Influence of Lorentz violation on the hydrogen spectrum Manoel M. Ferreira Jr (UFMA- Federal University of Maranhão - Brazil) Colaborators: Fernando M.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Quantum Mechanics of Simple Systems
Advertisements

Teppei Katori, Indiana University1 PRD74(2006) Global 3 parameter Lorentz Violation model for neutrino oscillation with MiniBooNE Teppei Katori,
Covariant Formulation of the Generalized Lorentz Invariance and Modified Dispersion Relations Alex E. Bernardini Departamento de Física – UFSCAR Financial.
Spinor Gravity A.Hebecker,C.Wetterich.
PHYS Quantum Mechanics PHYS Quantum Mechanics Dr Jon Billowes Nuclear Physics Group (Schuster Building, room 4.10)
Magnetically Induced Anomalous Magnetic Moment in Massless QED Efrain J. Ferrer The University of Texas at El Paso.
Lattice Spinor Gravity Lattice Spinor Gravity. Quantum gravity Quantum field theory Quantum field theory Functional integral formulation Functional integral.
Fermions and the Dirac Equation In 1928 Dirac proposed the following form for the electron wave equation: The four  µ matrices form a Lorentz 4-vector,
Unharmony within the Thematic Melodies of Twentieth Century Physics X.S.Chen, X.F.Lu Dept. of Phys., Sichuan Univ. W.M.Sun, Fan Wang NJU and PMO Joint.
P460 - real H atom1 The Real Hydrogen Atom Solve SE and in first order get (independent of L): can use perturbation theory to determine: magnetic effects.
PHYS Quantum Mechanics PHYS Quantum Mechanics Dr Jon Billowes Nuclear Physics Group (Schuster Building, room 4.10)
3D Schrodinger Equation
Physics 452 Quantum mechanics II Winter 2011 Karine Chesnel.
Physics 452 Quantum mechanics II Winter 2011 Karine Chesnel.
Chiral freedom and the scale of weak interactions.
The Statistically Anisotropic Curvature Perturbation from Vector Fields Mindaugas Karčiauskas Dimopoulos, MK, JHEP 07 (2008) Dimopoulos, MK, Lyth, Rodriguez,
QM in 3D Quantum Ch.4, Physical Systems, 24.Feb.2003 EJZ Schrödinger eqn in spherical coordinates Separation of variables (Prob.4.2 p.124) Angular equation.
PHYS Quantum Mechanics PHYS Quantum Mechanics Dr Jon Billowes Nuclear Physics Group (Schuster Building, room 4.10)
PHYS Quantum Mechanics PHYS Quantum Mechanics Dr Gavin Smith Nuclear Physics Group These slides at:
C4 Lecture 3 - Jim Libby1 Lecture 3 summary Frames of reference Invariance under transformations Rotation of a H wave function: d -functions Example: e.
Quantum Ch.4 - continued Physical Systems, 27.Feb.2003 EJZ Recall solution to Schrödinger eqn in spherical coordinates with Coulomb potential (H atom)
PHYS Quantum Mechanics PHYS Quantum Mechanics Dr Sean Freeman Nuclear Physics Group These slides at:
PHYS Quantum Mechanics PHYS Quantum Mechanics Dr Jon Billowes Nuclear Physics Group (Schuster Building, room 4.10)
Aug 29-31, 2005M. Jezabek1 Generation of Quark and Lepton Masses in the Standard Model International WE Heraeus Summer School on Flavour Physics and CP.
PHYS Quantum Mechanics PHYS Quantum Mechanics Dr Jon Billowes Nuclear Physics Group (Schuster Building, room 4.10)
Physical Chemistry 2 nd Edition Thomas Engel, Philip Reid Chapter 28 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy.
Chapter 41 Atomic Structure
Based on Phys.Rev.D84:043515,2011,arXiv: &JCAP01(2012)016 Phys.Rev.D84:043515,2011,arXiv: &JCAP01(2012)016.
Monday, Apr. 2, 2007PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #12, 13, 14 Monday, Apr. 2, 2007 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Local Gauge Invariance 2.U(1) Gauge.
A.F.Kord Sabzevar Tarbiat Moallem University (Iran) September 2011.
Self – accelerating universe from nonlinear massive gravity Chunshan Lin Kavli
The Impact of Special Relativity in Nuclear Physics: It’s not just E = Mc 2.
P D S.E.1 3D Schrodinger Equation Simply substitute momentum operator do particle in box and H atom added dimensions give more quantum numbers. Can.
Wednesday, Apr. 23, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #24 Wednesday, Apr. 23, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu Issues with SM picture Introduction.
A holographic approach to strongly coupling magnetism Run-Qiu Yang Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Lecture 20: More on the deuteron 18/11/ Analysis so far: (N.B., see Krane, Chapter 4) Quantum numbers: (J , T) = (1 +, 0) favor a 3 S 1 configuration.
Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D LANS Company Sensitive — unauthorized release or dissemination prohibited.
Absorption and Emission of Radiation:
Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #9 Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Quantum Electro-dynamics (QED) 2.Local.
The Possibility of Construction the Standard Model without Higgs Bosons in the Fermion Sector V.P. Neznamov RFNC-VNIIEF, , Sarov, N.Novgorod region.
Exact Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation for gravitational waves and magnetic field background Bruno Gonçalves UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE JUIZ DE FORA DEPARTAMENTO.
Wednesday, Mar. 5, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #13 Wednesday, Mar. 5, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu Local Gauge Invariance and Introduction.

The inclusion of fermions – J=1/2 particles
Two-dimensional SYM theory with fundamental mass and Chern-Simons terms * Uwe Trittmann Otterbein College OSAPS Spring Meeting at ONU, Ada April 25, 2009.
Monday, Mar. 10, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #14 Monday, Mar. 10, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu Completion of U(1) Gauge Invariance SU(2)
“Planck 2009” conference Padova May 2009 Facing Dark Energy in SUGRA Collaboration with C. van de Bruck, A. Davis and J. Martin.
P Spring 2002 L4Richard Kass Conservation Laws When something doesn’t happen there is usually a reason! Read: M&S Chapters 2, 4, and 5.1, That something.
Atomic Physics Quantum Physics 2002 Recommended Reading: Harris Chapter 7.
Monday, Apr. 11, 2005PHYS 3446, Spring 2005 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #18 Monday, Apr. 11, 2005 Dr. Jae Yu Symmetries Local gauge symmetry Gauge fields.
Light bending by a black body radiation J.Y. Kim and T. Lee, arXiv: [hep-ph] Jin Young Kim (Kunsan National Univ.) 10 th CosPA Meeting, Hawaii.
Wednesday, Nov. 15, 2006PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #19 Wednesday, Nov. 15, 2006 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Symmetries Local gauge symmetry Gauge.
Relativistic Quantum Mechanics
Quantum Field Theory (PH-537) M.Sc Physics 4th Semester
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #23 Symmetries Why do we care about the symmetry?
Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris
Perturbation Theory Lecture 2 Books Recommended:
Chapter III Dirac Field Lecture 2 Books Recommended:
Chapter V Interacting Fields Lecture 1 Books Recommended:
Chapter 41 Atomic Structure
Countries that signed the nuclear arms treaty with Iran
Handout 9 : The Weak Interaction and V-A
Stationary Perturbation Theory And Its Applications
Perturbation Theory Lecture 2 continue Books Recommended:
Spin and Magnetic Moments
Quantum Two.
Chapter 41 Atomic Structure
Quantum Two Body Problem, Hydrogen Atom
Accelerator Physics Synchrotron Radiation
American Physical Society
Presentation transcript:

Influence of Lorentz violation on the hydrogen spectrum Manoel M. Ferreira Jr (UFMA- Federal University of Maranhão - Brazil) Colaborators: Fernando M. O. Moucherek (student - UFMA) Dr. Humberto Belich – UFES Dr. Thales Costa Soares – UFJF Prof. José A. Helayël-Neto - CBPF

Outline: Part 1) Results of the Paper: “Influence of Lorentz- and CPT- violating terms on the Dirac equation”, Manoel M. Ferreira Jr and Fernando M. O. Moucherek, hep-th/ , to appear in Int. J. Mod. Phys. A (2006). Part 2) Results of the Paper: “Lorentz-violating corrections on the hydrogen spectrum induced by a non-minimal coupling”, H. Belich, T. Costa Sores, M. M. Ferreira Jr, J. A. Helayel-Neto, F. M. O. Moucherek, hep-th/ , to appear in Phys. Rev. D (2006)]

Standard Model Extension –SME  Conceived by Colladay & Kostelecky as an extension of the Minimal Standard Model. [PRD 55,6760 (1997); PRD 58, (1998).]  The underlying theory undergoes spontaneous breaking of Lorentz symmetry  Conceived as a speculation for probing a fundamental model for describing the Planck scale physics.  The low-energy effective model incorporates Lorentz- violating terms in all sectors of interaction.  Lorentz covariance is broken in the frame of particles but is preserved in the observer frame.  The renormalizability, gauge invariance and energy- momentum conservation of the effective model are preserved.

Results of the Paper: “Influence of Lorentz- and CPT-violating terms on the Dirac equation”, Manoel M. Ferreira Jr and Fernando M. O. Moucherek, hep-th/ , to appear in Int. J. Mod. Phys. A (2006). It includes: -Dirac plane wave solutions, dispersion relations, eigenenergies; -Nonrelativist limit and nonrelativistic Hamiltonian; - First order energy corrections on the hydrogen spectrum; - Setting of an upper bound on Lorentz-violating parameter. First part:

SME Lorentz-violating Dirac sector: → Lorentz-violating coefficients (generated as v.e.v. of tensor terms of the underlying theory) → CPT- and Lorentz-odd coefficients → CPT- and Lorentz-even coefficients

Analysis of the influence of the “vector coupling” term on the Dirac equation: → Modified Dirac Lagrangean Where: Modified Dirac equation: Dispersion relation:

Energy eigenvalues: C - violation: E + ≠ E - In order to obtain plane-wave solutions: The presence of the background implies:

Free Particle solutions: Eigenenergy :

Nonrelativistic limit Dirac Lagrangean: External eletromagnetic field: Two coupled equations: Nonrelativistic limit: Implying:

Using the identity: We obtain the nonrelativistic Hamiltonian: Pauli Hamiltonian + Lorentz-violating terms: Lorentz-violating Hamiltonian:

Evaluation of the corrections induced on the hydrogen spectrum First order Perturbation theory → 1-particle wavefunction: In the absence of magnetic external field, (A=0), only the first term contributes:

Taking the background along the z- axis, we have: The integration possesses two contributions. The first one is: A consequence of:

Second contribution: The angular integration is rewritten as: Considering the relations, It implies:

The presence of the background in vetor coupling does not induce any correction on the hydrogen spectrum. This result reflects the fact that this coupling yields just a momentum shift: The effect of the background may be seen as a gauge transformation: In such a transformation, the background may be “absorbed”, so that the lagrangean of the system recovers its free form: Result :

Analysis in the presence of an external magnetic field: In this case, the a contribution may arise from the A-term: For an external field along the z-axis: So we have:

We obtain: The magnetic external field does not yield any new correction, unless the usual Zeeman effect. Using: Once:

Analysis of the influence of the “axial vector” coupling term: Modified Dirac Lagrangian: Modified Dirac equation: Multiplying by:, we have:

Multiplying again by: We attain the following dispersion relation: For, → For

Free particle solutions: Writing: Which implies:

Free particle spinors:

Nonrelativistic limit Starting from: Implementing the conditions: and neglecting the term, we obtain:

Nonrelativistic Hamiltonian : Lorentz-violating Hamiltonian:

Evaluation of corrections on the hydrogen spectrum: In the absence of magnetic field: Contribution associated with: where n,l,j,m j, m s are the quantum numbers suitable to address a system with spin addition:

Relevant relations: For: With:

Taking into account the orthogonality relation: We obtain: Which implies: The energy is corrected by an amount proportional to ± m j, implying a correction similar to the usual Zeeman effect. sign (+) for j = l+1/2 sign (-) for j = l-1/2 This correction is attained in the absence of an external magnetic field!

Upper bound on the Lorentz- violating parameter Regarding that spectroscopic experiments are able to detect effects of eV, the following bound is set up:

Contribution of the term : First order evaluation: The operator acts on the 1-particle wavefunction: so that:

Considering: Only the terms in contribute to the result: The average of the momentum operator on an atomic bound state is null.

Evaluation in the presence of na external magnetic field Magnetic field along the z-axis: So that: The external magnetic field does not induce any additional correction effect.

Conclusions:  The Dirac nonrelativistic limit was assessed; the nonrelativistic Hamiltonian was evaluated.  The corrections induced on the hydrogen spectrum were evaluated in the presence and absence of external magnetic field.  For the coupling, no correction is reported.  For the case of the coupling, a Zeeman-like splitting is obtained (in the absence of B EXt. ).  An upper bound of (eV) is set up on the magnitude of the background.

Second Part: “Lorentz-violating corrections on the hydrogen spectrum induced by a non-minimal coupling” Main goal: To evaluate the corrections induced on the hydrogen spectrum induced by a non-minimal coupling with the Lorentz-violating background. [H. Belich, T. Costa Sores, M. M. Ferreira Jr, J. A. Helayel-Neto, F. M. O. Moucherek, hep-th/ , to appear in Phys. Rev. D (2006)] It includes: -Dirac nonrelativist limit and nonrelativistic Hamiltonian; - First order energy corrections on the hydrogen spectrum; - Setting of upper bounds on Lorentz-violating parameter.

Defining: Adopting Dirac representation: We have: Non-minimal coupling: Modified Dirac equation: Mass dimension:

Nonrelativistic limit: For the strong spinor component: Canonical momentum: After some algebraic development, it results:

In the absence of magnetic field, the relevant terms are: In the presence of magnetic field, the contributions stem from:

Calculation of corrections in the absence of an external magnetic field Hydrogen 1-particle wave function Identity: and So that: First term:

In spherical coordinates: Considering: We have: - Such a correction implies breakdown of the accidental degenerescence (regardless the spin-orbit interaction).

→ Bohr radius Where: Magnitude of this correction: Numerically: Regarding that spectroscopic experiments are able to detect effects as smaller than eV, the following bound is set up:

Second term: In absence of B Ext :

Outcome: Where it was used: Magnitude of the correction: Numerical value:

Third term: For a Coulombian field:

Ket Relations: For: With:

Magnitude of the correction: So we have: This result leads to the same bound of the latter result:

In the presence of magnetic field:

First term: Second term:

Magnitude of correction: Regarding that such a correction is undetectable for a magnetic strength of 1 G, we have: Third term: → Lorentz violation is more sensitively probed in the presence of an external magnetic field. 1G ≈ (eV) 2

Conclusions:  The nonrelativistic limit of the Dirac equation was assessed and the Hamiltonian evaluated.  The corrections on the hydrogen spectrum were properly carried out.  Such correction may be used to set up an upper bound of (eV) -1 on the Lorentz-violating product.  Lorentz violation in the context of this model is best probed in the presence of an external magnetic field.

Acknowledgments:  We express our gratitude to CNPq and FAPEMA (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Maranhão) for financial support.