Faculty Engagement in Partnership Work Nancy S. Shapiro University System of Maryland AACU 2007.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Strengthening Institutional Commitment to STEM Teacher Preparation and STEM Education: Lessons Learned from The Leadership Collaborative (TLC). Miami,

Advertisements

National Science Foundation Innovation Through Institutional Integration (I 3 ) Kathleen Bergin Program Director Directorate for Education and Human Resources.

National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies 1 Phase II: Educating the 2020 Engineer Phase II: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century...

The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate The scholarship of discovery The scholarship.

The Common Core State Standards: Opportunities and Challenges for the Mathematical Education of Teachers.

Teacher Education for the Global Age The Imperative for Change LONGVIEW FOUNDATION for Education in World Affairs and International Understanding, Inc.

Science teacher professional development through a large-scale, high-school and university partnership David May University System of Maryland.

Studying Higher Education Change and Sustainability Efforts in the Context of K-16 Partnerships American Educational Research Association April 12, 2007.

A Systemic Approach February, Two important changes in the Perkins Act of 2006 A requirement for the establishment of Programs of Study A new approach.

Master Graduate Teaching Fellows: A Pilot to Improve Science Teaching VIP K-16 Math Science Partnership Jennifer Frank, David May, Nancy Shapiro University.

Sunflower blank National Science Foundation Dan Maki Kathleen Bergin Math and Science Partnership Education and Human Resources Directorate Division of.

“NSF’s Division of Undergraduate Education: Funding Opportunities for Community Colleges” CUR November 18, 2011 Eun-Woo Chang Montgomery College.

Inquiry-based Curriculum Reform from Faculty Learning Communities Nancy Shapiro and David May, University System of Maryland Philip Sokolove, University.

Barbara Miller Education Development Center Implementing a Teacher Leadership Program with Sustainability as a Goal: Lessons from Math/Science Partnerships.

Enhancing Academic Practice Nigeria Role of Newcastle University.

Strategic Planning and the NCA Special Emphasis A Focus on Community Engagement and Experiential Learning.

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation FY’06 Institute Partnerships  Focus on:  Development of school-based intellectual leaders and.

STEM Education Reorganization April 3, STEM Reorganization: Background  The President has placed a very high priority on using government resources.

SUNY Cortland Conceptual Framework … our shared vision for preparing candidates to work in P-12 schools.

Foundation Fundraising Update June Goal seek external, foundation funding for consortial, collaborative project(s) which will advance the organization’s.

1 Strategic Planning: An Update March 13, Outline What we have done so far? Where do we stand now? Next steps?

Faculty Instructional Support Moving beyond putting courses online to curriculum redesign Leila Lyons, University of Delaware.

National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)

Strategic Planning Definitions Tennessee Board of Regents.

Providing Access to Higher Education: The University of California Experience UC Counselor Conferences September 2014.

NSF Programs That Support Research in the Two-Year College Classroom  V. Celeste Carter, National Science Foundation Jeffrey Ryan, University of South.

This work was supported in part by MSP grant # through the National Science Foundation. Opinions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily.

CENTER FOR THE INTEGRATION OF RESEARCH, TEACHING, AND LEARNING A national network of 25 research universities committed to using graduate education to.

THE SOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE SOTL FELLOWS PROGRAM Margaret Waterman May 1, 2012 cstl.semo.edu/sotl.

College of Agriculture and Life Sciences One of 10 TAMU Colleges Provost, President 3 missions: Teaching, Research, Service One of 5 Agrilife partners.

Grants as Planning Stepping Stones: Strategic Initiatives for Engagement with India at Winston-Salem State University UNC India Summit UNC General Administration.

1 Higher Education Engagement with K-12: Partnerships, Possibilities, and Pitfalls Nancy S. Shapiro Office of Academic Affairs University System of Maryland.

If We Build It, Will They Come? The Case for Structural Change to Support STEM Education Reform Association of American Colleges & Universities Annual.

Cindy M. Walker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No

Fill Em’ Up Austin Graham. Service-Learning Service-learning is a method of teaching, learning and reflecting, frequently youth service, throughout the.

Faculty Roles in STEM Partnerships James E. Hamos Directorate for Education & Human Resources November 2009.

Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.

Illinois MSP Program Goals  To increase the content expertise of mathematics and science teachers; 4 To increase teaching skills through access to the.

Where Innovation Is Tradition Students as Scholars : QEP Update Fall 2010 Kimberly K. Eby Bethany M. Usher QEP Planning Committee.

1 STEM Faculty Engagement in P-20 Partnerships: A Conflict of Interest? American Association of Colleges and Universities Faculty Work and The New Academy.

Woodrow Wilson Indiana Fellowship Program Vision Statement –Highly qualified STEM teachers –Problem-based STEM curricula –Rural schools network –New models.

CACHE and Freshman/High School Engineering. UTeachEngineering  Changing backgrounds of engineering freshmen  Overview of Texas program  Progress to.

Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address

Texas Science Technology Engineering and Math (T-STEM) Initiative Robin Gelinas—Texas Education Agency Director of Policy Initiatives.

Institutional Change and Sustainability: Lessons Learned from MSPs Nancy Shapiro & Jennifer Frank CASHÉ KMD Project University System of Maryland January.

A New Collaborative to Improve Broader Impacts Kevin Niemi, U. Wisconsin-Madison Kemi Jona, Northwestern U. Jane Horwitz, U. Penn

1 USM K-16 Framework: Opportunities for New Faculty Identities Making the walls between campus and community more permeable American Association of Colleges.

NBPTS - SEEKING EXCELLENCE IN SCIENCE TEACHING. EXCELLENCE National Board for Professional Teaching Standards -- Draft Report (1993). National Board for.

RAJEE AMARASINGHE CSU FRESNO Institutionalization Changes in Policy and Practice Among Partners.

The New York State School Improvement Grant Initiative Five Years On Office of Professional Research & Development, Syracuse University, NY.

Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.

Innovation through Institutional Integration (I 3 ) National Science Foundation Directorate for Education and Human Resources National Science Foundation.

Math and Science Partnership (MSP) Program A Research and Development Effort in K-16 Teaching and Learning James E. Hamos Directorate for Education & Human.

QAA Enhancement Themes Developing and Supporting the Curriculum at the University of Strathclyde Andrew McLaren Irene Bell.

MDC Strategic Plan Strategic Plan Coordinating Committee October/November 2010.

Computing Education for the 21 st Century (CE21) Jan Cuny Education Workforce CISE January 31, 2011.

Why Community-University Partnerships? Partnerships Enhance quality of life in the region Increase relevance of academic programs Add public purposes to.

Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.

The Math Science Partnership of Greater Philadelphia A Program of the National Science Foundation at La Salle University.

Goals 1.Ensure adequate supply of computing professionals 2.Achieve broader participation in the field Integrative Computing Education and Research: Preparing.

Fostering Sustained Impact: Lessons Learned from Geoscience Faculty Workshops Ellen Roscoe Iverson, Cathryn A. Manduca, Science Education Resource Center,

THE APPALACHIAN MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE PARTNERSHIP.

3A – The organization’s goals for student learning outcomes are clearly stated for each educational program and make effective assessment possible 3B --

Documentation and Assessment of Scholarship in Extension and Engagement: A National Perspective Amy Driscoll Associate Senior Scholar Carnegie Foundation.

David J. Lanoue Dean August 11, 2010 (Does not include budget information that is now obsolete.)

UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN Approved by President Cárdenas November 21, 2005 Goals reordered January 31, 2006.

Research Opportunities in AMSP UK Mathematics Education Retreat October 15, 2005.

Demonstrating impact as a practitioner- researcher FORCE16 | Portland, OR | Monday, April 18, 2016 Heather Coates IUPUI University Library Center for Digital.

A five-year community effort to improve Earth literacy and build a workforce prepared to tackle environmental and resource issues InTeGrate supports integrated.

A five-year community effort to improve geoscience literacy and build a workforce prepared to tackle environmental and resource issues InTeGrate supports.

Presentation transcript:

Faculty Engagement in Partnership Work Nancy S. Shapiro University System of Maryland AACU 2007

Vertically Integrated Partnerships K-16 (VIP K-16)  $7.5-million, 5-year Math and Science Partnership grant of the National Science Foundation.  Designed to bring inquiry science instruction to high- school and university students. Partners include:  1 public school system, 1 community college, and 7 USM IHEs  Goals:  Develop a sustainable learning community  Enrich science teacher knowledge  Engage college faculty in enriching their teaching and pedagogy

VIP K-16 Activities Involving IHE Faculty Course Redesign Summer internships for HS teachers to work with IHE faculty Professional learning communities Dissemination of their results to the P-16 Community

VIP K-16 Challenges to Faculty Engagement Different cultures among schools and universities Geography- distance between institutions and school system Little knowledge of educational research among Master Science Teachers, faculty fellows, and project staff Systemic barriers to change instructional practices “Publish or perish”-strong pressure to do research

CASHÉ: Change and Sustainability in Higher Education A three-year study that seeks to document curriculum transformation, faculty engagement, and sustainable change among higher education institutions involved in NSF Math and Science Partnership (MSP) Projects.

CASHÉ: Goals Discover how MSPs have changed undergraduate STEM education and teacher preparation at participating higher education institutions. Identify what strategies MSPs have used to engage faculty in these change initiatives Assess the impact (if any) that MSPs have had on campus culture, policies, and priorities in such areas as hiring, promotion and tenure, faculty advancement, faculty development, and rewards structures

Breakout Questions Primary Questions: 1.How do faculty communities view partnerships with the K-12 community? Are they programs of scholarship or community service? 2.What types of models and incentives is your institution using to encourage and reward higher education faculty involvement in P-16 initiatives? a.Which appear to be the most effective in terms of numbers of faculty involved and depth of engagement and participation?

Breakout Questions Secondary Questions: 3.To what extent has your institution created or adopted some form of the "community of practice" model to engage higher education faculty in P-16 activities? a.How are these communities structured and defined? b.How do these communities contribute to and support broader institutional objectives? 4.Have faculty in certain disciplines at your institution been able to make more headway than others through their involvement in P-16 initiatives? a. If so, what internal and external factors account for these differences? 5.What is it that you have seen that may make you draw a conclusion (or not) that involvement in P-16 transforms faculty into more reflective practitioners (beyond more immediate outcomes that may include increased awareness, increased knowledge, changed pedagogy, etc.)? a.What types of engagement foster such developments?