Www.energy.gov/EM 1 2015 National Cleanup Workshop Managing Large Capital Projects Ken Picha Deputy Assistant Secretary for Tank Waste and Nuclear Material.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Contract and Project Management: A Field Perspective Moderator Michael Peek, PE CCE CFM Office of Engineering and Construction Management.

Advertisements

Projectizing an Operating

Liquid Waste Organization

Nuclear Energy University Programs Fuel Cycle Technologies, Separations and Waste Forms Program August 10, 2011 Terry Todd, National Technical Director.

1 Transuranic Waste Processing Center Karen Deacon, Deputy Federal Project Director Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management.

Briefing to the Commission to Review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Laboratories (CRENEL) Joseph McBrearty, Deputy Director for Field Operations.

Office of Science Experience with Surveillance and Maintenance (S&M) of Environmental Remediation David Michlewicz – DOE Office of Science, Office of Safety,

1 Status of DOE Cleanup in Idaho Presentation to the “LINE Commission” By Rick Provencher Manager, DOE Idaho Operations Office April 7, 2012 Idaho Falls,

1 Best Practices for Risk-Informed Remedy Selection, Closure, and Post-closure Control for DOE’s Contaminated Sites October 30, 2013.

1 EM Update and Perspective David Huizenga Senior Advisor for Environmental Management 2012 DOE Project Management Workshop April 3, 2012.

1 Terry Tyborowski Deputy Assistant Secretary, Program Planning and Budget for Environmental Management February 27, 2014 Budget Update.

Safety  performance  cleanup  closure M E Environmental Management National Spent Nuclear Fuel Program Role in DOE’s Transformation Barb Beller, Project.

Defense Waste Processing Facility 257 Actual Canisters Produced in FY05 37% Waste Loading (averaged for FY05) 1,995 Total Canisters Produced (as of the10/31/05.

Office of River Protection 2014 Hanford ORP Site Status Report Glen Clark, WRPS 2014 ASP Workshop September, 2014 Albuquerque, NM Glen Clark, WRPS.

Departmental Initiative to Enhance Activity-level Work Planning and Control DOE and DOE Contractors Industrial Hygiene Meeting in Conjunction with the.

Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation,

Near Term Planning for Storage and Transportation of Used Nuclear Fuel Jeff Williams Project Director Nuclear Fuels Storage and Transportation Planning.

Savannah River Site Status Report DOECAP Analytical Services Program 2014 Workshop Ken Guay, (DOE SR Program Manager) September , 2014 Albuquerque,

1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Authorization Basis Plan Steven Hoey, ESH Manager NSLS-II Project Advisory Committee Meeting December 10 – 11, 2009.

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Office of Biological & Environmental Research Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee Roland.

NGA Federal Facilities Task Force Brief Update & Key Topics for Meeting May 16, 2002 Washington DC Jerry Boese Ross & Associates Environmental Consulting,

Waste Management Working Group CTMA Point Clear, AL W. T. (Sonny) Goldston EnergySolutions Working Group Chair July 6 - 9, 2015.

Acquisition and Contract Management Update Jay Rhoderick Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Tank Waste and Nuclear Material AtomEco-2012.

Integrating ISMS Safety Concepts and Tools into the Design of CH2M HILL’s Demonstration Bulk Vitrification System September 12-13, 2006.

M E Environmental Management safety  performance  cleanup  closure The U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Management Intergovernmental Meeting.

Office of River Protection 2015 Hanford ORP Site Status Report

1 LICENSING A U.S. GEOLOGICAL REPOSITORY WILLIAM BORCHARDT Executive Director for Operations U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science Environmental Management System Implementation August 2005.

1 Resuming Operations at WIPP Frank Marcinowski Acting Associate Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for The Office of Environmental.

11 Presented by: Kevin Smith, Manager September 29, 2015 ORP’s Path to Reinvigorating Technology Development DOE National Cleanup Workshop EM Technology.

1 By Jim McCormick-Barger DOE, WTP Lead Construction Inspector Quality Challenges with the Construction of the First Large Nuclear Facility in the Past.

DOE Order 413.3A Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets Catherine Santana Deputy Director, Project Management Systems, OECM.

Office of National Transportation Update Presented to: Spent Fuel Project Office Presented by: Gary Lanthrum, Director Office of National Transportation.

1 Construction of Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) Charting the Course for Major EM Successes in September 29, 2015 Frank.

EM Budget--- Past/Present/Future Mark W. Frei U.S. Department of Energy October 14, 2005.

Milestones or Millstones Alex R. Burkart, Deputy Director Office of Nuclear Energy, Safety and Security United States Department of State.

Environmental Management Review of Corporate Projects.

1 2001: WTP Construction Began. 2 WTP in 2015 Pretreatment Facility High-Level Waste Facility Low-Activity Waste Facility Analytical Lab.

1 What’s New in Environmental Management? Karen Shears, Director Procurement and Contracts Division Oak Ridge Office of Environmental.

Bechtel National Inc. 1 Using Human Performance Analysis to Eliminate Errors Presented September 13, 2006 DOE Integrated Safety Management Best Practices.

Waste Treatment Plant Project Innovation in Design The ISM Process at the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant John Hinckley August, 2009.

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Leveraging the Management Review Process of ISO and OHSAS for Facility-level and Institutional-level.

DOE Stanford Site Office Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1 U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Office of Science Review of the LCLS.

FIMS/Real Estate Workshop Palm Springs, CA June 2-6, 2008 DOE Oak Ridge Office Rebecca Whitehead.

1 West Valley Demonstration Project FY 2014 Budget Briefing Bryan C. Bower May 22, 2013.

 closure E M Environmental Management  cleanup  performance safety STRATEGY MEETING NATIONAL SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL PROGRAM Bringing Innovation to Spent.

1 EM Update Presented to the National Governors Association Federal Facilities Task Force Dr. Inés Triay Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Environmental.

California Integrated Waste Management Board 1 Committee Items C-D (Board Items 2-3) November 5, 2007 Consideration Of: Item C/2: The Scope Of Work For.

The Yucca Mountain Repository for Nuclear Waste June Edward F. Sproat III Director Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management U.S. Department.

Laboratory Operations Board

PRESENTED TO: ENERGY FACILITY CONTRACTORS GROUP SAFETY ANALYSIS WORKING GROUP SAFETY ANALYSIS WORKSHOP BY: CHRIS CHAVES NSR&D PROGRAM OFFICE OF NUCLEAR.

SPD-SWPF SALT WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY (SWPF) LESSONS LEARNED.

Waste Management Working Group FY2016 EFCOG Winter Workshop Renee Echols Perma-Fix Environmental Services Working Group Vice Chair Jan 26, 2016.

Request for Information & Capability Statements Richland Acquisitions Post-FY 2018 November 17-19, 2015.

The Challenge of Getting What You Asked For Integrated Safety Management Summit Knoxville TN August 24-27, 2009 Presented By: Patrice McEahern HNF

National Center for Coastal Ocean Science Environmental Management System Implementation August 2005.

1 Ventilation Systems Capital Asset Projects Safety Significant Confinement Ventilation System (15-D-411) Exhaust Shaft (15-D-412) Ronald.

Leading State Inspector Ivan Rovkach Department of Nuclear and Radiation Safety Ministry of Emergency Situations of the Republic of Belarus(GOSATOMNADZOR)

Office of Major Project Development (OMPD) Overview November 2015.

Office of Critical Decision-1 Approve Alternative Selection & Cost Range or Brief Presented by:

South Carolina Nuclear Advisory Council SRS Update and FY 2017 Budget Service ● Safety ● Security ● Stewardship ● SRNL ● Sustainability April 14, 2016.

American Recovery & Reinvestment Act Office of Environmental Management Presentation to Regulators March 6, 2009 Cynthia V. Anderson, EM Recovery Act Program.

Office of Project Management Oversight and Assessments Office of Critical Decision-3 Approve Start of Construction or Brief Presented by:

Capital Asset Projects executed by the

DOE Nuclear Safety Research and Development Program

Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management Update

EFCOG Startup and commissioning task team introduction

CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES NOVEMBER 22, 2016

Charles Simpson Washington River Protection Solutions May 2018

WSAC Decision Making Framework

Presentation transcript:

National Cleanup Workshop Managing Large Capital Projects Ken Picha Deputy Assistant Secretary for Tank Waste and Nuclear Material Office of Environmental Management September 2015

2 Annual Funding by EM Mission Area (Major Tank Waste Projects) Facility D&D $ 835M/ 14% Soil & Groundwater $ 527M / 9 % Site Services* $ 413M/ 7% Radioactive Tank Waste $ 2,297M / 39% Transuranic & Solid Waste $ 779M / 13% Special Nuclear Materials and Used Nuclear Fuel $ 967M / 17% * Excludes $472M UED&D Fund Contribution for FY 2016 FY 16 WTP (Hanford) $0.690B SWPF (SRS) $0.194B LAWPS (Hanford) $0.075B SDUs (SRS)$0.034B Total ~$0.993B

3 EM’s Largest Capital Projects in Construction Salt Waste Processing Facility: –Total Project Cost = $2.32Billion Rebaselined August 2014 –Construction Complete by 12/31/16 –Initiating commissioning activities Waste Treatment Plant –Current focus on direct feed of low-activity waste capability Salt Disposal Unit #6 –Total Project Cost = $143.2 million –Capable of disposing up to 30 million gallons of treated low-activity waste –Expect to complete early and under budget LAB HLW PT

4 EM Tank Waste Projects Moving Forward (Other than WTP and SWPF ) Defense Waste Processing Facility HLW Glass Canisters Implement Secretary’s project management initiative requirements –For projects prior to CD-1 –Independent review of alternatives –Attain Technology Readiness Level of 6 prior to CD-2 –Design reviews (30% and 90%) –Reviews by Project Management Risk Committee Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System CD-1 decision Tank Waste Characterization and Staging Facility CD-0 decision Status Briefings to reconstituted Energy Systems Acquisition Advisory Board –WTP –SWPF

5 Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Facility required to enable Direct Feed of low-activity waste to the WTP Low-Activity Waste Vitrification Facility Facility expected to support Direct Feed LAW operations Will have the capability to remove cesium through ion exchange and solids through filtration from supernate prior to transfer to the LAW Facility Provide sufficient feed to enable full capacity operations of both WTP LAW Facility melters – producing 30 metric tons of glass per day As a result of implementing DFLAW, WTP facilities will be able to begin processing some waste prior to completion of PT Facility

6 Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System (Continued) Early in 2014, the Deputy Assistant Secretary, Tank Waste and Nuclear Material Mission Unit (EM-20) chartered an independent technical, cost and schedule team to consider past and present pretreatment alternatives and potential project vulnerabilities –The report validated the selections made by ORP –This independent review complies with a key recommendation from the Improving Project Management, November 2014, report The contractor will perform scaled integrated testing of LAWPS critical technology elements to achieve TRL-6 prior to Critical Decision-2, Approve Performance Baseline. A DOE organized 30% design review is anticipated November 2015

7 Tank Waste Characterization and Staging Facility Blend problematic wastes in order to meet waste acceptance criteria (WAC) for WTP (Pretreatment and potentially High- Level Waste Facility) Mix and characterize waste (samples) to ensure WAC for WTP is met Condition out-of-specification wastes in order to meet WTP WAC Simplify WTP test program to complete technical issue resolution Redundancy built in to allow for efficient waste transfers Could provide for direct feed to the High-Level Waste Facility CD-0, Mission Need Approved September 2015 Mission Need briefed to Project Management Risk Committee

8 Conclusion EM is embracing Secretary’s Project Management Initiative –Reviews by Project Management Risk Committee –Design Reviews –Independent Review of Alternative Analysis –Technical Technology Readiness Level of 6 prior to CD-2 Implementation of Project Management Initiative increases probability of successful project execution