Synchrotron-based investigations of biogeochemical transformations of priority contaminants in soils at DOE sties July 18, 2006 Presented by Jeff Fitts.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Natural Gene Transfer to Develop Resistance to Metal Toxicity in Microbial Communities at the Oak Ridge FRC Jeffrey Fitts, Garry Crosson (BNL Environmental.
Advertisements

LEACHATE MANAGEMENT AND TREATMENT
Fecal Colform Bacteria Contamination during Rain Events in Sayler’s Creek, Virginia Blake N. Robertson Senior Honors Research Under the Supervision of.
Adventures in Microbial Electron Transfer and Technology Development Charles E. Turick, Ph.D. Environmental Biotechnology Savannah River National Laboratory.
BIOREMEDIATION Jiří Mikeš.
1 Best Practices for Risk-Informed Remedy Selection, Closure, and Post-closure Control for DOE’s Contaminated Sites October 30, 2013.
Bioremediation of selenium-contaminated environmental samples S. Hapuarachchi and T. G. Chasteen Department of Chemistry Sam Houston State University.
Biodegradation and Natural Attenuation
The Behavior of Radionuclides and RCRA Elements in Tank Backfill Grouts Mark Fuhrmann, Jeffrey Gillow, and John Heiser Environmental Sciences Department.
U(VI) interactions with carbonates: Spectroscopic studies
Marine Geochemistry of Uranium J. Kirk Cochran School of Marine & Atmospheric Sciences Stony Brook University (SUNY) Stony Brook, NY
Monitored Natural Attenuation of Inorganics USEPA Scientist - to - Scientist Meeting Las Vegas, Nevada June , 2000 Robert W. Puls, Ph.D. National.
Mercury Contamination in Brazil
Speciation of uranium in contaminated ground water at Rifle, CO by Nikki Peck.
Phytotechnologies for Environmental Restoration and Management Micah Beard, M.S. Shaw Environmental, Inc.
Permeable Reactive Barriers for Inorganic Contaminants and Treatment of Acid Rock Drainage USEPA Scientist - to - Scientist Meeting Las Vegas, Nevada June.
Permeable reactive barrier using nanoscale iron particles in As contaminated subsurface Emplacement of nano-particle - Emplacement into reactive barrier.
1 Kent S. Sorenson, Jr. Ryan A. Wymore Enhanced Bioremediation for Treatment of Chlorinated Solvent Residual Source Areas – Case Study and Implications.
Ramesh Chawla and Jacob Mlusu Department of Chemical Engineering
From flask to field: Lessons for transferring remediation technology to nuclear waste sites Vincent Adams, Ph.D. Director Office of Groundwater and Soil.
The main purposes of EnviroSync are to: (1) serve as an advocate for the MES-SR community (2) assess the state of existing SR facilities for MES research.
Environmental Remediation Sciences (SC – 23.4) Spring 2005.
Biogeochemical Framework to Evaluate Mercury Methylation Potential During in-situ Remediation of Contaminated Sediments NIEHS R01ES Heileen.
GeoSoilEnviroCARS Matt Newville, Steve Sutton, Mark Rivers Applications: XANES EXAFS Techniques: Near-neighbor distances and coordination environment.
New soil remediation strategies targeted at reduction of PACs contaminant exposure and mobility National Environmental Research Institute Aarhus University.
URANIUM ACCUMULATION IN SANDY SOIL IN AN ARID REGION DUE TO AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITIES Dr. Ashraf E. Khater King Saud University, Saudi Arabia Atomic Energy.
8/16/20151 BIOSORPTION OF COBALT AND COPPER FROM HYDROMETALLURGICAL SOLUTIONS MEDIATED BY Pseudomonas spp PRESENTATION BY: NONJABULO PRUDENCE DLAMINI.
Environmental Molecular Science Institute University of Notre Dame Actinides and Heavy Metals in the Environment The Formation, Stability, and Impact of.
BIOCYANIDE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT Activity III ; Project 5.
FORBES RESEARCH GROUP Tori Forbes W374
BIOREMEDIATION Bioremediation is the use of biological systems (mainly microoganisms) for the removal of pollutants from aquatic or terrestrial systems.
1 In-Situ Treatment of Groundwater with Non-aqueous Phase Liquids December 10-12, 2002, Chicago, IL Scott G. Huling, Ph.D., P.E. USEPA Robert S. Kerr Environmental.
University of Pretoria
GEOBACTER METALLIREDUCENS MUTANTS FOR CHROMIUM BIOREMEDIATION Ilaria J. Chicca, Gabriele Pastorella and Enrico Marsili School of Biotechnology, DCU GEOBACTER.
INVESTIGATING BIOGEOCHEMICAL CONTROLS ON METAL MIXTURE TOXICITY USING STABLE ISOTOPES AND GENE EXPRESSION Grant # 1R01ES Project Period 8/18/2014.
Seasonal Changes in Biogeochemistry of a Natural Wetland Receiving Drainage from an Abandoned Mine Diane McKnight and Eric August – University of Colorado.
Environmental Sciences Department BNL Environmental Sciences Dept. and EnviroSuite: from NSLS to NSLS-II Jeff Fitts July 18, 2007 Environmental Research.
Heavy metal transformations 5(iv) 1. Aims (i) To provide an overview of heavy metals’ transformations and their thermodynamic and kinetic processes in.
Environmental Remediation Science DOE Office of Science BER Advisory Committee July 11, 2006 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Office of Biological.
Results Phenylalanine (Figure 1A) P. aeruginosa grew logarithmically in the presence of phenylalanine. P. aeruginosa increased 100 fold over 10 days in.
Almost Everywhere: Naturally Occurring Arsenic in Wisconsin’s Aquifers Madeline Gotkowitz Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey.
Fe and associated As(V) reactivity in wetland soil : Kinetic modelling approach Mélanie Davranche, Aline Dia, Mohamad Fakih, Bernd Nowack, Guillaume Morin,
Wetland Creation Why? Can it be done? Does a created wetland serve the same ecological purposes as a natural wetland?
2010 Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Conference Applied Science and Technology for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management Grand.
Bioremediation-From the Lab to the Field
Evaluation of Intrinsic Biodegradation and Amendments to Support Enhanced Monitored Natural Recovery of Sediments Tom Krug and David Himmelheber, Geosyntec.
Environmental Remediation Science Division PART Review Long-term measure: by 2015 ERSD will “provide sufficient scientific understanding to allow a significant.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science The Office of Science Role in Environmental Cleanup Dr. James.
Groundwater Pollution
FRC Area 3 Site Bioremediation (August 24, 2003 – August 7, 2005) Tests were performed in two phases: (1) a clean water flush to remove bulk nitrate, Al,
Paul Northrup Brookhaven National Laboratory
Metals Greater solubility usually = greater toxicity Chromium (Cr) – Six oxidation states, +1, +2, +3, +4, +5, +6 +3, +6 most common used to prevent corrosion.
In-situ Immobilization of Mercury in Sediment and Soil by A New Class of Stabilized Iron Sulfide Nanoparticles Zhong Xiong, Feng He, Don Zhao, Mark O.
Jonathan Lloyd School of Earth, Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences The University of Manchester Geomicrobiology.co.uk Land.
Emma Nikols. How does the efficiency of Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas fluorescens biofilters compare when used to prevent soil contamination? This.
SERDP Perchlorate Research Catherine Vogel SERDP/ESTCP Program Manager for Cleanup Attachment 5.
The Secondary Mineralization of Ferrihydrite Under Reducing Redox Conditions: An Electrochemical Study Aron Griffin Engineering Science and Mechanics Advisor:
Microbial Anoxic Oxidation of Arsenite Lily Milner Chemical and Environmental Engineering, The University of Arizona 4/19/08 Acknowledgements: Dr. Reyes.
Oxytetracycline at Environmental Interfaces Studied by Second Harmonic Generation Patrick L. Hayes and Franz M. Geiger Department of Chemistry, Northwestern.
1 Groundwater Pollution GW 10 Monitored Natural Attenuation.
Groundwater Pollution
1 Source Removal- Policy and Practice in the FDEP Robert C. Cowdery, P.E. Hazardous Waste Cleanup Section Division of Waste Management Florida Department.
1 Students type their answers here The Cyahoga river is notable because A. it is polluted with selenium which led to the death of millions of birds. B.
What Is Soil? Chapter 1. Soil Analysis Ch Why Study Soil Science?  what we call soil is also known as the ‘lithosphere’  it plays an significant.
CORRELATION BETWEEN HYDROLOGICAL, GEOCHEMICAL AND MICROBIOLOGICAL PROCESSES IN GROUNDWATER-STREAM WATER MIXING ZONE Heejung Kim, Seong-Sun Lee, Yunjung.
Hansell Gonzalez Raymat DOE Fellow
BIOREMEDIATION Of HEAVY METALS (Copper; Cu)
Application of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles/silica Composites on the Removal of Uranium(VI) for Drinking Water Treatment and the Impact of Water Chemistry.
Iron and Biogeochemical Cycles
Chapter 2: Geochemistry Background
Presentation transcript:

Synchrotron-based investigations of biogeochemical transformations of priority contaminants in soils at DOE sties July 18, 2006 Presented by Jeff Fitts Environmental Research & Technology Division

3,000 inactive waste sites; DOE EM (Environmental Management) FY06 appropriation $6.6 billion The Big Three: Hanford, WA; Oak Ridge, TN; Savannah River, SC DOE Environmental Management Sites

Research funding from ERSP within DOE Environmental Remediation Sciences Program mission is to advance our understanding of the fundamental biological, chemical, and physical processes that control contaminant behavior in the environment in ways that help solve DOE’s intractable problems in environmental remediation and stewardship. ERSP Field Research Center at ORNL S-3 disposal ponds U processing waste In-use Neutralized 1984 Paved 1988

Manipulate Uranium oxidation state to control U solubility Oxidized uranium, U(IV), is soluble and mobile Reduced Uranium, U(IV), is insoluble and immobile Soil Bacteria often control the redox state of soil Two remediation approaches Extract uranium from the ground Stabilize uranium in the ground Groundwater Flow Uranium Plume

1.High nitrate (~1000 ppm in Area 2) 2.Acidity 3.Heavy metals (Ni, Al…) FRC conditions present challenges to in-situ bioremediation strategies Will introduction of nickel resistance into indigenous microbial community have a positive effect on nitrate reducers and stimulate iron and sulfate reducers? Problematic conditions 1.Too high redox for stimulating sulfate and Fe reducers 2.Affects metal bioavailability, and thus, toxicity 3.Inhibit nitrate reducers Result

ERSP project overview S3 ponds at ORNL Goal: Immobilize uranium in contaminated sediments via microbial reduction and precipitation Problem: Active uranium reducers are inhibited by co-contaminants in complex waste streams (e.g., heavy metals) Major project objectives Demonstrate application of natural gene transfer to improve community function under increased levels of toxic metal stress (Dr. Daniel van der Lelie, BNL Biology Dept.) Demonstrate ability to enhance uranium immobilization in ORNL sediments by indigenous microorganisms that have adopted the toxic metal resistance marker (Fitts)

Project design schematic FRC soils Model organisms Isolated from FRC fluidized bed reactor Nickel stress 1. Community structure 2. Improved nitrate red. Total community Horizontal gene transfer (in vivo) – soil columns Ni resistance Strain construction (in vitro) 1. S and Fe reduction 2. Uranium reduction and precipitation mechanisms

What is really happening to the uranium? How stable is the uranium associated with the soil? Could it become a problem in the future?

Contaminant speciation in complex real-world systems Heterogeneous materials such as soils Low contaminant concentrations Single-crystal oxide/water interfaces Derive atomic-level picture Test predictive models Speciation on model soil particles Speciation on model soil particles Focus on predominant processes Molecular details of transient species Improve predictions of contaminant behavior and in pure bacterial cultures 1 2 3

1. Growth media 2. Common soil bacteria, Pseudomonas w/ and w/o gene for Ni resistance 3. As a function of Ni concentration Role of soil bacteria and their mechanisms of toxic metal resistance Pure culture 1. Monitor bacterial growth (UV-Vis) 2. Measure Ni uptake by bacteria 2-5  l sample X-ray transparent window

C=O Scanning Transmission X-ray Microscope imaging at the carbon K-edge Washed cells exposed to Ni for 2 hrs Rinsed cells are dried on microscope window Ni resistance mechanisms Carbonates not observed O K-edge will be sensitive to NiO formation 0.8  m 2.5  m Carbonate in organic matrix Pseudomonas DMY2::ncc-nre exposed to 2 mM NiCl 2 C=C carbonate Optical Density at 290eV Cluster image NSLS Beamline X1A

U(VI) reduction by Fe(II)-containing minerals C Green rust: Fe(II)-containing mineral Green rust after Rxn w/ U(VI)-containing aqueous solution

Remobilization potential of sequestered Uranium After initial rxn with Green rust Reduced U, sequestered as U(IV) After exposure to oxygen Mixture of U(VI) & U(IV) Aqueous U(VI) Bioavailable Uranium How stable is U(IV) that is associated with Fe-oxide? What is the role of aqueous Fe(II)?

Pseudomonas DMY2 tested in column studies Media + Formaldehyde Media + 1 mM NiCl2 Media no Nickel added Kill 2,6 - FRC community 3,7 - FRC community + Pseudomonas wild type 4,8 - FRC community + Pseudomonas pMol222 5,9 - FRC community + Pseudomonas::ncc-nre

Geochemical interrogation: S, Fe & U at time zero U oxidation state at M5 edge S speciation and redox state U-Fe correlation U distribution port B Typical soil Organic matter Area 2 FRC soil inorganic sulfate sulfate reduced organic S species Area 2 FRC soil U 6+ standard U 4+ standard NSLS beamlines X27A & X15B

Geochemistry of columns after 65 days Ni distribution in Column 2 No reduction of Uranium observed Small increase in sulfide relative to kill (oxidation during transfer may be problem) Fe(III) oxides still dominate Initial mobilization of Uranium Nickel breakthrough observed but significant adsorption occurs Soil indicators by x-ray absorption spectroscopy Column effluent indicators

Determine chemical state of untreated wastesDetermine chemical state of untreated wastes Assess and optimize treatment technologies and remediation strategiesAssess and optimize treatment technologies and remediation strategies Assess end-states to improve long-term performance predictionsAssess end-states to improve long-term performance predictions Conduct basic science research to seed future innovation in cleanup technologiesConduct basic science research to seed future innovation in cleanup technologies Summary: Applications of synchrotron-based studies in nuclear waste management

Acknowledgements NSLS Measurements Paul Northrup (BNL Environmental Sci. Dep.) – XAS & Microprobe Bjorg Larson, Sue Wirick (Stony Brook University) – STXM James Ablett (BNL NSLS) – Microprobe beamline X27A Oak Ridge FRC Dave Watson (ORNL) BNL Biology Department Niels van der Lelie David Moreels, Safiyh Taghavi, Craig Garafola BNL Environmental Sciences Dept. Garry Crosson