Page 1ENVISAT Validation Review / GOMOS session - ESRIN – 13th December 2002 ENVISAT VALIDATION WORKSHOP GOMOS Recommendations by the ESL team : Service.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

ERS - ENVISAT SYMPOSIUM Gothenburg October, 2000 GOMOS GOMOS Calibration and Processor Verification Instrument Principle Calibration Instrument and.

Advertisements

Page 1 GOMOS Calibration Review - ESTEC - 10 September 2002 GOMOS Level 2 processing Verification activities Comparison with external sources ESTEC – SEPTEMBER.

Page1 SCIAMACHY Calibration Review – ESTEC – Sept 2002 SCIAMACHY Tangent Height Verification H.Bovensmann University of Bremen Institute of Remote.

SABER Instrument Performance and Measurement Requirements.

GlobColour CDR Meeting ESRIN July 2006 Merging Algorithm Sensitivity Analysis ACRI-ST/UoP.

SCILOV-10 Validation of SCIAMACHY limb operational BrO product F. Azam, K. Weigel, A. Rozanov, M. Weber, H. Bovensmann and J. P. Burrows ESA/ESRIN, Frascati,

Institut für Umweltphysik/Fernerkundung Physik/Elektrotechnik Fachbereich 1 Retrieval of SCIAMACHY limb measurements: First Results A. Rozanov, V. Rozanov,

Report from the 2 nd ACVE Workshop Frascati, Italy, 3-7 May 2004 Yasmine Calisesi International Space Science Institute.

CPI International UV/Vis Limb Workshop Bremen, April Development of Generalized Limb Scattering Retrieval Algorithms Jerry Lumpe & Ed Cólon.

Tangent height verification algorithm Chris Sioris, Kelly Chance, and Thomas Kurosu Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory.

Chiara Piccolo and Anu Dudhia Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, Department of Physics, Oxford University, Oxford, UK Predicted.

The Averaging Kernel of CO2 Column Measurements by the Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO), Its Use in Inverse Modeling, and Comparisons to AIRS, SCIAMACHY,

Extracting Atmospheric and Surface Information from AVIRIS Spectra Vijay Natraj, Daniel Feldman, Xun Jiang, Jack Margolis and Yuk Yung California Institute.

ADEOS-II. Stratospheric aerosol and cloud characterization from ILAS observations (extended) Sergey Oshchepkov Yasuhiro Sasano Tatsuya Yokota Hideaki.

A 21 F A 21 F Parameterization of Aerosol and Cirrus Cloud Effects on Reflected Sunlight Spectra Measured From Space: Application of the.

Page 1 1 of 21, 28th Review of Atmospheric Transmission Models, 6/14/2006 A Two Orders of Scattering Approach to Account for Polarization in Near Infrared.

Page 1 1 of 20, EGU General Assembly, Apr 21, 2009 Vijay Natraj (Caltech), Hartmut Bösch (University of Leicester), Rob Spurr (RT Solutions), Yuk Yung.

COST 723 Training School - Cargese October 2005 OBS 2 Radiative transfer for thermal radiation. Observations Bruno Carli.

EARLINET and Satellites: Partners for Aerosol Observations Matthias Wiegner Universität München Meteorologisches Institut (Satellites: spaceborne passive.

The Importance of Atmospheric Variability for Data Requirements, Data Assimilation, Forecast Errors, OSSEs and Verification Rod Frehlich and Robert Sharman.

Irion et al., May 3, 2005 Page 1 Ozone validation for AIRS V4 Fredrick W. Irion, Michael R. Gunson Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology.

Page 1 Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002 Monitoring of near-real-time SCIAMACHY, MIPAS, and.

Page 1 Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002 Validation of ENVISAT trace gas data products by comparison.

Page 1 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, SCIAMACHY scient. prod. 12/12/2002 Envisat Validation Workshop Atmospheric Chemistry Validation Team Ground-Based.

INTRODUCTION When two or more instruments sound the same portion of atmosphere and observe the same species either in different spectral regions or with.

A. Bracher, L. N. Lamsal, M. Weber, J. P. Burrows University of Bremen, FB 1, Institute of Environmental Physics, P O Box , D Bremen, Germany.

Validation workshop, Frascati, 13 December 2002Page 1 SCIAMACHY products quality and recommendations Based on presentations and discussions during this.

SCIAMACHY long-term validation M. Weber, S. Mieruch, A. Rozanov, C. von Savigny, W. Chehade, R. Bauer, and H. Bovensmann Institut für Umweltphysik, Universität.

Envisat Validation Workshop Atmospheric Chemistry Validation Team Ground-Based Measurements and Campaign Database Subgroup Comparisons with GOMOS air-density.

Page 1 ENVISAT Validation Review – Frascati – 9-13 December st Envisat Validation Workshop MERIS Conclusions and recommendations.

TEMPO Simulation and Retrieval Tools and Algorithm Testing at SAO Xiong Liu 3 rd TEMPO Science Team Meeting Huntsville, Al, May 27,

Retrieval of Ozone Profiles from GOME (and SCIAMACHY, and OMI, and GOME2 ) Roeland van Oss Ronald van der A and Johan de Haan, Robert Voors, Robert Spurr.

Validation by Model Assimilation/Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002 Expected Validation of Envisat Ozone Data E. Hilsenrath NASA Goddard.

INSTRUMENT STATUS AND PERFORMANCE Guido Levrini. Page 2 ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 December 2002 ASAR F Instrument operability issues.

Page 1 Validation Workshop, 9-13 th December 2002, ESRIN ENVISAT Validation Workshop AATSR Report Marianne Edwards Space Research Centre Department of.

Evaluation of OMI total column ozone with four different algorithms SAO OE, NASA TOMS, KNMI OE/DOAS Juseon Bak 1, Jae H. Kim 1, Xiong Liu 2 1 Pusan National.

Inter-calibration of Operational IR Sounders using CLARREO Bob Holz, Dave Tobin, Fred Nagle, Bob Knuteson, Fred Best, Hank Revercomb Space Science and.

Kinetic Temperature Retrievals from MGS TES Bolometer Measurements: Current Status and Future Plans A.A. Kutepov, A.G. Feofilov, L.Rezac July 28, 2009,

October 02, st IHOP_2002 Water Vapor Intercomparison Workshop Status of intercomparisons and the next steps  Characterize moisture measuring techniques.

Limb Retrieval at IFE/IUP in Bremen Working team: A. Rozanov, K.-U. Eichmann, C. v. Savigny, J. Kaiser Tests based on level 0 data Normalisation by –Solar.

1 COST 723 WG1 Meeting 1 October 6-7, 2003 University of Bern, CH Availability of UTLS relevant SCIAMACHY data C. von.

Page 1 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, GOMOS O 3 (r) 12/12/2002 ACVT-GBMCD subgroup GOMOS ozone profiles, analysis of comparison with GMBCD datasets.

Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Requirement: Provide information to air quality decision makers and improve.

The Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) Mission: Retrieval Characterisation and Error Analysis H. Bösch 1, B. Connor 2, B. Sen 1, G. C. Toon 1 1 Jet Propulsion.

Validation of OMPS-LP Radiances P. K. Bhartia, Leslie Moy, Zhong Chen, Steve Taylor NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland, USA.

Ozone PEATE 2/20/20161 OMPS LP Release 2 - Status Matt DeLand (for the PEATE team) SSAI 5 December 2013.

Page 1 Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002 Evaluation of Envisat data using a NWP Assimilation.

Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: Initial trade-off: Height-resolved.

Nine Years of Atmospheric Remote Sensing with SCIAMACHY – Instrument Performance Gottwald, Krieg, Lichtenberg, Slijkhuis – DLR-IMF Noël, Bramstedt, Bovensmann,

Institut für Umweltphysik/Fernerkundung Physik/Elektrotechnik Fachbereich 1 Status of SQWG activities H. Bovensmann, G. Lichtenberg, R. Snel, C. Lerot,

Global Characterization of X CO2 as Observed by the OCO (Orbiting Carbon Observatory) Instrument H. Boesch 1, B. Connor 2, B. Sen 1,3, G. C. Toon 1, C.

Radiance Simulation System for OSSE  Objectives  To evaluate the impact of observing system data under the context of numerical weather analysis and.

Methane Retrievals in the Thermal Infrared from IASI AGU Fall Meeting, 14 th -18 th December, San Francisco, USA. Diane.

Japan Meteorological Agency, June 2016 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Non-Meteorological Application for Himawari-8 Presented.

Upgrade from SGP V5.02 to V6.00: Conclusions from delta-validation of Diagnostic Data Set D. Hubert, A. Keppens, J. Granville, F. Hendrick, J.-C. Lambert.

Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: FP, 25 April 2014, ESTEC.

Page 1 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, GOMOS altitude-reg. 12/12/2002 Envisat Validation Workshop Atmospheric Chemistry Validation Team Ground-Based.

The Lodore Falls Hotel, Borrowdale

ISSI Atmospheric limb remote sounding by star occultation Dr

Surface Pressure Measurements from the NASA Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) Presented to CGMS-43 Working Group II, agenda item WGII/10 David Crisp.

V2.0 minus V2.5 RSAS Tangent Height Difference Orbit 3761

Ozone monitoring with GOMOS-ENVISAT experiment version 6

Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: FP, 25 April 2014, ESTEC Height-resolved aerosol R.Siddans.

Mina Kang1, Myoung-Hwan Ahn1, Quintus Kleipool2 and Pepijn Veefkind2

Entrapment An important mechanism for shortwave 3D cloud radiative effects and its inclusion in the SPARTACUS radiative transfer model Robin Hogan, Mark.

Combination Approaches

Acknowledgements : R. Bevilacqua and NRL POAM III Science Team

Dorothee Coppens.

Current Status of ROLO and Future Development

MIPAS-2D water database and its validation

Presentation transcript:

Page 1ENVISAT Validation Review / GOMOS session - ESRIN – 13th December 2002 ENVISAT VALIDATION WORKSHOP GOMOS Recommendations by the ESL team : Service d’Aéronomie (CNRS), FMI, IASB Odile Fanton d’Andon ACRI-ST

Page 2ENVISAT Validation Review / GOMOS session - ESRIN – 13th December 2002 GOMOS : a new instrument on-board o Very accurate for ozone, immune to instrument drifts o Accuracy is different from one occultation to the other o Altitude sampling depends on the geometry of observation o Sensitive to limb illumination conditions Star ENVISAT Principle : Stellar occultations

Page 3ENVISAT Validation Review / GOMOS session - ESRIN – 13th December 2002 Derivation of vertical profiles of transmission spectra in UV, VIS and NIR spectral range (Level 1b) Retrieval of O3, air, NO2, NO3, aerosols (spectro A), O2 and H2O (spectro B) by minimising the difference between measured transmission and a model (Level 2)

Page 4ENVISAT Validation Review / GOMOS session - ESRIN – 13th December 2002 Ozone Secondary maximum Diurnal variations due to photochemistry reactions are observed. Altitude range is higher than expected

Page 5ENVISAT Validation Review / GOMOS session - ESRIN – 13th December 2002 Feedback and lessons from validation General lessons on the observations  Large difference between observations in dark or bright limb  Degraded results in twilight conditions  Large oscillations at the bottom of the profiles  Error estimates underestimated

Page 6ENVISAT Validation Review / GOMOS session - ESRIN – 13th December 2002 Ozone  Excellent mean profiles : no bias with lidar and bias less than 10% with other sources  Individual differences  up to 20 % Feedback and lessons from validation

Page 7ENVISAT Validation Review / GOMOS session - ESRIN – 13th December 2002 N = 65 DARK

Page 8ENVISAT Validation Review / GOMOS session - ESRIN – 13th December 2002 Air : Overall good agreement with ECMWF; high level of fluctuations. O2 : show bias – need scientific study of algorithm and/or s database H2O: very preliminary; realistic around UTLS since last spectral re-calibration (end of November – V4) Temperature (high resolution profile) very promising (agreement with ECMWF better than 5K in 70% of cases) Temperature (low resolution) : Criticism. Lack of knowledge about model contribution. Feedback and lessons from validation NO2 and NO3 retrieval may be improved by changes in the algorithm (DOAS like method)

Page 9ENVISAT Validation Review / GOMOS session - ESRIN – 13th December 2002 Scintillation effect (20-40 km) Below 20 km High fluctuations 1)Weak SNR (DC, RTS) 2)Vertical sampling (only minimal smoothing is applied) Typical GOMOS ozone profiles relative difference with external sources Lessons from GOMOS ESL team studies Excellent agreement Dark limb

Page 10ENVISAT Validation Review / GOMOS session - ESRIN – 13th December 2002 Lessons from GOMOS ESL team studies Scintillation : current scintillation model does not fully describe the observed features [20 km – 40 km]

Page 11ENVISAT Validation Review / GOMOS session - ESRIN – 13th December 2002 DC : Dark charge remains higher than expected and erratic (RTS) despite three successive cooling of the instrument.  Impact on O3 retrieval  Larger for dimmer stars  Larger below 20 km Lessons from GOMOS ESL team studies Current specification (not yet implemented in PDS) : Dark charge calibration is performed at orbit level

Page 12ENVISAT Validation Review / GOMOS session - ESRIN – 13th December 2002 Limb radiance / background correction is not optimal  Straylight is observed near the poles  Fraction of stellar flux in the external bands  Day side : Limb is not well characterised yet Lessons from GOMOS ESL team studies

Page 13ENVISAT Validation Review / GOMOS session - ESRIN – 13th December 2002 Main recommendations Instrument DC : Monitoring of DC is fundamental – methods to characterise or better remove RTS must be investigated Level 1b : Short term – emergency (6-12 months) 1. First priority is to upgrade the background correction in D/B limbs. 2. Improve the estimation of the reference stellar spectra 3. Characterise and correct for reflectivity of the optics 4. Solve inconsistency between intercalibration of spectrometers and photometers 5. Solve non-uniformity issues for spectro B (re-characterisation)

Page 14ENVISAT Validation Review / GOMOS session - ESRIN – 13th December 2002 Main recommendations Level 2 - Algorithms : Short term – emergency (test and specifications within 6 months) 1.Experiment and qualify alternative spectral inversion schemes 2.Qualify and adapt smoothing in vertical inversion 3.Improve the error estimates and quality indicators (to be continued) Medium term (within months) 1.Specify modelling error 2.Experiment and qualify the full covariance matrix method 3.Compute averaging kernels and provide them in products Long term 1. Experiment coupling of spectrometers 2.Other species retrieval (OClO, …) 3. Study aerosol model variations and the use of a priori information

Page 15ENVISAT Validation Review / GOMOS session - ESRIN – 13th December 2002 Main recommendations Level 2 – algorithm tuning : Short term (2003) 1. Tuning of High resolution Temperature Profile and its error estimates 2. Check temperature effects in spectral inversion (p-loop) Level 2 – products updates : Short term (2003) 1.New temperature/density products : GOMOS only (Rayleigh + O2 + HRTP) and external ECMWF+MSIS profiles 2.Add HRTP product into the meteo product 3.Solar zenith angle at tangent point should be provided

Page 16ENVISAT Validation Review / GOMOS session - ESRIN – 13th December 2002 Main recommendations Validation : 1.Validation must continue 2.Supply reprocessed data to validating teams 3.DDS antenna is absolutely required to pursue the ESL activity 4.Frequent reprocessings are required during the whole next year 5.Validation via assimilation must continue Data dissemination : YES, after the red actions are implemented and validated in PDS

Page 17ENVISAT Validation Review / GOMOS session - ESRIN – 13th December 2002 First GOMOS assimilated ozone field

Page 18ENVISAT Validation Review / GOMOS session - ESRIN – 13th December 2002 N = 65 DARK

Page 19ENVISAT Validation Review / GOMOS session - ESRIN – 13th December 2002 Comparison with lidar measurements (Mauna Loa) O 3 vertical profiles (from 02967/ S009 / S143) :

Page 20ENVISAT Validation Review / GOMOS session - ESRIN – 13th December Comparison with lidar measurements (Mauna Loa) Relative difference of vertical profiles (from 02967/ S009 / S143):