NCQA Standards Update & Delegated Credentialing Tips NYSAMSS Annual Meeting – May 4, 2012 By: Di Hall, CPCS, CPMSM Director, Compliance & Quality Improvement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Advertisements

Quality Improvement Program 28 TAC §10.22 Workers’ Compensation Health Care Networks.
Documentation and Maintenance of Records What You Should Know and Why Program Training For Medicaid Providers of Home and Community Care Services Home.
Credentialing, Accreditation, Certification, Registration, and Licensure: What does it all mean? Donna Nowakowski, MS, RN Associate Executive Director.
Copyright Eastern PA EMS Council February 2003 Health Information Portability and Accountability Act It’s the law.
HIPAA PRIVACY REQUIREMENTS Dana L. Thrasher Constangy, Brooks & Smith, LLC (205) ; Victoria Nemerson.
Building a Medical Records Compliance Program for Your Office: Charles B. Brownlow, OD, FAAO December 17, 2012.
Hiring & Evaluating the Library Director Presenters: Dora U. Sims, Trustee, Birmingham Public Library Trustee at Large, United For Libraries Board Assisted.
Health Insurance Portability Accountability Act of 1996 HIPAA for Researchers: IRB Related Issues HSC USC IRB.
Samuel Steel Safety Group Meeting Four November 14, 2013 Samuel Safety Systems.
CAMSS The Complexities of Managed Care Credentialing Mei Ling Christopher, UnitedHealthcare Sallye Marcus, Anthem Blue Cross.
Accreditation 1. Purpose of the Module - To create knowledge and understanding on accreditation system - To build capacity of National Governments/ focal.
Contractor Safety Management
Division of Child Care STARS Interim Report. What is an interim report? Programs participating in the STARS for KIDS NOW program must demonstrate continued.
Telemedicine Credentialing and Privileging October 16, 2014.
Office of Inspector General (OIG) Internal Audit
© The Association of Independent Schools of NSW Preparing for the ASQA Audit.
Health and Wellness for all Arizonans azdhs.gov Arizona Association for Home Care Presentation Arizona Department of Health Services July 25, 2015.
HEDIS Audit – Appropriate Monitoring and Oversight of Vendors Presenter: Yolanda Strozier, MBA Project Manager, EQRO Services.
FPSC Safety, LLC ISO AUDIT.
ASPEC Internal Auditor Training Version
Guidelines for constructing a Compliance Program for Medicaid Managed Care Organizations and PrePaid Health Plans As provided by the Medicaid Alliance.
Expediting the Credentialing Process Geisinger Health Plan Adrienne Bingaman, Provider Data Analyst Geisinger Health Plan October 10, 2013 Geisinger Health.
Surviving Survey and Re-certification. Rural Mississippi Mississippi Stats ◦116 Hospitals ◦154 RHC’s (MSDH website) ◦28 CAH’s (35miles or “necessary.
COMPLYING WITH HIPAA BUSINESS ASSOCIATE REQUIREMENTS Quick, Cost Effective Solutions for HIPAA Compliance: Business Associate Agreements.
1 HIPAA Security Overview Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
DSDS Quality Assurance Unit State of Alaska, Dept. of Health and Social Services Division of Senior and Disabilities Services (DSDS) Quality Assurance.
Visit us at E mail: Tele:
Copyright ©2011 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. Health Information Technology and Management Richard.
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board Communication with Those Charged with Governance ISA Implementation Support Module Prepared by IAASB.
ISO 9001: 2000 Certified Audit Process What to do.
Gulana Hajiyeva Environmental Specialist World Bank Moscow Safeguards Training, May 30 – June 1, 2012.
FleetBoston Financial HIPAA Privacy Compliance Agnes Bundy Scanlan Managing Director and Chief Privacy Officer FleetBoston Financial.
HIPAA PRACTICAL APPLICATION WORKSHOP Orientation Module 1B Anderson Health Information Systems, Inc.
Drs. Krishna and Webb October 31,  6  6.1  6.2  6.3  6.4  7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4  7  7.3  7.4  LUNCH ANSI Training 2013: Webb/Krishna.
Guidance Training CFR §483.75(i) F501 Medical Director.
Noncompliance and Correction (OSEP Memo 09-02) June 2012.
Guidance Training (F520) §483.75(o) Quality Assessment and Assurance.
Project management Topic 3 Quality.
HIPAA Training Workshop #1 Council of Community Clinics – San Diego February 7, 2003 by Kaye L. Rankin Rankin Healthcare Consultants, Inc.
2004 Credentialing & CVO Standards National Credentialing Forum February 20, 2004.
Internal Auditing ISO 9001:2015
U N C H E A L T H C A R E S Y S T E M Telemedicine Sarah Fotheringham, JD Associate General Counsel, UNC Health Care
©2002 by the National Committee for Quality Assurance NCQA and HIPAA “A match made in ?” The Fifth National HIPAA Summit Sharon King Donohue, JD General.
Internal Audit Section. Authorized in Section , Florida Statutes Section , Florida Statutes (F.S.), authorizes the Inspector General to review.
A risk assessment is the process of identifying potential hazards an organization may face and analyzing methods of response if exposure occurs.
North Carolina Association Medical Staff Services May 27, 2016 Renee Aird Dengler, RN, MS, CPMSM, CPCS NCQA CVO & NCQA CR Certification.
What are the DCC-413 and DCC-414 and how do they pertain to me? The STARS Interim Report.
Performing Credentials File Audits Kathy Matzka, CPMSM, CPCS.
Final HIPAA Privacy Rule: The Research Provisions Julie Kaneshiro DHHS Office for Human Research Protections Phone: Fax:
BLOCK Health Funding Arrangement Presented by __________________ FNIHB-AB June 15, 2016.
United Behavioral Health, operating under the brand Optum U. S. Behavioral Health Plan, California, doing business as OptumHealth Behavioral Solutions.
Planning meetingCertification audit, stage 1 Pre-audit (optional) Document review Prior to every certification audit a planning meeting is conducted where.
External Provider Control
Credentialing: 2017 Updates and Frequently Asked Questions
Collaborative Practice Agreements
Diana K. “Di” Hall, CPCS CPMSM – Sr. Director, Compliance & Quality
Establishing and Understanding a CVO
ISO 9001:2015 Auditor / Registration Decision Lessons Learned
Delegation Compliance Specialist
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Navigating the Charter Renewal Process: Start to Finish
MAMSS Delegated Credentialing Panel May 19, 2016
Delegated Credentialing: Do You Know Where to Start?
Presentation to The Fourth National HIPAA Summit
How to conduct Effective Stage-1 Audit
Compliance with Law CVO/Delegation
Complaints, Malpractice Coverage/PLI, Medicare/Medicaid Sanctions
HUD’s Coordinated Entry Data & Management Guide
Presentation transcript:

NCQA Standards Update & Delegated Credentialing Tips NYSAMSS Annual Meeting – May 4, 2012 By: Di Hall, CPCS, CPMSM Director, Compliance & Quality Improvement CREDENT Verification & Licensing Services

Why is NCQA Important to MSPs? Leading Accrediting Body for Health Plans (HMO/PPO/POS) Health Plans needs Clinical Providers to service the needs of their members Provides framework of standards for Credentialing and Recredentialing of Clinical Providers Offer guidelines for delegating activities

Changes for 2012 (effective for surveys after July 1, 2012) New Delegation Elements  Complex Care Management  Utilization Management Decisions/Appeals HEDIS and CAHPS measures  Additional HEDIS measure (Childhood Immunization)  New HEDIS measures for PPO Plans

Other Changes/Clarifications Credentialing & Recredentialing  CR 1 – Credentialing Policies Added Nurse Practitioner to the list of Provider Types NCQA will include in their file audit of the HP Emphasized that all eligible providers under the scope of the HP must be credentialed according to NCQA standard, even if the practitioner type may not be one that NCQA would include in a file audit  Physician Assistants, Physical Therapists Emphasized that the HP must notify providers of rights

Other Changes/Clarifications Credentialing & Recredentialing  CR 3 – Initial Credentialing Verification Emphasized requirements documenting Board Certification expiration dates  If provider holds a “lifetime” certification, that must still be verified and documented within 180 days of Credentials Committee review  Verification of “lifetime” certification is not considered a “static” element by NCQA

Other Changes/Clarifications Credentialing & Recredentialing  CR 6 – Practitioners Office Site Quality Revised Factors in Element B: “Site Visits and Ongoing Monitoring” to ensure understanding of intent of the standard  Continuous monitoring of member complaints  Site visit conducted within 60 days of decision to act on compliant  Implementing actions plans for those sites not up to snuff  At least every six (6) months following up on action plan until the site has met all the criteria  Document, document, document – especially if you go back and find other issue

Other Changes/Clarifications Credentialing & Recredentialing  CR 11 – Assessment of Organizational Providers Provided Time Frames for CMS/State Review for Unaccredited Organizational Providers  Unaccredited = On-site HP review of provider  May allow CMS or State Review to substitute for accreditation or on-site review  CMS or State Review must not be older than 3 years when reviewed by Committee

Other Changes/Clarifications Credentialing & Recredentialing  CR 12 – Delegation of Credentialing/Recredentialing Emphasis that there must be a delegation agreement in place before delegation begins Why is this important?  ______________________________________

CR 12 – Delegation of Credentialing and Recredentialing  If the organization delegates any NCQA required credentialing activities, there is evidence of oversight of the delegated activities. The HP is responsible for provider credentialing/ recredentialing activities regardless of what level of delegation occurs

CR 12 – Delegation of Credentialing and Recredentialing  Element A: Written Delegation Agreement The written delegation document: Is mutually agreed upon Describes the responsibilities of the organization and the delegated entity Describes the delegated activities

CR 12 – Delegation of Credentialing and Recredentialing  Element A: Written Delegation Agreement Requires at least semiannual reporting by the delegated entity to the organization Describes the process by which the organization evaluates the delegated entity's performance Describes the remedies available to the organization if the delegated entity does not fulfill its obligations, including revocation of the delegation agreement

Tips/Advice Get in the loop on contracting  Who does it for your entity?  Do you get to review the contract before it is signed/implemented?  Get a copy for your records.  Get a copy of all P&Ps/Programs/Bylaws you will be required to meet.

Delegation Agreement - Sample Elements of an Agreement  Insurance  Compensation/Expenses  Delivery of Information  Term of Agreement  Termination

Delegation Agreement - Sample Elements of an Agreement  Performance Evaluation Correction Action Plans Mediation/Arbitration Potential Performance Measures Format of Data Timeliness of Data Delivery Accuracy of Data

Delegation Agreement - Sample Elements of an Agreement  Assignment  Governing Law  Certification/Compliance  Exhibits/Attachments Pricing Elements for verification Other Services Covered

CR 12 – Delegation of Credentialing and Recredentialing  Element B: Provision for PHI If the delegation arrangement includes the use of protected health information (PHI) by the delegate, the delegation document also includes the following provisions.

CR 12 – Delegation of Credentialing and Recredentialing  Element B: Provision for PHI A list of the allowed uses of PHI A description of delegate safeguards to protect the information from inappropriate use or further disclosure A stipulation that the delegate will ensure that subdelegates have similar safeguards

CR 12 – Delegation of Credentialing and Recredentialing  Element B: Provision for PHI A stipulation that the delegate will provide individuals with access to their PHI A stipulation that the delegate will inform the organization if inappropriate uses of the information occur A stipulation that the delegate will ensure that PHI is returned, destroyed or protected if the delegation agreement ends

Tips/Advice Make sure your know HIPAA! Is your internal security strong? Are you aware of any weaknesses? Know your own policies on PHI – are they more stringent? Could they be improved?

CR 12 – Delegation of Credentialing and Recredentialing  Element C: Right to Approve and to Terminate The organization retains the right to approve, suspend and terminate individual practitioners, providers and sites in situations where it has delegated decision making. This right is reflected in the delegation document.

Tips/Advice Are you getting information back on who was accepted or rejected if you are also doing credentialing for a group? Do your providers know the appeal process if rejected? Do you get copies of letters/directories?

CR 12 – Delegation of Credentialing and Recredentialing  Element D: Predelegation Evaluation For delegation agreements that have been in effect for less than 12 months, the organization evaluated delegate capacity before the delegation document was signed.

Tips/Advice Make sure you know what standards you have to meet  Some entities require activities “above and beyond” NCQA standards  Have a copy of the contract ready Virtually “meet” your auditor  Are they “one of us”?  Do they understand your processes/systems?

CR 12 – Delegation of Credentialing and Recredentialing  Element E: Annual File Audit For delegation arrangements in effect for 12 months or longer, the organization audits credentialing files against NCQA standards for each year that delegation has been in effect.

Tips/Advice – the same as before! Make sure you know what standards you have to meet  Some entities require activities “above and beyond” NCQA standards  Have a copy of the contract ready Virtually “meet” your auditor  Are they “one of us”?  Do they understand your processes/systems?

CR 12 – Delegation of Credentialing and Recredentialing  Element F: Annual Evaluation For delegation arrangements that have been in effect for more than 12 months, the organization performs an annual substantive evaluation of delegated activities against delegated NCQA standards and organization expectations.

Tips/Advice Make sure you know what will be evaluated  Performance Scores  Quality Scores Timing – does this happen at the same time as the file audit? Who does this?  Same person as the file audit  Their experience/qualifications matter too!

CR 12 – Delegation of Credentialing and Recredentialing  Element G: Reporting For delegation arrangements in effect for 12 months or longer, the organization evaluates regular reports.

Tips/Advice What is the reporting expectation?  Timeframes  Format  Delivery Feedback/Questions  Establish Process  Remember, this is a two-way street!

CR 12 – Delegation of Credentialing and Recredentialing  Element H: Opportunities for Improvement For delegation arrangements that have been in effect for more than 12 months, at least once in each of the past 2 years, the organization identified and followed up on opportunities for improvement, if applicable.

Tips/Advice What’s your policy?  Internal Audit Triggers  Complaints from Client(s)/Staff Data Capture  Forms/Databases Review/Corrective Action  Timeframes Reporting/Oversight  Internal Quality Committee

CR 12 – Delegation of Credentialing and Recredentialing If YOU are a NCQA Accredited or Certified Entity for the CR Standard, the following elements are good to go and do not need additional oversight:  Element D: Predelegation Evaluation  Element E: Annual File Audit  Element H: Opportunities for Improvement