Instructional Coaches Academy (ICAD3) 1.  Choose a movie title that describes your school experience and why.  Discuss in your table groups. 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
Advertisements

A Guide to Implementation
Breakfast & Conversation
Seeing Change Through to the Classroom Principal Leadership Academy November 2012.
Quality, Improvement & Effectiveness Unit
Co-Teaching as Best Practice in Student Teaching Conclusion 1.
An Overview of TPGES: The Framework for Teaching Jenny Ray, Facilitator Kentucky Department of Education & NKCES July 26, 2013.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
Benchmark assessment data generated from the Edusoft Assessment Management System is a powerful tool for informing classroom instruction, and ensuring.
Building Team Facilitation Skills Presented by: Mary Jo Meyers M.S.
1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP: CLASSROOM WALKTHROUGHS
Focus Groups for the Health Workforce Retention Study.
TOGETHER EVERYONE ACHIEVES MORE
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
Whose Job Is It? Part Two © Iowa Association of School Boards At the Board Table Discussion Tool.
Introduction to Lesson Study
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
Introduction to Home/School Compacts
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Key Leaders Network “Making Connections” October, 2012 Alabama Best Practices Center.
1 Our Approach to Lesson Study María E. Torres Summer, 2004.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Collaborative Instructional Leader Becoming a collaborative instructional leader.
Lesson Study.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
Literacy Partner’s Meeting Wednesday, October 22 nd Moderated Marking: The What, The Why, The How.
Using the Nine Characteristics to Test Assumptions in School Improvement G. Sue Shannon OSPI Senior Researcher WERA/OSPI Assessment Conference December.
The Power of Formative Assessment to Advance Learning.
Necessary Conditions. Washington Education Association Educational Service Districts Association of Washington School Principals Washington Association.
CiSELT Module 5.2: Classroom Dynamics. Assemble the contents of your envelope How does the puzzle represent a metaphor for teamwork? Each piece is a different.
Professional Learning Communities. Copyright © 2013 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved. Blackboard Collaborate Communication Tools 3.
Why Collaborate?. “Why do we have to collaborate? I know my job. If I do my job and everybody else does his, we will be fine. The teachers I work with.
LESSON STUDY INSTRUCTIONAL LEARNING TEAMS – LIVING WITHIN A PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY By Nancy J. Larsen, Ph.D.
Welcome to Lesson Study
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Tier I: Implementing Learning Walks & Instructional Rounds OrRTI Conference Tara M. Black, M.Ed. May 9,
TOP TEN LIST OF COACHING BELIEFS CURRICULUM 511 DR. PECK BY: HALI PLUMMER.
Florida Education: The Next Generation DRAFT March 13, 2008 Version 1.0 Lesson Study Presented by: Darliny G. Katz, Instructional Reading Specialist Florida.
WELCOME BACK TO CAMP!. Agenda Warm-Up for statistical and probabilistic thinking Norms for our PD Teaching through problem solving Break Lesson Study:
The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 6: Reflecting and Planning for Next Year December 2013.
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
Understand the purpose and benefits of guiding instructional design through the review of student work. Practice a protocol for.
Professional Learning Resources Download presentations and resources from today’s sessions!  Go to BISD homepage  Departments  Professional Learning.
The Power of Teacher Teams Presenter – Diane Still Kentucky Dept. of Education.
Mentors and beginning teachers teaching together in a collaborative setting AIP & Co-Teaching.
Innovate. Engage. Empower THE ONECLAY WRITES SCORING EXPERIENCE WELCOME! FIND A SEAT TALK TO OTHERS AT YOUR TABLE AND DISCUSS SUCCESSES SO FAR THIS YEAR.
Principal Student Achievement Meeting PLC Visioning and Beyond.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
1 Participating in Learning Community to: Present and Give Feedback on QUALITY EVIDENCE required to complete Professional Certification Washington State.
PLCs in Mount Airy City Schools Purpose of PLCs Collaborative meetings of educators in which data-driven decisions are made to improve teacher’s instruction.
Examining Student Work Middle School Math Teachers District SIP Day January 27, 2016.
Candidate Support. Working Agreements Attend cohort meetings you have agreed upon. Start and end on time; come on time and stay for the whole time. Contribute.
Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
BENCHMARK #3 “ASKING THE RIGHT QUESTIONS TO GUIDE THE RIGHT WORK” PLC YEAR 2 DAY 2 INQUIRY CYCLE.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
 Hello. I want to thank you for the opportunity to interview for this teaching position.  In being a teacher, I am aware of the effect that I play in.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Summative Evaluation Shasta Davis. Dimension: Preparation (Score- 4) Plans for instructional strategies that encourage the development of critical thinking,
LESSON STUDY 101 Traveler, there is no road. The road is created as we walk it together. Antonio Machado from "Proverbios y cantares" in Campos de Castilla.
TEACHERS COLLABORATING TO IMPROVE INSTRUCTION
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
Lakeland Middle School Professional Learning Communities (PLC)
New Goal Clarity Coach Training October 27, 2017
Reflecting on Research Lesson 1
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presentation transcript:

Instructional Coaches Academy (ICAD3) 1

 Choose a movie title that describes your school experience and why.  Discuss in your table groups. 2

How can Lesson Study enhance the teaching and learning process? 3

 Participants will understand how Lesson Study strengthens teaching and learning.  Participants will learn how to implement the Lesson Study process.  Participants will complete a Lesson Study cycle. 4

 Prevent II, Correct II, and Intervene schools are required to create common planning in the master schedule and to implement lesson study.  Districts are required to provide training to all schools in DA.  DA Strategies and Support Document: 2011%20Strategies%20and%20Support%20Document%20for%20Regular%20Schools_June _18.pdf 5

6  A professional development process in which a small group of teachers collaboratively plans, teaches, observes, revises, and reports results on a single class lesson.  Lesson Study is a Japanese approach to instructional improvement that has recently sparked much interest in the United States. It is an ongoing professional development process utilized within Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) to allow teachers the opportunity to create a model for high-quality instructional practices. It is also a method for improving a lesson through teacher collaboration.  A method of improving a lesson through a process of teacher collaboration.  “We” versus “Me” "Traveler, there is no road. The road is created as we walk it together.” -Antonio Machado What is Lesson Study?

Lesson Study is not about the teacher, it’s about instruction and student learning. 7

1.The team will meet on a regular basis to plan a Research Lesson. 2.One teacher from each team will present the lesson in his/her classroom. 3.The other teachers will observe the lesson and will take notes on what the students are doing and saying. 4.After the lesson is presented, the team will meet to discuss the lesson and their observations of the lesson. This is an engaging interaction of ideas and suggestions, with the focus always on the students. 8

9

◦ 4 to 8 member team ◦ Establish group norms ◦ Establish roles and responsibilities ◦ Develop a communication plan ◦ Build consensus through:  Data Analysis  Goal Setting  Problem Analysis 10

11 Ground Rules... 11

 Listen carefully to each other and communicate clearly.  Respect differences of opinion and the individuals who express them.  Allow one person to speak at a time.  Listen with an open mind.  Share what you think.  Avoid interrupting. Write comments or questions down and wait your turn.  Stay on task.  Establish roles for members.  Express views succinctly.  Share “air time” so that the discussion is not dominated by one person. 12

Facilitator: Keeps the group on task by guiding the process through questions. The facilitator makes sure that the group reaches the goal and ensures that all voices in the group are heard by guiding the colloquium on effective teaming, goal setting, data analysis, and problem analysis. Recorder: Keeps a written record of what has been accomplished. The recorder fills out necessary checklists and keeps the group apprised of what still needs to be done. 13

 The subject area and benchmark of focus should be chosen based on data.  Gather assessment data and disaggregate/analyze the data for patterns that emerge in areas of student weaknesses. 14

15

 Consider what evidence from the lesson will help us reflect on our goals for learning and student development.  Identify the data points to measure the impact of instructional strategies on anticipated barriers and student learning and development.  The purpose is to observe student learning in the lesson not to evaluate the teacher and his or her style. 16

 Types of questions the students asked  Types of questions the teacher asked  Evidence of higher‐level thinking  Evidence of confusion  Percent of students who raised hands  Body language, “aha” moments, shining eyes  Shifts in thinking that are evident  Number of times students refer to and build on classmates’ comments  Evidence of engagement  Following the lesson and deviations from the lesson 17

All team members (required) Knowledgeable Others Your Principal Your Superintendent Other Teachers School Board Members Hints for the observers: Observe the students, not the teacher! This is not YOUR lesson, it is the TEAM’S lesson. Observers should take notes, but should not interfere in the lesson or provide assistance. Link your observations to lesson goals. 18

The facilitator begins the colloquium with the teacher who taught the lesson, followed by team members and then observers. The teacher should describe the goals for the lesson, then comment on what went well, and the difficulties and learning's from planning and teaching the lesson. Team members should also address goals and speak to instructional decisions. Team members followed by other observers should present and discuss the student data collected. 19

 Would you like to refine and re‐teach the lesson in another classroom? What should be changed?  What went well in your lesson study effort, and what would you like to change next time around?  What new issues or problems came up that you would like to address in your next research lesson cycle? 20

 The shared process of improving the research lesson creates ownership of the lesson for the whole group.  As part of the improvement process, anticipate barriers to goals, e.g., student misconceptions, learning styles, and engagement.  Improve the research lesson with instructional strategies chosen to address the barriers.  The improved research lesson becomes “our” lesson, NOT “your” lesson or even “the” lesson. 21

22

23

1. Define the problem. 2. Plan the Lesson. 3. Teach the Lesson. 4. Evaluate the Lesson and Reflect on Its Effect. 5. Revise the Lesson. 6. Teach the Revised Lesson. 7. Evaluate and Reflect, Again. 8. Share the Results 24

25 Establishing Ground-Rules  Listen carefully to each other and communicate clearly.  Respect differences of opinion and the individuals who express them.  Allow one person to speak at a time.  Listen with an open mind.  Share what you think.  Avoid interrupting. Write comments or questions down and wait your turn.  Stay on task.  Establish roles for members.  Express views succinctly.  Share “air time” so that the discussion is not dominated by one person.

26

 Your job as a group is to: ◦ Read the lesson ◦ Modify the lesson as you see fit ◦ Prepare everything you need to teach this lesson ◦ Have one volunteer ready to teach this lesson to a group (your facilitator will assign a group to you) ◦ Know what data you will observe and collect during the lesson 27

28 Teaching and Observing

29 Colloquium: Debriefing

30

 The teachers reflect uninterrupted first to their group  The data collectors speak next, one at a time, uninterrupted  The students speak next one at a time, uninterrupted  Now, a free flowing dialogue- anyone may speak.  REMEMBER: Give everyone an opportunity to speak. 31

 What worked? What contributed to positive outcomes?  What didn’t work? What should we have changed?  Should we continue with this lesson study or change to another lesson? 32

 Please return to your original seating  What went well in your lesson study effort, and what would you like to change next time around?  How do we create a climate that encourages reflection? How do we embrace mistakes? 33

34

35 Colloquium Part II LSG analyzes data and discusses ways to revise the research lesson and apply learning’s to future lesson planning and delivery.

36 Improving the “Research Lesson”  The shared process of improving the research lesson creates ownership of the lesson for the whole group.  As part of the improvement process, reflect on the barriers to the initial goals, e.g., student misconceptions, learning styles, and engagement.  Improve the research lesson with instructional strategies chosen to address the barriers.  The improved research lesson becomes “our” lesson, NOT “your” lesson or even “the” lesson.

schools  What are the steps needed for schools to implement Lesson Study?  How can you support Lesson Study at your school? 37

38

References Florida Department of Education. (2010). Implementing Lesson Study: Differentiated Accountability Technical Assistance Document 1 st Edition. Florida and the Islands Regional Comprehensive Center. (2009). An Introduction to Lesson Study. 39

 Brainstorm the times when teachers look at student work.  Reconvene in the full group and compile a list based on the small-group conversations. (Note how many of these examples are cases of an individual teacher examining samples of student work and how many are instances of looking at student work with other colleagues.)  Share stories from your own experiences with collaborative work. How is looking at student work samples collaboratively different from looking at it individually? 40

41