IT Governance Steering Committee January 7, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reliability Center Data Request Task Force Report WECC Board Meeting April 2009.
Advertisements

Data Warehouse External Data Loads Implementation Certification May 27, 2009 Project Certification Committee May 27,
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
Implementation Council Meeting Structure and Resources Background: The Implementation Council (Council) roles and responsibilities are described in the.
Washington State Auditor’s Office Troy Kelley Independence Respect Integrity Debt-Offset Programs: A tool to help Washington collect delinquent debt Joint.
IT Governance Committee on Research Technology January 11, 2011.
Update on the Impact of Corporate Business Architecture on IT at StatCan 2011 MSIS Meeting Karen Doherty May 2011.
CBT Updated Roadmap December 13, Topics  Roadmap discussion  Discussion items  Revised timeline  Budget  Appendix 1 – excerpt of priority.
1 LBNL Enterprise Computing (EC) January 2003 LBNL Enterprise Computing.
Graduate System for Management of Admissions, Alumni & Records Tracking (Grad SMAART) January 8, 2007 Office of Graduate Studies.
Comprehensive M&E Systems
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
TRANSPORTATION POLICY COMMITTEE FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL STAFF COUNCIL ALUMNI CENTER APRIL 2, 2003.
Presentation to CAREGROUP Board of Directors Governing Your Networked IT Organization Ken Peffers Applicable IT Research, Inc. November 21, 2002.
Alliance for Strategic Technology (AST) SUNY Business Intelligence Initiative January 8, 2009.
Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0214/Audit Sistem Informasi Tahun: 2007.
7.2 System Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
UCSF SOM Faculty Council May 19, 2011 Elazar C. Harel, Ph.D.
David Proulx, Assistant Vice President for Financial Planning and Budgeting Budget Office Website:
Columbia-Greene Community College The following presentation is a chronology of the College strategic planning process, plan and committee progress The.
Technology Use Plan Mary Anderson 7/29/08 EDTECH 571 click to go to each slide.
Acquiring Information Systems and Applications
State of Kansas Statewide Financial Management System Pre-Implementation Project Steering Committee Meeting January 11, 2008.
April 2, 2013 Longitudinal Data system Governance: Status Report Alan Phillips Deputy Director, Fiscal Affairs, Budgeting and IT Illinois Board of Higher.
ENTERPRISE DATA INTEGRATION APPLICATION ARCHITECTURE COMMITTEE OCTOBER 8, Year Strategic Initiatives.
Information Technology Assessment Review Presented to the Board of the State Center Community College District.
IT Governance Steering Committee December 2, 2010.
South Carolina Public Charter School District Performance Framework Dana C. Reed, Assistant Superintendent of Performance Standards Courtney Mills, Director.
Agenda Teams Responsibilities Timeline Homework and next steps.
IT Governance Committee on Education Technology December 9, 2010.
State of Maine NASACT Presentation “Using the Business Case to Guide a Transformation Procurement” 1 Using the Business Case to Guide a Transformation.
University of Massachusetts Boston FY11 Budget Process February 25, 2010.
HIT Standards Committee Privacy and Security Workgroup: Initial Reactions Dixie Baker, SAIC Steven Findlay, Consumers Union June 23, 2009.
Legal Services Advisory Committee (LSAC) Grant Applicant Workshop February 11, 2013.
By: Heather Smith LDR 609. On January 15, 2009, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released the final regulation to move from the current.
1 THE CITY OF TOMORROW AND CULTURAL HERITAGE Thierry PROST EUROPEAN COMMISSION - DG RTD Directorate I - Preserving the Ecosystem Tel: +32/2/ Fax:
Financial Systems Needs Assessment Administrator Briefing Spring Quarter 2009.
FY10 Budget Update Finance and Administration Advisory Group July 9, 2009.
GOVERNOR’S EARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL (ECAC) September 9, 2014.
IT Governance Committee on Education Technology January 13, 2011.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
BuzzPort The GEORGIA TECH CAMPUS PORTAL Overview Summer 2003.
Information MSU Through the eyes of the users! Dewitt Latimer, Ph.D. Chief Information Officer
Copyright © The OWASP Foundation Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the OWASP License. The OWASP.
OIT Reorganization August 27, Today’s Agenda Principles of Reorganization Survey Feedback Organization Chart Leadership Team Structure Items to.
2010 Technology Committee Overview and Plan January 26, 2010 Presentation to Board Content revised 2/8/2010 based on Board input.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
The Quality Enhancement Plan from a SACSCOC Perspective 1 Leadership Orientation for 2016-A Institutions January 27, 2014 Michael S. Johnson Senior Vice.
IT Governance Committee on Research Technology December 9, 2010.
FY14-FY22 IT Roadmap – Update Budget and Investment Committee October 8, 2013.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
33 3. IS Planning Issues Scope of IS planning Barriers in IS planning Overview of IS planning Inputs to IS planning Process of IS planning Outputs from.
Deloitte Consulting LLP Commonwealth of Massachusetts Statewide Strategic IT Consolidation (ITC) Initiative IT Governance Sub-Committee Working Session.
Overview and Update.  LBUSD is currently facing a unique set of challenges and opportunities. It is imperative that we look intensely and thoroughly.
Information Technology Assessment Findings Presented to the colleges of the State Center Community College District.
NFM: Modular Template Measurement Framework: Modules, Interventions and Indicators LFA M&E Training February
Data, Surveys and Performance Monitoring by Mr Ben Freyer Deputy Director, Regional Support Services, DWSSC 22 November 2012 Ministry of Agriculture, Water.
URBACT IMPLEMENTATION NETWORKS. URBACT in a nutshell  European Territorial Cooperation programme (ETC) co- financed by ERDF  All 28 Member States as.
CHB Conference 2007 Planning for and Promoting Healthy Communities Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Boards Presented by Carla Anglehart Director,
Info-Tech Research Group1 Info-Tech Research Group, Inc. Is a global leader in providing IT research and advice. Info-Tech’s products and services combine.
New Hire Packet Automation Factors for Decision Making.
EECS David C. Chan1 Computer Security Management Session 1 How IT Affects Risks and Assurance.
CCSF – Citywide IT Plan Current State Assessment December 18 th, 2008 Craig Holt, Consulting Director.
State Steering Committee
COIT Planning & Budgeting
Auditing Cloud Services
AFN National Housing and Infrastructure Forum
Finance & Planning Committee of the San Francisco Health Commission
Technology Department Annual Update
Presentation transcript:

IT Governance Steering Committee January 7, 2011

Meeting Agenda  Review revised IT Governance structure (5 min)  Update from Subcommittee Chairs (10 min)  Review overall process flow for decision making (5 min)  Discuss immediate action items:  IT Funding Model (10 min)  Future of IDR/MyResearch (10 min)  Data access policy (10 min)  Next Steps (5 min) 2

Revised IT Governance Chart  Refer to handout with revised organization chart 3

Update from Committee Chairs  Technology and Architecture  Research  Education  Business  Clinical (next meeting) 4

Decision Process Flow 5 Develop Application/ Project Inventory Technology and Architecture Research Education Clinical Business Committees Review inventory, previous plans, and develop overall vision Identify and submit priorities Steering Committee Review May Identify decisions requiring SC input (for 2012 budget cycle) JanuaryFeb/MarchApril

Scope of Steering Committee Decision-Making - DRAFT  Focus on all significant areas of information technology:  Requires investment over $100,000 (hardware, software and labor);  Requires integration outside a specific unit (research, education, clinical and/or business);  Impacts underlying information architecture and/or requires change in architecture;  Requires change in IT policy;  Requires change in overall workflow and/or business process flow;  Requires development of new IT skill set in ITS. 6

Proposal Submittal Form  Agenda Topic:  Nature of presentation:  Information  Discussion  Decision  Situation: Where are we now?  Target: What do we want to achieve?  Proposal: How will we get there? 7

IT Funding Model Nature of presentation (check one): _Information _Discussion X Decision Situation: UCSF needs a new IT funding model to ensure successful and smooth operation of core IT infrastructure and services. The current situation is inconsistent, not auditable, unfair, and results in sub-standard services to a large number of faculty, staff, and students. Target: Develop a funding model that is:  Sustainable  Easy to understand and to implement  Fair and equitable  Legal and auditable Proposal:  Charge a campus-wide workgroup with developing a proposal and presenting it to the Steering Committee within six to nine months  The funding model can be built upon the current $35 data network charge and should address services such as data network, voice/phone, , helpdesk, desktop support, IT procurement, IT security, etc. 8

Research Data & Tools (IDR/MyResearch) Nature of presentation (check one): _Information _Discussion X Decision Situation: IDR and MyResearch are currently the recommended database and toolset environments for UCSF researchers who need to use clinical data. These systems are new and are currently only used by a small percentage of the campus research community. In order to reach a larger number of users we need to find out how to enhance the systems and how to govern their future. Time is of essence due to the imminent implementation of APEX/EPIC and the departure of Michael Kamerick who was the Director responsible for the development of these systems. Target: UCSF researchers need a database of clinical data and tools that are:  Populated with all required data elements from APEX and other clinical systems  Populated with researchers’ specific data when necessary  Easy to use  Secure  Properly funded Proposal:  Charge the Research committee with developing a plan and presenting it to the Steering Committee within three months 9

Data Access Policy Nature of presentation (check one): _Information _Discussion X Decision Situation: As we embark on a comprehensive data warehouse initiative, we need to update UCSF’s data access policy in order to remove unnecessary obstacles to data access and in order to encourage faculty, staff, and students to responsibly use university data. The current practice makes data access very difficult and discourages usage. As a result, access processes are expensive, too long, and inconsistent, and data are not used as widely and effectively as possible. Target: A revised data access policy that:  Is entirely consistent with law (e.g., HIPAA, FERPA) and other UC policies, while not over-interpreting their reach.  Provides authorized users efficient, ready access to data. For example, UCSF staff who have a legitimate need to access financial data should be able to access all UCSF financial data (not just their own departmental data).  Sets campus-wide standards for data sharing that replace unit controls.  Clearly states the user’s responsibility to protect data. Proposal:  Charge the Security & IT Policies subcommittee with developing a revised access policy and presenting it to the Steering Committee within three months 10

Next Steps  Complete inventory of applications (in-house versus vendor) and projects (current and future) for each area;  Develop website for overall IT Governance;  Next meeting February 1st 1:00 – 2:00pm. 11