Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 1 DoQuP Project WP.1 - Deliverable 1.3 The DoQuP Model: milestone of the DoQuP project Marina Cavallini CRUI.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Bologna Shaping the Agenda Bologna today and tomorrow Lesley Wilson Secretary-General, European University Association.
Advertisements

ENQA’S CONSULTATIVE MEMBERSHIP IN THE BFUG - WHAT DOES IT ENTAIL
Setting the stage: The Guidelines for external reviews of member and applicant agencies and the interpretation of the ESG/ENQA membership criteria Achim.
Prof. V.J. Papazoglou on behalf of the Hellenic Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (HQAA) ENQA Seminar on Current Trends in the European Quality.
Setting internal Quality Assurance systems
ARMENIA: Quality Assurance (QA) and National Qualifications Framework (NQF) Tbilisi Regional Seminar on Quality Management in the Context of National.
1-st stage DoQuP Report on countries. State standards in the area of assurance of education quality are developed with the aim of:  meeting permanent.
ECVET WORKSHOP 2 22/23/24 November The European Quality Assurance Reference Framework.
External Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area: Challenges and Trends Rolf Heusser, Switzerland TechnoTN Forum, Brussels, 4 May 2007.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
The role of European standards and guidelines for the development of the national system of independent assessment of the quality of higher education Seidakhmetova.
Quality Assurance in the Bologna Process Fiona Crozier QAA
Quality assurance in IVET in Romania Lucian Voinea Mihai Iacob Otilia Apostu 4 th Project Meeting Prague, 21 st -22 nd October 2010.
Quality Assurance at the University St. Kliment Ohridski Elizabeta Bahtovska National Bologna promoter TEMPUS SCM C-032B06 West Balkan Bologna Promoters.
A Common Immigration Policy for Europe Principles, actions and tools June 2008.
Culture Programme - Selection procedure Katharina Riediger Infoday Praha 10/06/2010.
Prof. A.Rauhvargers First draft of the revised Standards and Guidelines for the Quality Assurance in the EHEA.
LOGO Kazakh Ablai khan University of International Relations and World Languages Tempus Project TEMPUS IT-SMGR - DOQUP Documentation for.
Astana 23/8/2012 DoQuP Inf&Data for QA of SPs in PCs 1 DoQuP Project WP.1 - Deliverable 1.2 DoQuP information and data for quality assurance of study programmes.
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
Development and Evaluation of Joint Study Programmes Almantas Šerpatauskas Center for Quality Assessment in Higher Education.
Quality Assurance in Europe: Challenges and Opportunities Maria Helena Nazaré EUA President Former Rector Universidade de Aveiro, Portugal.
Implementation of DOQUP Project at L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University COMMITTED TO EXCELLENCE COMMITTED TO EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING AND RESEARCH.
PRESIDIUM OF QUALITY Patrizia BalleriniChieti, 06 giugno 2014.
Bishkek 3/5/2011 DoQuP Standards for QA of SPs in PCs 1 WP.1 - Deliverable 1.1 Standards for Quality Assurance of Study Programmes DoQuP standards for.
Alicante 24-26/4/2013 Organization for QA 1 2 nd DoQuP Training Seminar University of Alicante, April 2013 Aim of the Seminar Alfredo Squarzoni University.
TEMPUS DOQUP IMPLEMENTATION STAGES and ASPECTS in KAZAKH NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY after K.I.SATPAEV Saule Aidarova, Project Coordinator Saule Temirkhanova,
Bishkek, 2015 TAJIK INSTITUTE OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND SERVICE TEMPUS PROJECT TEMPUS IT-SMGR - DOQUP Documentation for Quality Assurance.
TEMPUS DOQUP in Kazakhstan: Strategic Impact on the National Level Saule Aidarova, Project Coordinator Kazakhstan.
Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area Tibor Szanto ENQA Rogaska Slatina, 30 November 2007.
KNU - Bishkek (KS) 21 April 2015 DOQUP PROJECT FINAL DISSEMINATION CONFERENCE 1 Tempus Project n TEMPUS IT-SMGR Documentation for QA of.
EU/CoE PROJECT “STRENGTHENING HIGHER EDUCATION REFORMS IN SERBIA”
Akkreditierungsrat The German System of Accreditation Franz Börsch Accreditation Council Office SYSTEM OBJECTIVES STANDARDS PROCEDURE.
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND STRUCTURAL ORGANIZATION FOR THE QUALITY ASSURANCE OF SPs ■ Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava ■ Faculty of Civil Engineering.
Quality Assurance – European Standards and Guidelines.
AMU DoQuP FINAL REPORT MD, PhD, Associate Professor G.Ahmadov Azerbaijan Medical University Bishkek, April 22, 2015.
Leonardo da Vinci Partnerships: an opportunity to work together Italian National Agency for LLP - Leonardo da Vinci Sectoral Programme.
Alicante 24-26/4/2013 Organization for QA 1 2 nd DoQuP Training Seminar University of Alicante, April 2013 Session on Organization for the Quality.
LOGO Kazakh Ablai khan University of International Relations and World Languages Tempus Project TEMPUS IT-SMGR - DOQUP Documentation for.
FOURTH EUROPEAN QUALITY ASSURANCE FORUM "CREATIVITY AND DIVERSITY: CHALLENGES FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE BEYOND 2010", COPENHAGEN, NOVEMBER IV FORUM-
Astana 23/8/2012 iQA of SPs in Italy 1 Internal Quality Assurance of Study Programmes in Italy Alfredo Squarzoni University of Genoa.
1 DoQuP standards for quality assurance of study programmes in partner countries Project strategic outcomes at Qafqaz University AZERBAIJAN Sannur Aliyev.
Bishkek 3/5/2011 QA of SPs in Italy 1 WP.1 - Deliverable 1.1 Standards for Quality Assurance of Study Programmes National Standards for Quality Assurance.
Evaluation Plan New Jobs “How to Get New Jobs? Innovative Guidance and Counselling 2 nd Meeting Liverpool | 3 – 4 February L Research Institute Roula.
Bratislava 10-12/10/2012 1st DoQuP Training Seminar Seminar Introduction 1 Training Seminar Methodologies and procedures of definition, gathering, elaboration.
Genova 3-4/11/2011 DoQuP Presentation 1 Presentation of the Tempus Project Number TEMPUS IT-TEMPUS-SMGR ( / ) “Documentation.
Strengths and weaknesses of the implementation of the Bologna Process: Spain Round Table Bratislava,10-12 October Guillermo Bernabeu, University of Alicante.
Rome May 31st, 2006 University towards E-learning: a Focus on Finland, France and Italy1 CONFERENCE University towards E-learning: a Focus on Finland,
PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, Curriculum and Programme Objectives: Mapping of Learning Outcomes Oleg V. Boev, Accreditation Centre, Russian.
Genova 3-4/11/2011 DoCuP Presentation 1 Dissemination In order to assure the best information on the activities and the best dissemination of the results.
1 Joint EAIE/NAFSA Symposium Amsterdam, March 2007 John E Reilly, Director UK Socrates-Erasmus Council.
Project financed under Phare EUROPEAN UNION MERI/ NCDTVET - PIU Material produced under Phare 2006 financial support Phare TVET RO RO2006/
ENCHASE “ENHANCING ALBANIAN SYSTEM OF QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION: APPLICATION OF THE PROCESS AND OUTCOME BASED METHODOLOGY ”
© 2008, Tod O' Dot Productions EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY – ENTERPRISE COOPERATION NETWORK Socrates Erasmus Programme Project No: Ref LLP
The European Students’ Union REPRESENTING STUDENTS SINCE 1982 Cristi Popescu – Executive Committe Member European context of QA ESPAQ Training Yerevan,
ESG 2015: Linking external and internal QA Involving stakeholders Tia Loukkola Director for Institutional Development 22 January 2016.
Andy Gibbs Yerevan 2009 Winter School “Promoting European Dimension in Higher Education”
Double degrees and joint degrees: international inter-university cooperation Lewis Purser, Director Academic Affairs.
Bologna Process - objectives and achievements Ms. Sirpa Moitus, FINEEC Mr. Kauko Hämäläinen Baku, 29 September 2015.
Quality assurance, learning outcomes and qualification frameworks Tia Loukkola Director for Institutional Development 22 January 2016.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
PUBLIC ACCREDITATION AGENCY FOR HIGHER EDUCATION “Key aspects of quality assessment for teaching and learning in HE” Niko Hyka Innovation and information.
Quality Assurance in Egypt and the European Standards and Guidelines
Study Programmes in the European Higher Education Area
Massimo Rimondi - CINECA - EQUASP IT coordinator
“CareerGuide for Schools”
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
European Approaches to and Italian Organization for
Indicators&Criteria in External Quality Assessment
National Correspondents for Qualifications Frameworks (QF-EHEA)
Presentation transcript:

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 1 DoQuP Project WP.1 - Deliverable 1.3 The DoQuP Model: milestone of the DoQuP project Marina Cavallini CRUI

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 2 Items of the presentation a)Objectives, outcomes and output of the DoQuP project b)What has been done: the DoQuP Model c)What remains to be done

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 3 Objectives, outcomes and output of the DoQuP project Wider objective of the DoQuP project Definition and implementation of an on-line documentation system for the quality assurance (QA) of study programmes (SPs) in partner countries (PCs), consistent with the European Standards and Guidelines for QA (ESG)

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 4 Why a clear and complete documentation of learning objectives, educational process, learning context, learning outcomes and management system is an essential and necessary aspect of the QA of SPs?

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 5 Because the availability of information and data on the characteristics and results of SPs is essential for their transparency, one of the most important objective of the Bologna process, and in order to ‘ensure trust’ in the SP capacity to meet the requirements for quality, in one word to guarantee its quality, making possible the formulation of an informed judgment on the SPs’ quality by all the interested parties, first of all students.

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 6 But the availability of information and data on the characteristics and results of SPs is also essential and necessary for their comparability at national and international level, another important objective of the Bologna process. Furthermore, their availability constitutes a powerful incentive to the improvement of SP quality (as a matter of fact, when a SP is required to document its quality, in case of bad quality it is also stimulated to adopt the opportune actions for its improvement).

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 7 Without taking into account that the availability of information and data on the characteristics and results of SPs is necessary in every assessment process.

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 8 Specific objectives of the project  to bring the current documentation process in the PCs into line with the ESG;  to enhance the quality and to increase the comparability of SPs in PCs, in order to allow all the interested parties to formulate an informed assessment of the educational process offered by SPs and to enhance mutual trust in the quality of SPs;

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 9  to promote modernisation of Higher Education (HE) and to increase transparency of SPs in PCs, through an on-line management of information and data necessary to assure quality of SPs;  to promote the adoption of the online documentation system to be implemented by the competent national authorities, in order to guarantee its dissemination among all the universities of the PCs and its sustainability.

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 10 Main outputs and outcomes of the project  Definition of the standards for QA of SPs in PCs;  Identification of information and data for QA of SPs in PCs;  Definition of the methodologies and procedures of documentation of the identified information and data;

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 11  Definition of the responsibilities and facilities for documentation of the identified information and data;  Design and production of software for online documentation;  Implementation of responsibilities and facilities;  Implementation of software for online documentation.

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 12 What has been done: the DoQuP Model The first two results:  Definition of the standards,  Identification of information and data, have been already achieved according to the established work-plan, while the achievement of the third result:  Definition of the methodologies and procedures of documentation of the identified information and data, should be completed in the PB meeting to be held in Dushanbe on 15th March 2013.

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 13 The process for the definition of the DoQuP Model Starting from the definition of “study programme of quality ”, i.e., according to the ESG: “A study programme can be said of quality when it complies with the national standards and requirements and:

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 14  it establishes educational objectives consistent with the mission of the institution which the study programme belongs to and the educational needs of the labour market of reference, and learning outcomes consistent with the educational objectives;

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 15  it designs and implements an educational process adequate to accomplish the learning outcomes, takes under control its development, assures a correct assessment of students’ learning and establishes appropriate criteria for students’ studies progression;  teaching staff, facilities, financial resources, student support services and partnerships with businesses, research institutions and other Higher Education Institutions are adequate to accomplish the learning outcomes and are taken under control;

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 16  it monitors the results of the educational process;  it adopts an adequate and effective management system for quality and guarantees the publicity of the information on the study programme; we have defined defines the five ‘DoQuP standards’ for the, or ‘DoQuP areas’ of, internal quality assurance of study programmes, i.e. the principles which must inspire design, development and control of a study programme:

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 17 DoQuP Standards A – Needs and Objectives B – Educational process C – Resources D – Monitoring and Results E – Management system for quality

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 18 Why to start from the definition of the educational objectives and of the learning outcomes in the definition of a system of iQA ? Today the need of communication, transparency and recognition at national and international level requires SPs focused mainly on what a student has to learn and on the development of his/her competences than on what have to be taught, because it is the student who has to be prepared at best for his/her future role in the society. This requires the passage from a staff-centred or input-based approach to a student-centred or output- based approach, which assumes the student as the centre of the teaching and learning process.

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 19 Then, remembering the definition of “quality assurance of a study programme”: “the whole of the activities (processes) for the management of the educational service aimed at achieving the established educational objectives and then at ‘ensuring trust’ in meeting the quality requirements to all interested parties” we have identified the Fundamental processes for a management for quality of study programmes

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 20 A Needs and Objectives A1 - Identification of the educational needs of the labour market A2 - Definition of the educational objectives A3 - Definition of the learning outcomes

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 21 B Educational Process B1 - Admission requirements B2 - Design and planning of the educational process B3 - Realization of the educational process

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 22 C Resources C1 - Identification and put at disposal of the teaching staff C2 - Identification and put at disposal of facilities C3 - Identification and put at disposal of financial resources C4 - Organisation and management of student support C5 - Establishment of partnerships with national and international businesses, research institutions and other Higher Education Institutions for the development of students’ external education and mobility

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 23 D Monitoring and Results D1 - Monitoring of the entrance students D2 - Monitoring of the students’ learning D3 - Monitoring of the students’ studies progression D4 - Monitoring of the students’ opinion on the educational process D5 - Monitoring of the graduates’ placement

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 24 E Management System for Quality E1 - Definition and adoption of the management system E2 - Revision E3 - Publicizing of information on the study programme

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 25 Then the ‘ DoQuP requirements for quality ’, i.e. the needs or expectations for quality, associated to each identified process have been established according to the ESG and the best practices of the European Agencies for quality assessment and accreditation of SPs, with the activities and behaviours for their accomplishment.

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 26 Furthermore, for each identified quality requirement the information and data to be documented by the study programmes in order to provide evidence of the quality of the educational service offered, and therefore to assure their quality, have been established, again according to the ESG and the best practices of the European Agencies for quality assessment and accreditation of SPs.

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 27 Example Quality Requirement A3 - Learning outcomes The SP should define learning outcomes in terms of what students are expected to know, understand and/or be able to demonstrate after completion of the educational process consistent with the established educational objectives.

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 28 Expected Activities and Behaviours The SP should establish learning outcomes in terms of what a student is expected to know, understand and/or be able to demonstrate after completion of the learning process. They should be specific for the SP and detailed in order to favour the understanding of the depth and extent of learning expected at the end of the educational process. The learning outcomes should be consistent with the established educational objectives and organised according to the Dublin Descriptors. The learning outcomes should be registered in an official document.

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 29 The SP should compare the established learning outcomes with those of other SPs of the same typology offered in the national and international contexts, in order to check the correspondences and point out the differences. The SP should document the results of the comparison, pointing out its peculiarities with respect to the SPs under the comparison.

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 30 Required Documentation Learning outcomes List the learning outcomes of the SP, subdivided according to the Dublin descriptors. Provide only information registered in official documents. Comparison with the learning outcomes of other SPs of the same typology Make available the hyperlink at the document where the exits of the comparison with the learning outcomes of other SPs of the same typology are registered (alternatively indicate the web site where they can be found).

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 31 The whole of standards and quality requirements, with the associated expected activities and behaviours for their accomplishment and information and data to be documented, constitute the DoQuP Model for the internal quality assurance of study programmes, a fundamental milestone of the project.

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 32 The document constitutes a fundamental milestone of the DoQuP project because it will be the reference document for the description of the educational objectives, educational process, resources, results and management system of the SPs and for the designing of the software for the online documentation.

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 33 What remains to be done  Definition of the responsibilities and facilities for the documentation of the identified I&D for the QA of SPs in PCs. In this activity each partner Universities of the PCs will have to define the responsibilities and the necessary facilities for the documentation of the identified information and data according to the established methodologies and procedures of documentation by 15th August Each University will present its organisation (responsibilities and facilities) for the documentation at the workshop to be held in Baku in the period

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 34  Design and production of the software for the online documentation of the identified information and data for QA of SPs in PCs. This activity, to be carried out in parallel with the definition of responsibilities and facilities for the documentation under the coordination of CINECA, has already started and will have to be completed by 15th August Also the software for the online documentation will be presented at the workshop to be held in Baku in the period

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 35  Training seminar on software for the online documentation. The third and last training seminar will be devoted to introduce and train the partner Universities of the PCs to the use of the software for the on line documentation.

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 36  Implementation of responsibilities & facilities. In this activity at least a meaningful number of SPs of the partner Universities shall have to documen their educational objectives, educational process, resources, results and management system according to the identified methodologies and procedures of documentation of the identified information and data.

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 37  Implementation of software for online documentation. In this activity, to be carried out in parallel with the implementation of responsibilities and facilities, the software for online documentation will be made available to each partner University of the PCs.

Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 38 Thanks for your attention