PROBATION TERMS AND OFFENDER BEHAVIOR Purpose: To align the terms of probation with a behavioral change model of probation and evidence-based practices.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 15 Sentencing Options
Advertisements

Applying EBP In The Field Midge Christianson, Director 6W Community Corrections Montevideo, Minnesota , extension 212
Yamhill County: Evidence-Based Decision Making (EBDM)
1 Cost-Effective Strategies to Improve Public Safety and Reduce Recidivism Cost-Effective Strategies to Improve Public Safety and Reduce Recidivism Judge.
NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION Report on Study of Youthful Offenders Pursuant to Session Law , Sections 34.1 and 34.2.
May 1, Division of Parole and Probation Tony DeCrona, Interim Chief Kim Madris, Deputy Chief Tony DeCrona, Interim Chief Kim Madris, Deputy Chief.
Misdemeanor Sanctions
Public Safety Realignment Local custody for non-violent, non- serious, non-sex offenders Changes to State Parole Local Post-release Supervision Local.
Criminal Justice Process: Proceedings Before Trial
Community Corrections.  Community Corrections are the subfield of corrections in which offenders are supervised and provided services outside jail or.
Community Corrections
Sentencing and Punishment
Probation Modification and Termination
Sentencing and Parole in Canada
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Michael Thompson, Director Council of State Governments Justice Center July 28, 2014 Washington, D.C. Measuring.
NYS Probation Officers Association Conference 2012 Gary Govel and Patti Donohue Community Corrections Representatives NYS Division of Criminal Justice.
Intro to Law Criminal Process: Sentencing. Sentencing Options Suspended Sentence – given, but does not have be served at that time, but may have to serve.
Overview of Adult Community Corrections. Outline Organizational Structure Organizational Structure Probation population breakdown Probation population.
Chapter 7 Probation Modification and Termination.
Evidence-based Practices (EBP) in Corrections
Evidence-Based Sentencing. Learning Objectives Describe the three principles of evidence- based practice and the key elements of evidence-based sentencing;
Chapter 8 Residential Intermediate Sanctions. Introduction Intermediate Sanctions are sentencing options between prison and probation that provide punishment.
Offender Rehabilitation
Risk/Needs Assessment Within the Criminal Justice System.
1 The MDOC Five Year Plan to Control Prison Growth Phase III: Long Term Policy Options SUMMARY BRIEF SUMMARY BRIEF Preliminary MDOC Proposal Revising Michigan’s.
EXTENDING THE THERAPEUTIC JUSTICE MODEL TO PROBLEM GAMBLERS Mark G. Farrell, JD; Jessica Aungst Weitzel, MPH; Thomas H. Nochajski, PhD, Buffalo Center.
Quantifying and Executing the Risk Principle in Real World Settings Webinar Presentation Justice Research and Statistics Association August 15, 2013 Kimberly.
1 CRJS 4476 Lecture #2. 2 Sentencing key here is in understanding the difference key here is in understanding the difference between the conviction and.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION 2010 Board of Parole Hearings Revocation Trends.
Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Probation Statistics Part 1 Crime, Justice & Security Statistics Produced in Collaboration between.
Michigan Department of Corrections Updated Prison Bed Space Projections Impact from Probation, Community Corrections, Parole and the MPRI Presentation.
Salient Factor Score CTSFS99. What it is How to use it.
OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.
State of Connecticut Judicial Branch Court Support Services Division RBA Report Card – Adult Probation November 10, 2010 Update to the Criminal Justice.
Sentencing and Corrections. Once Found Guilty, a defendant will be sentenced by a jury or judge.
Sentencing and Corrections. Judges Options Suspended Sentence: Sentence is given but is not imposed until the defendant messes up again (arrested or violates.
PAROLE. Parole  The release of an inmate into the community before the full sentence is served.
Realignment: A One-year Examination of Offenders Released from State Prison in the First Six Months of Public Safety Realignment Association for Criminal.
ACCELERATED COMMUNITY ENTRY (ACE) A program designed to increase the success of high risk offenders returning to the community from prison Western District.
Immediate Sanction Probation Pilot Project Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission June 8, 2015.
Proposed Recommendations for Guidelines Revisions.
Judge Neil Edward Axel District Court of Maryland (retired) Maryland Highway Safety Judicial Conference December 2, 2015 Best Practices & Sentencing Alternatives.
11/18/20151Sex Offenders Notes - Kuzyk Notes on recidivism among Connecticut sex offenders: Male offenders released in 2005 CT OPM – Criminal Justice Policy.
JUDICIAL CONCURRENCE WITH SENTENCING GUIDELINES July 1, 2006 – June 30, 2007 (Preliminary)
Risk Assessment and Community Notification Mark Bliven, Minnesota Dept. of Corrections Wednesday, Dec 9, 2015 Special Committee on Sex Offenders Connecticut.
Oregon Youth Authority Meeting the Challenge through Collaboration and Partnerships Oregon´s juvenile justice system is composed of a network of local.
Sentencing and the Correctional Process
After the Trial. After the Trial – Sentencing (Ch 10) Retribution (Revenge) Rehabilitation/Reformation Deterrence General Deterrence Specific Deterrence.
 State leadership created the bipartisan, inter-branch, inter- governmental Missouri Working Group on Sentencing and Corrections.
Community Corrections What happens when a prisoner is released?
Offender assessment tools: A valuable source of information for the court Richard P. Stroker Denver, Colorado April 27, 2011.
Fairbanks S.O. Treatment and Management Program (1998-Nov. 2103) Moreen Fried, LCSW # (1998-Nov. 2013)
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
North Dakota Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
Promising Practices in Criminal Justice Reform
Evidence Based Practices in Napa County Probation
Challenges in Determining Whether Treatment Programs are Effective
Sentencing.
Community Supervision Modification & Termination
Use Of Risk Assessments in Utah Sentencing
Santa Barbara County Re-Alignment Strategy Study
Criminal Sanctions.
Chapter 4 Probation: How Most Offenders Are Punished
Criminal Court Cases Chapter 16, Section 2.
Parole.
A Decade of Youthful Offender Supervision
Presentation transcript:

PROBATION TERMS AND OFFENDER BEHAVIOR Purpose: To align the terms of probation with a behavioral change model of probation and evidence-based practices. Proposal: To reduce the maximum terms of probation and to enable early termination based on positive behavior change.

Re-offending and Supervision Based upon National and Connecticut statistics, offenders placed on probation who violate their probation conditions and/or are rearrested, do so within 24 months after being sentenced to a term of probation. (Austin, Hill, 2007). In Connecticut, approximately 87% of the offenders who are rearrested while serving a term of probation, occur within their first 24 months of supervision. (Hill, 2007).

What Influences Re-Offending? The likelihood that an offender placed on probation will commit further crimes is associated with their assessed level of risk. (Andrews, Bonta, Wormith, 2004.) To have the greatest impact on recidivism reduction, supervision and treatment resources should focus on higher risk and non-compliant offenders. (Andrews, 2001; Lowenkamp, Latessa, 2004.)

Supervision Length Most treatment programs and correctional interventions designed to change criminal behavior can be delivered within 24 months. (Barry, 1999; Austin, 2006.) There is no evidence that lengthy periods of community supervision are associated with reductions in recidivism. (Austin, 2006.)

Cost Benefit Retaining many offenders under probation supervision in order to change criminal behavior and enhance public safety after 24 months, provides a diminishing return on the resource investment. (Taxman, 2006.)

Sentence Severity and Length There have been no consistent findings either in official statistics or research studies that the sentence severity or length has served as an effective crime deterrent, or reduced recidivism. (Gendreau, Goggin, Cullen, Andrews, 2000; McGuire, 2002.)

Providing incentives and reinforcement for positive behavior as well as appropriately administered sanctions for unacceptable behavior has been identified as an important principle in changing criminal behavior. (Bogue, Cambell, Carey, Clawson, Faust, Florio, Joplin, Keiser, Wasson, Woodward, 2004; Meyers, Miller, 2001; Taxman, 2006; Burnett, Roberts, 2004.) How Can Supervision Influence Offender Behavior?

In Connecticut…  Convicted offenders can be placed on probation supervision for up to 5 years for felony convictions; 3 years for Class A misdemeanors; and between 10 and 25 years for sex offenses.  The vast majority of offenders placed on probation in Connecticut regardless of compliant behavior, program participation, and successful completion of required conditions and services remain on probation supervision for their full term.

Recommended Changes CONNECTICUT PROBATION MAXIMUM TERMS Sex Offenses 10 to 25 years (No Change) Any Other Felony3 years A & B Misdemeanor2 years C Misdemeanor 1 year (No Change)

Early Completion For probation periods > 2 years for felony convictions, and > 1 year for A and B misdemeanor convictions, the supervising probation officer will report to the Court at the 2 or 1 year period on the progress of the probationer in addressing their assessed needs, and meeting any court ordered conditions. Unless ordered otherwise by the Court, the period of probation will end. If ordered by the Court, the period of probation may be extended for an additional year.

Early Completion ( Continued ) Based upon the circumstances of the case, the sentencing Judge will have the discretion at the time of sentencing to extend the period of probation up to one year beyond the statutory maximum term. The reason for the extension will be entered into the court record.