The Council’s Regional Portfolio Model Michael Schilmoeller for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council Generation Resource Advisory Committee Thursday,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
System Analysis Advisory Committee Futures, Monte Carlo Simulation, and CB Assumption Cells Michael Schilmoeller Tuesday, September 27, 2011.
Advertisements

Winter 2013/2014 Reliability Solution Including LNG MWHs N. Jonathan Peress Conservation Law Foundation Greg Lander Skipping Stone NEPOOL Markets & Reliability.
ENERGY VALUE. Summary  Operational Value is a primary component in the Net Market Value (NMV) calculation used to rank competing resources in the RPS.
Will CO2 Change What We Do?
Lisa Grow Vice President, Delivery Engineering & Operations Our Energy Future.
Technical Conference Avoided Cost Modeling January 6, 2015.
1 John J. Conti Acting Director Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting Prepared for the Energy Technology System Analysis Program (ETSAP) Florence,
Designing a Risk Model Michael Schilmoeller Thursday, December 2, 2010 SAAC.
Capacity Valuation.
Tenth Annual Midwest Energy Conference March 7, 2007 How Best Satisfy Midwest Electric Load Growth? Thomas R. Casten Chairman Recycled Energy Development.
1.  Purpose  To present Staff’s Preliminary Findings on the 2012 Integrated Resource Plans of:  APS – Arizona Public Service Company  TEP – Tucson.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Effects of Alternative Scenarios on Sixth Power Plan Northwest Power and Conservation Council Whitefish, MT June.
The Cost-Effectiveness Premium for Conservation Michael Schilmoeller Thursday May 19, 2011 SAAC.
Reinsurance Presentation Example 2003 CAS Research Working Party: Executive Level Decision Making using DFA Raju Bohra, FCAS, ARe.
INTEGRATION COST. Integration Cost in RPS Calculator While “Integration Cost” is included in NMV formulation, the Commission stated that the Integration.
Chapter 14 Risk and Uncertainty Managerial Economics: Economic Tools for Today’s Decision Makers, 4/e By Paul Keat and Philip Young.
Preliminary Analysis of the SEE Future Infrastructure Development Plan and REM Benefits.
EE 369 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
CHEAPER AND CLEANER: Using the Clean Air Act to Sharply Reduce Carbon Pollution from Existing Power Plants, Delivering Health, Environmental and Economic.
Utah Schedule 37 Update June 25, Schedule 37 Background Schedule 37 – Published rates for standard power purchase agreements with qualifying facilities.
National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future * NREL July 5, 2011 Tradeoffs and Synergies between CSP and PV at High Grid Penetration.
SAAC Review Michael Schilmoeller Thursday May 19, 2011 SAAC.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council 6 th Plan Conservation Resource Supply Curve Workshop on Data & Assumption Overview of Council Resource Analysis.
1 Systems Analysis Advisory Committee (SAAC) Tuesday February 10, 2004 Michael Schilmoeller John Fazio.
1 Regional Portfolio Model and Direct Use of Gas Assessment Michael Schilmoeller NW Power and Conservation Council for the Regional Technical Forum Tuesday,
KEC Electricity Committee, March 12, 2008 Benefit Cost Study of the Governor’s 2015 Wind Challenge: 1,000 MW by 2015 Bob Glass KCC Utilities Division,
1 Systems Analysis Advisory Committee (SAAC) Tuesday, April 29, 2003 Michael Schilmoeller John Fazio.
SAAC Review Michael Schilmoeller Tuesday February 2, 2011 SAAC.
Climate Change and The NW Power Supply Climate Impacts on the Pacific Northwest University of Washington April 21, 2009.
Net Metering Technical Conference Docket No PacifiCorp Avoided Costs October 21, 2008 Presented by Becky Wilson Executive Staff Director Utah.
Discussion of Resource Plans Michael Schilmoeller for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council Wednesday, June 10, 2009.
Colombian Firm Energy Market: Discussion and Simulation Peter Cramton (joint with Steven Stoft and Jeffrey West) 9 August 2006.
10/4/20021 Systems Analysis Advisory Committee (SAAC) Friday, October 4, 2002 Michael Schilmoeller John Fazio.
The Primary Sources of Risk and a New Metric Michael Schilmoeller Thursday May 19, 2011 SAAC.
Preliminary Results with the Regional Portfolio Model Michael Schilmoeller for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council Generation Resource Advisory.
Power System Economics Daniel Kirschen. Money © 2012 D. Kirschen & University of Washington1.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Draft Wholesale Power Price Forecasts Maury Galbraith Northwest Power and Conservation Council Generating.
The Council’s Approach to Economic Risk Michael Schilmoeller Northwest Power and Conservation Council for the Resource Adequacy Technical Committee September.
ERCOT Planning WMS 10/20/2010 Target Reserve Margin and Effective Load Carrying Capability of Installed Wind Capacity for the ERCOT System – Methodology.
1 Introduction to the Regional Portfolio Model Michael Schilmoeller NW Power and Conservation Council Thursday, June 10, 2010.
1 Systems Analysis Advisory Committee (SAAC) Thursday, December 19, 2002 Michael Schilmoeller John Fazio.
How the RPM Meets the Requirements for a Risk Model Michael Schilmoeller Tuesday, February 2, 2011 SAAC.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council A Look At The Council’s Conservation Planning Methodology and Assumptions A Look At The Council’s Conservation.
1 Systems Analysis Advisory Committee (SAAC) Friday March 19, 2004 Michael Schilmoeller John Fazio.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Overview of Draft Sixth Power Plan Council Meeting Whitefish, MT June 9-11, 2009.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council The Northwest Forecast – Energy Efficiency Dominates Resource Development Tom Eckman Manager, Conservation Resources.
Winter Power Supply Adequacy/Reliability Analysis Power Committee Briefing October 17, 2001.
Uncertainty in the Regional Portfolio Model Michael Schilmoeller for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council Generation Resource Advisory Committee.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council The Role of Energy Efficiency in Could (and Should) Play in Montana’s Future Insights from the 5 th Northwest.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council The Role of Energy Efficiency in the Northwest Power and Conservation Plan Tom Eckman Manager, Conservation Resources.
1 Proposed Input Assumptions to RTF Cost-Effectiveness Determinations February 2, 2010.
1 Domestic Heating Fuel Choice Study (aka The Direct Use of Gas) Michael Schilmoeller NW Power and Conservation Council web presentation for the web presentation.
The Impact of Intermittent Renewable Energy Sources on Wholesale Electricity Prices Prof. Dr. Felix Müsgens, Thomas Möbius USAEE-Conference Pittsburgh,
Resource Analysis. Objectives of Resource Assessment Discussion The subject of the second part of the analysis is to dig more deeply into some of the.
Slide 1 Overview of Conservation in the Pacific Northwest Energy Efficiency Options in the Northwest Post-2011Meeting March 4, 2008.
Pasadena Water & Power Integrated Resource Planning “IRP” April 18, 2016 Leesa Nayudu, Resource Planning Manager.
Defining LOLP Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Subcommittee Meeting November 14, 2008.
Steering Committee Meeting March 9, Why talk about assumptions? Garbage in, garbage out! “Let’s go dumpster diving!” Results sensitive to key.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Draft Wholesale Power Price Forecasts Maury Galbraith Generating Resource Advisory Committee Meeting.
Diversification of Energy Power Plants in the North of Chile Matías Raby.
1 Portfolio Analysis Update Power Committee Discussion August 30, 2004.
Estimating the resource adequacy value of demand response in the German electricity market Hamid Aghaie Research Scientist in Energy Economics, AIT Austrian.
Challenges, Issues, and Future Direction of the SAAC
GENESYS Redevelopment Strawman Proposal
Demand Response in the 7th Power Plan
Planning Tools Overview
Key Findings and Resource Strategy
Planning Tools Overview
Wholesale Electricity Costs
Presentation transcript:

The Council’s Regional Portfolio Model Michael Schilmoeller for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council Generation Resource Advisory Committee Thursday, September 25, 2008

2 Overview  Planning Principles  Selection of Resource Plans  Key techniques  Model operation

3 Different Kind of Risk Modeling  Imperfect foresight and use of decision criteria for capacity additions  Adaptive plans that respond to futures  Primarily options to construction power plants or to take other action  May include policies for particular resources  “Scenario analysis on steroids”  750 futures, strategic uncertainty  Frequency that corresponds to likelihood Planning Principles

4 Sources of Uncertainty  Fifth Power Plan  Load requirements  Gas price  Hydrogeneration  Electricity price  Forced outage rates  Aluminum price  Carbon allowance cost  Production tax credits  Renewable Energy Credit (Green tag value)  Sixth Power Plan  All of those to the left, except, perhaps, aluminum price  Power plant construction costs  Technology availability  Conservation costs Planning Principles

5 Most Elements of the Resource Plan Are Options To Construct 1071 Additions in Megawatts Beginning of year CCCT , SCCT Coal0.00 Demand Response , , , , , Wind_Capacity , , , , IGCC Conservation cost- effectiveness premium over market avg New Conservation Planning Principles

6 Why Use a Schedule of Construction Options for a Resource Plan?  More realistic!  Necessary for capturing construction risk  Consistent with earlier Council Plans Planning Principles

7 Operating Costs Model Overview

8 Spinner Graphs  Illustrates “scenario analysis on steroids,” one plan, across all futures  Link to Excel Spinner Graph ModelExcel Spinner Graph Model Model Overview

9 Overview  Planning Principles  Selection of Resource Plans  Key techniques  Model operation

10 Risk and Expected Cost Associated With A Plan Likelihood (Probability) Avg Cost Power Cost (NPV 2004 $M)-> Risk = average of costs> 90% threshold Selection of Resource Plans

11 Feasibility Space Increasing Risk Increasing Cost Selection of Resource Plans

12 Space of feasible solutions Feasibility Space Increasing Risk Increasing Cost Efficient Frontier Selection of Resource Plans

13 A B C D Efficient Frontier Selection of Resource Plans

14 Risk: Importance of Multiple Perspectives  Standard deviation  VaR90  90th decile  Loss of load probability (LOLP)  Resource - load balance  Incremental cost variation  Average power cost variation (rate impact)  Maximum incremental cost increase  Exposure to wholesale market prices  Imports and exports Selection of Resource Plans

15 Resource Plan Selection  Trade-off between economic cost and risk  Rate impacts and volatility  Exposure to market prices  Non-economic costs and risks, including associated carbon emissions  Meeting reliability standards  Difficulties with changing the resource plan Selection of Resource Plans

16 How Do We Interpret and Use a Schedule of Construction Options?  As a ceiling for what should be sited and licensed  To develop signposts for re- evaluation Siting and Licensing Early Construction Committed Construction In Service Selection of Resource Plans

17 Overview  Planning Principles  Selection of Resource Plans  Key techniques  Resource construction flexibility  Valuation calculation  Thermal resource dispatch  Decision criteria  Supply curves for conservation and price- responsive hydro  Model operation

18 Power Resource Risks Costs and Considerations  Commercial Availability Risk  Construction Risk  Responding fast enough to capture value  Sunk siting and permitting costs  Construction materials cost  Mothball and cancellation costs  Operation Risk  Fuel, maintenance, and labor costs  Retirement Risk  Carrying the forward-going fixed cost of an unused plant  Undervaluing and retiring a plant that may have value in the future Resource construction flexibility

19 The Construction Cycle  After an initial planning period, there typically large expenditures, such as for turbines or boilers, that mark decision points. Cash expenditures 18 months 9 months Resource construction flexibility

20 Construction Optionality Capacity Planning Construction Committed construction In service time Delay Resource construction flexibility

21 New Fixed Cost Capabilities Resource construction flexibility

22 New Fixed Cost Capabilities Resource construction flexibility

23 New Fixed Cost Capabilities  We will work our way through a pdf file that illustrates the logic Visio-Logic_v pdf Visio-Logic_v pdf Resource construction flexibility

24 Overview  Planning Principles  Selection of Resource Plans  Key techniques  Resource construction flexibility  Valuation calculation  Thermal resource dispatch  Decision criteria  Supply curves for conservation and price- responsive hydro  Model operation

25 Computation Valuation calculation

26 Traditional Costing Valuation calculation Hourly variable cost calculation:

27 “Valuation” Costing Valuation calculation Complications arise when we use extended time periods price Loads (solid) & resources (grayed)

28 “Valuation” Costing Valuation calculation Average loads and resources are the same, but in the first case, our system has net cost and in the second it has net benefit.

29 “Valuation” Costing Valuation calculation N*(N+1)/2 correlations (upper triangular matrix)

30 “Valuation” Costing Valuation calculation

31 “Valuation” Costing Valuation calculation Only correlations are now those with the market

32 Overview  Planning Principles  Selection of Resource Plans  Key techniques  Resource construction flexibility  Valuation calculation  Thermal resource dispatch  Decision criteria  Supply curves for conservation and price- responsive hydro  Model operation

33 Dispatchable Resources Thermal resource dispatch

34 Gross Value of Resources Thermal resource dispatch

35 Gross Value of Resources Thermal resource dispatch

36 Gross Value of Resources Using Statistical Parameters of Distributions Thermal resource dispatch Assumes prices are lognormally distributed

37 Estimating Energy Generation Thermal resource dispatch

38 Estimating Energy Generation Thermal resource dispatch

39 Estimating Energy Generation Thermal resource dispatch Applied to equation (4), this gives us a closed-form evaluation of the capacity factor and energy.

40 Overview  Planning Principles  Selection of Resource Plans  Key techniques  Resource construction flexibility  Valuation calculation  Thermal resource dispatch  Decision criteria  Supply curves for conservation and price- responsive hydro  Model operation

41 Example of Decision Criterion for Construction: CCCT and SCCT  Projected economic value, from the construction, fixed, and variable costs and values from simulated forward curves:  the electricity forward price is an average of flat electricity prices over the preceding 18-months  the natural gas forward price is also such an 18- month average  Project the energy adequacy at the end of the construction cycle. If the system would otherwise be inadequate, build this unit if it is the least cost among the options available. Decision criteria

42 Logic Flow for Decisions no Does the resource pay for itself? yes Go Stop Is the resource least cost of alternatives? yes Is forecast requirement on or before the earliest on-line date? no Decision criteria

43 Decision Criteria For Construction time criterion On-Line! construction phase optional cancellation period evaluation phase time criterion On-Line! Decision criteria

44 Example of Decision Criterion for Retirement  Forecast the value of the unit using the forward-going fixed cost only (fixed fuel transportation and salaries)  Mothball (de-staff, sell fixed fuel contracts) after pre-specified number of periods  Permanently decommission (convert the site to other purposes) if the plant remains in mothball status for some period Decision criteria

45 Overview  Planning Principles  Selection of Resource Plans  Key techniques  Resource construction flexibility  Valuation calculation  Thermal resource dispatch  Decision criteria  Supply curves for conservation and price- responsive hydro  Model operation

46 Supply Curves Supply curves

47 Supply Curves Supply curves

48 Conservation Supply Curve δ Supply curves

49 Components of Cost Reduction Additional conservation at $50/MWh Total System Costs SCCT deferral Reduced market prices Supply curves

50 Price-takers Still See Benefits Additional conservation at $50/MWh Total System Costs SCCT deferral Supply curves

51 SCCT Deferral  Why does conservation defer single cycle combustion turbines?  Low-capital cost resources are the traditional solution for risk management  SCCT have low capital cost  Conservation has high capital cost  Under what conditions does conservation hold an advantage over SCCTs? Supply curves

52 SCCT Deferral Supply curves

53 Price Responsive Hydro Supply curves

54 Price Responsive Hydro: Gross Value Supply curves

55 Price Responsive Hydro: Net Value or Cost Supply curves At right, value associated with use of hydro to meet higher market price. At left, value to return hydro using purchased market power at lower price.

56 Supply Curves Supply curves Supply curve representations also include constraints on utilization rate and on upper and lower prices.

57 Conventional Hydro  User-defined lookup function, with a random draw from 50 hydro years each simulation year  Derived from Genesys BPAREGU.OUT file and 2000 Bi-Op and includes independents and the three non-PNCA Idaho hydro units  Estimates of east-side and west-side generation by month, by hydro condition  Estimates of on- and off-peak generation (6x16 definition) Not! Supply curves

58 Overview  Planning Principles  Selection of Resource Plans  Key techniques  Model operation  Equilibrium search  Order of calculations

59 Energy Balance  First Law of Thermodynamics: In a closed system, energy may not be created or destroyed.  generation = loads – imports (+exports)  We assure balance by controlling generation through electricity price. The model finds a suitable price by iteration. Model operation

60 Equilibrium search Model operation

61 Computation Model operation

62 End

63 Predictors  Demand Response and Wind: identical logic for fixed and variable costs for the unit, except  the size of the plant is 1MW,  the electricity price is an period average of flat electricity prices Decision criteria

64 Predictors  Coal: identical logic for fixed and variable costs for the unit, except  the size of the plant is 1MW,  the electricity price is an period average of flat electricity prices  There was no variation or uncertainty in coal prices Decision criteria

65 Predictors  Conservation  Discretionary  Annual, energy-weighted average of year before last’s flat electricity price (lagged for budgeting)  Optional premium over market  Lost Opportunity  Energy-weighted average of last five year’s electricity prices  Ratchets upward to reflect represents such things as market transformation and the implementation of codes and standards  Optional premium over market Decision criteria