Smolt Monitoring Program: Overview and Data Collection Brandon R. Chockley SMP Pre-Season Meeting February 20, 2015 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Principal Investigator: Stephen J. Rocklage Co-authors: Billy D. Arnsberg and Dale S. Kellar Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries.
Advertisements

Smolt Monitoring Program 1982-Present BPA project#
A Study to Evaluate Delayed (Extra) Mortality Associated with Passage of Yearling Chinook Salmon Smolts through Snake River Dams Project No
Comparative Survival Study Smolt Monitoring Program 2010 PIT Tag Mark Groups.
Evaluate recreational and commercial mark-selective fisheries. (35018) Geraldine Vander Haegen, WDFW Charmane Ashbrook, WDFW Chris Peery, U. Idaho Annette.
Workshop: Monitoring and Evaluation of Harvest on Columbia River Salmonids July 31- August 1, 2007.
Survival Estimates for the Passage of Juvenile Salmonids Through Dams and Reservoirs of the Lower Snake and Columbia Rivers (Project ) CBFWA March.
UMATILLA RIVER FISH PASSAGE OPERATIONS
Monitoring and Evaluation of Yearling Fall Chinook Salmon Released Upstream of Lower Granite Dam Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.
Rebecca A. Buchanan Columbia Basin Research School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences University of Washington Seattle, WA INVESTIGATING MIGRATORY PROCESSES.
Growth and Development of the Columbia Basin PIT Tag Information System Growth and Development of the Columbia Basin PIT Tag Information System Overview.
NMFS, PTAGIS, SNKTRP, CJS and SURPH Steven G. Smith Northwest Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service 2004 PIT Tag Workshop.
Overview of Current Production Programs Across the Columbia River Basin.
The Columbia Basin PIT Tag Information System The First 20 Years Dave Marvin Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission A Presentation for the PSMFC PIT.
C. A. Peery, M. L. Keefer, and S. R. Lee Idaho Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit U.S. Geological Survey and Northwest Fisheries Science Center.
Assessing the use of PIT Tags as a Tool to Monitor Adult Chinook Salmon Returns to Idaho John Cassinelli Regional Fisheries Biologist Idaho Department.
Coordination of Tag and Mark Recovery Programs Dan Rawding WDFW.
COLUMBIA RIVER SALMON AND STEELHEAD RETURNS FPAC and TMT – March 2013 Presented by: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Variation in Straying Patterns and Rates of Snake River Hatchery Steelhead Stocks in the Deschutes River Basin, Oregon Richard W. Carmichael and Tim Hoffnagle.
Columbia River salmon : Who (or what) will save them? John Williams Klarälven meeting in Karlstad 9 May 2011.
Combining PIT Tags with Scale Reading to Better Understand the Life History of Snake River Fall Chinook Salmon Douglas Marsh and William Muir - NOAA Fisheries.
Alternative Gear Implementation Project Pat Frazier WDFW Region 5 Fish Program Manager Photo by Wild Fish Conservancy.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Evaluation of Alternative Commercial Fishing Gear in the Lower Columbia River, 2013: Behavior and.
Survival of Migrating Salmonid Smolts in the Snake and Lower Columbia Rivers, 2009 Technical Management TeamDecember 11, 2009 Lessons Learned 2009 Bill.
1 Mainstem Passage Strategies In The Columbia River System: Transportation, Spill and Flow Augmentation Presented By: Albert Giorgi, Ph.D.
Documenting O. mykiss life histories in the White Salmon River prior to the reintroduction of anadromous fish above Condit Dam. Brady Allen and Patrick.
ISAB Snake River Spill-Transport Review ISAB – Presentation to Council September 17, 2008.
May 10, 2012 Presented by Micki Varney Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Smolt Monitoring Program: Overview and Data Collection (SMP Traps) Brandon R. Chockley SMP Pre-Season Meeting Feb. 11,
BUILDING STRONG ® PORTLAND DISTRICT 1. BUILDING STRONG ® PORTLAND DISTRICT 2 BiOp Performance Standards for Dam Passage Survival RPA RM&E Actions - Strategy.
Lewis River Fish Passage Monitoring and Evaluation Plan (draft)
Estimating the Age and Origin of Spring/Summer Chinook Salmon at Lower Granite Dam Christian Smith USFWS Abernathy Lab, Longview, WA Jody White Quantitative.
COMPARATIVE SURVIVAL STUDY Chapter 3: Annual SAR by study category and ratios of SARs Comparisons of SARs Transport to In-River By hatchery group Hatchery.
Washington’s Lower Snake River Compensation Plan Steelhead Program – A retrospective and program adaptive management overview Mark Schuck and Joe Bumgarner.
2015 G AS B UBBLE T RAUMA M ONITORING P ROTOCOL SMP Preseason Meeting – Bypass Facilities February 20, 2015 Brandon R. Chockley 1.
Migration pathway, age at ocean entry, and SARs for Snake River Basin fall Chinook prior to summer spill at LGR, LGS, and LMN dams.
Effectiveness of alternative broodstock, rearing and release practices at Winthrop NFH William Gale and Matt Cooper -USFWS, Mid-Columbia River Fishery.
The relationship of Snake River stream-type Chinook survival rates to in-river, ocean and climate conditions Howard Schaller, USFWS * Charlie Petrosky,
Downstream Survival of Juvenile Stream Type Chinook Salmon and Steelhead Through the Snake/Columbia River Hydropower System and Adult Return Rates AFEP.
Findings of Congress The Endangered Species Act is the last resort for species at risk of extinction. Under the ESA, the National Marine Fisheries Service.
Changes to FPC32.net & GBT.net for 2015 Brandon R. Chockley SMP Pre-Season Meeting Feb. 20, 2015.
2010 work planned, new operations, and wrap up Presenter: Robin Ehlke CSS Annual Meeting Apr 2 nd 2010.
2005 Subyearling Migration Fish Passage Center. Overview – summer migration Court ordered summer spill occurred from June 20 to August 31, 2005 Question.
Joe Bumgarner Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Release Strategies to Improve Post-Release Performance of Hatchery Summer Steelhead in Northeast Oregon. Lance Clarke, Michael Flesher, Shelby Warren,
Ocean rivers SARs LGR-LGR SARs LGR-LGR Harvest Mouth of Columbia predicted returns Mouth of Columbia predicted returns Juvenile travel time and survival.
Northwest Power Planning Council Fish and Energy Impacts Resulting from Reductions in Summer Bypass Spill July 16, 2003.
Performance of a New Steelhead Line Derived from Hatchery Parents Collected in Autumn in the Grande Ronde River Lance Clarke, Michael Flesher, Shelby Warren,
Upstream passage success rates and straying of returning adults Presenter: Jack Tuomikoski CSS Annual Meeting Apr 2 nd 2010.
Historical Review Fish Migration Data. Two Management Approaches Spill for Fish Passage Planning dates Percent passage dates.
2016 Smolt Monitoring Program Juvenile Passage Data and
Payette MPG Sockeye Adult Tributary Juvenile Data Tributary Data
Northwest Fisheries Science Center Technical Management Team
Comparative Survival Study Annual Meeting
FPAC Development of the Future SMP
Age at ocean entry of Snake River Basin fall Chinook and its significance to adult returns prior to summer spill at LGR, LGS, and LMN dams.
MPG Spring-Summer Chinook
Smolt Monitoring 2009 Condition Sampling Standardization
Snake River MPG Fall Chinook Adult Tributary Juvenile Data Tributary
The Data Wars Of the Columbia Basin.
Comparative Survival Study Project #
Northwest Fisheries Science Center Technical Management Team
Steelhead status in Idaho – 2012 Update
2017 TMT Year-end Review December 12, 2017 Brandon R. Chockley
2015 Inland Avian Predation Rates
Direct Survival of Migrating Salmonid Smolts in the Snake and Lower Columbia Rivers: Update with 2007 Results Northwest Power and Conservation Council.
Spring 2006 Gas Bubble Trauma Observed in Fish – Preliminary Analysis
NOAA Mainstem PIT Tag Research
Smolt Migration 2006 (preliminary results)
Eagle Fish Genetics Lab (IDFG): Craig Steele Mike Ackerman
Presentation transcript:

Smolt Monitoring Program: Overview and Data Collection Brandon R. Chockley SMP Pre-Season Meeting February 20,

Goals of the SMP Provide real-time data on juvenile salmonids to Fisheries Managers in support of in-season management decisions Provide real-time data on juvenile salmonids to Fisheries Managers in support of in-season management decisions Provide a time-series of data for evaluation of effects of changing conditions on fish migration (timing, survival, travel time). Provide a time-series of data for evaluation of effects of changing conditions on fish migration (timing, survival, travel time). Implement Gas Bubble Trauma Monitoring Program Implement Gas Bubble Trauma Monitoring Program Implement 11 RPA’s from 2014 Biological Opinion Implement 11 RPA’s from 2014 Biological Opinion 2

Three Components of the SMP 1.PIT-tag marking at Hatcheries  Wells Hatchery (WDFW) – CH0  Leavenworth NFH (USFWS) – CH1  Priest Rapids (WDFW) – CH0  Dworshak NFH (USFWS/NPT) - ST 2.PIT-tag marking at Traps and Rock Island  Imnaha River Trap (NPT) – CH1 and ST  Grande Ronde River Trap (ODFW) – CH1 & ST  Snake River Trap (IDFG) – CH1 & ST  Salmon River Trap (IDFG) – CH1 & ST  Rock Island Dam (Chelan PUD) – CH1, CH0, ST, SO 3

Target PIT-tag Totals for SMP  Cooperation with Comparative Survival Study  Wild CH1 from traps are pre-assigned to 70% Monitor-Mode and 30% Return-to-River  Wild ST from traps are pre-assigned to 50% Monitor-Mode and 50% Return-to-River  Hatchery ST from DWOR NFH are pre-assigned to 70% monitor-mode and 30% Return-to-river Site Wild ST Hatch. ST Wild CH1 Hatch. CH1 Hatch. CH0 Unk. CH1 Unk. CH0 Unk. SO GRNTRP 1,2003,6002,8001,400 RI2BYP 1,2002,800 4,0004,8003,400 SALTRP 1,4003,4003,2004,000 SNKTRP 1,4003,6002,8003,600 IMNTRP 5,00010,000 DWOR NFH 1,500 WELH 6,000 PRDH 3,000 LEAV NFH 15,000 4

Three Components of the SMP 3.Fish sampling at SMP Traps & Bypass Facilities  Snake Basin Traps: Imnaha River Trap (NPT), Grande Ronde River Trap (ODFW), Salmon River Trap (IDFG), Snake River Trap (IDFG),  Snake Bypass Facilities: Lower Granite Dam (WDFW/PSMFC), Little Goose Dam (ODFW), Lower Monumental Dam (WDFW/PSMFC)  Upper Columbia Bypass Facility: Rock Island Dam (Chelan PUD)  Lower Columbia Bypass Facilities: McNary Dam (WDFW/PSMFC), John Day Dam (PSMFC), Bonneville Dam (PSMFC) 5

Fish Sampling Data Collection Daily sample of target juvenile salmonids and lamprey Daily sample of target juvenile salmonids and lamprey Daily sample of incidental species Daily sample of incidental species Descaling and mortality data on target species Descaling and mortality data on target species Daily condition subsample (COE bypass facilities) Daily condition subsample (COE bypass facilities) Weekly GBT monitoring (all bypass facilities except JDA) Weekly GBT monitoring (all bypass facilities except JDA) 6

Daily Sample of Target Species Daily sample target of 300 to 500 target salmonids per day Daily sample target of 300 to 500 target salmonids per day Sample rate(s) adjusted to accommodate this target Sample rate(s) adjusted to accommodate this target  Sample rate may be adjusted to accommodate research There are some sample rate considerations to remember (more later) There are some sample rate considerations to remember (more later) 7

2015 Sampling Schedule and Data Collection – Bypass Facilities SiteWhen SamplingData Collected LGR 3/26-10/31 (24-hr, every day) Samples of target salmonids and lamprey Descaling and mortality on target species Samples of incidentals Condition subsample o Salmonids only at LGR, LGS, & LMN o Salmonids and Lamprey at MCN GBT Monitoring o Once-per-week at LGR, LGS, & LMN o Twice-per-week at MCN LGS 4/1-Start of Transport ??-hr,every-other-day (??-hr, every-other-day) Start of Transport – 10/31 (24-hr, every day) LMN 4/1-4/11 (??-hr, every-3 rd -day (??-hr, every-3 rd -day) 4/12-Start of Transport ??-hr,every-other-day (??-hr, every-other-day) Start of Transport – 10/1 (24-hr, every day) MCN Early April-10/1 (24-hr, every-other-day) 8

2015 Sampling Schedule and Data Collection – Bypass Facilities SiteWhen SamplingData Collected JDA 4/1-9/15 (24-hr, every day) High Temps (6-hr, twice-per-week) Samples of target salmonids and lamprey Descaling and mortality on target species Samples of incidentals Condition subsample on salmonids and lamprey (JDA and BON only) Twice-per-week GBT (BON and RIS Only) BON ~3/5-10/31 (24-hr, every day) High Temps (24-hr, every-other-day) RIS 4/1-8/31 (24-hr, every day) 9

2015 Sampling Schedule and Data Collection – Traps SiteWhen SamplingData Collected Salmon River Trap (WTB) ~3/5-~5/26 (5 days per week) Samples of target salmonids and lamprey Descaling and mortality on target species Samples of incidentals PIT-tagging o Hatchery and wild Chinook and steelhead at WTB, LEW, GRN o Wild Chinook and steelhead at IMN Snake River Trap (LEW) ~3/5-~5/26 (7 days per week) Grande Ronde River Trap (GRN) ~3/5-~5/26 (7 days per week) Imnaha River Trap (IMN) SMP reporting: ~early March-mid-July (7 days per week) 10

Sample Rate Considerations  Maximum sample rate of 25% at Lower Columbia River sites (BON & JDA)  Higher rate is possible under certain circumstances (e.g., research, GBT?)  Avoid using sample rates between 12% and 25% whenever possible  Avoids impacts to sample accuracy  Minimizes impacts to PIT-tag studies near the divert during sample (DDS) trigger of 20%. 11

Sample Rate Considerations 2.8% and 7.5% of sample rates in 2013 and 2014, respectively, used sample rates between 12% and 24% 12

Sample Rate Considerations  Avoid 0.6%, 0.67%, 0.7%, 1.5%, 3.0%, 7.0%, and 15% sample rates whenever possible  Reduces potential for rounding errors in reports 7.9% and 10.4% of Sub-batches in 2013 and 2014, respectively, used these sample rates 13

Information to Collect on Target Species (Salmonids and Lamprey) Species identification Species identification Special species (salmonids only) Special species (salmonids only) Marks, clips, and tags (salmonids only) Marks, clips, and tags (salmonids only) Detailed condition data (discuss later) Detailed condition data (discuss later) Descaling (salmonids only) Descaling (salmonids only) Mortality Mortality 14

Information to Collect on Smolts Species Identification Salmonid identification – Use the PSMFC publication “Columbia River Basin Juvenile Fish Field Guide”. Salmonid identification – Use the PSMFC publication “Columbia River Basin Juvenile Fish Field Guide”.  FPC has copies or contact Rick for copies Lamprey identification – Use USFWS guide Lamprey identification – Use USFWS guide  Available on FPC FTP web-site (ftp://ftp.fpc.org/FPC32.net/Manuals/Lamprey%2 0ID%20card.pdf) ftp://ftp.fpc.org/FPC32.net/Manuals/Lamprey%2 0ID%20card.pdfftp://ftp.fpc.org/FPC32.net/Manuals/Lamprey%2 0ID%20card.pdf 15

Species – Chinook (CH) 16

Species – Chinook (CH) Cont’d…  Holdover (HO) - used for yearling Fall Chinook; typically >160mm and typically observed in April and May  Lyons Ferry (LF) – used for yearling fall Chinook reared at Lyons Ferry Hatchery and released from Lyons Ferry Hatchery or at acclimation sites above Lower Granite Dam. This code should only be used at Snake River sites that can positively identify Lyons Ferry releases.  Fry (FR) – used for Chinook < 60 mm (Age Code = 0)  Three Special Species Codes are applicable to Chinook 17

Species – Steelhead (ST) Only applicable Special Species Code for steelhead is Eroded Fin (EF) Only applicable Special Species Code for steelhead is Eroded Fin (EF) EF is used only with unclipped steelhead if the dorsal fin or paired fins are clearly eroded as a result of hatchery rearing. EF is used only with unclipped steelhead if the dorsal fin or paired fins are clearly eroded as a result of hatchery rearing. May encounter Rainbow trout - use the less streamlined shape and the non-silvery color characteristics to identify rainbow trout and enter these as Incidental Species May encounter Rainbow trout - use the less streamlined shape and the non-silvery color characteristics to identify rainbow trout and enter these as Incidental Species 18

Species – Sockeye (SO) Only applicable Special Species Code for sockeye is Fry (FR) Only applicable Special Species Code for sockeye is Fry (FR) (≤60 mm) In general, sockeye ≥200 mm are considered kokanee and should be entered as Incidental Species, UNLESS they are clipped, CWT, and/or PIT-tagged In general, sockeye ≥200 mm are considered kokanee and should be entered as Incidental Species, UNLESS they are clipped, CWT, and/or PIT-tagged  Exception to this at RIS Sockeye >450 mm (18 inches) should be considered adult sockeye fallbacks and entered as Incidental Species Sockeye >450 mm (18 inches) should be considered adult sockeye fallbacks and entered as Incidental Species 19

Species – Coho (CO) Only applicable Special Species Code for coho is Fry (FR) Only applicable Special Species Code for coho is Fry (FR) (≤ 60 mm) 20

Species – Lamprey Juveniles 21

Clips, Marks, and Tags Clips – Adipose, right ventral, left ventral, or any combination Clips – Adipose, right ventral, left ventral, or any combination  Clips are recorded in Catch Detail and touch screen CWT – LGR, LGS, LMN, and traps will examine all unclipped Chinook (CH1 & CH0), coho and sockeye for coded-wire-tags. CWT – LGR, LGS, LMN, and traps will examine all unclipped Chinook (CH1 & CH0), coho and sockeye for coded-wire-tags.  CWT are recorded in Catch Detail and touch screen  Try to avoid false CWT scans on PIT-tags EL – In 2015 ALL SMP dam sites will collect elastomer data on Yearling Chinook and Steelhead EL – In 2015 ALL SMP dam sites will collect elastomer data on Yearling Chinook and Steelhead  EL are recorded in Mark/Recap 22

Descaling Examine all non-condition fish for descaling (except fry and lamprey juveniles) Examine all non-condition fish for descaling (except fry and lamprey juveniles) Non-condition fish are either descaled (>20% on 1 side) or not descaled. Non-condition fish are either descaled (>20% on 1 side) or not descaled. No additional information about presence or absence of predator marks required for non- condition fish. No additional information about presence or absence of predator marks required for non- condition fish. 23

Mortality sample tank/room mortalities and GBT mortalities that died after being removed from the separator. Do NOT examine morts for descaling. Sample Morts - sample tank/room mortalities and GBT mortalities that died after being removed from the separator. Do NOT examine morts for descaling.  All Sample Morts should be scanned for PIT-tags  If PIT-tagged “Mort” should be uploaded to PTAGIS  Mort with PIT-tag should be disposed of in a route that does not have a PIT-tag detection (or PIT-tag removed) facility related mortalities (e.g. transportation raceways, separator morts.) Facility Morts - facility related mortalities (e.g. transportation raceways, separator morts.) - fish taken out of the SMP sample and sacrificed by non-SMP researchers. For example, mortalities from acoustic telemetry marking should be entered as Research Mortalities. Research Morts - fish taken out of the SMP sample and sacrificed by non-SMP researchers. For example, mortalities from acoustic telemetry marking should be entered as Research Mortalities. mortalities due to SMP PIT tagging operations (only applicable at tagging sites). PIT-tag Morts - mortalities due to SMP PIT tagging operations (only applicable at tagging sites). 24

SMP Protocols, Data Entry Programs and Manuals Fish Passage Center FTP site provides links to updates SMP protocols and manuals and newest versions of data entry programs:   Protocols and Manuals: SMP - ftp://ftp.fpc.org/FPC32.net/Manuals/ftp://ftp.fpc.org/FPC32.net/Manuals/ GBT - ftp://ftp.fpc.org/GBT/ftp://ftp.fpc.org/GBT/   Pre-season Meeting Presentations: ftp://ftp.fpc.org/FPC32.net/Preseason%20Present ations/ ftp://ftp.fpc.org/FPC32.net/Preseason%20Present ations/   Data Entry Programs: FPC32.net - ftp://ftp.fpc.org/FPC32.net/ftp://ftp.fpc.org/FPC32.net/ GBT.net - ftp://ftp.fpc.org/GBT/ftp://ftp.fpc.org/GBT/ 25