2004 State of the Commute Survey: Assessing the Impacts of Regional Transportation Demand Management National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dulles Area Transportation Association June 14, 2007.
Advertisements

Let’s Ride! The Complete Get-to-Work Program A Central Texas Solution for: Brought to you by the Commute Solutions Coalition.
North Texas Clean Air Coalition Citizen Survey Executive Summary Report Prepared by: National Service Research October 20, 2004.
Oakland Industrial Park Transportation Needs Assessment Study Sponsored by A service of Hampton Roads Transit Prepared by THE MARKETING SOURCE,
Transportation Demand Management: Transport Canada Initiatives Canadian TDM Summit, November RDIMS
1 HOV Attitudinal Research Among Hampton Roads Commuters Sponsored by Conducted by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC August 2002.
Tom Fairchild The R&D initiative of Arlington County Commuter Services.
Overview of JARC & New Freedom Projects, FY 2013 HSTC Task Force Meeting February 20,2014 Lynn Winchell-Mendy Transportation Planner National Capital Region.
University of Massachusetts Boston Catherine Paquette, Deputy Project Manager.
RideshareOnline.com New tools to help save money, time and the environment while helping people live more independently! Prepared for: 2010 Public Transportation.
2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12.
1 Providing Commute Choices to Employees Krute Singa.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide 2007/2008 Household Travel Survey Changes in Daily Travel Patterns 1994 to 2007/2008 Robert E. Griffiths Technical.
Contents Regional Travel Options Bicycle Friendly Policies Potential for Converting Drive Alones Bicycling + Health and Wellness What is ZAP Twin Cites.
The Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Law.  The CTR Law requires major employers - in Urban Growth Areas throughout Washington - to implement an employee.
Commuter Connections FY 2006 Work Program National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board May 18, 2005.
Connie Ruth, EPA Best Workplaces for Commuters The Advantages of Excellent Commuter Benefits Why your University or College Should Achieve the Best Workplaces.
Transportation 101 June 12, Presenting Agencies  Southwestern PA Commission’s CommuteInfo program  GG & C Bus Company, Inc.  Mid Mon Valley Transit.
Performance Analysis Presentation to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (NCR-TPB) November 28, 2012 Adopted: July 18, 2012 Item.
One Call Transportation Services One Call Transportation Services Building on a Network.
1 The Aggregate Rail Ridership Forecasting Model: Overview Dave Schmitt, AICP Southeast Florida Users Group November 14 th 2008.
Transportation 101 August 7, Presenting Agencies  Southwestern PA Commission’s CommuteInfo program  IndiGO: Indiana County Transit Authority 
CITY OF TACOMA CTR PILOT CTR Board WSDOT Headquarters May 30, 2014.
Mobility Solutions Are Needed Now… 20 Tools To Get You Prepared.
National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board February 19, 2013 ITEM #12.
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions reduction strategies February 2014.
1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC.
CO 2 Emissions from Cars, Trucks & Buses in the Metropolitan Washington Region Presentation to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide 2007/2008 Household Travel Survey Presentation of Additional Findings by Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services.
Houston-Galveston- Brazoria Conformity Commitments Shelley Whitworth H-GAC.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to 12 th Annual TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.
Commuter Connections FY 2009 Work Program National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board February 20, 2008.
Challenges and Choices San Francisco Bay Area Long Range Plan Therese W. McMillan Deputy Executive Director, Policy Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
10/22/021 Recent Innovations in Transportation Demand Management Peter Valk Transportation Management Services 12 th Annual UCLA Symposium on the Transportation/Land.
FY Commuter Connections TERM Analysis Results TBP Technical Committee December 5, 2014 ITEM #8.
The Purple Line Transit Connecting Bethesda, New Carrolton, and the Washington Metro Presented by- Nick Flanders Rose Ryan Anupam Srivastava.
Transportation Demand Management Overview November 2006 James Stutz Transportation Supervising Planner TDM and Marketing Unit Office of Transit & Ridesharing.
Metropolitan Washington Region 2002 Vanpool Survey TPB Technical Committee Meeting April 4, 2002 Technical Committee Item # 8.
National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board April 21, 2010 ITEM #7 Bike to Work Day 2010.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation
GCAA Feb 17, Results 1.2 million miles of travel 600 tons of air pollution Each day these efforts reduce: Currently partnering with more than 1650.
Transportation 101 February 18, CommuteInfo Introducing… a better way to work.
Phase 2: Data Collection Findings and Future Steps.
UFCU Employee Mobility Program. Did you know?  Mobility programs can be marketed as part of employee benefits packages. Companies that offer these options.
National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board April 15, 2009 ITEM #8.
Commuter Connections FY 2007 Work Program National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Technical Committee March 3, 2006.
1 Climate Change: Impact on Transportation (And Transportation Impact on Climate Change) August 14, 2008 Mike Clifford Metropolitan Washington Council.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide 2007/2008 Household Travel Survey Presentation of Findings on Weekday Travel Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services.
GWRideConnect Program and Services FY GWRideConnect Program Scope TDM Agency operated by the GWRC Commission that serves the residents of Planning.
From Here to There: Transportation Demand Strategies to Support the Grounds Plan at the University of Virginia Presented by Chris Conklin, P.E.
1 National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board September 21, 2005 Gasoline Prices and Commuting Alternatives.
Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida Performance Measurement.
Transportation Modeling – Opening the Black Box. Agenda 6:00 - 6:05Welcome by Brant Liebmann 6:05 - 6:10 Introductory Context by Mayor Will Toor and Tracy.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
WELCOME! Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Survey Briefing.
OneCommute People Vanpool Management Contacts Program Management Accounts Surveys Meetings/Events Transit Passes Program Plan Actuals Mode Counts Vehicle.
75% of Hudson Valley residents drive alone to work
Changing the Commuter Equation
New Yorkers have the longest commute times in U.S.
Overview of Changes Made to CMAQ & System Performance Measures
Scenario Planning in the Atlanta Region
Our Suite of Services.
Integrating Travel Demand Management into the Long-Range Planning Process 2017 AMPO October 19, 2017.
National CAPITOL REGION STATE OF THE COMMUTE
Commuter Transportation and The Rapid
Increasing Access to Commuter Benefits
April 23, 2018.
Bay Area Commuter Benefits Program
Triad Commute Challenge Overview
Performance Measurement
Presentation transcript:

2004 State of the Commute Survey: Assessing the Impacts of Regional Transportation Demand Management National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board December 15, 2004

2 Purpose of Data Collection Estimate effectiveness of the Commuter Operations Center and six Transportation Emission Reduction Measures (TERMs): Telework Resource Center Integrated Rideshare Guaranteed Ride Home Employer Outreach Employer Outreach for Bicycling Regional Mass Marketing Effectiveness measures: users, placements, and reductions in Vehicle Trips (VT), Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT), and emissions

State of the Commute Survey Survey sample 7,200 randomly-selected workers in the Metropolitan Washington non-attainment area. Telephone survey conducted between February and May Survey questions Commute Patterns Availability/attitudes toward commute options Awareness of regional/employer commute services Provide for comparisons with 2001 State of the Commute survey

5 Mode Split Comparison: 2001 to 2004 Driving alone increased slightly from 70% in 2001 to 71% in There was a drop in carpooling and vanpooling from 7% to 6% Transit stayed the same at 17%.

6 Commute Lengths 2001 vs The one-way commute distance increased from 15.5 miles in 2001 to 16.5 miles in The average commute time was 34 minutes in 2004, up from 32 minutes in 2001.

7 Employer Commute Assistance Over half of the region’s employers offer commute benefits or support services to their employees. Metrochek is offered by 31% of employers, up from 29% in % of employers offer Metrochek in DC, 20% in Maryland, and 22% in Virginia. 81% of employees whose employer did not offer commute benefit programs drove alone vs. 63% of commuters whose employers did offer commute benefits.

8 Parking Availability Free on-site parking at employer sites was available to 66% of commuters in 2004, up from 65% in % of District employers offer free parking, compared to 78% in both Maryland and Virginia 86% of commuters who had free parking drove alone compared with 47% of commuters who did not receive this benefit.

9 Telecommuting In 2001, 11.3% of the workforce teleworked an average of 1.1 days per week In 2004, 12.8% of the workforce teleworked an average of 1.3 days per week Federal telecommuting increased from 6.9% in 2001 to 11.8% in 2004 Non-Federal telecommuting increased from 12.6% in 2001 to 13.4% in % of Virginia commuters telework, compared to 12% for Maryland and 10% for DC.

10 Telework Potential in Region Public Sector lags behind Private / Non- Profits and has the highest potential for growth

11 Attitudes and Awareness: Overall Commute 29% said that their commute was more difficult than a year ago, mainly because of longer commute distances or added congestion. 14% said that their commute was easier than a year ago because of a shorter commute distance, less traffic congestion, or they switched to an alternative mode. More than half of the commuters felt that their commute was about the same as a year ago.

12 Attitudes and Awareness: Transit and Ridesharing Transit 68% of commuters said that public transportation was available from home to work, about the same as % of commuters said they don’t ride the bus because “it takes too long”, up from 27% in % of commuters said they didn’t take the train because the service was not available, about the same as in Ridesharing 47% of commuters said they didn’t rideshare because they “didn’t know anyone to rideshare with”, about the same as 2001.

13 Attitudes and Awareness: Guaranteed Ride Home Almost 60% of commuters know that there is a regional GRH program, a dramatic increase from 2001 when only 20% of commuters were aware of the program. Findings show that all mode users are equally aware of the program.

14 Attitudes and Awareness: Marketing and Advertising Over half of commuters have seen, heard, or read advertising for commuting. 13% recalled Commuter Connections as the sponsor of the ad. 17% of commuters who drive alone said they were influenced by the ads and would consider using alternative modes.

15 Commuter Connections Transportation and Emission Impacts - Daily Trips reduced91,000 VMT reduced1,722,000 NOx reduced1.96 Tons VOC reduced1.01 Tons

16 Cost Effectiveness of Commuter Connections Programs Cost Per Trip Reduced $ 0.15 Cost Per VMT Reduced $ 0.01 Cost per ton of NOx reduced$ 6,000 Cost per ton of VOC reduced$12,000

17 Benchmarking TDM – Employer Outreach RegionEmployer Regulation Number of Employer Clients Clients Per 100,000 Employees WashingtonNo5, AtlantaNo40018 HoustonNo1276 PhoenixYes (50 or more employees) 1,20077 San DiegoNo20014

18 Benchmarking TDM – Ridematch Database Comparison RegionDatabase Size Annual Applications Applicants per 1,000 employees Placement Rate Washington17,00021, % Atlanta28,0006, % Houston7,0005,0002.3N/A Phoenix2,6003,3002.1N/A San Diego13,30012,0008.5N/A

19 Conclusions Employers are participating in offering commute benefits in greater numbers, but more of them need to either start or expand programs. Free parking is still the norm rather than the exception. Advertising creates high awareness and encourages commuters to take action. There is tremendous potential for additional telecommuting.

20 Conclusions Transportation Demand Management (TDM) is an important tool in maintaining and operating the region’s transportation infrastructure. TDM would be more effective if more housing and employment were concentrated along major corridors and in activity centers with less free parking. The region needs to build upon its successful track record with TDM – our program impacts and cost effectiveness compare favorably with other similar metropolitan regions.