measuring Progress. An opportunity for middle managers… Two linked workshops exploring what it means to implement the Act.
AUDIT STAFF TRAINING WORKSHOP 13 TH – 14 TH NOVEMBER 2014, HILTON HOTEL NAIROBI AUDIT PLANNING 1.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
Our new quality framework and methodology:
Introduction to the PRISM Framework
Student Pathways Survey 2009 Principals
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
The Nuts and Bolts of National Board Certification
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
Presentation transcript:

Military Family Services Program Participant Survey Briefing Notes

What are the elements of the MFSP Accountability Framework? Financial accountability MOU Needs assessment Audits Formal site visits Evaluation of services (see MFSP: Parameters for Practice, pp )

MFSP Accountability Framework at a Glance Service Category Service Components ObjectivesIndicators Personal development and community integration Child and youth development and parenting support Family separation and reunion 1711 Prevention support and intervention TOTAL156293

Why Collect this Information? Implementation of the service accountability framework in MFSP: Parameters for Practice (pp ) It is hoped that this system will replace BSI and NID Will provide more meaningful information for decision making at national and local level

MFSP Accountability Framework The System The method (survey) used to collect data to measure the performance indicators within the MFSP Accountability Framework.

How Was the MFSP Accountability System Developed? Involvement of field throughout the process With intention to create value at centre level and at MFSP level With an emphasis on how to improve

Why a Survey Approach? Our main choices are to: – observe – ask Surveys are an efficient method of obtaining information about experiences, opinions, past behaviors – these cannot be observed Surveys are easy to analyze

The Accountability System Aim was to create feasible system that provided meaningful information for a reasonable effort A selection from the accountability framework – Based on field based workgroup priorities – DMFS management priorities 17 objectives and indicators selected – All service components represented (two have 2 indicators each) – Some relate to process; some to outcomes

The Accountability System (2) In addition 4 items were selected from principles of family support as described in MFSP: Parameters for Practice 11 structured items look at participant characteristics and participation patterns 3 open ended items to allow respondents to expand on any answers or provide additional information.

Final Overview of the Survey Questions 1 – 4 – How you and your family were treated in this centre. Questions – Your family’s experiences in the community in which you live. Questions 22 – 43 – information about you and members of your family 3 Open ended questions – Further explanation – Other comments about this centre – Other comments about this community experience

How Does the Survey Work? Items are written to obtain information about the experience of participants, – not a direct reflection of centre services (services may be provided directly, indirectly or by others) Respondents should think of current posting when answering questions

How will information be used? Responses within each centre will be aggregated Centres can look for trends in responses and use information to better understand what works well and what needs attention DMFS will also aggregate data on national level and use information to manage MFSP

Database Will enable completion of surveys on line or on paper by 2007 – For Year 1 surveys will be completed on paper (machine scorable forms) Will automatically analyze in real time Centres will have reports of own data and comparison data (national, previous year) DMFS will have aggregated data Results will be presented in tables and charts

What Impact Will Survey Results Have on Funding? The survey will not have a direct impact on funding. It is one of many sources of information that are taken into account in the management and funding of centres and of the MFSP as a whole.

How does the MFSP Accountability Framework System (MFSP Participant Survey) link to Local Evaluation?

Evaluation Planning DMFS establishes evaluation requirements common to all MFRCs Centres determine their own additional evaluation needs Centre Evaluation Committee or equivalent Develops a centre evaluation plan that integrates local and corporate evaluation requirements

Example of a Local Evaluation Plan Required MFSP survey Interested in more detail about Assessment and Referral component— develops own survey Conducts focus groups to get more detail and context for survey results Can use items in accountability framework and/or create own

Possible Uses of Evaluation Information Information Funding application Activity Listing Evaluation Plan Other Information Service delivery planning Improvements in Services Improvements In Programs New Programs Organizational planning Strategic Planning Staff Training Facility Issues Access, Use, Uptake Issues Advocacy DND Partners Community Partners Marketing, Promotion

The MFSP Evaluation Survey General Procedures

When is the survey conducted? Two-week period, chosen by centre, during last fiscal quarter Centres should maximize legitimate participation during evaluation period

Who is the Survey data about? The survey is collecting data that reflects the experience of MFSP participants as defined in MFSP: Parameters for Practice (page 26/27)

Who can complete the survey? One person per family,18 years or over Normally this would be an immediate member of that family and knowledgeable about the entire family experience If not an immediate family member then they must ensure that they are responding based on that families experience. Paid staff are not eligible even if participating in services (volunteers are)

Can we combine the survey with other evaluation activities? To ensure consistency across C/MFRCs and to maintain the integrity of the process, we ask that no other formal evaluation activities be undertaken during the two-week period

How do we assure confidentiality? Respondents do not provide their name They seal their completed survey into an envelope Envelope is placed into a sealed collection box that will be shipped to DMFS When surveys are analyzed it will be in aggregate—no individual responses will be reported.

What Is the Role of the Board of Directors, Staff, Volunteers and Partners? Promote the survey in general conversation. Encourage families to complete the survey. Be prepared to explain why another survey is necessary.