Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Refining the Program Intervention Based on Research.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
REGIONAL CONFERENCES Planning, Doing, and Using Evaluation.
Advertisements

Implementing NICE guidance
M & E for K to 12 BEP in Schools
Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
What You Will Learn From These Sessions
Training Objectives.
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Program Evaluation. Lecture Overview  Program evaluation and program development  Logic of program evaluation (Program theory)  Four-Step Model  Comprehensive.
1 Theory of Change Chesapeake Bay Funders Network Program Evaluation Training Workshop OMG Center for Collaborative Learning January 9-10, 2008.
Action Logic Modelling Logic Models communicate a vision for an intervention as a solution to a public health nutrition (PHN) problem to:  funding agencies,
Developing a Logic Model
Environmental Scans and Needs Assessments. Navigating Platforms Google and open web – “Environmental Scan” “Environmental scan and program planning”
Molly Chamberlin, Ph.D. Indiana Youth Institute
How to Develop the Right Research Questions for Program Evaluation
National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:3 Inform, Educate, and Empower People about Health Issues.
FORMATIVE EVALUATION Intermediate Injury Prevention Course August 23-26, 2011, Billings, MT.
Creating a service Idea. Creating a service Networking / consultation Identify the need Find funding Create a project plan Business Plan.
Edward M. Haugh Jr. ESC Consultant. III. Recommendations for Applying Outcomes Planning to ESC  I. Introduction to Outcomes Planning II. A Sample ESC.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
Leaving No One Behind Communicating with Special Populations During Public Health Emergencies Doris Y. Estremera, MPH, CHES San Mateo County Health Department.
Understanding Project Management. Project attributes  The project has a purpose  Project has a life cycle like an organic entity  Project has clearly.
Qualitative Evaluation of Keep Well Lanarkshire Alan Sinclair Keep Well Evaluation Officer NHS Lanarkshire.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Using the Evaluation System to Answer Key Questions About Your Initiative.
Program Evaluation and Logic Models
Preparing for the Main Event Using Logic Models as a Tool for Collaboratives Brenda M. Joly Leslie M. Beitsch August 6, 2008.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Planning, Doing, Reviewing. To provide quality and professional services through training and technical assistance to its customers, thereby producing.
PRECEDE/PROCEED.
Welcome! Please join us via teleconference: Phone: Code:
TeamSTEPPS Implementation Guide. T EAM STEPPS 05.2 Page 2 Implementation Guide Shift Toward a Culture of Safety.
Workshop 6 - How do you measure Outcomes?
Guidance on communication with respect to safe drinking water and household hygiene World Health Organisation Alison Parker Cranfield University All photographs.
INEE MS Contextualization Juba, South Sudan 6-9 March, 2012.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Identifying and Analyzing Stakeholders and Their Interests.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Health Impact Assessment.
CONDUCTING A PUBLIC OUTREACH CAMPAIGN IMPLEMENTING LEAPS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: TRAINERS’ HANDBOOK Conducting a Public Outreach Campaign.
Community Plan Implementation Training 5-1 Community Plan Implementation Training 5-1.
 The underrepresentation of diverse populations in research an important barrier to: ◦ Understanding differences between groups ◦ Developing culturally.
1 Nemours Health Planning and Evaluation Collaborative Learning Session I: Designing Effective Health Programs.
Strategic Plan Review Drawing a Picture & Sharing a Story.
OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES OF CONDUCTING RESEARCH IN LARGE SCALE PROGRAMS Presented by: Deanna Olney and Jef Leroy, IFPRI.
Information Sharing Children and Adult Services. Adult Services Health – NHS Mental Health - Support Services Adult Social Services The National Probation.
The P Process Strategic Design
Context Evaluation knowing the setting Context Evaluation knowing the setting.
Public Health Dorset Presents Rhonda Halling, May 2015.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Using the Evaluation System to Answer Key Questions About Your Initiative.
PRECEDE/PROCEED.
Background, Philosophical Basis and Principles of Behavior.
The International Conservation Volunteers Alliance Accreditation Program Conservation Volunteers Alliance >The first world organisation established to.
@theEIFoundation | eif.org.uk Early Intervention to prevent gang and youth violence: ‘Maturity Matrix’ Early intervention (‘EI’) is about getting extra.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas The Strategic Prevention Framework.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center 1 Putting Advocacy Plans into Practice.
 2007 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Section B Logic Models: The Pathway Model.
CHAPTER 16 Preparing Effective Proposals. PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS  Conducting a Preliminary Assessment  Prior to Writing the Proposal  How Fundable.
Session 7: Planning for Evaluation. Session Overview Key definitions:  monitoring  evaluation Process monitoring and process evaluation Outcome monitoring.
TeamSTEPPS for Office-Based Care Implementation Planning.
Promoting physical activity for children and young people Schools and colleges Implementing NICE guidance 2009 NICE public health guidance 17.
Assessment/Evaluation Make evaluation a central part of planning – not an afterthought 1) Determine Needs 2) Determine Desired Outcomes 3) Determine Activities.
Program Planning for Evidence-based Health Programs.
Evaluation Planning Checklist (1 of 2) Planning Checklist Planning is a crucial part of the evaluation process. The following checklist (based on the original.
Introduction Social ecological approach to behavior change
Supported by: Student Hubs is a registered charity in England and Wales, number Impact Measurement Proving and Improving your Social Impact.
How to show your social value – reporting outcomes & impact
Incorporating Evaluation into a Clinical Project
HEALTH IN POLICIES TRAINING
Looking at your program data
SUCCESSFUL MEASURING JAMES HARDIN, DIRECTOR, HEALTH IMPACT
The Strategic Prevention Framework
Creating Health Communication Campaign
Presentation transcript:

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Refining the Program Intervention Based on Research

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas What do we mean by refining the intervention? Refining the intervention refers to the process of making your work more effective by using the results of your evaluation to adjust and improve the initiative Key questions you should consider: – What are we seeing? – What does it mean? – What are the implications for improvement?

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Why should you use your evaluation research to refine the intervention? The primary purpose of evaluation is to ensure that your intervention is having the intended effect, and make adjustments if something is not working

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas When should you refine the intervention? Regularly throughout the life of an intervention Once a year is typical There are other specific times when an evaluation may be especially helpful When it’s clear that what you’re doing isn’t working When participants are dropping out at a high rate Between sessions a time-limited or sequential program When funders or participants ask you to adjust some aspect of your program When funding or other resources are reduced When the goal or issue changes

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Who should be involved in refining the intervention? Participants Staff members People who are directly or indirectly involved in supporting the work This might include educators, government officials, health professionals, employers, funders, etc. Since their contribution is needed to make changes successful, it is important that they have input into the planning of those changes Those who led and participated in the evaluation

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Evaluating an initiative should look at three main areas: Process Impact Outcomes Each aspect of the intervention builds on what comes before. In order to have the impact you want, you have to put together and run your program well (process). If your process didn’t go properly, then you haven’t really conducted the program you planned for. How do you refine an intervention based on research?

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas How do you refine an intervention based on research? Process An evaluation of your process compares what you planned to do with what you actually did Process encompasses logistics and program implementation Community participation Community assessment Program planning Staff hiring and/or volunteer recruitment Staff and/or volunteer training Outreach to and recruitment of potential participants Implementation strategy Evaluation strategy Timelines and benchmarks

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Impact The impact is the effect it had on the environmental conditions, events, or behaviors that it aimed to change Generally, a program aims only to influence one or more particular behaviors or conditions – risk or protective factors An evaluation of the risk and protective factors you targeted, will tell you if you made the desired impact How do you refine an intervention based on research?

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas How do you refine an intervention based on research? Outcomes The outcomes of a program are the changes that actually took place because of it The goal of an intervention is usually not just a change in behavior (risk/protective factors), but the changes in community health that occur as a result of that change For instance, the impact of a tobacco control program is that people stop smoking. However, the intended outcomes are reduced rates of heart disease, lung cancer, and other smoking-related diseases in the population If your intervention is having the desired outcome, you should still strive to make the intervention better and more effective Ask yourself if there are additional risk and protective factors you could target, or areas of the program that could be expanded or strengthened?

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Outcomes If your intervention did not result in the outcomes you intended, consider what you might need to change Are there risk and protective factors that would be more relevant? Are there better ways to communicate your program’s message? Were there parts of the program that worked less effectively than others? Were there problems in how the program was delivered? Was it too formal? Were there unaddressed language barriers? Was the program culturally and contextually adapted for your situation? In evaluating the results of the program, it helps to work backwards to determine where the intervention went off track, starting with outcomes and working back to process to determine what area of the intervention needs to be adjusted for better results How do you refine an intervention based on research?