Ram Krishnan Department of Education 1H:\Excel\FTE\Workshop\2009\FEFPA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 MFP 101 Understanding the Minimum Foundation Program Formula FY
Advertisements

Class Size Reduction: Accountability Calculations FAMIS Summer Conference June 13, 2011.
FLORIDA EDUCATION FINANCE PROGRAM (FEFP) FUNDING
1 Disbursement of Capital Outlay Funds Encumbrance Authorization Request (OEF Form 352) Cash Disbursement Request (OEF Form 442)
Kansas Legislative Research Department SCHOOL FINANCE BASICS 1 January 2013.
Florida Atlantic University Overview of Operating Budget Process Presentation to the Florida Atlantic University Foundation, Inc. Board of Directors February.
1 School Year 2006–07 Accounting and Budgeting Committee Video Teleconference Kim Thompson OSPI - School Apportionment and Financial Services
FLORIDA EDUCATION FINANCE PROGRAM (FEFP) FUNDING Charter School Funding November
Escambia County School District. Q.1.7 Increase the graduation rate as measured by the Federal Uniform Rate. Year District State % 70.6%
The Case of the Mysterious, Moving Calculations … Counting High School Graduates and Dropouts Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support from.
Scenario – Practical Applications of School Law JESSAMY GUERRERO.
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR SCHOOL CHOICE PROGRAMS Presenters: Jean Ammel, Deputy Executive Director Independent Education and Parental Choice and Kim Ward,
FLORIDA EDUCATION FINANCE PROGRAM (FEFP) FAMIS Summer Conference June 13, 2011.
1 The Florida Education Finance Program (FEFP) and Charter Schools Florida’s Charter School Conference November 15, 2012 Office of Funding and Financial.
Enrollment, Attendance, and Support Units New Superintendent Workshop.
Virtual Education Reporting Presented by: Sally Roberts, Educational Policy Consultant Florida Department of Education 1.
MISSISSIPPI ADEQUATE EDUCATION PROGRAM (MAEP) AN OVERVIEW OF HOW THE FORMULA IS CALCULATED.
1 Oregon Community College Distribution Formula. 2 What is the Distribution Formula?  The method the State Board of Education and CCWD use to allocate.
Appropriate and Predictable Funding Update Nate Johnson Executive Director, Planning and Analysis June 19, 2008.
Evergreen School District Budget Advisory Committee January 21, 2015 January 21, 2015 BAC1.
Shoreline School District Trends & Projections William L. (“Les”) Kendrick (Consultant) October 16, 2006 October Headcount Data is Used in this Report.
State Accountability and Federal Adequate Yearly Progress.
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR SCHOOL CHOICE PROGRAMS Presenters: Jean Miller, Deputy Executive Director Independent Education and Parental Choice and Kim.
1 The FLORIDA EDUCATION FINANCE PROGRAM (FEFP) and Charter Schools Florida’s Charter School Conference November 18, 2009.
South Kitsap School District Preliminary Budget July 17, 2013 Sandra Rotella SFO CPA Assistant Superintendent Business Operations.
Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction K-12 Financial Resources Slide 1 10/4/2015 K-12 Financial Resources Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Walton County School District 5-Year Facilities Work Plan
Virtual Education Reporting Presented by: Sally Roberts, Educational Policy Consultant Florida Department of Education.
1 Supplemental ESF Application and Changes in ARRA Reporting Office of Educational Management Services New York State Education Department March 10, 2010.
Proposed Budget. UFTE 7, (Unweighted Full Time Equivalent Students) X Cost Factors = WFTE 8, (Weighted Full Time Equivalent Students)
Charter School Facilities Funding 2010 Florida Charter School Conference November 9, 2010 William E. Fontaine Office of Educational Facilities.
FY2010 Budget and 2009 Legislative Session Update July 15, 2009 Janice Palmer Arizona School Boards Association Jeremy Calles Arizona Department of Education.
Understanding the Nuts and Bolts of the Foundation Budget and Local Contribution Roger Hatch Melissa King MASBO Annual Institute May 17 th, 2013.
Charter School Meeting Department of Public Instruction October 20, 2014 Charter School Meeting Department of Public Instruction October 20,
East Lansing Public Schools PLANNING FOR THE FISCAL YEAR AND BEYOND March 28, 2005.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Charter Schools in Florida Friday, February 13, 2015 Mid-Year Transportation.
Budget Workshop: Fiscal Policies, Process, and Budget Guidelines Board of Governors April 21, 2005.
Lincoln Public Schools Budget Tool Kit. Timeline for Budget September Last Friday - Enrollment January-March Staffing Conferences January-April.
Lincoln Public Schools Budget Tool Kit. Timeline for Budget September Last Friday - Enrollment January-March Staffing Conferences January-June.
Maryland’s Process for Projecting Enrollments in Higher Education Michael J. Keller Director of Policy Analysis and Research Maryland Higher Education.
1 Budget Overview Budget Information Committee February 26, 2007.
Bright Futures Scholarship Program and Florida PrePaid College Plan ( )
Graduation, Completion, and Dropout Counts and Rates Tracking Student Cohorts in MSIS November 1, 2006 Office of Research and Statistics Mississippi Department.
Florida Department of Education Transportation Directors Meeting – February 10, 2011 Presenter: Ruth Jones Education Information & Accountability Services.
Building Quality Budgets For Strong Community Schools Marcia Saulo and Elsa Forthmuller Region Finance Directors, Imagine Schools.
Accountability Training Review Agenda for Today: Review of calculation changes and what’s new In depth review of Closing Gaps calculations Graduation Rates.
Christopher M. Quinn, MACC, CPA, CFE, CGFO, CGMA Finance Director Lina Williams Budget & Financial Analyst Tuesday, June 7 th 2016.
FLORIDA EDUCATION FINANCE PROGRAM (FEFP) FAMIS Summer Conference June 11, 2012.
Mukwonago Area School District Historical Enrollment and Future Enrollment Projections.
1 School Year 2005–06 Enrollment Essentials for State Funding Prepared By: Kim Thompson OSPI - School Apportionment and Financial Services
MISSISSIPPI ADEQUATE EDUCATION PROGRAM (MAEP)
DJJ Accountability Rating System
Vocational and Skill Center Program Funding Priorities
GASBO Conference November 10, 2016 Angela Palm
Private School Choice Programs Special Education Scholarship Program Independent Charter Schools Program Open Enrollment Program Blue Ribbon Commission.
Title I A Comparability Report
Budget Overview Review of Last Years Budget
Parent/Community Meeting March 13, 2018 Presented by:
Spring-Ford Area School District 2012/2013 Proposed Final Budget
Preliminary Budget February 12, 2018.
Dropout Rates 1.
Change to the FTE Calculation for the 201819 School Year
Budgeting, Cost Accounting & FTE
Minimum Foundation Program (MFP) Past, Present & Future
Change to the FTE Calculation for the 201819 School Year
Property Tax Levy – Taxes Payable 2019
Roanoke County Public Schools Budget
FTE Recalibration Kendra Jahnke June 2018.
System Budget FY 2016 Board of Education May 21, 2015.
School Finance Update CASE Nuts & Bolts
Presentation transcript:

Ram Krishnan Department of Education 1H:\Excel\FTE\Workshop\2009\FEFPA

What is FTE (Full-Time Equivalent)  An FTE is the unit of measurement employed by the State of Florida to count PK-12 public school student enrollment for the purposes of funding education.  FTE and enrollment are not synonymous.  To get a full FTE: Enrolled full-time in school Must be in attendance on survey weeks  Those not full-time generate a proportionate fraction of FTE

FTE and COFTE Compared 3 FTE (Full-Time Equivalent) Is a type of count of Public School Students Sums Surveys Used for funding Operations COFTE Is a subset of FTE Sums Surveys Used for funding Facilities

Relationship of COFTE and FTE COFTE A subset of Surveys 2 & 3 FTE Survey 1 (July) Survey 4 (June) FTE is sum of Surveys 1-4 Survey 2 & 3 FTE (Oct & Feb)

COFTE Includes:  Conversion Charter Schools  Students instructed in a public school facility  Surveys 2 and 3 5

COFTE Does NOT Include:  Traditional Charter Schools  Hospital / Homebound  McKay Scholarships  DJJ students  Washington Special students  Florida Virtual School students  Students held at ancillary offices like Superintendent’s office 6

Charter School Trends 7

Non-COFTE Enrollment Trends FTE Type DJJ 13, , , , FLVS 4, , , , McKay 15, , , , Charter 79, , , ,

FTE and COFTE Trends 9

Capital Outlay FTE: Purpose  Used to determine the amount of PECO funds going to each district  These funds are used for ○ Buildings ○ Work stations ○ Support Facilities 10

FTE Forecasts Forecast used for DOE Budget to Governor and for Legislative Three-Year forecast Summer Forecast Refinement of Summer Forecast based on October Survey Forecast Used for Governor’s Budget to Legislature December Forecast School District Forecast after review and approval by Education Estimating Conference January-March Forecast Refinement of Jan-Mar Forecast based on February Survey Final input into the Legislative process March-April Forecast 11

Capital Outlay FTE Forecast  COFTE is estimate based on Appropriated FTE Used to Determine DRS Millage Rates  is the Ten Year Forecast ○ Used for 5 year plan Education Facilities Plan District Facilities Work Plan ○ Used by Dept of Community Affairs for Growth Management Purposes ○ Issues dealing with Concurrency 12

Appropriated FTE  Is based on district forecast ○ Districts and DOE work together to come up with FTE Forecast that will be used to Appropriate Education Funds if approved by the Public School Education Conference  Is also used as baseline to generate COFTE forecasts 13

Determine Regular Term FTE  Start with Appropriated FTE  Include FTE for Surveys 2 and 3  Subtract Survey 1 and Survey 4  Forecast 10 year Regular Term  Once the Regular Term forecast has been generated, our next step is to Forecast COFTE 14

COFTE Inputs COFTE Historical Data (10 years) ○ to Birth Data ○ Received from BEBR / EDR ○ onwards is projected birth Non-Promotions ○ Removed non-COFTE non-promotions 15

COFTE Forecast Process Initial DOE Forecast Births Historical COFTE COFTE part of Appropriated FTE Formulas Formulas are Cohort Survival Models that control for the non- promotion policy of the school district Review by School Districts Review of District Appeals by State Estimating Conference Accept/Appeal Final Forecast Process includes state and district review and input Non- promotions

Cohort Models  Calculated By District and By Grade  Based on premise that the best predictor of a grade’s enrollment is the enrollment of the prior grade the year before. Grade 8 enrollment in Year 1 Grade Progression Ratio Net effect of non- promotions Grade 9 enrollment in Year 2 Represents effect of net migration

GPRs  A Grade Progression Ratio (GPR) is the ratio of the number of students in a specific grade in one year compared to the number of students in the next grade in the following year.  GPRs are used for both FTE and COFTE forecasting 18

Unweighted GPR YearGradeFTE GradeNP ( G5 FTE) + ( NP G4) – ( NP G5) ( G4 FTE) GPR = Grade Progression Ratio Calculating Unweighted GPR Denominator

Weighted GPRs (WGPRs) 20  WGPRs are a weighted average of single year GPRs.  Averaging Scheme differ for one-year ahead and for long- term forecasts. Appropriated FTE (1-yr ahead) A simulation study is done to determine the averaging scheme (1-5 years) that best fits the historical data. Long-Term Forecast (2-10 yrs ahead) The most recent historical year GPR is used for year 2.. For years 3-10, the most recent GPR is averaged with a 10-year average GPR weighted so that each subsequent year uses less of most recent GPR and more of the 10-yr avg.

The Models and their Weights Year 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5 Model Model Model 3111 Model 411 Model Model Model 7321 Model 821 Model Year 1 = Most Recent Historical Year

Long Term Weighted GPRs  Consistent  Defendable  Long term – Focus should not be solely on current conditions. Things will change in six years. However, guard against over-optimism.

Long-Term Weighted GPRs 23 Rationale: to conform to accepted forecasting practice that the number of years of input data increases as the forecast horizon increases.

The Forecast May Be Modified By District Using Contextual Judgment 24 Contextual Judgment (judgment for a specific reason) may require: Omission of specified years from calculation of WGPRs Application of a factor to discount or enhance trends.

The COFTE Forecast  ((Weighted GPR) * (Prior Grade of Prior Year))  Add Non-Promotions from Prior Grade of Prior Year  Subtract Non-Promotions from Current Grade of Prior Year 25

Summary  Entered Inputs – Historical COFTE, Appropriated COFTE Estimate, Births and Non-Promotions  Determined Unweighted GPRs  Used Models to calculate Weighted GPRs and then Long Term Weighted GPRs  Applied contextual judgement to weighted GPRs based on current conditions  Generate the COFTE forecast