12 GeV CEBAF INJECTOR Reza Kazimi Users Group Annual Meeting June 4, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Capture Section Design for the CLIC Positron Source A. VIVOLI* Thanks to: L. RINOLFI (CERN) R. CHEHAB (IPNL & LAL / IN2P3-CNRS) O. DADOUN, P. LEPERCQ,
Advertisements

Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
Chris Tennant Jefferson Laboratory March 15, 2013 “Workshop to Explore Physics Opportunities with Intense, Polarized Electron Beams up to 300 MeV”
CESR as Light Source David L. Rubin for the CESR Operations Group Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics.
K. Moffeit 6 Jan 2005 WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at the International Linear Collider SLAC January 6-8, 2005 Polarimetry at the ILC Design issues.
1 Low-energy RHIC electron Cooler (LEReC) Update November 17, 2014.
2 February 2005Ken Moffeit Spin Rotation scheme for two IRs Ken Moffeit SLAC.
Electron and Ion Spin Dynamics in eRHIC V. Ptitsyn Workshop on Polarized Sources, Targets and Polarimetry Charlottesville, VA, 2013.
The present CEBAF Wien Spin Manipulator: Designed for 100kV beam and max rotation +/- 110 degrees Adaptation of SLAC design (how different?) X turn coil.
CEBAF Polarized Electron Source: Outlook & Horizon Operations Group Meeting May 13 th & 20 th, 2009 Joe Grames M. Poelker, P. Adderley, J. Clark, J. Grames,
Polarized Electrons for Polarized Positrons A Proof-of-Principle Experiment P. Adderley 1, A. Adeyemi 4, P. Aguilera 1, M. Ali, H. Areti 1, M. Baylac 2,
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 23 rd Annual HUGS Program June 2-20, 2008 CEBAF Overview HUGS08 June 3 CEBAF Overview HUGS08 June.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, 2001 Polarized Proton Acceleration and Collisions Spin dynamics and Siberian Snakes Polarized proton acceleration.
Recent Experiments at PITZ ICFA Future Light Sources Sub-Panel Mini Workshop on Start-to-End Simulations of X-RAY FELs August 18-22, 2003 at DESY-Zeuthen,
1 Options for low energy spin manipulation Ken Moffeit, SLAC 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 29 September to 3 October 2009 K. Moffeit, D.
Polarized Injector Status QWeak Collaboration Meeting February 1, 2010 P. Adderley, J. Clark, J. Grames, J. Hansknecht, M. Poelker, M. Stutzman, R. Suleiman,
Electron Source Configuration Axel Brachmann - SLAC - Jan , KEK GDE meeting International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Extended ALICE Injector J.W. McKenzie, B.D. Muratori, Y.M. Saveliev STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
Y. Roblin, D. Douglas, F. Hannon, A. Hofler, G. Krafft, C. Tennant EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF OPTICS SCHEMES AT CEBAF FOR SUPPRESSION OF COHERENT SYNCHROTRON.
EIC Users Meeting, SBU, 6/27/14 Polarized Electron Beams in the MEIC at JLab Fanglei Lin for MEIC Study Group EIC Users Meeting, Stony Brook University,
R.Chehab/ R&D on positron sources for ILC/ Beijing, GENERATION AND TRANSPORT OF A POSITRON BEAM CREATED BY PHOTONS FROM COMPTON PROCESS R.CHEHAB.
Capture and Transport Simulations of Positrons in a Compton Scheme Positron Source A. VIVOLI*, A. VARIOLA (LAL / IN2P3-CNRS), R. CHEHAB (IPNL & LAL / IN2P3-CNRS)
Injector Options for CLIC Drive Beam Linac Avni Aksoy Ankara University.
MeRHIC Internal Cost Review October, Dmitry Kayran for injector group MeRHIC Internal Cost Review October 7-8, 2009 MeRHIC: Injection System Gun.
Injector Status & Commissioning QWeak Collaboration Meeting May 24, 2010 P. Adderley, J. Clark, S. Covert, J. Grames, J. Hansknecht, M. Poelker, M. Stutzman,
S. Bettoni, R. Corsini, A. Vivoli (CERN) CLIC drive beam injector design.
Development of High Current Bunched Magnetized Electron DC Photogun MEIC Collaboration Meeting Fall 2015 October 5 – 7, 2015 Riad Suleiman and Matt Poelker.
CEBAF Source and Injector Status PREx-II Collaboration Mtg Feb. 26, 2016 Matt Poelker and Joe Grames Center for Injectors and Sources.
ILC Positron Production and Capturing Studies: Update Wei Gai, Wanming Liu and Kwang-Je Kim Posipol Workshop, Orsay, France May 23-25, 2007 Work performed.
AIP and Large Projects Arne Freyberger OPS 2015 StayTreat.
Preservation of Magnetized Beam Quality in a Non-Isochronous Bend
Frank Stulle, ILC LET Beam Dynamics Meeting CLIC Main Beam RTML - Overview - Comparison to ILC RTML - Status / Outlook.
Eliminating one constraint for the scheduling committee Jay Benesch
PEPPo a Proof-of-Principle Experiment
Beam Commissioning Adam Bartnik.
S.M. Polozov & Ko., NRNU MEPhI
Joe Grames Center for Injectors and Sources
P. Chevtsov for the ELIC Design Team
Polarized Electrons for Polarized Positrons
Calibration of the PEPPo Polarimetry (a tale of two polarimeters)
with help from Riad Sulieman, Arne Freyberger, and Joe Grames
CEBAF Injector Update PREX/CREX March 3-4, 2017
Jefferson Lab, Newport News, U.S.A.
Large Booster and Collider Ring
DC Injector and Space Charge Simulation Status
Electron Polarization In MEIC
CEBAF Injector Overview
Upgraded Injector Test Facility
Accelerator Issues Raised in Hall A Parity Collaboration Meeting, April B-Team Meeting April 29, 2009.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Capture and Transmission of polarized positrons from a Compton Scheme
Magnetized Electron Beam for Ion Cooling at JLEIC
Electron Source Configuration
Polarized Positrons at Jefferson Lab
Production of Magnetized Electron Beam from a DC High Voltage Photogun
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Center for Injectors and Sources
R. Suleiman and M. Poelker October 12, 2018
A. Freyberg Aug 2016 ECT’16 =>
Test of Booster at UITF Reza Kazimi (12/12/18)
Polarized Source: Recent Activities
Injector Setup for G0 and HAPPEX & Lessons Learned
LCLS Injector/Diagnostics David H. Dowell, SLAC April 24, 2002
CEBAF Pulsed Operation for JLEIC Electron Injection
Comparison between 4K and 2K operation performance of CEBAF injector cryomodules Grigory Eremeev Monday, August 19, 2019.
CEPC injector beam dynamics
Update on ERL Cooler Design Studies
Andrew Hutton Concept suggested independently by Haipeng Wang
Presentation transcript:

12 GeV CEBAF INJECTOR Reza Kazimi Users Group Annual Meeting June 4, 2012

2 12 GeV Injector What we are working on: 45MeV to 123MeV final energy 200 kV Gun 2-Wien Spin Flipper SRF Capture inside the new booster 3-Wien Polarized Positrons

3 12 GeV Injector What we are working on: 45MeV to 123MeV final energy 200 kV Gun 2-Wien Spin Flipper SRF Capture inside the new booster 3-Wien Polarized Positrons Motivation Make CEBAF work Parity Violation experiments are more demanding More efficient use of polarization Expand the physics capability

4 12 GeV CEBAF Upgrade

% of Linac Energy

6 West Recombiner

7 Parity Quality Beams at CEBAF 1.158

8 Beam quality and Injector In CEBAF many of critical beam parameters are set in the injector and some remain unchanged through the accelerator. Therefore, the injector plays a significant role in setting the final beam qualities such as bunch structure, energy spread, current stability, etc. Parity quality is achieved when the two helicity states are created and treated similarly particularly in the injector’s low energy region. Also, if the symmetry is maintained, the beam motion can be damped through the initial acceleration in the injector, further reducing the position asymmetry.

9 Chopper FC#1FC#2 BuncherCapture Bunchlength Cavity CryounitCryomodules Synchrotron Light Monitor 100/500 keV Mott Polarimeter 5 MeV Mott Polarimeter Injection Chicane 45 MeV Dump/ Spectrometer PreBuncher Gun#2 Gun#3 V-Wien Filter H-Wien Filter Apertures Polarized Electron Source (130 kV) Electron Spin Manipulation Bunching & Acceleration 500 keV SRF Acceleration (<10 MeV) SRF Acceleration (<65 MeV) Injection Chicane Spin Solenoids Synchronous Injection B C A Brief description of the CEBAF Injector

10 Chopper Operation

RK, 2010 Breaking down the problem Chopper PCup FC#1FC#2 BuncherCapture Bunchlength Cavity CryounitCryomodules Synchrotron Light Monitor 500 keV Dump 5 MeV Dump Injection Chicane 45 MeV Dump/Spectrometer Prebuncher Gun#2 Gun#3 V-Wien Filter H-Wien Filter Apertures Space Charge Bunching Process Acceleration The CEBAF Injector Upgrade

12 Chopper Faraday Cup BuncherCapture Superconducting Booster Cryo-modules 500 keV Dump 5 MeV Dump Injection Chicane Spectrometer/Beam Dump Prebuncher Gun#2 Gun#3 V-Wien FilterH-Wien Filter Apertures Increase Gun Voltage from 130 kV to 200 kV Lowers the space charge effect and reduces difference between high and low bunch charge. Faraday Cup The CEBAF Injector Upgrade

The CEBAF 200kV Inverted Gun Higher voltage = better beam quality. New design

14 Chopper Faraday Cup BuncherCapture Superconducting Booster Cryo-modules 500 keV Dump 5 MeV Dump Injection Chicane Spectrometer/Beam Dump Prebuncher Gun#2 Gun#3 V-Wien FilterH-Wien Filter Apertures Increase Gun Voltage from 130 kV to 200 kV Lowers the space charge effect and reduces difference between high and low bunch charge. Upgrade the Wien Filters for higher energy beam Enables electron spin setting and 180 deg spin flip as required by Parity Quality experiments Faraday Cup The CEBAF Injector Upgrade

15 Chopper Faraday Cup BuncherCapture Superconducting Booster Cryo-modules 500 keV Dump 5 MeV Dump Injection Chicane Spectrometer/Beam Dump Prebuncher Gun#2 Gun#3 V-Wien FilterH-Wien Filter Apertures Integrate Capture into the Booster Accommodates higher energy beam, simplifies beam setup, and increases reliability Faraday Cup The CEBAF Injector Upgrade Upgrade the Wien Filters for higher energy beam Enables electron spin setting and 180 deg spin flip as required by Parity Quality experiments Increase Gun Voltage from 130 kV to 200 kV Lowers the space charge effect and reduces difference between high and low bunch charge.

16 Chopper Faraday Cup BuncherCapture Superconducting Booster Cryo-modules 500 keV Dump 5 MeV Dump Injection Chicane Spectrometer/Beam Dump Prebuncher Gun#2 Gun#3 V-Wien FilterH-Wien Filter Apertures Upgrade the Wien Filters Enables 180 deg electron spin flip as required by Parity Quality experiments Integrate Capture into the Booster Accommodates higher energy beam, simplifies beam setup, and increases reliability New Booster with new SRF design Eliminates the x/y coupling and improves and simplifies the Parity Quality beam setup. Faraday Cup The CEBAF Injector Upgrade Increase Gun Voltage from 130 kV to 200 kV Lowers the space charge effect and reduces difference between high and low bunch charge.

17 Modeling the New Booster Beam brightness is reduced at the higher gun voltage due to the β mismatch at the start of the capture (a beta-graded cavity). Different booster designs considered in an injector without a capture cavity: 5+5 Existing booster, two 5-cell cavities 1+7, 1-cell cavity and standard CEBAF 7-cell cavity

18 Modeling the New Booster Evolutionary genetic algorithm optimization using an ASTRA model

19 Bunch Length for Different Currents

20 New booster with 2 cell + 7 cell cavities Significantly reduced rf kick and x/y coupling and easier operation

21

22 Chopper Faraday Cup BuncherCapture Superconducting Booster Cryo-modules 500 keV Dump 5 MeV Dump Injection Chicane Spectrometer/Beam Dump Prebuncher Gun#2 Gun#3 V-Wien FilterH-Wien Filter Apertures Upgrade the Wien Filters Enables 180 deg electron spin flip as required by Parity Quality experiments Integrate Capture into the Booster Accommodates higher energy beam, simplifies beam setup, and increases reliability New Booster with new SRF design Eliminates the x/y coupling and improves and simplifies the Parity Quality beam setup. Upgrade the Cryo-modules to increase the injector energy from 45 MeV to 123 MeV To achieve the 12 GeV injector energy requirement Faraday Cup The CEBAF Injector Upgrade Increase Gun Voltage from 130 kV to 200 kV Lowers the space charge effect and reduces difference between high and low bunch charge.

23 Upgrade of the Accelerating modules C25R100 Up to 30 MeV + Up to 100 MeV

24 Order of Modules Horizontal rms beam size (top) and beam energy (bottom) along the two modules. Red curve is high gradient module first. Blue curve is low gradient first.

25 Next Topic: 3 Wien System

26 Spin Precession at CEBAF Spin rotation through a Bend spin precession= [(g-2) / 2m e ]E  Where g=  E  E is in MeV The spin difference between the injector and the experimental hall is the sum of all the spin precessions through all the bends in the accelerator At certain final energies, the electron spins at different halls become parallel otherwise they are not. At present we use a single Wien filter to rotate the spin angle of all three halls. Their relative spin angles difference remain unchanged. 3 Wien system

27 Past Scheduling Issue Example For example, Qweak energy was reduced 2 MeV in October 2011 to improve the polarization for hall A on passes 2-5. With C at P 2 =1 Hall B has P 2 =1 on passes 2 and 4 and P 2 =0 on passes 3 and 5. HD-Ice wanted polarization on pass 3 as well, but …. PassP MeV/linac P MeV/linac Independent Wiens P 2 Hall AHall BHall AHall B A,B,C Wien system

28 Future12 GeV Issues 28 Energy which gives full polarization at fifth pass to A/B/C simultaneously is 1047 MeV/linac, or GeV to D. The figure of merit for GlueX is about 0.6 at this energy vs 12.1 GeV per R. Jones. The hall D eta factory proposers give Wien GeV Energy (GeV) P 2 Optimize A P 2 Opt A&B P 2 Optimize B Independent Wiens P 2 Hall A Hall B Hall C Hall D12.1 P is “percent alignment” of polarizations. Polarization is P times Cathode polarization (88%)

29 Future12 GeV Issues 29 Energy which gives full polarization at fifth pass to A/B/C simultaneously is 1047 MeV/linac, or GeV to D. The figure of merit for GlueX is about 0.6 at this energy vs 12.1 GeV per R. Jones. The hall D eta factory proposers give 0.9. For those experiments which require high but not fully longitudinal polarization, there exist combinations of three halls in the linac energy range which provide ~95% of cathode polarization to two or three of A/B/C at various passes. If there’s an experiment running which requires full longitudinal polarization, e.g. parity, near 11 GeV the problem becomes harder and the other halls may be down in the range of 80% of cathode. 3 Wien system

30 Present Wien Internals 30 3 Wien system E(x) B(y) 16 cm 38 cm

31 Just an Idea Have a Wien filter for each beam to provide full longitudinal polarization for every hall. In the injector the only place that the three beams are separated, is between the chopper cavities. If one could build three independent small Wien filters around the separated beams, then one could set the spin angle for each beam separately. The chopper Wiens provide ±90 degree spin rotation. The spin flipper system remains unchanged. 3 Wien system

32 3 Wien system 2.6 cm

33 single Wien model 33 3 Wien system 30 cm

34 Three Wiens Z+ end view 34 A B C 3 Wien system

35 Chopped beam through the model Full 6mm radial by 24 degree theta extent for A and C beams. Full radial extent by 12 degree theta for B beam. All the rays remain within the bunches. IT’S POSSIBLE! 35

36 Next Topic: PEPPO

37 S&T Review May 9- 11, 2012 PEPPo, Polarized Electrons for Polarized Positrons, is an experiment in progress at the CEBAF Injector Polarized Bremsstrahlung and pair production Demonstrate producing polarized e + from polarized e - beam Characterize low-energy (<10 MeV) polarized pair creation E.G. Bessonov, A.A. Mikhailichenko, EPAC (1996) A.P. Potylitsin, NIM A398 (1997) 395 Slide 37

38 Chopper Faraday Cup BuncherCapture Superconducting Booster Cryo-modules 500 keV Dump 5 MeV Dump Injection Chicane Spectrometer/Beam Dump Prebuncher Gun#2 Gun#3 V-Wien FilterH-Wien Filter Apertures Faraday Cup The CEBAF Injector Upgrade PEPPO line

39 T1T1 T2T2 S1S1 S2S2 D D PtPt P e- Calorimeter e+e+ e-e- PEPPo will measure polarization transfer from electrons to positrons in 2-8 MeV energy range PEPPo Proof-of-Principle Concept Slide 39 S&T Review May 9-11, 2012 Step 3: Measure e+ polarization Step 2: Collect positrons Step 1: Polarization from e- to e+

40 Conclusions We are upgrading injector energy to meet CEBAF requirement. Parity Violation experiments are more demanding and require upgrading some of the existing injector components and beam dynamics. More efficient use of polarization can be achieved if a practical independent spin manipulation scheme is found. A proof-of-principle experiment for producing polarized positron at CEBAF is in progress that could eventually expand the physics capability.

41

42

43 Conclusions The CEBAF Injector will not only increase its energy to meet the 12 GeV requirements, but also is planned to get upgrades to other systems in order to meet the future demands for parity quality beams. During the long shutdown we plan to continue our beam dynamic modeling to further improve our setup parameters. A model for independent spin settings in the halls was presented but it is by no means the only option. For example combining three independent beam lines each having their own gun and Wien could be another option. It depends on how much improvement we will get to the schedule and time saved for running at highest polarization possible. The proof-of-principle PEPPO experiment is in progress and we hope to get better understanding for having positrons at CEBAF.

44 Slide 44 S&T Review May 9- 11, 2012 In-Kind Support… External Funding… (Growing) Collaboration… A. Adeyemi, P. Aguilera, H. Areti, M. Baylac, G. Bosson, A. Camsonne, L. Cardman, S. Covrig, C. Cuevas, O. Dadoun, J. Dumas, E. Fanchini, T. Forest, E. Forman, A. Freyberger, S. Golge, J. Grames, P. Guèye, C. Hyde, R. Kazimi, Y. Kim, J.-F. Muraz, M. Marton, M. Poelker, S. Setiniyaz, J.-S. Réal, R. Suleiman, A. Variola, E. Voutier, Y. Wang Grew support beginning ~2009 JPOS Workshop

45 PAIR CREATION E.A. Kuraev, Y.M. Bystritskiy, M. Shatnev, E. Tomasi-Gustafsson, PRC 81 (2010) Half-centry-old result of Olsen & Maximon (1959) revisited (2010) to address unphysical result of polarized pair creation at low energy <10MeV. BREMSSTRAHLUNG Slide 45 S&T Review May 9- 11, 2012 Polarized bremmstrahlung & pair creation

46 Polarized Electrons for Polarized Positrons Positron momentum distribution and polarization will be measured during the run period from May 25 through June 29. Projected Data Slide 46 S&T Review May 9-11, 2012

47 Present Wien Steel box with 5.375” inside width, 3.125” inside height. Nickel disk at each end to reduce field Z extent. hole for HV B(y) E(x) 47 3 Wien system

48

49 Basics of new Wiens Three osculating 26mm circles have their centers on a 30mm circle. There’s a stock metric steel tube size 26mm OD, 1mm wall – perfect for shielding one Wien from the next. E-field limit suggested 4 MV/m 200 keV beam, 90 degree precession capability needed For those values and sharp edged fields 30 cm long, BdL=3600 G-cm and E=2.5 MV/m. Since E field and B field don’t fall off the same way in Z, the electrode length has to be adjusted to minimize steering. 49

50 End fields Electrode length was adjusted to match magnetic field fall-off. Magnetic shield length was varied in a failed attempt to adjust the B field end profile. Final electrode 14.8 cm half-length. Final steel tube 15cm half-length. x axis cm from center y axis V/cm or 208*G 50

51 Electrode curvature I explored electrodes as arcs of circles, keeping 1cm spacing on mid-plane cm chosen 51

52 Three Wien filters on 30mm circle 52

53

54

55

56 3 Wien System Spin rotation through a Bend spin precession= [(g-2) / 2m e ]E  Where g= The spin difference between the injector and the experimental hall is the sum of all the spin precessions through all the bends in the accelerator At certain final energies, the electron spin at the halls become parallel otherwise they are not. A Wien filter for each beam provides full longitudinal polarization for every hall.

57 E field in midplane of Wien 8mm circle V/cm 57 3 Wien system

58 Scheduling Issue Example Energy which gives full polarization at fifth pass to A/B/C simultaneously is 1047 MeV/linac, or GeV to D. The figure of merit for GlueX is about 0.6 at this energy vs 12.1 GeV per R. Jones. The hall D eta factory proposers give 0.7. For those experiments which require high but not fully longitudinal polarization, there exist combinations of three halls in the linac energy range which provide ~95% of cathode polarization to two or three of A/B/C at various passes. 1080/linac isn’t bad for two existing halls and drops hall D only 110 MeV, to 12.0 GeV. If there’s an experiment running which requires full longitudinal polarization, e.g. parity, near 11 GeV the other halls are down in the range of 80% of cathode, 60% longitudinal polarization. Worst case ~1.4m of beam line will be needed for the triple Wien. Of this, 40cm would be made available by removal of the capture cavity. The additional 100cm would be obtained by moving the new quarter cryomodule downstream. Longer U-tubes would be needed. Girders downstream of the quarter would have to be relocated. A temporary FODO lattice would be installed in the 1.4m upstream of the quarter until the triple Wien is implemented Wien system

59 Motivation Energy which gives full polarization at fifth pass to A/B/C simultaneously is 1047 MeV/linac, or GeV to D. The figure of merit for GlueX is about 0.6 at this energy vs 12.1 GeV per R. Jones. The hall D eta factory proposers give 0.7. For those experiments which require high but not fully longitudinal polarization, there exist combinations of three halls in the linac energy range which provide ~95% of cathode polarization to two or three of A/B/C at various passes. 1080/linac isn’t bad for two existing halls and drops hall D only 110 MeV, to 12.0 GeV. If there’s an experiment running which requires full longitudinal polarization, e.g. parity, near 11 GeV the other halls are down in the range of 80% of cathode, 60% longitudinal polarization. Worst case ~1.4m of beam line will be needed for the triple Wien. Of this, 40cm would be made available by removal of the capture cavity. The additional 100cm would be obtained by moving the new quarter cryomodule downstream. Longer U-tubes would be needed. Girders downstream of the quarter would have to be relocated. A temporary FODO lattice would be installed in the 1.4m upstream of the quarter until the triple Wien is implemented Wien system

60 Parity Quality Beam

61 Chopping System (As Installed)

62 Synchronous Photoinjection A B C A B C… MHz 111ps Beam Current

63 Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility:

64 Chopper Operation Animation Chopper #1 RF Cavity (499 MHz) Chopper #2 RF Cavity (499 MHz) Lens B CA Master Slit Beam 3 cm 130 cm