Klystron Cluster RF Distribution Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Breakdown Rate Dependence on Gradient and Pulse Heating in Single Cell Cavities and TD18 Faya Wang, Chris Nantista and Chris Adolphsen May 1, 2010.
Advertisements

11/27/2007ILC Power and Cooling VM Workshop Mike Neubauer 1 RF Power and Cooling Requirements Overview from “Main Linac Power and Cooling Information”
PETS components and waveguide connections CLIC Workshop 2007 David Carrillo.
5th Collaboration Meeting on X-band Accelerator Structure Design and Test Program. May 2011 Review of waveguide components development for CLIC I. Syratchev,
April SCRF Meeting FNAL08 S.Fukuda 1 HLRF Summary and Work Assignment S. FUKUDA KEK.
KCS Ongoing R&D Christopher Nantista SLAC LCWS11 Granada, Spain September 29, …… …… …… … ….
1 X-band Single Cell and T18_SLAC_2 Test Results at NLCTA Faya Wang Chris Adolphsen Jul
Design of Standing-Wave Accelerator Structure
RF Systems and Stability Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
Beam loading compensation 300Hz positron generation (Hardware Upgrade ??? Due to present Budget problem) LCWS2013 at Tokyo Uni., Nov KEK, Junji.
Christopher Nantista ML-SCRF Technology Meeting July 28, 2010 REPORT.
Different mechanisms and scenarios for the local RF
SLHC-PP – WP7 Critical Components for Injector Upgrade Plasma Generator – CERN, DESY, STFC-RAL Linac4 2MHz RF source Thermal Modeling Gas Measurement and.
Test Facilities Sami Tantawi SLAC. Summary of SLAC Facilities NLCTA (3 RF stations, one Injector, one Radiation shielding) – Two 240ns pulse compressor,
7.8GHz Dielectric Loaded High Power Generation And Extraction F. Gao, M. E. Conde, W. Gai, C. Jing, R. Konecny, W. Liu, J. G. Power, T. Wong and Z. Yusof.
Christopher Nantista Chris Adolphsen SLAC TILC09 Tsukuba, Japan April 20, 2009.
Christopher Nantista ILC 2 nd Baseline Assessment Workshop (BAW-2) SLAC January 18, …… …… …… … ….
Christopher Nantista 2011 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas (ALCPG11) University of Oregon, Eugene March 20, …… …… …… … ….
KCS Operational Issues Chris Adolphsen, Chris Nantista and Faya Wang GDE PAC Review at KEK 12/12/12.
201 MHz NC RF Cavity R&D for Muon Cooling Channels
RF Distribution Alternatives R.A.Yogi & FREIA group Uppsala University.
Test Facilities and Component Developments Sami Tantawi SLAC May 15, 2008.
Chris Adolphsen 10/03/09 MLI and HLRF Summary. Vladimir Kashikhin.
Status of the Fermilab Cold BPM R&D Manfred Wendt Fermilab 10/1/20091LCWA09 Main Linac WG.
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
Christopher Nantista ARD R&D Status Meeting SLAC February 3, …… …… …… … ….
Proposed TDR baseline LLRF design J. Carwardine, 22 May 2012.
LLRF ILC GDE Meeting Feb.6,2007 Shin Michizono LLRF - Stability requirements and proposed llrf system - Typical rf perturbations - Achieved stability at.
Clustered Surface RF Production Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.
Vladimir Kashikhin. FLASH Cavity Gradient Stability Comparison of beam-off measurements of pulse-to-pulse cavity gradient jitter during the flattop.
Anders Sunesson RF Group ESS Accelerator Division
Klystron Cluster RF Distribution Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.
Modulator and overmoded RF components status for the 12GHz Test Stand at CERN - RF meeting – 17/03/2010.
Power Distribution System R&D at SLAC Christopher Nantista ILC08 Chicago, Illinois November 18,
L-band (1.3 GHz) 5-Cell SW Cavity High Power Test Results Faya Wang, Chris Adolphsen SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
KSC Operation Control of Cavity Gradients Failure Analysis Near and Long Term R&D Effect on Beam Emittance Chris Adolphsen SLAC 9/7/2010 Going Native in.
Christopher Nantista ILC10 Beijing, China March 27, 2010.
Linac RF Source Recommendations for Items 22,23,24,46,47 Chris Adolphsen.
Ding Sun and David Wildman Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee
Aug 23, 2006 Half Current Option: Impact on Linac Cost Chris Adolphsen With input from Mike Neubauer, Chris Nantista and Tom Peterson.
TE 01 -TE 02 DLDS Elements BINP-KEK
Power Distribution System (PDS) Design and R&D Status Christopher Nantista SLAC SCRF Fermilab April 24, 2008.
BCD input from WG2 WG2 12/08/2005 H. Hayano Chris Adolphsen Terry Garvey Hitoshi Hayano.
Measurements of the X-ray/pump laser pulse timing Valery Dolgashev, David Fritz, Yiping Feng, Gordon Bowden SLAC 48th ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop.
The Design and Analysis of Multi-megawatt Distributed Single Pole Double Throw (SPDT) Microwave Switches Sami G. Tantawi, and Mikhail I. Petelin Stanford.
1 Al Moretti, APC, Fermilab MAP- Winter Meeting February 28 - March 4, 2011 TJNAF Newport News, VA.
The NLC RF Pulse Compression and High Power RF Transport Systems Sami G. Tantawi, G.Bowden, K.Fant, Z.D.Farkas, W.R.Fowkes J.Irwin, N.M.Kroll, Z.H.Li,
Evaluation of the TE 12 Mode in Circular Waveguides for Low-Loss High Power Transportation Sami G. Tantawi, C. Nantista K. Fant, G. Bowden, N. Kroll, and.
KCS and RDR 10 Hz Operation Chris Adolphsen BAW2, SLAC 1/20/2011.
BEAMLINE HOM ABSORBER O. Nezhevenko, S. Nagaitsev, N. Solyak, V. Yakovlev Fermi National Laboratory December 11, 2007 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop.
KCS Main Waveguide Testing Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista and Faya Wang LCWS12 Arlington, Texas October 25, 2012.
Jan Low Energy 10 Hz Operation in DRFS (Fukuda) (Fukuda) 1 Low Energy 10Hz Operation in DRFS S. Fukuda KEK.
A Multi-Moded RF Delay Line Distribution System for the Next Linear Collider S. G. Tantawi, G. Bowden, Z.D. Farkas, J. Irwin, K. Ko, N. Kroll, T. Lavine,
HLRF R&D Towards the TDR Christopher Nantista ML-SCRF Webex meeting June 29, 2011.
Summary of Relative RF Distribution Costs with Gradient Considerations (Work in Progress) Chris Adolphsen SLAC.
Feasibility and R&D Needed For A TeV Class HEP e+e- Collider Based on AWA Technology Chunguang Jing for Accelerator R&D Group, HEP Division, ANL Aug
Advancements on RF systems D. Alesini (LNF-INFN) Quinto Meeting Generale Collaborazione LI2FE, Frascati 15-16/03/2011.
L-Band RF System & Main Linac Integration Programs
Areal RF Station A. Vardanyan
ILC Power and Cooling VM Workshop
ILC High Power Distribution
LLRF Research and Development at STF-KEK
Klystron Cluster System (KCS)
Development of X-band 50MW klystron in BVERI
Klystron Cluster System Development
NC Accelerator Structures
Chris Adolphsen Sergei Nagaitsev
12 GHz High Power RF components requirements for CEA activities
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
CEPC RF Power Sources System
Presentation transcript:

Klystron Cluster RF Distribution Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC

Klystron Cluster Concept RF power “piped” into accelerator tunnel every 2.5 km Service tunnel eliminated Electrical and cooling systems simplified Concerns: power handling, LLRF control coarseness Same as baseline

Single Tunnel Layout with KCS Americas RegionEuropean Region RF Waveguide

Layout Requires Addition of Two 3 m Diameter Shafts per Linac

coaxial region matching ridge wrap-around waveguide WR650 ports gap 0.48 m step taper Power is tapped off from the circular TE 01 mode, in 5 or 10 MW increments, into a coaxial region, without breaking azimuthal symmetry (no surface E fields). A wrap-around mode converter extracts this power from the coaxial TE 01 mode into two output waveguides, analogous to the klystron output arms. The various required coupling designs (~3-50%) differ only in a) gap width (~3-8”) and b) matching ridge. The same devices are used in reverse for launching power into the pipe. Coaxial Tap Off (CTO)

3dB CTO Design Simulation WR650 WC1375 1/4 geometry

1 2 3 l … -3 dB -4.8 dB-7 dB l dB -4.8 dB Power Combining: Power Dividing: As it runs along the tunnel, tap-offs of increasing coupling extract the same amount of power from the main waveguide every three cryomodules (rf unit). The same coupling devices are used in reverse to combine the power in the cluster building. Tap-ins depend on proper ratio and proper phase of power already in pipe. First tap-in (launcher) and last tap-off (extractor) are 3 dB units reversed relative to the others and shorted (with proper phase length) at port dB 1 Arrangement of Couplers klystron local PDS 38 m …

Phase I Demonstration Steps (To Be Completed in Next 6 Months) 2.5 MW Step 1: Build two 3dB CTO’s, short port 1’s to make launcher/extractors, and cold test back-to-back (verify w/ spacer). 5 MW Step 2: Build step tapers and pumpout, include in assembly, cold test again, and high power test up to 5 MW. 2.5 MW Vacuum Pump-Out Or Pressure Port 2.5 MW

Step 3: Adjust input coupling (beta = 6) and resonantly charge line (tau = 8 us) to field levels equal to those for 350 MW transmission (requires only 2.5 MW of klystron power). Do this under pressure (2 bar absolute) and under vacuum (< 1e-6 Torr). Sets Coupling Resonant Short 350 MW ~12 m of WC1890

Main Waveguide D = m ± 1.5 mm L = m (8’) One-side double grooved flanges: Vacuum seal – Viton® fluoroelastomer O-ring RF back-up seal – Bal Seal® canted coil contact spring Aluminum, formed & welded Order for 4 sections due in January 2010 (~ 1.5 mm tolerances) 16 bolts

Coaxial Tap-Off (CTO) with wrap-around power extraction 35.51” (0.902 m) Aluminum, welded Order for 2 CTOs due in March 2010

~6.24 MW 350 MW dB 200 m of WC1890 directional coupler tap-offtap-in phase shifter Develop bends and configure a 200 m resonant ring to test them and a final design tap-in/off. Stored energy is about 1/5 of the worst case in the ILC with speed-of-light limited klystron shutoff times. Phase II Demonstration (To Be Completed in 2012)

General Atomics high power 90° profiled curvature bend in 44.5 mm corrugated waveguide for TE 01 mode at GHz Overmoded Bend (Two Approaches) Each TE 01 bend is composed of two circular-to-rectangular mode converters and an overmoded rectangular waveguide bend. SLAC compact high power 90° bend in 40.6 mm circular waveguide tapered to overmoded rectangular waveguide for TE 01 mode at GHz TE 01 TE 20

Beam Energy Variation The pulse to pulse cavity gradient jitter at FLASH is < 0.1% with appropriate initial detuning, and is not correlated cavity to cavity. Thus with FB control of the cluster, the pulse to pulse energy gain variation within a cluster would be < 0.5 * sqrt(832) * 0.1% = 1.4% Starting the KCS at 15 GeV, the largest beam energy variation would be < 1.4% at about 30 GeV, which is comparable the beam energy spread. It decreases as roughly 1/energy along the linac. Blue: Nominal + 100Hz Initial Detuning; Red: Nominal Initial Detuning; Green: Nominal – 100Hz Initial Detuning.

Assumptions for Availability Study No downtime from rf breakdown in the main rf distribution waveguide – will gauge reliability during the R&D program. Include 2 spare klystrons – no downtime if any source fails (klystrons can be repaired/replaced while cluster operational). Can also quickly turn off power to individual cryomodules. Failures in local distribution system and cryomodules the same as for the RDR. Vector sum control system for each cluster would have redundancy so it would be rare to lose cluster control (OK if input from a few of the cryomodules are missing).

RF Breakdown The peak surface electric field in the CTO of 1.6 MV/m is lower than in the Aluminum VTO (variable tap-off) at 5 MW (1.9 MV/m), which has run for hours with 1ms pulses at 14 psig N2 with no rf breakdowns. Running the CTO under vacuum (< 1e-6 Torr) should be breakdown free based on operational experience with SS and copper (if Al worse, would Cu coat it). E.g., our 5- cell,1.3 GHz SW structure runs reliably with 20 MV/m surface fields with 1 ms pulses. The peak surface magnetic field for the maximum 340 MW (full current) flowing through a CTO is 15 kA/m on the edge of the tube defining the gap. The pulsed heating temperature rise of 3 degC in this case is considered negligible. In the tapers and main 0.48m waveguide, the surface electric fields are non-existent. SLAC has decades of experience running high power in overmoded X-band TE01 mode waveguide. The mode can basically only break down by gas ionization (Emax ~ 4 MV/m), so need to have a good vacuum or high gas pressure. The two bends required in each main waveguide may be the most risky part of the system, as they carry the maximum power and must depart from the pure TE01 field pattern.

LLRF Cluster Control Digitize and sum cryomodule (CM) probe signals locally and transmit in real time to the associated cluster building. Here the digital signals from each of the ~ 100 CMs are split three ways and sent to three identical Drive Processors The output rf from each of the klystrons are also digitized and split three ways, one going to each Drive Processor. Each Drive Processor uses the CM sum signals, the klystron output signals and dynamic FF tables to compute the digital drive signal to each of the klystrons (one digital output per klystron). At each klystron, the three digital signals from the Drive Processors go through 2-of-3 majority logic before being used to generate a klystron drive signal. The clock signals and LO for this system are provided by redundant sources so that if one source fails, the signals would still be provided by the others. With this scheme, individual CMs or klystrons may have to be turned off due to LLRF failures, just as in the baseline design, but rarely the entire cluster.

Summary Surface klystron clusters reduce the ILC cost by a few 100 M$, eliminate the service tunnel and simplify the power and cooling systems. Design builds on our 15 year experience with high power (up to 500 MW), over-moded, low loss X-band components, and 5 year experience developing L-band distribution systems and a SW accelerator. Construction underway of a test system to evaluate the robustness of this approach – will be operated both under vacuum and under pressure. If successful, a larger scale system (200 m) would be built by 2012 that’s includes bends. Will continue to evaluate the effect on beam operation due to the more coarse energy control.