1 CHARGE The goal of the breakout groups is to –define and prioritize research questions to help guide the US Global Change Research Program, –determine.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An example of a large-scale interdisciplinary carbon problem Multidecadal climate variability Atmospheric evidence Ocean source? (upwelling, biological.
Advertisements

The UN-REDD Programme Measurement, Assessment, Reporting and Verification (MARV) Issues and Options for REDD 10 March 2009 Peter Holmgren.
May 9, Subgroup 4: Management of forests and forest-influenced landscapes Konstantin von Teuffel and Hubert Sterba.
Summary discussion Top-down approach Consider Carbon Monitoring Systems, tailored to address stakeholder needs. CMS frameworks can be designed to provide.
National Assessment of Ecological C Sequestration and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes – the USGS LandCarbon Project Zhiliang Zhu, Project Chief, What.
The International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change IHDP
Cross Cutting Group B: Ammonia policy context and future challenges Chair: Till Spranger Rapporteur: Zbigniew Klimont Attendees: 13.
Bureau of Land Management NAIP Information Meeting July 19 th, 2006.
Introduction to Breakout Session 2.2 Essential Variables for GEO SBAs (Chair: Antonio Bombelli) Coordinator of the GEO Task CL-02 “Global Carbon Observations.
MINISTRY OF TOURISM, ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Forest Monitoring For REDD “A Case of The Integrated Land-use Assessment (ILUA) - Zambia” Presented.
Communication on "Land as a Resource" Jacques DELSALLE Head of sector Land & Soil European Commission, DG Environment FoEE Conference "Putting resource.
Building the knowledge base for the implementation/ monitoring of biodiversity strategies Breakout group discussion 1.
Module developers: Erika Romijn, Wageningen University
The TNA Process in Costa Rica Experiences and lessons learned Francisco Sancho Advisor TNA
Land as a Resource State of play 5 March Land as a Resource: at the crossroad of objectives 1 and 2 of 7 th Environmental Action Programme (EAP)
Josiane Masson, DG ENV.D4 15/01/2014 Earth Observation potential for environmental policy making?
Summary of Breakout Session 1.2 GEO Societal Benefit Areas (Chair: Antonio Bombelli) Coordinator of the GEO Task CL-02 “Global Carbon Observations and.
MDGs, and WSSD Plan of implementation Ashbindu Singh Regional Coordinator Division of Early Warning & Assessment – North America United Nations Environment.
MNV/RL 1 Developing historic land cover databases The BIOME 300-experience Prof. Dr. Rik Leemans [ Dutch Institute of Public Health.
FDES Meeting NYC 8-10 November 2010 The interface between core environmental statistics and other information systems: which interaction is important?
Vulnerability and Adaptation Methods and Tools. NATIONAL LOCAL INTEGRATED / DYNAMIC SECTORAL / STATIC GLOBAL GIS temporal Indicator analysis and ranking.
Science themes: 1.Improved understanding of the carbon cycle. 2.Constraints and feedbacks imposed by water. 3.Nutrient cycling and coupling with carbon.
Getting Ready for the Future Woody Turner Earth Science Division NASA Headquarters May 7, 2014 Biodiversity and Ecological Forecasting Team Meeting Sheraton.
The Collaborative Environmental Monitoring and Research Initiative (CEMRI) A Pilot in the Delaware River Basin Peter S. Murdoch, USGS Richard Birdsey,
The Implementation of Land and Ecosystem Accounts in Europe Towards integrated land and ecosystem accounting Roy Haines-Young, University of Nottingham.
1 Breakout Notes Session 3 Group 2 – (Global/Broad Scale/Regional) Integrated assessment models (socio-economic/biophysical) in relationship to land cover.
1 Land Cover Land Use Change Program and LBA Dr. Garik Gutman LCLUC Program Manager NASA Headquarters.
Summary Report of Working Group on Impacts Project ABC Science Team Meeting April 5, 2005 UNEP-Tongji Institute, Shanghai.
Discussion Topics – Delaware River Basin Pilot Project Synergistic opportunities between FIA/FHM/GC/USGS –Scaling – top down/bottom up – multi-tier approach.
The Merton Report an AIMES/IGBP-ESA partnership As Earth System science advances and matures, it must be supported by robust and integrated observation.
1 CHARGE The goal of the breakout groups is to –define and prioritize research questions to help guide the US Global Change Research Program, –determine.
GEO Strategic Target on Climate (Carbon) Facilitate a comprehensive global carbon observation and analysis system in support of decision-making, including.
Support to the Global Forest Resource Assessment process Organisations: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) + European Commission.
INTEGRATED DATA COLLECTION FRAMEWORK IN LINE WITH SEEA CONCEPT -- FISHERIES Sachiko TSUJI, Jennifer gee, FIPS, FAO.
Translation to the New TCO Panel Beverly Law Prof. Global Change Forest Science Science Chair, AmeriFlux Network Oregon State University.
Wish-list to the Emission community.  TFMM annual meeting held in Zagreb on the 6-8 May 2013  Main issues :  Review of the implementation of the EMEP.
Spatial and temporal patterns of CH 4 and N 2 O fluxes from North America as estimated by process-based ecosystem model Hanqin Tian, Xiaofeng Xu and other.
1 Research Questions – Session 1 What management activities have the biggest potential to affect quantifiable long-term carbon storage or sequestration.
1Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorology OFCM OFCM Special Session: Challenges of Urban Test Beds Charge to the Joint Action Group for Joint.
Joint Canada-Mexico-USA (North American*) Carbon Program Planning Meeting January 25–26, 2007 *By North America we mean the North American land, adjacent.
Intercontinental and Hemispheric Scale Transport and the LRTAP Convention Terry J. Keating, Ph.D. Office of Air and Radiation U.S. Environmental Protection.
Breakout Session IV: Applying Remote Sensing Observations to Impacts Assessment Background (1) The IPCC WG 2 Report (2008) “Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation.
Breakout Session IV: Applying Remote Sensing Observations to Impacts Assessment IPCC WG 2 Report (2008) Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability.
Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research an intergovernmental organization for global change research socio-economic implications international.
Terrestrial Carbon Observations TCO Previous Strategy 1- better identify the potential end users, and their requirements 2- organize and coordinate reliable.
Systematic Terrestrial Observations: a Case for Carbon René Gommes with C. He, J. Hielkema, P. Reichert and J. Tschirley FAO/SDRN.
Daniel Metcalfe and numerous others Oxford University Centre for the Environment Drought impacts on leaf morphology and respiration.
CarboEurope: The Big Research Lines Annette Freibauer Ivan Janssens.
CHARGE QUESTIONS: ENDPOINTS  anthropogenic emissions   air pollution   climate OK, but can we be more specific?  Intercontinental transport of.
Terrestrial Ecosystems Monitoring Sites (TEMS) Who, what, where International on-line directory of monitoring sites and networks carrying out long-term.
Breakout Group 6 Ocean and Atmosphere Group Terrestrial Group.
Breakout Session 1 Air Quality Jack Fishman, Randy Kawa August 18.
Metrics and MODIS Diane Wickland December, Biology/Biogeochemistry/Ecosystems/Carbon Science Questions: How are global ecosystems changing? (Question.
Group C: Invasive Species Interactions With Other Stressors Q1: Critical Scientific Issues Climate change Drought & extreme weather Increasing CO 2 Fire.
Future Earth workshop – Kuala Lumpur Breakout session 2: Research priorities and opportunities to strengthen capabilities within Future Earth in Asia and.
Monitoring and MRV context of the Country National Forest Inventory (NFI): the previous NFI has not covered some forest type (the sampling strategy did.
Assessment of the state of coasts in Europe – EEA activities and needs Andrus Meiner, European Environment Agency European Conference on Coastal Zone Research:
Research Progress Discussions of Coordinated Emissions Research Suggestions to Guide this Initiative Focus on research emission inventories Do not interfere.
Identifying Monitoring Questions from your Program Logic.
Break-out session 1: Group 1 Chair: Ekosse, Georges-Ivo. Rapporteur: Berefo, Eric Transition Team member: Hackmann, Heide Participants:  Abiodun, Babatunde.
Information Needs for Sustainable Forests Management Nguyen Tuong Van Forest Sector Support Partnership 17 th of March 2010, Hanoi.
GEO Land Cover Side Event
Assessment of POP pollution in EMEP region
Terrestrial-atmosphere (1)
Potential Landsat Contributions
CARIAA Country Reviews: Methodology and outcomes
Workshop on Gap Analysis and Prioritization
European Forest Data Centre & European Soil Data Centre Progress report Jesús San-Miguel Databases, early waringn, remote sensing, simulation models,
Forest monitoring now and future challenges
Emissions What are the most sensitive parameters in emissions to improve model results (chemical species, spatio-temporal resolution, spatial distribution,
Presentation transcript:

1 CHARGE The goal of the breakout groups is to –define and prioritize research questions to help guide the US Global Change Research Program, –determine the relative priorities of the research questions, and –designate whether research priorities are sufficiently mature for short-term research or are more long-term in scope.

2 Breakout #2 Questions What ecosystem observations are needed to improve our understanding of carbon on land? What land-use observations are needed to improve our understanding of how carbon can be managed?

3 Breakout Notes Session 2 Group 3 Land-use conversion resolution - Spatial -Ex: Fertilize/Irrigate (yard-by-yard basis) -Push toward finer scale resolution -Trading done at plot-level -Wetlands - Temporal -Annual LUCC map -Annual statistics

4 Breakout Notes Session 2 Group 3 Approaches of Observation: - Foresters -Structure - Inventory: -Remote Sensing -Soil carbon - Ecologist -LAI

5 Breakout Notes Session 2 Group 3 Land Management Information - Surveys - Not statistical -Mapping management -Privacy issue - Historical Info -How and why land is changing?

6 Breakout Notes Session 2 Group 3 Compliance Program - Anything C = international - Internal and global compliance - Policy and observations must be compatible Urban Interface - Need information at wildland/urban interface

7 Breakout Notes Session 2 Group 3 Projection Models - What would go into a projection model? -How much seed was sold? -Policy? - Domain-specific / base-line information -Soils -Historical -Trend vs. Business –as-usual -How do you know what business-as-usual looks like in the future?

8 Breakout Notes Session 2 Group 3 Soil - Better sampling methods -Goals? -What about other countries? Lateral C Flux - Water transport Wetlands - Production of methane (more attention)

9 Breakout Notes Session 2 Group 3 Other environmental changes concurrent w/ LUCC - N deposition -> Uptake of C?? - Corridors - Fire - Insects - N-Cycle

10 Breakout Notes Session 2 Group 3 Socio-Economic - The end result -Policies set on transportation and social planning - GDP? - Transportation sector

11 Breakout Notes Session 2 Group 3 Forest conversion -Rate -Pattern -Fragmentation -Degradation -Fire -Edge-effects -Regeneration Integrate Data Sets -R.S. data with ground-based measurements -Socio-economics and policy

12 Breakout Notes Session 2 Group 3 Atmospheric Measurements - Inverse modeling -Can it evaluate country contributions? Data Management - Collaborative Modeling? - Meta-data

13 Research Questions – Session 2 Research question/topicPriorityMaturity What is a useful observation strategy for C compliance monitoring and reporting system? (multiple elements) 1S What are the drivers of these land use transitions and how can they be used to construct base-line information? 1S How can we improve or refocus carbon-specific allometry? (global) 1L How can we design a national carbon-specific soil sampling methodology? 1L How can we better estimate/model lateral transport of C? 2L How can we better estimate/manage methane?2L

14 Research Questions – Session 2 Research question/topicPriorityMaturity We know the area of fire and insects, but what about the impact on C? 1S What are the socio-economic indicators of C storage and change? (development patterns, e.g. transportation network pattern) 1L Questions of policy/time/spatial scale?3L What is the magnitude rate and pattern of forest conversion? Fragmentation? Degradation? Fire? Edge- effect ? 1S How can we best manage and deliver collected data?1S