DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, US CMS US CMS Detector Project Overview Dan Green US CMS Project Manager DOE/NSF Lehman Review, May 8-10, 2001

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, Outline Project Status - Financial –FY98+99 Closeout, 1 year “rolling” closeout Schedule Changes (V31) –Installation -and Commissioning Technical Progress

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, US CMS - DOE, NSF Profile US CMS balance between DOE and NSF funds is roughly correct. We have modified I&C planning to match the CMS V31 schedule. NSF ends in FY03.

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, US CMS Detector Project No trends are evident. No “divergence”.

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, Financial Overview - I BCWS 84.0 AYM$ BCWP 74.1 Obligations 80.6 Paid Actuals 64.6 Obligations/BCWS 96 % BCWP/BCWS 88 % Paid Actuals/BCWP 87 % We are getting the funds out to groups and we are getting the jobs under contract. There is some lag in schedule/reporting and in invoicing.

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, % Complete at L2 The CP is ~ completed up to progress payments. ECAL, EMU and HCAL are > 50% complete, while Tridas and FPIX are only ~ 25% complete

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, CSC - Labor Experience Early experience on CSC assembly is favorable. Now have ~ 35 of 148 CSC

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, HCAL - M&S Cost Experience HB-1 pre- assembled at Felguera. Shipped to CERN. Megatiles will be inserted in bldg # 186. The mating of optics to absorber will begin at CERN in CY 2001.

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, HB OPTICS - Labor Experience Labor experience for CSC and for HCAL optics has been good. This is the bulk of US CMS labor costs. M&S ~ OK, Labor ~ OK ==> worry about electronics (schedule) and installation (EDIA too).

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, Closeout of Completed Tasks FY completed tasks have been closed. The ACWP can be compared to the BCWS for CV on these tasks. In future tasks with end dates more than one year ago which are reported complete will be closed.

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, Contingency Usage and Performance We have 34 months of monthly reporting. CR can be followed at any level of detail needed. We need to watch contingency following the SiTrkr baselineing.

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, Financial Overview - II TPC = Constant (AYM$) BAC Contingency = TPC - BAC 29.0 ETC = BAC - BCWP 64.1 BCWP/BAC 54 % Contingency/ETC 45 % We have a fixed total cost. We are 54 % complete and retain 45% contingency on the estimated cost to complete.

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, US CMS Contingency Use We started with 48.7 M$ in contingency. We have used 19.7 M$, retain 29.0 M$, and we are 54% complete. Of the increase, ~ 7 M$ is due to scope increases, so we have used ~12.7 M$ on better estimates of > BCWP = 74.1 M$ tasks (<17 %).

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, US CMS Revised ML1

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, LHC - V31 Single beam in LHC 1/06 2 months LHC, then run 1 month shutdown - complete CMS 4/06 start run at 10^33 for 10 fb-1 8/06 Planning for installation and commissioning uses V31 for scheduling and planning. Note that late B.O. in UX means increased US CMS costs.

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001 W. Mason, F. Feyzi - UW/PSL Test of CSC Installation fixture Fully balanced chamber can rotate to any angle Counterweight Balance limits w/ or w/o chamber Installation of CSC

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, HCAL Critical Path - V31

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, WBS 1 - Endcap Muon Final or next-to final Prototype Boards for all on- chamber electronics produced and tested. CSC CFEB ALCT CFEB LVDB

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, Off-Chamber Electronics MPCMPC CCBCCB DMBDMB CLCTTMBCLCTTMB VMEControlVMEControl DDU-99 DMB-99 CLCT-99 TMB-99 CCB-99 First Prototype Boards produced and tested (8.99)

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, Location of Peripheral Crates YE2 walkway showing 60 0 sector of ME2 and VME crate

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, Over 20,000 scintillator tiles built and measured RMS of fibers = 4.4% RMS of tiles = 6.5% RMS of wire/coll = 1.2% RMS of average layer light yield = 4.6% WBS 2 - HCAL Optical Production

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, HF - EDIA, FNAL -> RDMS 0.5 cm spacing, packing fraction, source tubes, edge chamfer design complete. Redesign was US scope increase.

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, HPD - Anti-Reflection Angular “acceptance” and numerical aperture. Wavelength “acceptance” and photocathode response

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, QIE Status - OK Input Amplifiers/Splitters: design finished, layout done. Integrators: design finished, layout partially done. FADC: design finished, layout done Range comparators and ranging logic: not done Biasing network: not done State machine, timing: design being worked on now LVDS drivers, receivers: not done Other digital logic: not done Total design submitted - on track so far - minor slippage. Yarema group is on track with their schedule

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, WBS 3.1 Trigger TDR Finished and available as CERN/LHCC , CMS TDR 6.1 December 15, 2000 Met Level 1 Milestone for submission to LHCC by end of Approved by LHCC, March, 2001

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, Calorimeter Trigger Status (U. Wisconsin) Successful Prototyping Program –Crate, 160 MHz Backplane & Clock Card –Receiver & Electron Isolation Cards tested –Adder ASIC tested & production finished –4 Gbit/sec Copper 20 m link system tested ASIC Prototypes –Tested* Phase & Boundary Scan delivered –Tested* Isolation & Sort delivered *Tested by Vitesse Testing Program Plans –Next generation Backplane finished –Next generation Receiver, Elect. Iso. Cards –Next generation Copper Link New Vitesse Chip (7214  7216) –Test delivered ASIC prototypes Simulation Program –New ORCA4 results verify performance

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, Muon Trigger System Tests Muon Port Card (Rice)  Sector Receiver (UCLA) –Data successfully sent from input of one MPC, through 100m of optical cables, to output of SR Sector Receiver  Sector Processor (Florida) –Data successfully sent from input of one SR, through custom backplane, into the SP –Successfully sent data from three SRs connected to the SP to emulate an entire trigger sector Clock and Control Board prototype (Rice) – Distributed clock & control signals w/ programmable delays Port Card  Sector Receiver  Sector Processor – Successfully sent data from the input of two MPCs (representing ME2 and ME3), through one SR, and reconstructed tracks correctly in the SP – Complete chain test using simulated data from ORCA4

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, WBS 3.2 DAQ The DAQ effort continues in an R&D phase - watching and evaluating commercial developments. The ML1 for DAQ is the TDR, due in 2002, postponed 1 year. Paris Sphicas is US CMS L2 DAQ manager and CMS L2 PRS manager. Much work on forming and launching the 4 PRS groups has been accomplished.

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, WBS 4 - ECAL Avalanche Photodiodes –final structure selected. –Neutron Source operational. Front-End Electronics –FPPA pilot wafers back and under test. –Honeywell Bit-serializer dropped, moved to CERN group. Monitor Laser –Preparation for shipping laser to CERN.

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, FPPA2000 (UHF1x) The FPPA is in final preproduction. The responsibility has shifted from Princeton to LBNL. Evaluation is in train.

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, After  = 1x10 14 p/cm 2 increase in current after 300V (2-8)% noisy channels (PSI) With  = 6x10 14 p/cm 2 same I with pixels at C FPix. Sensors, 1st Subm. Sensor Submission Before irradiation 90% of pixels have V brkdwn >300V WBS 5 - FPIX

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, VHDI for Row of 5 ROCs Test Station VHDI - Prototype

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, Assembly of Detectors; NIKON coord. meas. Need 672 units Assembly of Butterflies; OMIS II meas. coord. Need 96 units SiDet Assembly R&D

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10,  m  = 14  m over pixel Pixels at 20 o to beam 150  m /  12 = 43  m  = 46  m over pixel Charge sharing vs position Pixels normal to beam 150  m D:\LHM\2001\Presentations\Plenary Presentations\For Dan \Cern Test Result.ppt CERN Test Beam

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, WBS 8 - SiTrkr

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, Preparation for Pre-Production Mock-up frames for training gantries KSU Probe Station

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, WBS 6 - Common Projects

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, Detector Project Summary M&S cost experience has been good. The labor for CSC and HCAL absorber has been well estimated. Contingency use has been good enough to allow for modest scope increases - SiTrkr Planning for I&C is in train, with cost increases due to delay and re-estimations.