Objectives: 1.Enhance the data archive for these estuaries with remotely sensed and time-series information 2.Exploit detailed knowledge of ecosystem structure.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Invasive Species as a Trilateral Challenge Preventing the Introduction and Spread of Aquatic Invasives Species in North America Commission for Environmental.
Advertisements

Benthic Assessments One benthic ecologists concerns and suggestions Fred Nichols USGS, retired.
Framework for the Ecological Assessment of Impacted Sediments at Mining Sites in Region 7 By Jason Gunter (R7 Life Scientist) and.
Salt Marsh Restoration Site Selection Tool An Example Application: Ranking Potential Salt Marsh Restoration Sites Using Social and Environmental Factors.
Maines Sustainability Solutions Initiative (SSI) Focuses on research of the coupled dynamics of social- ecological systems (SES) and the translation of.
Integrated State-Federal Partnership for Aquatic Resource Monitoring in the United States Anthony (Tony) R. Olsen USEPA NHEERL Western Ecology Division.
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
International Natural Resource Management (INRM) Changxiao Li, Ph.D. SUMBER: /jpk/data/gjzrzygl/.../e-book/Chapter%2003.ppt‎
Recommendations to Inform Development of a Climate Change Adaptation Strategy for the Lake Watershed Climate Change Adaptation Strategy for the Lake Simcoe.
Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Stephen.
Britta Bierwagen 1, Roxanne Thomas 2, Kathryn Mengerink 2 & Austin Kane 2 1 Global Change Research Program National Center for Environmental Assessment.
What Needs to be Done? Environmental Impacts Carol Turley and Jerry Blackford Plymouth Marine Laboratory, UK CCS R & D Workshop, Royal Academy of Engineering,
Southern California Bight Regional Marine Monitoring Program Ken Schiff
Moving to Horizontal Connections: Design Concept 2 Impacts: 1. What are the critical interactions among resources (and resource management) that will.
1 Issue: Society Depends on Ecosystem Modeling to Predict Threats and Minimize Risk.
NCCOS Centers Center for Coastal Monitoring and Assessment, Silver Spring, MD CCEHBR - Cooperative Oxford Laboratory Branch, Oxford, MD Center for Sponsored.
Integrated Ecosystem Assessment for the Gulf of Mexico Becky Allee Gulf Coast Services Center.
Water Quality Monitoring The Role of the Clean Water Act.
Notice: The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and may not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the United States Environmental.
1/6/2003ESA Ecological Vision Committee Building the scientific foundation for sound environmental decisions U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office.
Wetland Monitoring and Assessment National Water Quality Monitoring Council Meeting August 20, 2003.
Carolinas Integrated Sciences & Assessments (CISA) Work to Support NIDIS July 31 st – August 1 st, 2012 Wilmington, NC.
National Aquatic Resource Surveys National Coastal Condition Assessment – 2010 Sarah Lehmann.
ORD’s Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) Sound Science for Measuring Ecological Condition
Climate Change: SEAFWA Thoughts? Ken Haddad, Executive Director Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission September 2007.
Indicators of Persistent Toxic Substances in the Great Lakes Basin Jon Dettling Great Lakes Commission PBT Reduction Team – Great Lakes Regional Collaboration.
Jan 2005 Kissimmee Basin Projects Jan Kissimmee Basin Projects Kissimmee River Restoration Project (KRR) Kissimmee Chain of Lakes Long Term Management.
Landscape Conservation Cooperatives The Right Science in the Right Places.
Currents of Change Workshop Currents of Change Environmental Status & Trends of the Narragansett Bay Region May 1, 2009.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
1 Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Assessing Historic Properties and Cultural Resources in the Main Hawaiian Islands Dave Ball, MA, RPA Pacific Region.
Changing Focus on Watershed Issues < 1960’s: Water supply and flooding > 1960’s: Land use effects on water quality > 1980’s: Riparian and aquatic ecology.
Coastal development impacts on biological communities in the Chesapeake Bay Examples from the Atlantic Slope Consortium R
Canada’s Ocean Strategy. The Oceans Act In 1997, Canada entrenched its commitment to our oceans by adopting the Oceans Act. In 1997, Canada entrenched.
1 Survey of the Nation’s Lakes Presentation at NALMS’ 25 th Annual International Symposium Nov. 10, 2005.
1 Some Context for NMFS Ecosystem Modeling Ned Cyr NMFS Office of Science and Technology.
COASTAL MARINE SCIENCES (CMARS) WORKSHOP Impact of Land Use on Water Quality and Aquatic Life In Maryland’s Chesapeake and Coastal BaysOVERVIEW Land Use.
The Science Requirements for Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning Dr. Robert B. Gagosian President and CEO Ocean Studies Board November 10, 2009.
Monitoring Principles Stella Swanson, Ph.D.. Principle #1: Know Why We Are Monitoring Four basic reasons to monitor:  Compliance Monitoring: to demonstrate.
International Natural Resource Management (INRM) (III) Changxiao Li, Ph.D.
Benthic Community Assessment Tool Development Ananda Ranasinghe (Ana) Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) Sediment.
Evaluating Fish Response to Habitat Restoration Overview of Intensively Monitored Watershed Research in the PNW Rationale for IMW approach Extent of current.
Assessing Linkages between Nearshore Habitat and Estuarine Fish Communities in the Chesapeake Bay Donna Marie Bilkovic*, Carl H. Hershner, Kirk J. Havens,
Sustaining Lakes in a Changing Environment - SLICE.
Criterion 1: Conservation of Biological Diversity Indicator Refinement: What is the state of Indicator Science? 1. Overview of the Criterion 2. Review.
WATERS Network MISSION STATEMENT: To transform understanding of the Earth’s water and related cycles across spatial and temporal scales to enable forecasting.
Why Does NOAA Need a Climate & Ecosystem Demonstration Project in the California Current System? Capabilities and Drivers La Jolla, CA 6 June, 2005.
Breakout Session IV: Applying Remote Sensing Observations to Impacts Assessment Background (1) The IPCC WG 2 Report (2008) “Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation.
Response of benthic algae communities to nutrient enrichment in agricultural streams: Implications for establishing nutrient criteria R.W. Black 1, P.W.
A Pivotal Moment for Leaders Across the Gulf Coast States and Connected Communities Throughout the Country.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
U S Environmental Protection Agency
The Science Requirements for Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning Dr. Robert B. Gagosian President and CEO September 24, 2009.
Science requirements for implementing EBM Rob Stephenson DFO, St. Andrews Biological Station.
IERM Overview Goals: 1. Development of an integrated, whole-system model for ecological response to water level/flow scenarios 2. Blend ecological research.
A Collaborative Approach to Assessing Watershed Conditions in Coastal National Parks Kristen Keteles, Cliff McCreedy, Jim Tilmant and Mark Flora.
Data and Metadata Archiving: Atlantic Coast Environmental INdicators Consortium (ACE INC) Lexia M. Valdes June 11, 2003 R
Using Satellite Data and Fully Coupled Regional Hydrologic, Ecological and Atmospheric Models to Study Complex Coastal Environmental Processes Funded by.
DELAWARE NATIONAL ESTUARINE RESEARCH RESERVE Promoting stewardship of the nation’s coastal areas through science and education …
New Ecological Science Advice for Ecosystem Protection The EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) Staff Office supports three external scientific advisory committees.
K. Bruce Jones EPA Office of Research and Development U.S. EPA Science Advisory Board Regional Vulnerability Assessment Advisory Panel Meeting October,
Provide impartial information on the health of our ecosystems and environment, the natural hazards that threaten us, the natural resources we rely on,
Scientific Information Management Approaches Needed to Support Global Assessments: The USEPA's Experience and Information Resources Jeffrey B. Frithsen.
Analytical Needs What is Available What is Needed G.P. Patil
Rebecca Tharme Riverfutures Limited – UK
US Environmental Protection Agency
Department of the Interior Northeast Climate Science Center
RT 1 : Ecological Status Research area 1 : Developing and validating new Bioassessment tools gaps for Transitional and Coastal waters (methods, taxonomy)
IBI’s: An Introduction
Water Science meets Policy Brussels 30 September 2010
Presentation transcript:

Objectives: 1.Enhance the data archive for these estuaries with remotely sensed and time-series information 2.Exploit detailed knowledge of ecosystem structure and function to develop candidate indicators 3.Test the ability of these indicators to gauge ecosystem health and detect trends resulting from both natural variability and anthropogenic stresses Our research plan includes the development of: Indicators of microalgal and macrophyte functional groups controlling primary production Indicators capable of determining plankton and fish community structure (organization) and function Biological indicators coupled to physical-chemical and remote sensing assessments of ecosystem function, trophic state and change Indicators to be applied within a national coastal framework by establishing collaborations with other EaGLe Centers and EPA/NSF/NOAA-supported ecological indicator research Plum Island LTER Chesapeake Bay Neuse/ Pamlico North Inlet EPA STAR’s Estuarine and Great Lakes (EaGLe) Coastal Initiative Goal: Develop the next generation of indicators of environmental condition for the US coastlines to help EPA’s Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) meet state needs. Five keys to improving indicators of coastal condition: Link stressors (causes) with responses (effects) Separate multiple stressors, especially anthropogenic from natural perturbations. Great Lakes Environmental Indicators Project GLEI glei.nrri.umn.edu Problem: Eutrophication and hypoxia Objectives: 1. Develop and validate indicators of nutrient and DO impacts on estuarine condition at different biological, spatial and temporal scales 2. Evaluate indicators by conducting highly- coordinated studies in distinct estuarine ecosystems including Pensacola Bay and Mobile Bay Address multiple scales, from small watersheds to large estuaries or biogeographical regions. Provide reference conditions as a benchmark from which to compare future assessments. Integrate indicators into suites suitable for use by agencies and managers. Atlantic Slope Consortium EaGLe Indicator types: Early warning: microbial biofilms and crustacean genes sensitive to hypoxia and/or nutrients Fish reproduction: molecular and morphological responses to DO stress Invertebrate communities: changes in community structure due to hypoxia and nutrients Land use: cause-effect linkages between land use and nutrients/hypoxia Primary production: remote sensing of whole-estuary chlorophyll a using satellite imagery Goal: Develop and test a set of indicators in freshwater and coastal systems that are ecologically appropriate, economically reasonable, and relevant to society Objectives: Develop and test indicators of aquatic resource condition Use environmental, geographic, and stressor data to predict indicator responses at a variety of scales Establish linkages between upstream watersheds and downstream estuaries Deliver a nested suite of indicators to managers Four “messages” from our research: 1.A taxonomic key of indicators can be used to guide managers to the best indicators to use for various situations and questions 2.Land use affects the attainment of estuarine condition downstream 3.Both the amount and spatial arrangement of land uses affect the attainment of stream and wetland condition. 4.Community efficiency in providing quality of life for watershed/estuary residents can be assessed by combining ecological indicators with socio- economic indicators. Goal: Develop indicators of salt marsh condition that can be used to diagnose the significance of specific causes of stress as well as to facilitate restoration and management Pacific Estuarine Ecosystem Indicator Research Consortium Objectives: 1.Identify relevant coastal environmental indicators and their potential stressors within the Great Lakes watershed 2.Establish a large-scale field study to examine relationships between stresses and responses 3.Recommend a suite of hierarchically-structured indicators (spatial, temporal, and biological) that are useful for making informed management decisions Key results: Establishment of a process and method to quantify multiple human disturbance gradients across the whole US Great Lakes basin Development of biological response indicators for nutrients, exotic species and land use Assessment of land use change from 1992 – 2001 for the entire US Great Lakes watershed Public archiving of data: EaGle data will be archived through EPA’s Environmental Information Management System (EIMS) Prototype data archiving system to capture and make publicly available data collected under EPA STAR grants Consortium for Estuarine Ecoindicator Research for the Gulf of Mexico Atlantic Coast Environmental Indicators Consortium Goal: Develop indicators that can effectively, efficiently, and economically measure and monitor the condition of the Great Lakes coast as well as point to causes of impairment USEPA NCER Objectives: 1.Identify an integrated approach to salt marsh management and monitoring that complements the existing ecological risk paradigm used to assess effects of toxic substances 2.Develop an integrated suite of indicators to assess effects of stressors at multiple scales using a large scale field study that evaluates relationships between stresses and response 3.Evaluate the utility of our findings in current management scenarios Key results: Development of an indicator species approach for monitoring effects of contaminants in salt marsh species with tools ranging from molecular techniques to diagnose specific contaminants to population viability assessments that allow managers to weigh the significance of detrimental responses. Development of specific indicators for endocrine disruption effects, nutrient enrichment, bird abundance and diversity, fish condition, shellfish condition, toxic metal bioavailability and mobilization, and marsh plant community change.