LANSING, MI APRIL 11, 2011 Title IIA(3) Technical Assistance #2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing an NCATE/IRA Program Report
Advertisements

By: Edith Leticia Cerda
The Content Side of the ACPS Professional Learning Plan (PLP)
Analyzing Student Work
A Guide to Implementation
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
1 Literacy PERKS Standard 1: Aligned Curriculum. 2 PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1. Aligned Curriculum 2. Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction.
Co-Teaching as Best Practice in Student Teaching Conclusion 1.
Action Plan Mr. Ahmed Zaki Uddin Mathematics O-Level.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
EdTPA: Task 1 Support Module Mike Vitale Mark L’Esperance College of Education East Carolina University Introduction edTPA INTERDISCIPLINARY MODULE SERIES.
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
Evaluating and Revising the Physical Education Instructional Program.
Technical Assistance March 18, 2015 Webinar and Meeting
Title I Needs Assessment and Program Evaluation
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Proposal Strengths and Weakness as Identified by Reviewers Russ Pimmel & Sheryl Sorby FIE Conference Oct 13, 2007.
Atlantic Canada Mathematics Assessment Resource Entry - 3 Introduction to the Resource CAMET (Council of Atlantic Ministers of Education & Training )
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Kyrene Professional Growth Plan
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Title I Needs Assessment/ Program Evaluation Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session October 5, 2010.
One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module: Plan
ASSESSMENT& EVALUATION Assessment is an integral part of teaching. Observation is your key assessment tool in the primary and junior grades.
Sharon Walpole University of Delaware Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia Literacy Coaches in Action: Strategies for Crafting Building- Level Support.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
Evaluation Process/Requirements for CAPP Algebra Project.
Help or Hindrance: A Blended Approach to Learner Engagement A presentation to The Ako Aotearoa ‘Research in Progress’ Colloquium.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
TITLEIIA(3) IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY COMPETITIVE GRANTS PROGRAM 1.
TitleIIA(3) Technical Assistance
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
EDU 385 Education Assessment in the Classroom
Comp 20 - Training & Instructional Design Unit 6 - Assessment This material was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health and.
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
Student Assessment Workshop #5 CERRA National Board Candidate Support Workshop Toolkit WS
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
Developing a Teaching Portfolio for the Job Search Graduate Student Center University of Pennsylvania April 19, 2007 Kathryn K. McMahon Department of Romance.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
STARTALK: Our mission, accomplishments and direction ILR November 12, 2010.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE) Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement Session Technical Assistance.
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Together, we can make a difference.
Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.
MakingConnections Unit planning.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
What Are the Characteristics of an Effective Portfolio? By Jay Barrett.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Documenting Completion of your PDP
MWSD. Differentiated Supervision Mode (DSM)  Reference Pages in Plan Book 8-16 Description of Differentiated Mode Relevant Appendices 34 Teacher.
Carol Stewart Kennesaw State University. Purpose  To conduct a comprehensive needs assessment of the school that addresses academic areas of math and.
Instructional Design Ryan Glidden. Instructional Design The process of planning, creating, and developing instructional or educational resources.
Assessment Small Learning Communities. The goal of all Small Learning Communities is to improve teaching, learning, and student outcomes A rigorous, coherent.
SAS Integration Trainer (SASIT) September Please Do the Following: Connect to the Internet Navigate to:
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Title II, Part A(3) Competitive Grant Program for Improving Teacher Quality Technical Assistance March 26, 2009 Webinar.
Professional Learning Communities Creating powerful and effective learning for teachers and students.
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Georgia Department of Education
Presentation transcript:

LANSING, MI APRIL 11, 2011 Title IIA(3) Technical Assistance #2

Proposal Development Suggestions ALIGNING NEEDS, GOALS/OBJECTIVES, ACTIVITIES, AND EVALUATION

Clearly describe relationships/ alignment in your proposal

ALIGNING PROPOSAL COMPONENTS NEEDS SECTION Provide a summary description of pertinent needs from pre-proposal needs survey (represents potential teacher participant perceptions of their needs) From your needs survey data, identify your 3-5 primary needs; don’t try to address every need in the first phase (16 months) of the project

NEEDS SECTION Report needs specific to partner school(s) gathered  1) from school staff (additional to pre-proposal needs survey),  2) known by IHE partners, or  3) gathered from existing public data (curriculum status, assessment needs, student achievement, professional development status, etc.). Some of these may relate to the needs identified by participants; others may be additional needs to be addressed.

NEEDS SECTION For Category #1 (“Returning Participants”) Proposals. Report evaluation results of previous projects, including effects on participants and needs still to be met (based on evaluation data and reflections on previous project) Avoid generic or generalized needs statements, such as national needs—focus on needs pertinent to your project and partner schools Only use state-level needs/priorities if they are pertinent to your proposal

NEEDS SECTION If you used paper/pencil survey or any other survey not consistent with the MDE needs survey, be sure to attach a compilation of results of your survey (or submit individual completed surveys) as part of appendix. BE SURE TO INCLUDE DESCRIPTION OF OTHER PROJECT REQUIREMENTS AS OUTLINED IN THE RFP and ASSOCIATED SCORING RUBRIC RELATED TO NEEDS.

SAMPLE DISPLAY OF PRIORITY NEEDS BASED ON ANALYSIS OF NEEDS SURVEY DATA Item% 3, 4, 5 %Yes High Priority Numbers and operations75% Measurement83%67% Cut Off Point—75% or more identify as high need Content needs (need score of 3, 4, 5 combined by 75% or more)

Item % 3, 4, 5 %Yes High Priority Using inquiry-based instructional strategies75%67% Incorporating real-world applications into lessons 75% Encouraging and facilitating collaboration among students 75%50% Using a variety of classroom-level student assessment activities 74%67% Using computers as a tool and resource for teaching and learning 75%67% Learning about the requirements of the Common Core 90%83% Pedagogical needs (need score of 3, 4, 5 combined by 75% or more)

Item% 3 and 4 Level and comfort with workshops (one-day or half- day sessions) 100% Level of interest in participating in workshops 83% Level of comfort with conferences (usually one or two- day sessions) 91% Level of interest in participating in conferences 59% Level of comfort with Professional Learning Communities 58% Level of interest in participating in Professional Learning Community 75% Professional Development format preferences (score of 3 and 4 combined by 75% Interest in SB-CEU credits from this project Yes = 82%

GOALS/OBJECTIVES/ INTENDED OUTCOMES Be sure to show the connections/relationships between your identified needs and your goals/objectives/intended outcomes.

GOALS/OBJECTIVES/ INTENDED OUTCOMES There should be intended outcomes related to each of your priority needs (Some needs may be combined for a single outcome or a strand of related needs could be combined for a single outcome—however, keep outcomes focused)

GOALS/OBJECTIVES/ INTENDED OUTCOMES You may also have goals/objectives/intended outcomes that address aspects of your project not specific to identified needs, such as technology use to help you address an outcome or associated need Avoid vague, generic, or universal goals/outcomes (such as “improve student achievement,” “provide professional development,” or improve classroom practice”)

GOALS/OBJECTIVES/ INTENDED OUTCOMES Outcomes for teachers/other participants should relate to directly to identified needs Intended outcomes for students should also relate to needs being addressed by your project (such as increased knowledge a algebraic functions or improved understanding of the U.S. election system or improved skills in conducting scientific research or improved descriptive writing skills)

GOALS/OBJECTIVES/ INTENDED OUTCOMES BE SURE TO INCLUDE DESCRIPTION OF OTHER PROJECT REQUIREMENTS AS OUTLINED IN THE RFP and ASSOCIATED SCORING RUBRIC RELATED TO GOALS/OBJECTIVES/INTENDED OUTCOMES.

ACTIVITIES/PLAN OF OPERATION A plan of operation includes not only a schedule of activities, but a description of how those activities are designed (educationally) to make progress toward goals/objectives/intended outcomes—thus, activities are aligned with intended outcomes and their associated needs Describe how you plan to address a particular outcome (that is based on an identified need)

ACTIVITIES/PLAN OF OPERATION You may describe a workshop, institute, series, or other professional development format you will use, but you must also indicate instructional strategies or methods (within those PD formats). If use of content-related materials are a major part of your strategy (such as use of a text, module, on-line resource, etc.) that should be included in our intervention description.

ACTIVITIES/PLAN OF OPERATION For example, if you plan to train participants on use of a particular pedagogical strategy (such as use of a graphing calculator or use of a particular writing strategy), describe the strategy and how you plan to conduct the training.

ACTIVITIES/PLAN OF OPERATION Avoid vague and general strategies—describe how you plan to address the intended outcome and associated needs BE SURE TO INCLUDE:  Description of other project requirements as outlined in the RFP and  Associated scoring rubric related to plan of operation.

EVALUATION In the evaluation section, be sure you describe connections/relationships between evaluation and intended outcomes (which are related to both needs and activities).

EVALUATION Evaluation is the way you measure progress toward goals/objectives/intended outcomes (and, thus, whether you have made progress in meeting identified needs). In the evaluation process, you may also assess the effectiveness of your activities in addressing intended outcomes.

EVALUATION Evaluation has both:  formative (using data to improve the program as it evolves) and  summative components (determining effects on participants and drawing conclusions about strengths and weaknesses of the project). Most evaluation data can be used for both formative and summative purposes.

EVALUATION Evaluation measures or indicators of accomplishment should be related directly to identified needs. For example, if learning content related to algebraic functions is a need and there is an outcome addressing it, your measure should relate (for teachers) to improved understanding of algebraic functions.

EVALUATION If the need is to learn technology-based strategies to facilitate student learning of algebraic functions, then the measure is about increased skills in the use of calculators to help students learn algebraic functions.

EVALUATION The evaluation section also includes description of data collection procedures to gather information related to measures/indicators of accomplishment. Lesson observation could focus on overall lesson with something like SAMPI Lesson observation system, with additional items specific to what you expect to see in classrooms as a result of your project.

EVALUATION BE SURE TO INCLUDE DESCRIPTION OF OTHER PROJECT REQUIREMENTS AS OUTLINED IN THE RFP and ASSOCIATED SCORING RUBRIC RELATED TO EVALUATION.