Annual Report. Submission of UCEDD Annual Report DD Act: required each center to submit annual report to the Secretary (ADD) DD Act: required each center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How to Request Technical Assistance Sera Morgan Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services Administration HIV/AIDS Bureau Division.
Advertisements

Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
This project is financed, in part, by a DHHS grant from the Office of Community Services. © Community Action Association of Pennsylvania Introduction.
P e r f o r m a n c e Measuring Results of Organizational Performance Lesson 1 Strategic Planning/ Performance Management Abstract.
1 Program Performance and Evaluation: Policymaker Expectations 2009 International Education Programs Service Technical Assistance Workshop Eleanor Briscoe.
Reporting Results for Pesticide Programs Robin Powell, EM Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe Environmental Department.
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
Center for Health Care Quality Licensing & Certification Program Evaluation 1 August 2014 rev.
Accreditation Engaging in Continuous Improvement.
Legal & Administrative Oversight of NGOs Establishing and Monitoring Performance Standards.
Grants Business Process Re-Engineering (BPR) Overview
Developing Earmark Grant Performance Measures: Grant Proposal Section 3 Deanna Khemani.
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
1 Fiscal Year 2012 UCEDD Grant Applications Suad Jama, Program Specialist Administration on Developmental Disabilities Administration for Children and.
MODULE II 1 How are UCEDDs Connected?. Topics of Presentation 1. Administration on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AIDD) 2. Association of.
Mathematics/Science Partnerships U.S. Department of Education: New Program Grantees.
Center for Community Inclusion & Disability Studies Community Advisory Committee Brief Orientation October 31, 2013.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
State Plan Template: Part E 5 YEAR GOALS, OBJECTIVES, EXPECTED OUTCOMES 5-YEAR LOGIC MODEL ANNUAL WORK PLAN.
1 National Healthy Start Association, Inc. Prepared for Secretary Advisory Committee on Infant Mortality January 2008 Historical Overview of the Healthy.
Erica Cummings Grant Coordinator 1.  The New Mexico Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (DHSEM) is responsible for:  Monitoring.
1 The Basics: UCEDDs and the CPAC Orientation. 2 Acronyms The five most common acronyms in this slideshow are: DD Act: Developmental Disabilities Assistance.
Committee of Practitioners ESEA Flexibility Waiver Review June 25, 2014.
Fiscal Year 2008 UCEDD Grant Applications Jennifer Johnson, Ed.D. Administration on Developmental Disabilities Administration for Children and Families.
ADD Perspectives on Accountability Where are We Now and What does the Future Hold? Jennifer G. Johnson, Ed.D.
Overview of Statewide AT Program Management. This PowerPoint will allow you to… Describe the State Plan and how it works Describe the basic requirements.
1 MODULE III Orientation to the UCEDD. 2 Introductions Name Part of state you are from Experience with disability Parent? Self-Advocate? Provider?
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Participation of the State Advisory Panel and State Interagency.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
The Life of a Policy Council Member
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
©2007 Dr. Karl Squier 1 The RISCA Toolkits Approach to Implementing Comprehensive School Counseling Programs.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov 2009 NASCSP Annual Conference Weatherization Assistance Program: The Federal Perspective September 16, 2009.
Integrating Administrative Records into the Federal Statistical System 2.0 Shelly Wilkie Martinez Statistical and Science Policy U. S. Office of Management.
Knowing What ¢ount$: Connecting Performance to the Budget
AUCD’s TA Contract with ADD ADD TA Institute May 31, 2007 Update.
Office of Performance Review (OPR) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Stephen Dorage.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
PATH Reporting and the Government Performance Results Act (GPRA) James McNemar, Data Specialist Rachael Kenney, Deputy Project Director PATH Technical.
1 MODULE III Orientation to the UCEDD. 2 Topics of Presentation 1. Orientation to the UCEDD 2. Themes of the DD Act 3. Core Functions 4. Areas of Emphasis.
1 MODULE II How are UCEDDs Connected?. 2 Topics of Presentation 1. Administration on Developmental Disabilities (ADD) 2. Association of University Centers.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Policy 2320: A Process for Improving Education: Performance- Based Accreditation System RESA 6 – October, 2014 Office.
AUCD’s TA Contract with ADD UCEDD Directors Meeting October 30, 2006.
District Accreditation Completing the Standards Assessment Report July 20, 2010.
OSEP Project Directors’ Conference Managing Your Grants 101 Terry Jackson – OSEP Shedeh Hajghassemali – OSEP July 22, 2008.
State Plan for FY and Program Review of Statewide AT Programs Jeremy Buzzell and Robert Groenendaal.
What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation.
Kaplan University - Adjunct Professor Tomicka Seabrooks: February 28, Welcome to Program Evaluation.
Interview Design Four Focal States Connecticut, Indiana, North Carolina, Massachusetts Additional States Arizona, Utah, Washington State Interview Protocol.
Performance Accountability Review Risk-Based Management Kathryn Hornsby Technical College System of Georgia NACTEI May 14, 2009.
OVERVIEW OF FEDERAL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Community-Based Child Abuse Prevention (CBCAP) and Promoting Safe and Stable Families (PSSF) Grantees Meeting.
1 Office of Community Services Division of State Assistance COMMUNITY SERVICES BLOCK GRANT Office of Community Services Division of State Assistance Update.
Delivering Results and Satisfaction: Strategic Planning for Information Professional Leaders and Managers SLA 2016 Annual Conference Donald Malcolm Smith,
UCEDD Program Announcement Jennifer Johnson, Ed.D. Administration on Developmental Disabilities Administration for Children and Families U.S. Department.
Federal budget 101. Federal budget 101 PROCESS AND TIMELINE President’s Budget Request February Congressional Budget Resolution Early spring (passed.
Using Regional Groups to Effect Positive Change in HIV Care
September DEI Project Lead Bi-Monthly Administrative Web Conference
Building Partnerships:  How the Office of Assessment and Accreditation Can Help You and Your Program Be Successful.
Karen Ann Breslow, MA, SELPA Program Coordinator
ADD Updates Jennifer G. Johnson, Ed.D.
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
Sandra Moller, Director
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Future of Public Health in Kansas: Local Pilot
Presentation transcript:

Annual Report

Submission of UCEDD Annual Report DD Act: required each center to submit annual report to the Secretary (ADD) DD Act: required each center to submit annual report to the Secretary (ADD) The UCEDD Annual Report is due to ADD July 30 of each year The UCEDD Annual Report is due to ADD July 30 of each year The Annual Report will be submitted through National Information Reporting System (NIRS) and UCEDDs will use NIRS to collect and maintain data throughout the year The Annual Report will be submitted through National Information Reporting System (NIRS) and UCEDDs will use NIRS to collect and maintain data throughout the year

Annual Report Sections Introduction Introduction Narrative report on goals & results and outcomes Narrative report on goals & results and outcomes Fund leveraged Fund leveraged Results from the measurements of indicators and progress Results from the measurements of indicators and progress a. Measure of improvement and consumer satisfaction b. Measure of collaboration GPRA GPRA

GPRA Government Performance and Results Act

Purpose (1) improve the confidence of the American people in the capability of the Federal Government, by systematically holding Federal agencies accountable for achieving program results; (1) improve the confidence of the American people in the capability of the Federal Government, by systematically holding Federal agencies accountable for achieving program results; (2) initiate program performance reform with a series of pilot projects in setting program goals, measuring program performance against those goals, and reporting publicly on their progress; (2) initiate program performance reform with a series of pilot projects in setting program goals, measuring program performance against those goals, and reporting publicly on their progress; (3) improve Federal program effectiveness and public accountability by promoting a new focus on results, service quality, and customer satisfaction; (3) improve Federal program effectiveness and public accountability by promoting a new focus on results, service quality, and customer satisfaction;

Continue (4) help Federal managers improve service delivery, by requiring that they plan for meeting program objectives and by providing them with information about program results and service quality; (4) help Federal managers improve service delivery, by requiring that they plan for meeting program objectives and by providing them with information about program results and service quality; (5) improve congressional decision-making by providing more objective information on achieving statutory objectives, and on the relative effectiveness and efficiency of Federal programs and spending; and (5) improve congressional decision-making by providing more objective information on achieving statutory objectives, and on the relative effectiveness and efficiency of Federal programs and spending; and (6) improve internal management of the Federal Government. (6) improve internal management of the Federal Government.

Continue Every 2 years ADD submits annual program performance plan and report to the president, congress and the National Council on Disability Every 2 years ADD submits annual program performance plan and report to the president, congress and the National Council on Disability The program performance report also includes indicators of progress The program performance report also includes indicators of progress ADD has established two GPRA measures for the UCEDD program ADD has established two GPRA measures for the UCEDD program

UCEDD GPRA Measures Grantees will report to ADD quantitative data for two Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) measures:- Grantees will report to ADD quantitative data for two Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) measures:- 1. The first GPRA measure for the UCEDD program focuses on impact on individuals with developmental disabilities The second GPRA measure captures information about the outcomes for UCEDD trained professionals The second GPRA measure captures information about the outcomes for UCEDD trained professionals

MTARS Monitoring and Technical Assistance and Review System

What is MTARS MTARS = Monitoring and Technical Assistance Review System MTARS = Monitoring and Technical Assistance Review System ADD established the MTARS to: ADD established the MTARS to: monitor individual grant programs monitor individual grant programs address areas where grantees may benefit from technical assistance address areas where grantees may benefit from technical assistance identify innovative practices that may assist other grantees identify innovative practices that may assist other grantees

Benefits of MTARS To ADD: To ADD: Provides a means to better understanding grant programs Provides a means to better understanding grant programs Provides information to strengthen its position when justifying its programs to Federal oversight agencies. Provides information to strengthen its position when justifying its programs to Federal oversight agencies. Helps with accountability requirements (GPRA and PART) Helps with accountability requirements (GPRA and PART) ADD grantees: ADD grantees: Evaluative Evaluative Learn from reviewers how to become more effective Learn from reviewers how to become more effective Sharing of innovative practices that are highlighted through the MTARS process. Sharing of innovative practices that are highlighted through the MTARS process.

MTARS Activities and Phases In general, the MTARS spans the Federal fiscal year (October 1 – September 30). In general, the MTARS spans the Federal fiscal year (October 1 – September 30). The process is divided into four phases: The process is divided into four phases: Planning Planning Pre-site visit Pre-site visit Site visit Site visit Post-site visit Post-site visit

MTARS Schedule FY 2008 FY 2008 Indiana (Region 5) Indiana (Region 5) Arizona (Region 9) Arizona (Region 9) Rhode Island (Region 1) Rhode Island (Region 1) FY 2009 FY 2009 Puerto Rico (Region 2) Puerto Rico (Region 2) Alaska (Region 10) Alaska (Region 10) Nevada (Region 9) Nevada (Region 9) North Dakota (Region 8) North Dakota (Region 8) FY 2010 FY 2010 South Carolina (Region 4) South Carolina (Region 4) Kentucky (Region 4) Kentucky (Region 4) Connecticut (Region 1) Only UCEDD Connecticut (Region 1) Only UCEDD FY 2011 FY 2011 New York (Region 2) Only P&A New York (Region 2) Only P&A

MTARS Team Larger MTARS Team divided into three Program Teams: Larger MTARS Team divided into three Program Teams: DD Council Program Team DD Council Program Team P&A Program Team P&A Program Team UCEDD Program Team UCEDD Program Team

MTARS Team Generally, the MTARS Team is comprised of the following people: Generally, the MTARS Team is comprised of the following people: ADD Central Office Program Specialist ADD Central Office Program Specialist Peer Reviewer Peer Reviewer Individuals with developmental disabilities/family members Individuals with developmental disabilities/family members Fiscal Reviewer Fiscal Reviewer

MTARS Monitoring Elements Has evolved from a primary focus on mere compliance with the law to one that is more dynamic and takes into consideration the following six elements: Has evolved from a primary focus on mere compliance with the law to one that is more dynamic and takes into consideration the following six elements: Program compliance with the DD Act Program compliance with the DD Act Accountability and achievement of program goals Accountability and achievement of program goals Collaboration with other DD programs within the State Collaboration with other DD programs within the State Fiscal management Fiscal management Technical assistance needs Technical assistance needs Innovative practices Innovative practices

What are the Self-Assessment Checklists? Forms the MTARS teams use to review the DD Council, P&A, and UCEDD Forms the MTARS teams use to review the DD Council, P&A, and UCEDD There are checklists for each program: There are checklists for each program: DD Council DD Council P&A P&A UCEDD UCEDD

What is the Purpose of the Self- assessment Checklists? Communication tool between the Program and the MTARS Team Members

Purpose of the Checklists Communication from MTARS Team to Program: Communication from MTARS Team to Program: What we are reviewing What we are reviewing Who we want to talk to Who we want to talk to What kinds of documents we want to see What kinds of documents we want to see Communication from Program to MTARS Team: Communication from Program to MTARS Team: Evidence of what they are doing Evidence of what they are doing

Purpose of the Checklists Helps to identify technical assistance needs Helps to identify technical assistance needs Issues related to compliance Issues related to compliance Evidence of best or innovative practices Evidence of best or innovative practices

How are the Checklists Organized? There are three checklists for each program: There are three checklists for each program: 1. Program Compliance 2. Program Practices and Operations 3. Best Practices and Innovations

Compliance Taken directly from the DD Act Taken directly from the DD Act Includes citations from the DD Act Includes citations from the DD Act Programs are required to do what is on the compliance checklist Programs are required to do what is on the compliance checklist

Program Practices and Operations Practices that support the operation of the program Practices that support the operation of the program Not required to follow what is in the checklist Not required to follow what is in the checklist Recommendations to program Recommendations to program

Compliance and Program Practices and Operations Checklists Collaboration Organizational Administration Membership/Consumer Advisory Committee Program Administration Evaluation and Reports Fiscal

Best Practices and Innovations This checklist is the same for all programs This checklist is the same for all programs Helps the MTARS team and program identify best practices and innovations Helps the MTARS team and program identify best practices and innovations 6 Elements to identifying best practices and innovations 6 Elements to identifying best practices and innovations

Administrative Accountability Initiatives

Questions?