The Lagrangian time scale for turbulent transport in forest canopies, determined from measured fluxes and concentrations and modelled source distributions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Land surface in climate models Parameterization of surface fluxes Bart van den Hurk (KNMI/IMAU)
Advertisements

Land Surface Evaporation 1. Key research issues 2. What we learnt from OASIS 3. Land surface evaporation using remote sensing 4. Data requirements Helen.
Parameter identifiability, constraints, and equifinality in data assimilation with ecosystem models Dr. Yiqi Luo Botany and microbiology department University.
Using Flux Observations to Improve Land-Atmosphere Modelling: A One-Dimensional Field Study Robert Pipunic, Jeffrey Walker & Andrew Western The University.
Modelling Australian Tropical Savanna Peter Isaac 1, Jason Beringer 1, Lindsay Hutley 2 and Stephen Wood 1 1 School of Geography and Environmental Science,
1 Division of Atmospheric Sciences, Department of Physical Sciences, University of Helsinki, POBox 64, FIN-00014, Helsinki, Finland (e  mail:
A numerical simulation of urban and regional meteorology and assessment of its impact on pollution transport A. Starchenko Tomsk State University.
Reducing Canada's vulnerability to climate change - ESS Variation of land surface albedo and its simulation Shusen Wang Andrew Davidson Canada Centre for.
Steffen M. Noe, Ahto Kangur, Urmas Hõrrak, Marko Kaasik SMEAR Estonia - Current state and further development.
A MONASH UNIVERSITY PERSPECTIVE Musa Kilinc and Danielle Martin School of Geography and Environmental Science.
Carbon flux at the scale up field of GLBRC. The Eddy Covariance cluster towers Terenzio Zenone 1 Jiquan Chen 1 Burkhard Wilske 1 and Mike Deal 1 Kevin.
Reading: Text, (p40-42, p49-60) Foken 2006 Key questions:
6/2/2015 A GAP-FILLING MODEL (GFM) FOR TOWER-BASED NET ECOSYSTEM PRODUCTIVITY MEASUREMENTS Zisheng Xing a, Charles P.-A. Bourque a, Fanrui Meng a, Roger.
Photosynthetically-active radiation (spectral portion, CI) h h h h h h h h.
CABLE: the Australian community land surface model
Soil Temperature Profiles Diurnal vertical heat transmission from solar inputs  Follow downward heat pulses animation.
Atmospheric Analysis Lecture 3.
Modeling a Microclimate within Vegetation Hisashi Hiraoka Academic Center for Computing and Media Studies Kyoto University NATO ASI, KIEV
1 River Discharge Stream Animation. 2 Surface Currents.
Integrating Fluxes of Carbon Dioxide and Water Vapor From Leaf to Canopy Scales Dennis Baldocchi Ecosystem Science Division/ESPM UC Berkeley.
KYTALYK /CHOKURDAGH site PAGE21 WP4 Meeting, Department of Geography and Geology –University of Copenaghen 9-10 February 2012 (1)Vrije Universiteit, Faculty.
Characterisation of mixing processes in the lower atmosphere using Rn-222 and climate-sensitive gases P. Schelander, A. Griffiths, A.G. Williams, S. Chambers.
Evaporation Slides prepared by Daene C. McKinney and Venkatesh Merwade
Modeling climate change impacts on forest productivity with PnET-CN Emily Peters, Kirk Wythers, Peter Reich NE Landscape Plan Update May 17, 2012.
Soil-Vegetation-Atmosphere Transfer (SVAT) Models
Calculating leaf wetness duration in an apple orchard Tor Håkon Sivertsen The Norwegian Crop Research Institute.
Evaporation What is evaporation? How is evaporation measured? How is evaporation estimated? Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections 3.5 and 3.6 With assistance.
Modeling Forest Ecosystem Energy, Carbon and Water Fluxes: Impacts of Canopy Structure Conghe Song Department of Geography University of North Carolina.
Enhanced Ecosystem Productivity in Cloudy or Aerosol-laden Conditions Xin Xi April 1, 2008.
Deep circulation and meridional overturning Steve Rintoul and many others ….
Carbon Sequestration in US Midwest Region and GLBRC: Lessons from the flux towers Terenzio Zenone 1 Jiquan Chen 1 Mike Deal 1 Burkhard Wilske 1 Poonam.
Estimating ET Type of method used will be determined by: 1. Type of surface (e.g. open water vs. leaf) 2. Availability of water for evaporation
Eva van Gorsel1, Ray Leuning1, Helen A
Ground-based energy flux measurements for calibration of the Advanced Thermal and Land Application Sensor (ATLAS) Eric Harmsen, Associate Professor Dept.
CO 2 - Net Ecosystem Exchange and the Global Carbon Exchange Question Soil respiration chamber at College Woods near Durham New Hampshire. (Complex Systems.
Integrating Fluxes of Carbon Dioxide and Water Vapor From Leaf to Canopy Scales Dennis Baldocchi Ecosystem Science Division/ESPM UC Berkeley.
Integration of biosphere and atmosphere observations Yingping Wang 1, Gabriel Abramowitz 1, Rachel Law 1, Bernard Pak 1, Cathy Trudinger 1, Ian Enting.
The Soil-Plant-Atmosphere (SPA) Model Multilayer canopy and soils, 30 minute time-step Standard components –Radiative transfer scheme (sun/shade) –Soil.
Site Harvard Hemlock Site 305 Site Harvard EMS tower  The LAI estimates are impacted by changes in the occlusion effect at the different scales.  75.
The Role of Virtual Tall Towers in the Carbon Dioxide Observation Network Martha Butler The Pennsylvania State University ChEAS Meeting June 5-6, 2006.
Toward a mesoscale flux inversion in the 2005 CarboEurope Regional Experiment T.Lauvaux, C. Sarrat, F. Chevallier, P. Ciais, M. Uliasz, A. S. Denning,
Landscape-level (Eddy Covariance) Measurement of CO 2 and Other Fluxes Measuring Components of Solar Radiation Close-up of Eddy Covariance Flux Sensors.
ATM 301 Lecture #11 (sections ) E from water surface and bare soil.
ATM 301 Lecture #9 (6.1, Appendix D) Surface Energy Fluxes and Balance Major Surface Energy Fluxes Review of Radiation Solar Radiation Thermal Radiation.
Biases in land surface models Yingping Wang CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research.
Surface conductance and evaporation from 1- km to continental scales using remote sensing Ray Leuning, Yonqiang Zhang, Amelie Rajaud, Helen Cleugh, Francis.
Evapotranspiration Eric Peterson GEO Hydrology.
Jan. 20, 2011 B4730/5730 Plant Physiological Ecology Biotic and Abiotic Environments.
Local-Scale Observation Site (LSOS) MicroMet Measurements February IOP1 March IOP2 February IOP3 March IOP4 Janet Hardy, ERDC-CRREL.
Changes in carbon cycling by Brazilian rain forest: effects of soil moisture reduction on soil, leaves and canopy Patrick Meir, AC Lola da Costa, S Almeida.
University of California, Berkeley
SiSPAT-Isotope model Better estimates of E and T Jessie Cable Postdoc - IARC.
Perspectives on water cycling in ecosystem models Sarah Davis June 12, 2012 Water in Bioenergy Agroecosystems Workshop.
IN Measurements 10 Hz data of 3D wind speed T sonic H 2 O CO 2 Pressure OUT Fluxes Hz data of Fc (carbon flux) LE (water flux) Hs (sensible heat.
Thermodynamics and mass-balance in natural systems in a burn area Vadose Zone Journal Soil Science Society of America Keep in mind: authors are looking.
Evaporation What is evaporation? How is evaporation measured?
Evaporation What is evaporation? How is evaporation measured? How is evaporation estimated? Reading for today: Applied Hydrology Sections 3.5 and 3.6 Reading.
1 UIUC ATMOS 397G Biogeochemical Cycles and Global Change Lecture 18: Nitrogen Cycle Don Wuebbles Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Illinois,
Modeling Surface Energy Balance Using the MEP Method Jingfeng Wang 1 and Rafael L. Bras 1,2 1 University of California at Irvine 2 Georgia Institute of.
Testing of the Soil, Vegetation, Atmosphere model using the NORUNDA dataset Ivan Kovalets Ukrainian Center for Environmental and Water Projects (UCEWP)
Radiation Schemes in Biophysical Models: Big Leaf vs. 2-Leaf Submodel in the Simple Biosphere Model (SiB) Ian Baker ChEAS Annual Meeting Kemp Research.
Performance of a new urban land-surface scheme in an operational mesoscale model for flow and dispersion Ashok Luhar, Marcus Thatcher, Peter Hurley Centre.
Field Data & Instrumentation
The Cabauw Experimental Site for Atmospheric Research (CESAR): New developments Fred C. Bosveld (KNMI) Content CESAR and its research themes Long term.
Conghe Song Department of Geography University of North Carolina
Marcos Heil Costa Universidade Federal de Viçosa
Ecosystem Demography model version 2 (ED2)
Surface energy balance and photosynthesis: scaling from leaf to canopy with the SCOPE model Christiaan van der Tol, Wouter Verhoef, Joris Timmermans, Anne.
Explicit representation of sunlit and shaded canopy fraction: fun modeling issues and interesting WLEF results. Ian Baker, Joe Berry, C. James Collatz,
Vinod Mahat, David G. Tarboton
Presentation transcript:

The Lagrangian time scale for turbulent transport in forest canopies, determined from measured fluxes and concentrations and modelled source distributions Vanessa Haverd, Ray Leuning, David Griffith, Eva van Gorsel, Matthias Cuntz February 06, 2008

CSIRO. The Lagrangian time scale for turbulent transport in forest canopies, determined from measured fluxes and concentrations and modelled source distributions Lagrangian Dispersion in Plant Canopies z 0 = 0 SjSj z m = h c z j-1 zjzj z ref ; c ref z i ; c i Dispersion Matrix, D Calculated using Lagrangian Dispersion theory (e.g. LNF, Raupach 1989) Inputs are turbulence statistics Standard deviation of vertical wind velocity:  w (measured) Lagrangian Timescale: T L (parameterised)

CSIRO. The Lagrangian time scale for turbulent transport in forest canopies, determined from measured fluxes and concentrations and modelled source distributions Lagrangian Dispersion in Plant Canopies: Applications AssumedInferredApplication 1.D, ScLand-surface scheme calculations of in-canopy T, CO 2, H 2 O (eg CABLE) 2.D, cSSource/sink partitioning between ground and veg (eg. Leuning et al. 2000; Denmead et al. 2000) 3.c, SDConstraint of in-canopy Lagrangian timescale (This work! )

CSIRO. The Lagrangian time scale for turbulent transport in forest canopies, determined from measured fluxes and concentrations and modelled source distributions Parameterisations of Lagrangian Timescale,  L

CSIRO. The Lagrangian time scale for turbulent transport in forest canopies, determined from measured fluxes and concentrations and modelled source distributions Approach(1) SjSj Turbulence stats (obs) cost c i - c ref (obs) param opt D ij c i – c ref (predicted) SVAT model ww Prior  L LL Turbulent transfer Model (LNF)

CSIRO. The Lagrangian time scale for turbulent transport in forest canopies, determined from measured fluxes and concentrations and modelled source distributions Approach(2) SVAT modelparam opt Met data Net fluxes (obs) Stomatal conductance/ photosyn params, a 1, D s,0, V c,max,0,  Leaf angle distribution parameter,  L Net fluxes (predicted) cost Source/sink distribution S j P gap (obs) P gap (predicted) Leaf area density distribution Fixed parameters

CSIRO. The Lagrangian time scale for turbulent transport in forest canopies, determined from measured fluxes and concentrations and modelled source distributions SVAT model, applied to Tumbarumba Multilayer canopy model (Wang and Leuning, 1998) Sunlit/ shaded leaf model coupling stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and energy partitioning Radiation distribution in the canopy (3 wave-bands) Recent additions Soil and biomass respiration rates (Keith et al. 2008) Heat storage fluxes in the canopy air and biomass (Haverd et al. 2007) Multilayer soil model with coupled heat/moisture fluxes and litter

CSIRO. The Lagrangian time scale for turbulent transport in forest canopies, determined from measured fluxes and concentrations and modelled source distributions Measurements 70 m tower in 40 m temperate Eucalyptus forest (Tumbarumba Ozflux site) Continuous measurements at 70 m: eddy fluxes (H, E, CO 2 ) R net upward and downward solar radiation fluxes met data Continuous temperature and water vapour profiles 2 week campaign (Nov 2006) 7 tower inlets to 2 Fourier transform infrared spectrometers Hourly measurements of CO 2, water vapour Ground-based Lidar measurements of direct beam transmission probability (P gap ) and hence foliage density profile. (Jupp et al. 2008) Array of 3D sonic anemometers   w profile, Eulerian timescale. Chamber measurements of CO 2 and CH 4 soil fluxes (Fest et al. 2008)

CSIRO. The Lagrangian time scale for turbulent transport in forest canopies, determined from measured fluxes and concentrations and modelled source distributions Measured Concentration Profiles

CSIRO. The Lagrangian time scale for turbulent transport in forest canopies, determined from measured fluxes and concentrations and modelled source distributions Foliage Area Volume Density and P gap Jupp et al., 2008

CSIRO. The Lagrangian time scale for turbulent transport in forest canopies, determined from measured fluxes and concentrations and modelled source distributions Hourly Net Fluxes at 70 m

CSIRO. The Lagrangian time scale for turbulent transport in forest canopies, determined from measured fluxes and concentrations and modelled source distributions Vertical source/sink distributions

CSIRO. The Lagrangian time scale for turbulent transport in forest canopies, determined from measured fluxes and concentrations and modelled source distributions Hourly flux partitioning between ground and vegetation

CSIRO. The Lagrangian time scale for turbulent transport in forest canopies, determined from measured fluxes and concentrations and modelled source distributions Turbulence Statistics from Measurements

CSIRO. The Lagrangian time scale for turbulent transport in forest canopies, determined from measured fluxes and concentrations and modelled source distributions Functional form of  L (Styles et al. 2002) c 1 →∞ ; c 2 = 0.32c 1 = 0; c 2 = 0.32 c 1 = 7.32; c 2 = 0.32

CSIRO. The Lagrangian time scale for turbulent transport in forest canopies, determined from measured fluxes and concentrations and modelled source distributions Measured and Predicted Concentrations using prior  L (Styles et al. parameterisation)

CSIRO. The Lagrangian time scale for turbulent transport in forest canopies, determined from measured fluxes and concentrations and modelled source distributions Measured and Predicted Concentrations using optimised  L (Styles et al. parameterisation)

CSIRO. The Lagrangian time scale for turbulent transport in forest canopies, determined from measured fluxes and concentrations and modelled source distributions Massman and Weil parameterisation (1999)

CSIRO. The Lagrangian time scale for turbulent transport in forest canopies, determined from measured fluxes and concentrations and modelled source distributions Measured and Predicted Concentrations using optimised  L (Styles et al. and MW parameterisations)

CSIRO. The Lagrangian time scale for turbulent transport in forest canopies, determined from measured fluxes and concentrations and modelled source distributions Prior and Optimised Profiles of  L Styles et al. Massman and Weil Piecewise linear

CSIRO. The Lagrangian time scale for turbulent transport in forest canopies, determined from measured fluxes and concentrations and modelled source distributions Summary T L required to calculate dispersion matrix linking in-canopy source/sinks to concentrations. High uncertainty in T L because it cannot be measured directly We have estimated the profile of T L using Hourly vertical profiles of θ, [CO 2 ], [H 2 O] SVAT model predictions of source/sink distributions and uncertainites, constrained by meaurements : Net fluxes above canopy Chamber measurements of CO2 ground fluxes P gap from ground-based Lidar Result: with c 1 = 8.4±3.2; c 2 = 0.49±0.05 decreases with canopy depth 1.7 times higher than prior estimate based on T E

Contact Us Phone: or Web: Thank you CMAR Vanessa Haverd Phone: