The Importance of Healthy Riparian Areas and their Current Status in Wisconsin Tim Asplund, Buzz Sorge (WI DNR) Advanced Lake Leaders – Green Lake Sept.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Information Needs for the Integrated F&W Program (ESA and Power Act) Jim Geiselman - BPA.
Advertisements

Riparian Thinning: Logic Paths for Silvicultural Prescriptions
David McCormick & Simon Harrison
Stream Corridors Christine Hall Natural Resources Conservation Service North Jersey RC&D Slides 1-12.
Effects of Land Use and Associated Factors On Biological Communities of Small Streams in the Illinois River Basin of Arkansas by James C. Petersen, Billy.
Riparian Zone Habitat Assessment Vegetation and More.
Waterfront Recreation (photo of big boat going by) Module 6:1.
Daren Carlson – MN DNR 14 April Overview Prairie monitoring – Change analysis – Status/trend monitoring – Grassland adaptive management collaborative.
Clearwater River Habitat/Bioassessment
September 6th, 2002 Lake Management Plans -What Now- Aquarius Systems’ Aquatic Plant Harvesting Seminar Craig Helker, Wisconsin DNR.
Development of a Macrophyte-based IBI for Minnesota Lakes
Frogs - Habitat Survey Habitat survey  Why conduct a habitat survey? To understand the condition and quality of a waterway 
Lake Status Indicator Selection and Use in SLICE David F. Staples.
Kettle Pond Vegetation Monitoring January 2011 Scattered throughout Cape Cod National Seashore are numerous freshwater lakes and ponds of glacial origin.
Point-intercept aquatic plant sampling Ray Valley, Cindy Tomcko, Donna Dustin 19 November 2008.
Healthy Lake Workshop Native Buffers & Stewardship Practices June 28, 2014 Eagle Lake Paw Paw, Michigan.
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
Aquatic Habitat Lakes and Oceans Lecture 15. Factors Influencing Lake Dynamics Hydrology Geology Morphometry Base chemistry Biology (food chain) Human.
Minnesota’s Depressional Wetland Condition Assessment (a.k.a. ‘Status & Trends of Wetland Quality in Minnesota’) John Genet 6 th Annual Minnesota Wetlands.
Bioassessment 1.0. Stream Visual Assessment Protocol 1. Turbidity 2. Plant growth 3. Channel Condition 4. Channel Flow Alteration 5. Percent Embeddedness.
Watersheds Capture, Store And Safely Release Water.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocol (RBP). Background to RBP changes in community/assemblage composition used to evaluate existence and degree of impact.
Analyzing Stream Condition Using EMAP Algae Data By Nick Paretti ARIZONA PHYCOLOGY ECOL 475.
Protecting Lake Water Quality & Aquatic Habitat from Effects of Lakeshore Development Kellie Merrell Lakes & Ponds Management & Protection Section VT Agency.
Interaction of Invasive Plants with Environment and Other Biota Eric Dibble Bill James Susan Wilde.
AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS Determined by the salinity of water 2 types:
Fundamentals of River Restoration and Salmonid Fisheries OWEB, 1999, Fundamentals of River Restoration and Salmonid Fisheries OWEB, 1999, Fundamentals.
Freshwater Fishery Management Objective- Discuss the lake habitat to include basic fishery management techniques.
Summary of Proposed Changes to Shoreland Zoning Ordinance April 10, 2012.
S e s s i o n 5 Managing riparian land for terrestrial wildlife.
IMPACTS OF LAND DEVELOPMENT ON OREGON’S WATERS 2001 This slide show was borrowed from the internet but we added our own research when we presented it.
Name of presenter Date of presentation.  To help preserve and protect Wisconsin’s over 15,000 lakes and 86,000 miles of rivers.
AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS Determined by the salinity of water 2 types: Freshwater & Marine.
Coastal Web Atlases in the Chesapeake Bay Region: Examples from Virginia and Maryland Marcia R. Berman Center for Coastal Resources Management Virginia.
Habitat Presentation 1 Phil Kaufmann --- USEPA, Corvallis, OR
1 The National Rivers and Streams Survey – An Overview and Results.
Biological Assessment REFORM Summer School, Wageningen (NL), 28 June 2015 Christian Wolter Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries.
Seagrass and Salt Marsh: Critical Coastal Habitats
R I O Hs - Rio Grande Silvery Minnow Index of Habitat Health Joel D. Lusk and Cyndie Abeyta U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Bosque Hydrology Group Water.
Objective: Have a working knowledge of the relationship between the vegetative cover in a watershed and water yield and water quality.
Assessing Linkages between Nearshore Habitat and Estuarine Fish Communities in the Chesapeake Bay Donna Marie Bilkovic*, Carl H. Hershner, Kirk J. Havens,
National Aquatic Resource Surveys Wadeable Streams Assessment Overview November, 2007.
 Sustainability Master Plan  Effect of Runoff on Stream  Negative Effect on Lake Carnegie  Final Pre-Restoration Assessment  Why this first order.
Sharon Stanton & FIA National Indicator Leads RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ENHANCED FOREST INDICATORS.
What questions are researchers asking in order to understand fire ecology? Landscape perspectiveSpecies perspective How does the ecosystem, topography.
The Influence of Natural and Anthropogenic Perturbations on Lake Riparian Forest and Coarse Woody Debris Modeling Linkages Between Aquatic and Terrestrial.
Conceptual Modeling as a Tool for Developing a Watershed Management Plan An aid to understanding linkages Barbara Washburn California Watershed Assessment.
THE STORY OF RED LAKE Douglas County Pamela Toshner DNR Lake Management Coordinator June 2006.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
Red Lake Fishery Scott Toshner Senior Fisheries Biologist Inland Waters of Douglas and Bayfield Counties.
Comparison of Benthic Invertebrate Communities Upstream and Downstream of Proposed Culvert Installations in Alabama Amy C. Gill USGS, Alabama Water Science.
National Monitoring Conference May 7-11, 2006
Riparian Areas: Functions and Conditions Authors: Gene Surber, MSU Extension Natural Resources Specialist Bob Ehrhart, Research Specialist, RWRP, Univ.
MALLARD LAKE FISH HABITAT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT “FISH STICKS” A project to increase the amount of quality fish habitat in the littoral zone of Mallard Lake.
Lake Roosevelt Rainbow Trout Habitat/Passage Improvement Project No Jason McLellan Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation January.
Sustaining Lakes in a Changing Environment - SLICE.
Riparian Buffers And Their Role In Coastal Georgia By Jackie Jackson & Bethany Jewell Water Resource Planners.
Detecting Ecological Effects of Development in the Wappingers and Fishkill Watersheds Karin Limburg, Karen Stainbrook, Bongghi Hong SUNY College of Environmental.
Case Study Development of an Index of Biotic Integrity for the Mid-Atlantic Highland Region McCormick et al
Ecology O2 Nutrients CO2 Ecology is the study of the relationships between organisms and their physical and biotic environment: Relationships involve.
Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment in Lapland1 Classification and monitoring of the surface waters of Finland National.
Restoration of the Swan Pond Embayment Michelle Cagley, Tennessee Valley Authority.
Tim Asplund, Buzz Sorge (WI DNR)
Fundamentals of River Restoration and Salmonid Fisheries OWEB, 1999, Fundamentals of River Restoration and Salmonid Fisheries Dylan Castle.
Includes large logs more than 6 inches wide
Lakes & Large Impoundments Chapter 22
Case Studies in EI Measurement: Fathom Five & Banff National Parks
Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Aquatic Ecosystem and Biodiversity Report Card Assess and rate the ecological condition of creeks and rivers across Adelaide.
Waterfront properties Could fish live here?
AQUATICS.
Presentation transcript:

The Importance of Healthy Riparian Areas and their Current Status in Wisconsin Tim Asplund, Buzz Sorge (WI DNR) Advanced Lake Leaders – Green Lake Sept. 26, 2013 Courtesy of MN DNR

Lakeshore zone Shallow zoneComplexity: The degree to which both lakeshore and shallow zones are intact. Complex habitats facilitate movement of food into and out of lakes, provide shelter and nesting areas for fish an wildlife, and buffer human impacts. Disturbance:

Shorelands and Shallows

SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT

Shoreland Assessments Riparian Habitat – Vegetation cover – Shoreline and bank – Trees and shrubs Littoral Habitat – Bottom substrate – Aquatic plants – Fish habitat Human Influences – Docks, piers, seawalls – Buildings, lawns, driveways

Data: U.W. BioComplexity project

log Growth Rate (mm/yr) Woody Habitat (no./km) High Development Low Development Undeveloped High Development Low Development Undeveloped From Schindler et al Fish grow ~3X faster in lakes with lots of woody habitat

FLOATING-LEAF VEGETATION Jennings et al 2003

Shorelands and Shallows

2007 National Lake Assessment

Poor Biology is Three Times More Common when Lakeshore Habitat is Poor Regional summary: Northern Plains, Coastal Plains and Xeric have highest proportion of lakes with poor habitat conditions While Northern Appalachian exhibits the highest proportion of lakes with high-quality habitat, > 25% of lakeshores are in poor condition

National Lake Assessment (P-Hab) method

Habitat assessment plot (P-hab) Benthic Sampling

1. Littoral Habitat

Canopy Understory Groundcover 2. Riparian Zone

3. Shoreline

Pier Building Lawn 4. Human Development

55 individual habitat metrics captured at each site (550/lake).

NLA Physical Habitat and Human Disturbance Indices Riparian (Lakeshore) Vegetation Cover Index Littoral Habitat Cover Index Littoral Habitat and Lakeshore Vegetation Complexity Index Riparian Disturbance Intensity and Extent Index

Bottom substrate Aquatic macrophytes Fish cover Canopy Understory Ground cover Shoreline substrate Human influence Bank features Invasive species Littoral Zone Riparian Zone Both Protocol

Condition of the Nation’s Lakes: Habitat *) NLA Primary indicator is Lakeshore Habitat *

Condition of the Nation’s Lakes: Habitat

Stressors to the Nation’s Lakes: Extent, Relative Risk, and Attributable Risk #1 – Lakeshore vegetation: Poor biology is three times more common when lakeshore vegetation cover is in poor condition. This affects 36% of lakes. #2 – Nutrients: Poor biology is 2.5 times more common when nutrients are high. This affects about 20% of lakes.

Riparian Disturbance

Littoral Cover Index

Lakes sampled for shore habitat in 2012 and 2013

Goals of 2013 National Lake Assessment Lakeshore Sampling 1)expand the assessment of lakeshore habitat condition across Wisconsin 2)analyze lakeshore habitat condition in terms of lake area and surrounding land use 3)Compare macrophyte survey methods: point- intercept vs. transect 4)develop ecoregion-specific lakeshore habitat metrics for Wisconsin 5)Incorporate lakeshore habitat metrics into WisCALM and Citizen Lakes Monitoring 6)use lakeshore habitat metrics in addition to trophic status to assess lake health

Lake Condition Metrics (Water Quality, Plants, Shorelands, etc ) Putting it together – Setting lake specific objectives and management strategies Objective Box plots: All lakes in a given natural community and/or ecoregion Poor Impaired/ UAA Fair Watch List Good Maintain Condition Excellent Consider for O/ERW TSI AMCI LittRipVeg

Lakes sampled for shore habitat in 2012 and 2013

Restoring Complexity and Functional Values of Shorelands

Reference Developed/Control Developed/Treated Found – Post Crystal – Post Total Number Starrett/Crystal Escanaba/Found White Sand/Lost L. St. Germain/Star Moon/Jag % Canaopy Closure