Session Materials  Wiki

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WELCOME – RIG 2 - Session 1 September, 2012 OESD 114 RIG 2 - Session 1.
Advertisements

Thank you!. At the end of this session, participants will be able to:  Understand the big picture of our new evaluation system  Create evidence-based.
PSESD Teacher Principal Evaluation Project Regional Implementation Grants October 25, pm.
Session Materials  Wiki 
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Module 2: Using Instructional and Leadership Frameworks in Educator Evaluation 1.
TPEP Teacher and Principal Evaluation Process Bellevue Chamber of Commerce Presentation January 15, 2015 Presented by: Dr. Patty Siegwarth: Bellevue School.
ESD 112 Professional Growth Cycle
Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Module 2: Using Instructional and Leadership Frameworks in Educator Evaluation 1 March 2013.
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
Session Materials  Wiki
Session Materials Wireless Wiki
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
December 2014 Supporting Principals as Instructional Leaders.
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation.
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Student Growth 2.0 Fall,  Face-to-Face Sessions  Student Growth 2.0  Rater Agreement Practices  TPEP/ Washington State Learning Standards.
Update on Teacher Principal Evaluation System (TPEP) Implementation July, 2014.
Session Materials  Wiki 
Session Materials  Wiki   Wireless  Network: OpenAir  Password:
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing Educators for Rater Agreement and Sustainability: Planning for Professional Learning.
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.
Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Legislative Update Michaela Miller TPEP Program Manager OSPI TPEP RIG Update March 15th, 2012 Jim Koval TPEP Program.
Session Materials  Wiki 
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Materials  Wiki 
February 10, 2012 Session 3: Effective Leadership in the Common Core February 10, 2012 Session 3: Effective Leadership for the Common Core NYSED Principal.
CCSS Mathematics Fellows Tamara Smith Regional Mathematics Coordinator Olympic ESD Complete the Math Task on the Table.
Examining Student Work and Data Professional Learning Community Action Teams PUSD Instructional Services-PLC Action Team Training Fall 2008.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
NEW TEACHER PRINCIPAL EVALUATION. RACE TO THE TOP AND ESSB 5895  The principles guiding the change  Quality teaching and leading is critically important.
Ongoing Training Day 3. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Background Agenda Review.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
Leading Innovation 2011: Sanding the Edges - Tuning a Lesson STRUCTURED LESSON REVIEW BEGIN.
Ongoing Training Day 2. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research Review Taking Stock Collect evidence Principal Practices & the Rubric End-of-the-Year Looking.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Program Introduction to Principal Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Introduction to Teacher Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 6: Reflecting and Planning for Next Year December 2013.
Entry Task As you enter, please take a moment to place a blue dot on the continuum on the wall that represents your perception of the following: Consider.
1 Support Provider Workshop # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
Th e Heart of TPEP: Learning Centered Conferencing Michelle Lewis John Hellwich TPEP.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation AARPE Session 5 Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement.
Materials  Wiki 
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness F. Prioritize Areas for Feedback 1.
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Implementing Educational Policy Name Workshop Facilitator.
Materials  Wiki 
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
July 11, 2013 DDM Technical Assistance and Networking Session.
Session Materials  Wiki   Wireless  Network: OpenAir  Password:
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
DECEMBER 7, 2015 Educator Effectiveness: Charter School Webinar.
Educator Evaluation and TPEP in Washington State Changes to the law for Procedures for Evaluation are now addressed in: RCW 28A.405 WAC.
Presentation transcript:

Session Materials  Wiki

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 2

Session Norms  Be present  Participate actively:  Ask questions  Share connections  Listen  Work together as a community  Invite and welcome contributions of every member 3

Outcomes  Consider how ideas from Rethinking Teacher Evaluation might influence your thinking about how to create a system that supports professional growth  Examine and apply student growth rubrics for teacher evaluation  Update Communication Plan

System Components Understand, align and communicate 6696,5895, ESEA Flexibility Waiver Teacher and Principal Criteria System Components eVal Management System Communication plan Review and select Instructional frameworks: 5 Dimensions (CEL) Danielson Marzano Leadership frameworks: AWSP Marzano Discuss and determine Measures and Evidence Observations Plans Artifacts Reflections Other Roles and responsibilities Systems and structures Fine tune and finalize Summative Model Measures and Evidence Student Growth Feedback Prepare to Pilot PD Plan Communication Tools and forms New Eval Participants

TPEP Core Principles 6 1. The critical importance of teacher and leadership quality 2. The professional nature of teaching and leading a school 3. The complex relationship between the system for teacher and principal evaluation and district systems and negotiations 4. The belief in professional learning as an underpinning of the new evaluation system 5. The understanding that the career continuum must be addressed in the new evaluation system 6. The system must determine the balance of “inputs or acts” and “outputs or results”

District Updates: Job Alike Groups  Divide yourselves by Job Groups and Instructional Framework  What are your professional development plans for your stakeholder group for the instructional framework you have selected 7

Joyce Report, 2011 Rethinking Teacher Evaluation  Take 20 minutes of silent, independent reading time to briefly review the article  Select one passage and one back up passage that resonated with you 8

Save the Last Word for Me!  Work in groups of 3  Select a time keeper  One person shares their passage and implications for their work (up to 2 minutes)  The group takes 3 minutes total to respond to selected passage  The original person has 1 minute for a final comment.  Repeat until all participants have shared their passage, and the group has had an opportunity to respond.  If time, how did the protocol work for you today? There will be a total of 20 minutes for this discussion.

Share  Whip around the table  Each person, shares one implications for your work with the larger group from your district  Each district should be prepared to share one implication with the whole group

Student Growth Rubrics  Review proficient column of criteria 8 student growth rubric  Underline key words or phrases

Student Growth Rubric 8.1  Work in teams of 3-5  Go to  Identify the systems, processes and structures that would need to be in place to support this work?

Sharing 13  Take a few moments to review the systems, structures and processes that other groups have identified.  Are there any you might add to your list?

Option for Team Time: Self-Assessment  In district teams. Consider the work you have just completed:  What do you already have in place?  What gaps do you notice?  Implications?

Sample goal – Criteria 6 15  Take a few minutes to review the sample criteria 6 goal  Record clarifying questions

Criteria 6.1- Establishing Student Growth Goals 16  With a partner, review the student growth rubrics for criteria Establishing Student Growth Goals.  What differentiates the levels of performance for this student growth component?

Rating 17  Based on the rubric, how would you rate the criteria 6.1 goal?  What is your rationale?

6.2 Achievement of Student Growth Goals 18  Locate component 6.2 on the student growth rubric  What differentiates the levels of performance for component 6.2?

Sample Student Achievement Data  Based on this data, what rating would you select for criteria 6.2 – Achievement of Student Growth Goals?  What is your rationale?

Nested Goals 20  Locate the “Completed Example Student Growth Goals” document located on the wiki  How are the goals for criteria 3, 6 and 8 alike and different in this sample?

Team Work  You saw one example of a tool to support the development of a student growth goal.  What might a tool for goal setting look like in your district?

Reflection  Take a few minutes to reflect with a small group at your table.  What did you learn as a result of this process?  What questions did this process surface for you?

Team Planning Ideas  Update Communication Plan: Who else needs this information?  Criteria 8 Student Growth Goal gap analysis of systems, structures and processes  Continue work on student growth supporting documents/tools  Continue working to identify measures and evidence.  Other topics relevant for your team