Technologically Enhanced Language Learning Project Progress to 20 May 2008 Dr Gee Macrory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pédagogie des Langues à lécole Intégration des Nouvelles Technologies Pédagogie des Langues à lécole Intégration des Nouvelles Technologies Technologically.
Advertisements

Partners in Learning C ollaborative T echnology L anguage I nitiative.
PGCE Primary Full Time SE1 and SE2 Placements. Aims of this briefing meeting  Know about the changes made to documentation for  Be aware of.
Speaking, Listening and Learning: Working with children in Key
© University of Reading October 2014 E-Portfolio Tools for Reflective Practice in Initial Teacher Training From Blackboard to.
Early Level Transitions. Are we confident there is effective progression in children’s learning through early level ? Are we confident there is effective.
Specialist leaders of education Briefing session for potential applicants - Cohort 4 SLEs Application Window 2 – 23 October 2013.
Professional learning course Examining the Literacy teaching guide: Phonics 1.
BA (Hons) Primary Education Year Three School Based Training Briefing
Language Learning for Everyone Warrington Teaching School Alliance Janet Lloyd Network.
Year 1 School Based Training Have experience across all three key stages; Develop an understanding of the multiplicity of roles within the primary school;
Strategic Leadership of ICT
A Big Picture about the 2008 STARTALK Shuhan Wang.
Mentor Development – MFL. Wednesday 18 th March 2009.
Training Programme – Introduction Training Programme – Introduction Estimated cost of a three year assignment = $ 1 MILLION (Source: Brewster 2001) Done.
The National Qualifications Framework Liz Heydon/Jill Reilly.
Welcome to Mentor Training for People and their roles Heather Davies – Programme Director Caroline Lundy – GEB Programme Tutor Jo Traunter.
Professional learning course Examining the Literacy teaching guide:
Training Programme – Introduction Training Programme – Introduction Estimated cost of a three year assignment = $ 1 MILLION (Source: Brewster 2001) Done.
Vivienne Griffiths, Carol Tingey, Manuela Thomae Canterbury Christ Church University Paper presented at the TEAN conference, May , Manchester.
Technologically Enhanced Primary Language Learning MMU: MFL team.
Technologically Enhanced Primary Language Learning Project by Gee Macrory CILT Initial Teacher Education Conference September 2008.
The EMR Internationalising Education China Project Introductions.
PGCE Full-time SE3 Briefing March Aims Be aware of the expectations of SE3 Understand what is expected of you during serial days Understand the.
Welcome to the Secondary PGCE New Mentor meeting.
Who is best able to teach Primary Modern Foreign Languages (PMFL)? Kerrie Simpson University of Manchester, 13 th February 2014.
Implementation & Evaluation Regional Seminar ‘04 School Development Planning Initiative “An initiative for schools by schools”
CLIL Secondary Language Exchange Program The University of Reading Suzanne Graham and Katie Lee.
Technologically Enhanced Language Learning Pedagogy Progress to October 2008 and planning for Year 2 Dr Gee Macrory.
SOCRATES II Community Action Programme in the Field of Education (2000 – 2006)
Promoting improvement ITE thematic dissemination conference: secondary modern languages 26 November 2013 Elaine Taylor HMI, National Lead for Modern Languages.
12 th January  More genuine consultation  Review our provision  Share best practice  Establish local area networks.
Teacher standards and links to curriculum and assessment.
Designing CLIL University of Goldsmith, April 24th 2014 Language Learning Matters.
Session 1: Getting started on the PSQM Journey.
CHANGES EXPLAINED STIMULATING MINDS (22/10/13). In 2012 the framework was revised to make it clearer and easier to use, with a clear focus on developing.
Food Safety Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators Evaluation Plan.
New Challenges for Multilingualism in Europe, Dubrovnik, 2010 Gee Macrory, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK, Lucette Chrétien, Université de Poitiers,
History PGCE Subject Development Panel Jan Feedback from Chief External Examiner 2013/14 KEY STRENGTHS: 1.Highly efficient and effective communication.
Becta Research conference 2003 Proving effective practice with ICT Learning at Home & School: Lessons from the ImpaCT Case Studies Chris Comber, Univ.
Gee Macrory Institute of Education Manchester Metropolitan University 19 November 2009 Promoting diversity in language learning: the role of teacher education.
Modern Languages Experiences and Outcomes Curriculum for Excellence Support for Trialling.
Year 1 First Placement University of Hull BA Primary Teaching Year 1 Mentors’ Meeting June 2014.
Technologically Enhanced Language Learning Pedagogy Teacher seminar 27 November 2009 Presentation 2: Pedagogy and language learning.
P.G.C.E. Primary M.F.L. Technology and Language Learning.
UNIVERSITY OF HUDDERSFIELD SUPPORTING PRE-SERVICE TRAINEES ON PLACEMENT Pre-service Mentor Training 2011.
Afternoon session. Aims  to become familiar with the rationale and structure of the renewed frameworks, including support for planning, teaching and.
Technologically Enhanced Language Learning Pedagogy Project overview PGCE Primary MFL 8 December 09.
Technologically Enhanced Language Learning Pedagogy Overview : October 2009 Dr Gee Macrory.
MMU 10 December 2008 Dr Gee Macrory.  BA (Hons) Primary Education: - All year 2 39 hours SK & methodology - Year 3 and 4 options 50 hours - Proposed.
ICT in Schools Project Summary FACULTY OF EDUCATION & CHILDREN’S SERVICES.
Development Team Day 5a October Aim To explore approaches to evaluating the impact of the curriculum on pupil learning.
Birmingham Primary Strategy Team Subject Leader Training Session 4 Leading Improvement.
Teaching and Learning Policy Summary. Having purpose Putting the vision into practice Analyse Plan Do Review Record Report.
© Crown copyright 2006 Renewing the Frameworks Enriching and enhancing teaching and learning.
Y1 SBT Workshop EYFS Input Please ensure you have registered your name before you take a seat.
Secondary ITE 1-year PGCE Calderdale Hub Professional Mentor Meeting September 2015.
© Crown copyright 2006 Renewing the Frameworks Driving Improvement.
SKILLS PARTNERSHIP PROGRAMMES
Association for Language Learning ITET Seminar, 7 July 2016, Sheffield Hallam University Literacy in the languages classroom in England: a challenge for.
Interdisciplinary learning (primary version)
Vicki Stokes School of Education 02/10/17
Technologically Enhanced Language Learning Pedagogy
Practice of Teaching Part 1
Welcome to the School of Education
Practice of Teaching Part 1
PGCE Secondary Modern Languages
PGCE PCE Mentoring Training
Project overview Gee Macrory.
Bringing Design and Technology Alive
Presentation transcript:

Technologically Enhanced Language Learning Project Progress to 20 May 2008 Dr Gee Macrory

Today’s presentation Resume of TELLP project Report on progress so far

Resume of TELLP project Aims Timescale Personnel Outcomes Activities proposed

Aims Central aim: the provision of an innovative context for initial teacher training within a technologically- enhanced, holistic,cross-curricular approach to teaching languages in the primary schools in the three countries (England, France, Spain)(bid,p.13)

Timescale & personnel Lynda Moore, Head of Primary Programmes, IOE (Director); Gee Macrory (Head of Languages); Languages tutors: Pura Ariza, Cathy Brady & Joanne Mimnagh Lucette Chr é tien Jos é Luis Ortega

Which trainees? Primary languages specialists in each country Group 1: 2 sub-groups, (i) those placed for school experience in the 6 project schools, (ii) the larger cohort of primary languages trainees Group 2: generalist primary trainees

Trainee outcomes Primary trainees will be able to identify and critically evaluate (a) the characteristics of a holistic cross- curricular approach to language teaching and learning and (b) the impact of the technology on:

Processes of children ’ s learning Development of intercultural understanding Children ’ s motivations School community Wider school curriculum (bid, p.15)

Activities (bid, p.15) Core focus group of the 3 universities ’ project is teacher trainees Trainees will: - acquire skills of planning effective video- conferencing sessions between international classes - gain familiarity with primary pedagogy in the partner countries - engage in joint planning (home and abroad) - carry our focussed observation of impact of use of technology on children ’ s learning

Progress to date Tutor observations of VC and issues arising Focus group work with children Preparation of trainees Trainee activities: some examples Trainee perceptions Implications for next year

Tutor observations of VC in 6 schools  Issues of language use (which language, which skill, linguistic progression, etc)  Classroom organisation and management issues  Development of intercultural awareness

Focus group work with children All 3 countries Data from KR/SP - Very positive about cultural knowledge - Increased confidence - Awareness of language learning “ you absolutely have to see them ”

Preparation of trainees Tasks given to trainees going from England to France and Spain March 08 + from France to England May 08 Introduction to LP

Trainee activities VC in home school and/or on placement abroad – observing and assisting Interviewing children and staff involved Preparation of sound files for LP Preparing class for VC

Development of trainee activity Independent VC sessions – trainees in lead Use of related technologies: digi blues? Uploading of material on to LP

Trainee perceptions so far Beneficial for children, especially from a cultural perspective Insights into the language pedagogy issues Trainees beginning to be able to understand the issues to do with CLIL and with cross- curricular approaches to language learning Very keen to use the technology – good ideas Beginning to see implications for curriculum and whole-school planning

Our next steps Interview trainees in all 6 schools (in-depth, semi-structured, recorded interviews) with reference to criteria on p15 of bid Identify support needed by schools for their project and the university project July: 3 university meeting in Manchester Write report Set up project website

Implications for next year Identify trainees for placements as early as possible (can visit, plan, etc) Provide ICT sessions/LP briefing early at university Offer whole-school briefing to project schools about the university project