Thoughts on OIB Science Team KCJ. Acquisition Strategies OIB developed 3, basic acquisition strategies February 2011 I. Establish once the bedrock topography.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Titelmasterformat durch Klicken bearbeiten ESA-CCI Sea Ice ECV Stefan Kern*, et al. *) University of Hamburg. CliSAP, ICDC.
Advertisements

OIB Land Ice Team Meeting GSFC Jan 26-27, January 26, Thursday OIB 0830 Guidance from HQ (Wagner) 0900 Final Flight selection and prioritization.
Helen Amanda Fricker Scripps Institution of Oceanography Ted Scambos National Snow and Ice Data Center Bob Bindschadler NASA/GSFC Space Flight Center Laurie.
Preliminary SWOT Orbit Design Study R. Steven Nerem, Ryan Woolley, George Born, James Choe Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research, University of Colorado.
Ice Sheets GNSS (GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, Beidou, QZSS) Matt King.
IV: Ice velocity – costal regions + select areas (phase 1), all ice sheet (ph. 2) SEC: Surface elevation changes, ERS/Envisat/CryoSat, GLL: Grounding.
Draft Ice Sheet Science Goals, Objectives and Requirements plus Draft Science Team Terms of Reference Strawman by KCJ and derived from the draft Project.
High-Resolution Maps of Outlet Glacier Surface Elevation Change from Combined Laser Altimeter and Digital Elevation Model Data (ID # ) Joanna Fredenslund.
The ICESat-2 Mission: Laser altimetry of ice, clouds and land elevation T. Markus, T. Neumann NASA Goddard Space Flight Center W. Abdalati Earth Science.
SEAT Traverse The Satellite Era Accumulation Traverse (SEAT) collected near-surface firn cores and Ultra High Frequency (UHF) Frequency Modulated.
IceBridge Science Objectives The following are the major science objectives of Operation IceBridge in priority.
NSIDC IceBridge Value Added Data Products Ted Scambos, Bruce Raup, Susan Rogers, Mary-Jo Brodzik.
Presented at Division for Early Childhood National Harbor, Maryland November, Child Outcomes: What We Are Learning from National, State, and Local.
OIB Long Range Planning Luthcke and Jezek. OIB Long Term Observation Goals OIB is meant to provide data to improve our understanding of the mass evolution.
Michael Studinger & IceBridge Science Team & Instrument Teams.
Summary: Scientific Achievement, Applications and Future Requirements Zueheir Altamimi Steve Klosko Richard Gross Aleksander Brzezinski.
IceBridge Program Overview Tom Wagner IceBridge Program Scientist.
Ventures Proposal Science Objectives and Requirements.
IceBridge Science Team Meeting Agenda Thursday January 20, :00 Science Team Progress (2 min, one vu-graph summary from each team member) 1:30 Cryosat.
ICESat dH/dt Thinning Thickening ICESat key findings.
IceBridge Science Team Meeting September 27, 2010 Goddard Space Flight Center.
IceBridge Science Team Meeting September 27, 2010 Goddard Space Flight Center.
Surface Based Sounding SAR Update May 3, PRISM SAR Radar system installed on Tucker Sno-Cat at Summit, Greenland.
Assessment of OIB 2009 Data over Pine Island and Thwaites Glaciers K. Jezek OIB Science Team Meeting.
GIIPSY Meeting Agenda Tuesday December 12 6:00PM-8:30PM AGU Fall Meeting, San Francisco PERSPECTIVES (~45-60min) 10 min GIIPSY Overview and Meeting Objectives.
GIIPSY Activities STG-3 to STG 4 Ken Jezek Katy Farness Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University DLR’s TerraSAR-X Acquisition: Recovery Glacier.
7/14/2015 IceBridge Observations of Sea Ice Thickness, Structure, and Volume Change: Bringing a NOAA Viewpoint Update Summary: Jan 19, 2011 PI: Dave McAdoo,
1 NASA’s future science needs in Antarctica and the Southern Ocean Waleed Abdalati NASA Headquarters January 24, 2012.
Chapter 13- Polar and highland climates temperature is key (again) cold due to limited solar radiation low angle of incidence of insolation Moisture is.
Global Inter-agency IPY Polar Snapshot Year (GIIPSY): Goals and Accomplishments Katy Farness & Ken Jezek, The Ohio State University Mark Drinkwater, European.
Integration Tide Gauge and Satellite Altimetry for Storm Surge and Sea Level change prediction. Ole B. Andersen and Y. Cheng (DTU, Denmark) Xiaoli Deng,
Spatially Complete Global Surface Albedos Derived from MODIS Data
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Center for Satellite Applications.
GHP and Extremes. GHP SCIENCE ISSUES 1995 How do water and energy processes operate over different land areas? Sub-Issues include: What is the relative.
Towards repeat-track measurements of elevation change using ICESat/GLAS B. E. Smith Funded by the ICESat science team With thanks to Charlie Bentley, Charlie.
Professional Practice Required Elements Self-Reflection, Professional Growth Planning To be completed by all principals and assistant principals annually.
Slide: 1 Osamu Ochiai Water SBA Coordinator The GEO Water Strategy Report – The CEOS Contribution Presentation to the 26 th CEOS Plenary at Bengaluru,
Agency, version?, Date 2012 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Add CGMS agency logo here (in the slide master) Coordination Group.
Ice Sheet Mass Changes and Contribution to Sea Level Rise  Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets were close to balance 1992 to  Net only 1% of annual.
Privacy Project Framework & Structure HIPAA Summit Brent Saunders
Background Management Council (MC) was briefed on approach in early Feb 2003 and approved it Agreed that every Service Group (SG) will participate in.
IPY STG SAR Workshop Day 1 Summary GIIPSY thematic science objectives presented along with a strawman acquisition strategy Agency representatives from.
SSIP Process A Suggested Pathway, Timeline and Gantt Chart WRRC Regional Forum Eugene October 31 and November 1, 2013.
GEO Forest Carbon Tracking Outcomes in 2010 Per-Erik Skrøvseth (NSC) Osamu Ochiai (JAXA) Frank Martin Seifert (ESA) Ake Rosenqvist (for JAXA) CEOS Plenary,
Researcher requires geographical subset due to disk space restriction. Goes directly to NSIDC site hoping for “one stop shopping” at
Presented to Kepler Pre-Launch Educator Workshop January 31, 2009 Shari Asplund Discovery and New Frontiers Programs Education and Public Outreach Manager.
OIB telecon 5/24/2012 Telecon Agenda: -- Introduction, goals of meeting. (5 min) -- Review of science reqs as of the end of the 2011 field season (Smith/Studinger)
Using instrumented aircraft to bridge the observational gap between ICESat and ICESat-2.
Antarctic ice shelf thicknesses derived from satellite altimetry Jennifer Griggs and Jonathan Bamber Bristol Glaciology Centre, University of Bristol.
Variations in mass balance and snow and firn densities along a transect in the percolation zone of the Greenland Ice Sheet Vicki Parry (1), Peter Nienow.
University of Kansas S. Gogineni, P. Kanagaratnam, R. Parthasarathy, V. Ramasami & D. Braaten The University of Kansas Wideband Radars for Mapping of Near.
Science Team Objectives K. Jezek and J. Richter-Menge Science Team Co-leads.
Mapping Greenland Using NASA’s Full- Waveform, Medium/High-Altitude, LVIS Lidar System: Potential 2009 Coverage and Expected Performance Michelle Hofton.
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Research and Discover 2003 ICESat Precise Elevation Data Over the Antarctic Megadunes Tom Daigle: NASA/University of New Hampshire Research and Discover.
Global Ice Coverage Claire L. Parkinson NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Presentation to the Earth Ambassador program, meeting at NASA Goddard Space Flight.
Code Cryospheric Sciences Branch Christopher A. Shuman and Vijay P. Suchdeo (with help from many others, thank you!) Ice Sheet Elevations from ICESat.
CLIMAR-III, Gdynia, Poland, May 2008 Advances in the AVHRR Pathfinder Sea Surface Temperature Climate Data Record and its Connections with GHRSST Reanalysis.
Ice Loss Signs of Change. The Cryosphere  Earth has many frozen features including – sea, lake, and river ice; – snow cover; – glaciers, – ice caps;
R.W. Arritt for the NARCCAP Team December 2006
Greenland Ice Sheets CCI
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Verifying Precipitation Events Using Composite Statistics
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Field Maps Aim: What are fields?.
An T Nguyen (MIT) Thomas A Herring (MIT)
AMPS DMSP WMC CReSIS IREP Program at Univ. of Tasmania - Dan Steinhoff
The FRAME Routine Topography Contour Lines Gentle Slopes Steep Slopes
GODAE Final Symposium, 12 – 15 November 2008, Nice, France
Richard L. Collins1, David E. Atkinson1 Brentha Thurairajah1, V
Presentation transcript:

Thoughts on OIB Science Team KCJ

Acquisition Strategies OIB developed 3, basic acquisition strategies February 2011 I. Establish once the bedrock topography grid and ice surface sampling epoch. – a) 5 km or less spaced flight lines parallel to elevation contours near coast and seaward of ice margin. – b) km spaced flight lines parallel to elevation contours upstream. – c) Collect along center lines of most Greenland and Antarctic glaciers. II. Extend coverage and repeat elevation measurements using high elevation lidar – a) Fill regions between low elevation flight lines – b) Repeat acquisitions in succeeding years for dh/dt III. Use extended and base data to improve ICEsat slope errors, tie ICEsat and OIB to Cryosat, tie earlier data to ICEsat-2. July 2012 Seasonal Strategy 1) ICESat-2 continuity and a summer commissioning phase January ) OIB will fly a grid pattern the same glacier each season. 2) OIB will fill coverage gaps so that regions are sampled at least once during OIB 3) Remaining time devoted to acquisitions in support of ICESat and ICESat-2 science interpretation 4) After 1-3 are complete, use remaining time to support other programs. Re-evaluate the strategies as we approach ICESat

Assessments Science team validated data quality through intercomparisons (e.g. cross-overs). Should there be a focus on experiments designed to refine error model predictions? Science team struggled with assessing impacts? How best to assess progress towards objectives and scientific contribution?

Reporting Emphasize documenting impact of OIB on ICESat to ICESat-2 continuity. Will that reveal tweaks? Should there be an annual OIB report on missions, progress towards objectives, and science accomplishments?