Critical Thinking in Safety Decision-Making: Evaluating Information Sufficiency Reconciling and Validating Information Applying the Safety Threshold Criteria.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Child Protective Investigation Very Complex First Responder Job: Substance Abuse, Mental Illness, Domestic Violence, Extreme Poverty, Physical Abuse, Sexual.
Advertisements

EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION
Interim Director Bobby Cagle Georgia Division of Family and Children Services.
The Information Domains and Information Collection.
Safety Planning. Safety Plan KNOW THE FAMILY D1: Extent of Maltreatment D2: Surrounding Circumstances D3: Child Functioning D4: Adult Functioning D5:
Getting Started With Intake & CPS Process. Developmental Competencies SW Understands the roles and tasks of the intake process SW Understands.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center1 Refresher: Child Outcome Summary Form Child Outcome Summary Form.
Successful Solutions Professional Development LLC A Basic Approach to Child Safety Chapter 4 Mandated Reporting Law.
Worker Focused Safety Program Violence in the Workplace Worker Training Module 4.
Child and Family Outcomes Chapter 12: Child Outcomes Summary Form Exit Information.
An overview of Florida’s Practice Model Florida Department of Children and Families Copyright 2013 Florida Department of Children & Families.
Forensic Interviewing Protecting Children from Neglect and Abuse.
Child Protection Transformation Overview October 18, 2012.
Orientation Core 100_OR_PPT_July 2013 PPT 1. Module 1: Introduction to the Child Welfare Pre-Service Training OBJECTIVES : Identify Child Welfare Pre-Service.
The Comprehensive School Health Education Curriculum:
CTC Mod 2 Post Work. Objectives Post-Work LO – Access the CWIS webpage – Identify types of records available in the Statewide Database – Identify questions.
Overview of the Safety Assessment and Management Process Bryle Zickler, Human Services Program Specialist – OCYF Jana Hitchcock, Curriculum & Instructional.
Florida Department of Children and Families Copyright 2013 Florida Department of Children & Families.
Assessment Skills Lab Structured Decision Making (SDM) Version 1.0 | 2014.
1 Manifestation Determination. 2 Today’s Goals and Objectives…. Define Manifestation Determination Discuss when to complete a Manifestation Determination.
Lakota Oyate Wakanyeja Owicakiyapi. The purpose of the LOWO Tiwahe Risk Assessment/Investigation is to protect children from risks of harm and to assess.
1 Safety, Risk And Protective Capacity. 2 Competencies Assessing safety, risk and protective capacity Gathers and evaluates relevant information about.
Assessment with Children Chapter 1. Overview of Assessment with Children Multiple Informants – Child, parents, other family, teachers – Necessary for.
Present and Impending Danger, Child Vulnerability and Protective Capacity.
CPS INVESTIGATIVE ASSESSMENT. Competencies Ability to integrate your investigation and family assessment into one document Ability to document solution.
Safety Framework Supervisors as Coaches Department of Children and Families.
Self-Sufficiency Matrix Short Services Option Based on Abt Associates Training PP Michigan Statewide HMIS Staff Training.
204: Assessing Safety in Out-of-Home Care Updates.
Present and Impending Danger, Child Vulnerability and Protective Capacity.
1 Effects of Abuse and Neglect on Child Development Dynamics of Abuse and Neglect: Signs of Maltreatment.
Introduction to Key Concepts
Safety Planning. Safety Plan KNOW THE FAMILY D1: Extent of Maltreatment D2: Surrounding Circumstances D3: Child Functioning D4: Adult Functioning D5:
Welcome to the … CAPMIS Refresher 1. Name Agency, unit, and primary job function or title, time “on the job” One thing you find helpful about CAPMIS Introductions.
Annual Ethics Training Presbytery assembly October 13, 2015
Assessing Child Safety The Seventeen Safety Threats Central to the Core Mission.
ASSESSING CHILD SAFETYASSESSING CHILD SAFETY Central to our core mission.
Child Safety Framework: Analyzing and Planning for Child Safety.
 Context for the Training  Training Related to Implementation of Safety Decision Making Methodology  Fidelity of the Family Functioning Assessment.
Case Management.  Context for the Training  Training Related to Implementation of Safety Decision Making Methodology  Fidelity of the Ongoing Family.
Thursday, January 07, 2016 Charting the Course towards Permanency for Children in Pennsylvania Module 5: Risk Assessment.
Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium.
 Context for the Training  Training Related to Implementation of Safety Decision Making Methodology  Fidelity of the Family Functioning Assessment.
 Secure resident safety  Assess the resident, provide medical and/or psychosocial treatment as necessary  Examine the resident’s injury and/or psychosocial.
204: Assessing Safety in Out-of-Home Care Overview.
Supervising to Permanency PRESENTED BY THE ALLIANCE FOR CHILD WELFARE EXCELLENCE.
SunCoast Region Transformation Implementation Team November 2, 2012.
Adult Protective Services: Reporting Elder Abuse Policy, Practice, and Communication Robert Wallace Adult Services Program Manager June 2015.
7/6/09Office of Training and Professional Development1 Unit 3D: Safety Assessment Safety Permanency Well-being.
Clinical Supervision in CPS and FVS Safety Risk Critical Thinking.
Introduction to the Domains
Documenting a Sufficient Family Functioning Assessment
Documenting a Sufficient Family Functioning Assessment
Reporting Student Progress
Case Consultation.
Family Preservation Services
Florida’s Safety Methodology
Making Small but Significant Changes
Introduction to Case Management
Module 9 Safety Planning
Assessment and Analyzing Family Functioning
DECISION- MAKING HOW TO USE THE PPT TEMPLATE:
Module Safety and Risk.
DECISION- MAKING HOW TO USE THE PPT TEMPLATE:
Assessment of Impending Danger and Caregiver Protective Capacities
Module 7 Why We Must Understand the Family, The Child and the Parent / Caregiver
Present Danger Assessment and Planning
The Family Functioning Assessment: Investigation and Safety Planning
Further Information Gathering for Impending Danger Assessment
Georgia Division of Family and Children Services
Family Functioning Assessment - Ongoing
Presentation transcript:

Critical Thinking in Safety Decision-Making: Evaluating Information Sufficiency Reconciling and Validating Information Applying the Safety Threshold Criteria

Safe ? Yes No KNOW THE FAMILY D1: Extent of Maltreatment D2: Surrounding Circumstances D3: Child Functioning D4: Adult Functioning D5: General Parenting Practices D6: Discipline or Behavior Management

 List the criteria for sufficient information  Explain what reconciliation and validation are in information gathering and analysis  Apply the safety threshold criteria When you have finished this module, you will be able to:

Information standards

D1: Extent of Maltreatment D2: Surrounding Circumstances D3: Child Functioning D4: Adult Functioning D5: General Parenting Practices D6: Discipline or Behavior Management KNOW THE FAMILY

or D1: Extent of Maltreatment D2: Surrounding Circumstances D3: Child Functioning D4: Adult Functioning D5: General Parenting Practices D6: Discipline or Behavior Management KNOW THE FAMILY

?

Five essential criteria: 1. Describes the domain (by definition) in full and acceptable ways, so that a picture of what has or is happening can be understood

D1: Extent of Maltreatment D2: Surrounding Circumstances D3: Child Functioning D4: Adult Functioning D5: General Parenting Practices D6: Disciplinary Practices Five essential criteria: 2. Is relevant to the domain only

Five essential criteria: 3. Is pertinent to gaining a full understanding of the domain

D O T E C T I V E D A N G E R VULNERABLEVULNERABLE C H I P PACPAC TYTY THTH EATSEATS U N S A F SAFSAF Five essential criteria: 4. Is adequate… enough information to have confidence about conclusions we reach C

Five essential criteria: 5. Covers the principal or core issues associated with the domain

Information collection with the child victim Other siblings Non- abusing parent Alleged perpetrator

Reconciling & Validating D1: Extent of Maltreatment D2: Surrounding Circumstances D3: Child Functioning D4: Adult Functioning D5: General Parenting Practices D6: Discipline or Behavior Management KNOW THE FAMILY

Present or impending danger threats Child vulnerability Caregiver protective capacity = Safe or Unsafe +/-

DANGER THREAT? 1. Immediacy2. Severity 3. Out of Control4. Vulnerable Child5. Observable

Immediacy WITHOUT DELAY OCCURRING IN NEAR FUTURE

Immediacy Severity SERIOUS INJURY DEBILITATING PHYSICAL HEALTH SIGNIFICANT IMPAIRMENT/ACUTE SUFFERING TERRORIZING/LIFE THREATENING

Severity Out of Control Immediacy NOT SUBJECT TO INTERNAL INFLUENCE UNRESTRAINED/UNMANAGED WITHOUT LIMITS

Out of Control Severity Vulnerability Immediacy DEPENDENT ON OTHERS FOR PROTECTION INDIVIDUAL CHILD FACTORS (AGE, PHYSICAL ABILITY, COGNITIVE ABILITY, DEVELOPMENTAL STATUS AND MORE...) ALL CHILDREN IN HOME

Vulnerability Out of Control Severity Immediacy Observable CAN BE SEEN AND DESCRIBED HAS BEEN OBSERVED BY FAMILY AND OTHERS PERSONAL OBSERVATIONS FEELINGS OR PERCEPTIONS EVIDENCED BY SPECIFIC BEHAVIORS, SITUATIONS OR VERBAL STATEMENTS

 Critical thinking  Five criteria for evaluating information sufficiency  Importance and process of reconciling and validating information  Safety threshold criteria

a. Information that gives us a full picture b. Is relevant to the particular information domain c. Is pertinent to the information domain d. Is adequate and gives us confidence about conclusions e. All of the above

a. Information that gives us a full picture b. Is relevant to the particular information domain c. Is pertinent to the information domain d. Is adequate and gives us confidence about conclusions e. ALL OF THE ABOVE The correct answer is (e) all of the above. Information sufficiency is dependent upon these four standards and a fifth one – being able to describe principal or core issues associated with each domain - being met which ensures you that you have all the necessary information you need to make the appropriate safety decision.

a. Other children in the home, victim, non-abusing parent, alleged perpetrator b. Alleged perpetrator, victim, other children in the home, non- abusing parent c. Victim, other children in the home, non-abusing parent, alleged perpetrator d. Victim, non-abusing parent, other children in the home, alleged perpetrator

a. Other children in the home, victim, non-abusing parent, alleged perpetrator b. Alleged perpetrator, victim, other children in the home, non- abusing parent c. VICTIM, OTHER CHILDREN IN THE HOME, NON-ABUSING PARENT, ALLEGED PERPETRATOR d. Victim, non-abusing parent, other children in the home, alleged perpetrator The correct answer is (c). Because of a combination of factors - safety concerns, children generally being more open and honest, or at least easier to recognize when they are being deceptive, we almost always interview all children in the home prior to the adults. And, the last adult we want to interview is the alleged perpetrator so we can be as prepared as we can with the most information available to us at the time of that interview.

a. Quoting exactly what the parents said b. Knowing only what maltreatment occurred c. Determining the evidence that is necessary for prosecution d. Settling or resolving differences in information in order to have a true understanding of each information domain e. None of the above

a. Quoting exactly what the parents said b. Knowing only what maltreatment occurred c. Determining the evidence that is necessary for prosecution d. SETTLING OR RESOLVING DIFFERENCES IN INFORMATION IN ORDER TO HAVE A TRUE UNDERSTANDING OF EACH INFORMATION DOMAIN e. None of the above The correct answer is (d): settling or resolving differences in information in order to have a true understanding of each information domain. Remember, the foundation for all quality decision making is the accuracy of the information upon which the decision is based so it is essential for you to resolve all critical discrepancies in what has occurred regarding the maltreatment and in what you know about the family in terms of their day to day functioning which reveals impending danger.

a. Immediate b. Potentially Severe c. Out Of Control d. Protective Capacity e. Observable

a. Immediate b. Potentially Severe c. Out Of Control d. PROTECTIVE CAPACITY e. Observable The correct answer is (d) protective capacity. The other four choices, along with vulnerable child, are the five safety threshold criteria. Protective capacity, on the other hand, has to do with an adult caregiver’s ability to protect a child from an identified danger threat in the household in which the caregiver and child reside. It is a key component in the determination of safe or unsafe but is not one of the safety threshold criteria in identifying whether a present or impending danger threat exists or not.

a. True b. False

a. True b. FALSE The correct answer is (b) false. In terms of the safety threshold criteria “observable” simply means someone in the family or any second party observer, neighbor, teacher, or any collateral contact has personally seen the action, behavior or circumstance being described. Skilled investigators and case managers try to validate this information from another source whenever possible.

Module Three: Critical Thinking in Safety Decision Making Congratulations!

1. Log into FSFN. 2. Click Create > Worker Training > Individual Training Plan. 3. Click Search within the Assigned Training in Progress group box. 4. Enter E-Learning 3: Critical Thinking (or simply enter “E“ followed by *) and then click search. 5. Click Select next to the course when it appears. 6. Click Continue at the bottom of the page. 7. When the selected course title is displayed on your Individual Worker screen, indicate that the status is “Completed” and record the completion date. 8. Click Save. To receive credit for this course, you will need to: This should then be displayed in your “Individual Training History”.