Brad Barber Project Manager for SCFA Texas Forest Service Brad Barber Project Manager for SCFA Texas Forest Service.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
S trategic S ubwatershed I dentification P rocess Illinois Department of Natural Resources Conservation 2000 Ecosystems Program.
Advertisements

Forest Legacy Assessment of Need Identifying Future Forest Legacy Areas Governors Commission for Protecting the Chesapeake Bay through Sustainable Forestry.
Delivering SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Through the National Science and Technology Consortium.
080820_v1DP TRAVEL MANAGEMENT - PROCESS ON THE GILA NATIONAL FOREST.
©2003 Institute of Water Research, all rights reserved Water Quality Modeling for Ecological Services under Cropping and Grazing Systems Da Ouyang Jon.
Update: National Assessment of Fish Habitats Climate Change and Fish Habitat Meeting, Denver, CO, October 19-20, 2009 Dana Infante 1, Peter Esselman 1,2,
Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
Increased Ethanol Production Impacts on Minnesota Wetlands Dr. David Kelley University of St. Thomas 2013 Minnesota Wetlands Conference.
USDA Forest Service Southwestern Region. Overview  Why Landscapes?  Other Landscape Efforts  Strategic Action Plan Summary  Region-wide Landscape.
South Llano River: One of 2011’sTop Ten National Fish Habitat Action Plan named SLR as “water to watch” WHY?? –Conserve freshwater, estuarine, and marine.
DRASTIc Groundwater Vulnerability map of Tennessee
Science & Monitoring Team Meeting Sept 23rd. Agenda Introductions Overview of CPRW & CO Conservation Exchange Review draft charter/workplan Watershed.
Relationship to E-Flows Riparian Areas Influences groundwater/surface water relationships Provides filters to improve water quality Provides habitat for.
Every Acre Counts The Newfound Watershed Master Plan Land Conservation Priorities In the Newfound Lake Watershed January 23, 2015 Dan Sundquist GreenFire.
GIS-Data Sources Francisco Olivera, Ph.D., P.E. Srikanth Koka Department of Civil Engineering Texas A&M University.
A Free Tool to Aid Planning Lucas Ridley UT - Chattanooga.
Getting the Big Picture How to Look at Your Watershed Indiana Watershed Planning Guide,
Anadromous Fish Run Site Selection Tool An Example Application: Identifying Restoration Projects for Community-Based Efforts.
An introduction to data sources and possible projects. Marc Albrecht Marc Albrecht University of Nebraska at Kearney University of Nebraska at Kearney.
Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1, 15 January 2007, Pages Biological integrity in.
Notice: The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and may not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the United States Environmental.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © m Percentage of Surface Drinking Water from Intermittent, Ephemeral, and Headwater Streams in the Continental.
Jeremy Erickson, Lucinda B. Johnson, Terry Brown, Valerie Brady, Natural Resources Research Institute, University of MN Duluth.
The Firewise Virginia Program John Miller - Chief, Resource Protection Virginia Department of Forestry.
Burl Carraway. Purpose of Redesign Shape and influence use of forest land on a scale and in a way that optimizes public benefits from trees and forests.
Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry How to estimate future forest cover in a watershed.
Geographic Information Systems Other Digital Data.
GIS Tools for Watershed Delineation Public Policy Perspectives Teaching Public Policy in the Earth Sciences April 21, 2006 Gary Coutu Department of Geography.
Prioritizing Agricultural Lands for Riparian Buffer Placement in the Raritan Basin: A Geographic Information System (GIS) Model Project Partners: North.
Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry How to estimate future forest cover in a watershed.
Growth and Land Use Planning Analysis for Washington County, Utah Presented by: Eric D Zimmerman.
Predicting Sediment and Phosphorus Delivery with a Geographic Information System and a Computer Model M.S. Richardson and A. Roa-Espinosa; Dane County.
ACWQ Austin Canopy & Water Quality Progress Report: Austin Tree-Canopy Resource, Phase II Spring 2012, Geography 4427, Texas State University April 2,
Flintstone-Oldtown Planning Region Comprehensive Plan Kick-Off Meeting June 23, 2010 Insert pictures.
The WLP must be consistent with these objectives 1.maintaining or enhancing an economically valuable supply of commercial timber from the woodlot licence.
Montana Forest Stewardship “Empowerment of Forest Owners through Personal Involvement”
A GIS-Based Model to Identify Sensitive Water Resource Properties in Need of Protection 2009 Watershed Science and Technical Conference September 14 &
Delineation of the Texas Hill Country Watersheds with Named Streams Team Members: Justin McInnis: Project Manager Matt Anding: Assistant Project Manager.
Forest Health Monitoring. Aerial survey Annual ‘first cut’ at detecting and assessing forest health disturbancesAnnual ‘first cut’ at detecting and assessing.
Support of the Framework for Monitoring Office of Management and Budget March 26, 2003.
Desktop Analysis Used To: Identify areas that meet certain criteria (e.g. contig forest 50 acres+, id gaps as well, or set lower value in urban area) Identify.
Green Infrastructure Network Design Analysis Beaufort County, North Carolina.
Our Nation’s Forestlands On the Edge Susan Stein USDA Forest Service FREMO Workshop, Annapolis FREMO Workshop, Annapolis September 18, 2007.
Watershed delineation and data preparation for groundwater modeling using GIS in the Savannah River Site GIS term project presentation November 25, 2003.
Oregon Spatial Analysis Project July Oregon SAP Background Information ODF Process What We Found What We Learned What We Plan to Modify.
Bacteria and Dissolved Oxygen Total Mass Daily Load Development for the Atascosa River Jessica L. Watts.
T28 N R4 W S01 T 5 N R 4 E S 15 T31 N R4 E S20.
Incident Command Tool for Protecting Drinking Water (ICWater) Doug Ryan USDA Forest Service Olympia, WA.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
BASINS 2.0 and The Trinity River Basin By Jóna Finndís Jónsdóttir.
ORSANCO Biological Programs Extra-curricular Updates EMAP-GRE ORBFHP NRSA.
Helping Communities Protect Wildlife Habitat Emily Brunkhurst Wildlife Biologist NH Fish and Game Taking Action for Wildlife.
Washington Forest Stewardship Spatial Analysis Project “Using Geospatial Technologies to Implement Program Strategically”
San Joaquin Valley Landscape-scale Planning for Solar Energy and Conservation UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA BREN SCHOOL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE.
Condition of Forests in San Diego County: Recent Conifer Tree Mortality and the Institutional Response Presented by California Department of Forestry Mark.
Iowa Rivers Information System Inventory, Modeling, and Evaluation of Basin, In-Stream Habitat, and Fishery Resource Relationships Kevin Kane, Iowa State.
Ron Torgerson – FFSL Central Area Manager Nick Mustoe – Central Area Forester Fred Johnson – Fire Management Officer.
Colorado River Water Resources Vulnerability Project for Hill Country Conservancy Daniel Zavala Araiza.
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and the Conservation and Use of Plant Genetic Resources Summary of
Texas Surface Water Resources
Using RMMS to Track & Report BMP Implementation
Modeling Support for Attoyac Bayou Watershed– SELECT
Headwaters of Red River ● Lower Demlow Lake ● Langlade County
Lancaster County Conservancy Long Range Protection Plan
Drinking Water Mapping Application
Drinking Water Mapping Application Source Water Protection Tools
Watershed Literacy & Engagement
Drinking Water Mapping Application:
% Riparian Natural Cover
Presentation transcript:

Brad Barber Project Manager for SCFA Texas Forest Service Brad Barber Project Manager for SCFA Texas Forest Service

Forest Resource Richness Forest Resource Threat Critical Private Forestland Forestland Forest patches Riparian areas Wetlands Priority watersheds Public water supply Proximity to public land T&E Species Slope Development level Forest health (Insects and diseases) Wildfire risk All 13 of above input layers Site productivity † † Layer added for Southern Region

Compendium of maps Analysis methodology, results, maps, and explanation of significance of private forestland in the South Summary report GIS Model Highlight state-specific issues affecting critical private forestland and its management Regional and state maps of the three output layers

National Land Cover Database Cover Classes 41, 42, 43, 91 Cover Classes 41, 42, 43, 52, 90 Layer values: 0, 1

Use data from Forestland layer Overlay state maintained roads Layer values: 0, 1 Layer Value Layer Values by Patch Size Patch Size (acres)

USGS National Hydrography Dataset Buffer streams by 25 meters x stream order Layer values: 0, 1

Forested wetlands National Wetlands Inventory (US Fish and Wildlife) National Land Cover Database (2001 & 1992) Preferred source Fill gaps in NWS data Layer values: 0, 1

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) data on Impaired Waters within 12-digit, Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) watersheds Based on Clean Water Act Section 303(d) lists that show water quality standards impairment or threats to the attainment of beneficial uses or anti-degradation provisions Layer values: 0, 1

Protected Areas Database (Conservation Biology Institute) Layer values: 1 mile = 0

15-30% slope included Layer values: 0, 1

Site Productivity SSURGO—NRCS Soil Survey Geographic data Preferred STATSGO—NRCS State Soil Geographic data † Fill in gaps in SSURGO † STATSGO being updated and renamed to Digital General Soil Map of the United States Layer Value Layer Values for Site Productivity Site Index at 50 years

U.S. Census Bureau data—1990 and 2000 Layer will include those areas where the number of households increased by 1 to 8 per square kilometer between 1990 and 2000 Layer values: 0, 1

Insect and Diseases Data from the forest health risk mapping effort by USDA Forest Service Annosus Root Disease Fusiform Rust Beech Bark Disease Southern Pine Beetle Gypsy Moth Balsam Wooly Adelgid < >25 Percent mortality of trees expected over next 15 years = 0 = 0.33 = 0.67 = 1

Southern Wildfire Risk Assessment = 0 = 0.11 = 0.22 = 0.33 = 0.44 = 0.55 = 0.67 = 0.78 = 0.89 = 1.0

Threatened & Endangered Species Public Drinking Water Supply Layer values: 0, 1 Include watersheds (12-digit HUC) in which surface water intake is present and 1-mile buffer surrounding ground water intakes Layer values: 0, 1

Forestland Priority watersheds Riparian areas Development level Public drinking water supply Wildfire risk Site productivity Wetlands Forest patches T&E Species Proximity to public lands Slope Forest health 10.1% 9.4% 9.0% 8.9% 8.8% 8.2% 7.8% 6.8% 6.6% 6.5% 5.5% 2.9% Percent Contribution of Each Layer to Overall Composite Output Layer

Percent contribution of layers to model output (values sum to 100)

PR Weighting done by Ecoregion NLCD 2001 Mapping Zones

Forestland 10.1% Priority Watersheds 9.4% Public Water Supply 8.9% Riparian Areas 9.4% Development Level 9.0% Forest Health 8.8% Wildfire Risk 8.2% Site Productivity 7.8% Wetlands 6.8% Forest Patches 6.6% T&E Species 6.5% Proximity to Public Land 5.5% Slope 2.9% Percentages sum to 100 Forestland (10.1%) Slope (2.9%)