Region Three Pilot “Virtual” Consolidation. Consolidation Legislation and Guidance Title I Schoolwide Fiscal Guidance issued February, 2008 [Section E]

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Principal’s Guide to Title I, Part A and LAP Requirements
Advertisements

Schoolwide Programs (SWP) NCLB Regional Meetings April 2010.
Targeted Assistance & Schoolwide Programs NCLB Technical Assistance Audio April 18, :30 PM April 19, :30 AM Alaska Department of Education.
IMPLICATIONS FOR KENTUCKY’S SCHOOLS AND DISTRICTS SUPERINTENDENTS’ WEBCAST MARCH 6, 2012 NCLB Waiver Flexibility 1.
Empowering Educators: Planning for Success Office of Student Programs.
1 “Changing Performance” Nashville, Tennessee February 2, National Title I Conference Consolidating Funds S choolwide P rograms Sandy Brown &
Campus Improvement Plans (CIP) Schoolwide Programs.
2008 Spring Planning Workshop for the School Year Office of School Improvement Field Services Unit.
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers.
UNDERSTANDING SPECIAL EDUCATION FUNDING How to account for IDEIA funds.
Title I, Part A Flexibility: Addressing Barriers to Improving Student Achievement Anita Villarreal State Coordinator, Title I, Part A Division of Federal.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
FY12 Title I Common Program Review Findings Title I Technical Assistance Session May 11, 2012.
Fiscal Compliance for Title III Keisha Davis Monitoring & Compliance Section School Business Division
Title Grants Division Illinois State Board of Education 1 NCLB TITLE GRANT MANAGEMENT ISBE Illinois Association of Title I Directors Annual Fall Conference.
1 MERA May 17, 2011 Mike Radke, Director, Office of Field Services, Michigan Department of Education.
FISCAL MONITORING OBJECTIVES:  To provide a clearer understanding of the monitoring process;  To provide further guidance for documentation needed for.
Title I Schoolwide Ray Draghi and Rasha Hetata October 2014.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Field Services Consolidated Application Schedule.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Virginia Department of Education Division Leadership Liaison Meeting January 7, 2013.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
Fiscal Compliance for Title III Keisha Davis Monitoring & Compliance Section School Business Division
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
Consolidation of Funds in Schoolwide Programs FY15 Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Federal Programs.
Office of Federal Programs FY15 (SY ) ESEA Programs Applications and Due Dates October 31, 2014.
Federal Grant Training. I. Title I-A Fiscal Requirements  To ensure Title I-A funds are in addition to regular services normally provided, three fiscal.
MAS/FPS Fall Directors’ Workshop MDE OFS Updates October 2014 Office of Field Services.
Schoolwide Funding Consolidation Panel Panelists: Nancy Konitzer, Arizona Department of Education, Rebecca Vogler, Cincinnati Public Schools and Jose Figueroa,
Kristen Tosh Cowan, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit PAFPC Conference April 5, 2011.
What Business Managers Need to Know About Presented by: Cindy Rhoads, Regional Coordinator Division of Federal Programs PA Department of Education
Schoolwide Consolidation Consolidation Legislation and Guidance Title I Schoolwide Fiscal Guidance issued February, 2008 [Section E] Designing Schoolwide.
CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLANS (CIP) Schoolwide Programs.
Oklahoma State Department of Education Janet Barresi State Superintendent of Public Instruction Consolidated Schoolwide Funds.
1 Division of Public Schools (PreK -12) Florida Department of Education Florida Education: The Next Generation DRAFT March 13, 2008 Version 1.0 NCLB: 2009.
Title I Part A: Back to Basics ESEA Odyssey Fall 2010.
Priority & Focus School Title I, Part A, Set-Asides and Choice/Transfer Option Requirements Under ESEA Waiver District Coordinators/Administrators Priority.
Federal Programs and the ESEA Flexibility Waiver Titles I, II, VI and X.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
1 46th Annual PAFPC Conference May 5, 2015 MARIA GARCIA Schoolwide Program Manager DIVISION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Title I Schoolwide Programs.
PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION Fiscal Components of Monitoring Stephanie English, Chief Monitoring.
SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT TESTS District Level: Maintenance of Effort School Level: Comparability of Services Child Level: Educational.
1 MARIA GARCIA Schoolwide Program Manager DIVISION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Title I Schoolwide Programs.
1 Schoolwide Accounting John Dunn Director of Financial Review Title II A Conference March 5, 2008 Georgia Department of Education Kathy Cox, Superintendent.
What are the Differences Between Targeted and Schoolwide Title I Programs?
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
Federal Flexibility Initiative DRAFT. Federal Flexibility Initiative The federal flexibility initiative is one of Commissioner Williams’ priorities. The.
1 Restructuring Webinar Dr. Zollie Stevenson, Jr., Ph.D. Director Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office of Elementary and Secondary.
The Day in the Life of OFPSI staff By: Dr. Shawnrell Blackwell Director of Federal Programs & School Improvement (OFPSI) Petersburg City Public Schools.
Office of Field Services MAS/FPS Regional Presentation October 2015.
Title I, Part A Schoolwide Programs Webinar #8 James Connolly Terry Reyes Office for Grants and Federal Fiscal Compliance May 13,
Kay Townsend, Fiscal Consultant Title I, IIA, VI, & X Oklahoma State Department of Education (405)
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title I, Part A Overview May 11, th Annual Juvenile.
Title I, Part A Schoolwide Programs Webinar #9 James Connolly Terry Reyes Office for Grants and Federal Fiscal Compliance May 27,
Title I, Part A Schoolwide Programs Webinar #4 James Connolly Terry Reyes Office for Grants and Federal Fiscal Compliance March 18,
Title I Annual Meeting West Orange Elementary School Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools.
School-wide Consolidation: LEA Panel
A Principal’s Guide to Title I, Part A and LAP Requirements
Federal Grant Programs Conference October 23, 2017
Consolidation of Funds for Title I Schoolwide Schools Initiative
Virtual Network Meeting: Consolidated Application
The Role a Charter School Plays in its Charter Authorizer’s Submission of the Consolidated Federal Programs Application Joey Willett, Unit of Federal Programs.
Office of Federal and State Accountability
ESEA Programs | December 2018
Constructing High Performing Schoolwide Programs
ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING NOBLE ACADEMY COLUMBUS.
AUDITS----SINGLE AUDIT CONCEPT, COMPLIANCE
Title I, Part A Virginia Department of Education
Developing and Revising Schoolwide Plans
ESSA Schoolwide 2017.
Presentation transcript:

Region Three Pilot “Virtual” Consolidation

Consolidation Legislation and Guidance Title I Schoolwide Fiscal Guidance issued February, 2008 [Section E] Designing Schoolwide (SW) Programs Guidance

Consolidation Legislation and Guidance EDGAR Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A FED. REG (JULY 2, 2004)

What Does Consolidation Mean? Schoolwide school treats the funds it is consolidating as a single “pool” of funds. Funds from the contributing programs lose their identity. The school uses funds from this consolidated schoolwide (SW) pool to support any activity of the SW program. [Section E2]

What is the Purpose of Consolidation? The purpose of consolidating funds is to help a SW program school effectively design and implement a comprehensive plan to upgrade the entire educational program in the school based on the school ’ s needs identified through its comprehensive needs assessment [E-1].

State Aid dollars and local tax revenue Title I, Part A Title II, Part A Title II, Part D (purposes) Which Funds can be Consolidated?

Title III (?) Title VI (?) Section 31a Which Funds can be Consolidated?

Why Consolidate?

When State-aid and local tax revenue is pooled with supplementary Federal funds and/or Section 31a, individual funding streams lose their identity. This provides the school more flexibility in program implementation. Flexibility

The district could not afford costs associated with grade level meeting time for analyzing assessment data. This meeting time was not allowable out of any of the supplementary programs. Now, these meetings can be implemented in accordance with the SW Reform model and comprehensive SW plan. The funding source becomes moot. Flexibility Example

The school determines that the summer school program needs funds in excess of the available Title I allocation. In a consolidated SW program, IIA funds could be used to support direct instruction without the necessity of a “ transfer ”.

Time and Effort – DRAFT!!! If State Aid and local tax revenue are pooled with Federal dollars and/or Section 31a, and personnel are 100% funded with pooled dollars AND performing a single FUNCTION Semi-Annual Certification documentation is streamlined. (MDE will provide a template.)

Budget Consolidated Application budgeting requirements are GREATLY reduced. One district level budget that includes aggregate amounts for all consolidated schools. Single item per function and cost objective.

No need to submit the Consolidated Application and Title I School Selection by May 13 th. A July 1 submission date of a quality application will ensure mid-August approval. Due Date

LEA Planning Cycle The requirement to complete the LEA Planning Cycle is removed.

Amendments Amendment process is streamlined.

If Section 31a funds are pooled, the requirement for Eligibility Worksheets and identification of eligible students is eliminated. Eligibility Worksheets

Increased technical support for schools and districts related to school improvement planning. Technical Support

School Improvement Plan Emphasis is on a high-quality plan rather than the level of description included in the budget.

Eligible targeted schools can accelerate the year of planning to become a consolidated SW school for Targeted Schools

Consolidation Requirements

Comprehensive Needs Assessment The school must conduct a comprehensive needs assessment (using all four types of data) to identify gaps in student achievement and identify needs of students, staff and other stakeholders.

Schoolwide Plan Exceptional, comprehensive Schoolwide Plan that is focused on an identified Schoolwide reform and aligned to the comprehensive needs assessment.

Basic Program Historical school-level basic educational program is identified and continues to be offered. (MDE will provide a template.)

Identification of Consolidated Funds SW school must identify in its SW plan which programs are included in its consolidation and the amount each program contributes to the consolidated SW pool [E-2]. (See “Combining Funds in a SW Program” Template.)

Equitable Services Funds must still be shared with private schools as required by legislation.

Supplement not Supplant Each school operating a SW program must receive all the State and local funds it would otherwise receive to operate its educational program in the absence of Title I, Part A or other [supplemental] education funds [E-2].

Intent and Purposes The school must be able to demonstrate that its SW program contains sufficient resources and activities to reasonably address the intent and purposes of the included programs, particularly as they relate to the lowest-performing students [E-14]. (See “Combining Funds in a SW Program” Template.)

Other Program Responsibilities Annual Title I, Part A meeting Parent involvement Agendas, sign-ins, bids, contracts District required set-asides

Other Program Responsibilities Maintenance of Effort Title I Comparability Title I School Selection Health and Safety and Civil Rights

Record Keeping

Programmatic Record Keeping Evidence that intent and purposes of programs were fulfilled.

Financial Accounting “Virtual” pooling – maintain multiple grant numbers, function codes and cost objectives. Two drawdown options: (1) Proportionate charging (2) Sequence charging Functional category reporting must still be maintained

State-Aid and local tax revenue must be distributed fairly and equitably to all schools–including SW program schools–without regard to whether those schools are receiving Federal and State supplementary funds. [E-18] Financial Accounting

Comparability – Two Options: (1) Proportionate charging (2) Other Ability to determine if Federal funds are unspent at the end of the year.

Monitoring

Programmatic Review of proposed activities Activities linked to needs assessment Research base Monitoring

A school operating a SW program that is consolidating only Federal education funds and Section 31a funds must ensure these funds are being used only to address instructional needs that are identified in the SW plan and directly linked to the school’s needs assessment. Monitoring

Goal: 100% Participation from Eligible Region 3 Schools

Current Status:

QUESTIONS